Nations naturally increase & decrease in size. There is nothing wrong or unnatural about this, however if you experience a decrease and then decide to flood your territory with the members of other Nations you’ll make yourself: vulnerable, destabilise your territory, create an unnecessary “minority situation” for yourself, and delegitimise your claim to whatever territory & resources, unless you can successfully fight to get these back. It is nothing short of madness to support such actions (regardless of territory) against ones own tribe. “Replacement migration” can never be justified unless one openly supports ethnic cleansing/genocide.
What is currently being advocated as “charity” are methods that have previously been utilised to destroy populations elsewhere. The same can be said of polluting or removing whatever food source, which is most interesting in light of current health and drug fuelled problems in The West. It appears that we are ruled by a political & industrial class at war with itself. “The people” are not being poisoned by foreign powers but by the insatiable greed of their own.
At the end of the day we all breathe the same air and live on the exact same planet, so one can naturally wonder where the logic lies in ravaging the one home that we have. It would make sense to protect ones Nation & secure its territory, resources & habitat. I don’t understand why people have ceased to think long-term?
A Nation will not naturally end just because a fertility rate isn’t static. ALL arguments in support of Native displacement and “replacement” has its basis in nothing but hatred or a misplaced belief that whatever governmental system can be kept alive indefinitely if enough human capital is thrown at it. Different systems require different components and most important of all: systems come & go.
A big thanks to all of those who share the type of information that I’ve linked to below.
“United Nations projections indicate that over the next 50 years, the populations of virtually all countries of Europe as well as Japan will face population decline and population ageing. The new challenges of declining and ageing populations will require comprehensive reassessments of many established policies and programmes, including those relating to international migration.
Focusing on these two striking and critical population trends, the report considers replacement migration for eight low-fertility countries (France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Republic of Korea, Russian Federation, United Kingdom and United States) and two regions (Europe and the European Union). Replacement migration refers to the international migration that a country would need to offset population decline and population ageing resulting from low fertility and mortality rates.”
EVIDENCE 1 – published by Reuters in 2017.
EVIDENCE 2 – a screenshot from The UN’s page – this is from 2000