Several interesting articles have been published as of late regarding the current parliamentary election in Norway. I hope that my fellow Norwegians keep an eye on things, or maybe an election isn’t about current events but about unwavering ideology. It can certainly explain the bottomless hatred from a certain political side….
Norway has been over-taxed for years! Norwegians have been duped for way too long! I hope that the bureaucracy can be reduced so that Norwegians will experience more freedom, especially when it comes to using their own money!
It is not appealing to move back when looking at the general cost of living. When the weather is so brutal you would think that Norwegians would do anything to attract people. Shitty weather, high taxes, expensive products and services not to forget poor offers when it comes to public services makes Norway un-appealing when comparing the country to other European nations with milder weather, cheaper food of better quality and a cost of living that is way friendlier. What Norwegians should think of is this: How can we make our country attractive to our fellow country men who live abroad so that they would be interested in moving back?
Turning Norway into a tax-haven for example would instantly make it more competitive as Norway will always lose out when it comes to the weather. Improving the food industry and local produce could also be an idea, in fact there are many reforms that could benefit Norway.
Yet I think that many will focus on the current cultural turbulence in Europe. This is understandable but also saddening as many will support taking in more and more and more migrants as a giant virtue signalling exercise, from the politicians championing this there is something way more sinister lurking in the background. Their own hunger for power and their own loathing of European culture.
Europe is messy at the moment culturally speaking and the best thing that nations can do is to protect themselves from all of their neighbours who are becoming security risks due to their idealism backfiring big-time and sorting out any internal problems so that it will be understood far and wide that European nations will not support or harbour Jihadis. That European nations believe in themselves and their heritage.
Whether Norwegians pick idealism or realism remains to be seen…
This is a great post from Norwegian Politician Siv Jensen criticising the labour party’s tax plan, as they are planning to increase the fortune-tax, this will affect those who just happen to live in a house of a certain value etc; without any respect for that person’s actual income level. A nasty business in other words.
This is a very surprising article about female celebrities without children. What really caught my attention is that a lot of these women are liberals, in fact very outspoken liberals. When I think about how women with traditional families are ridiculed I’m starting to believe that this is subconscious envy. I cannot really think of another reason as to why women’s most natural role is being held up as an embarrassing and nasty example. The more abortions you have, the more partners, the more you focus on your career, the better you are. Feminists are telling young women that it doesn’t really matter how you look like, I bet a lot of men would probably disagree. Feminists tells you that you are empowered and that you should walk around piss drunk, wearing whatever you want. Feminists want to fundamentally change men, rather than teaching women how to defend themselves and brothers and fathers to protect the safety of their women. More alarmingly I’ve been told that feminists have just succeeded in making men more aggressive towards women as the natural restraint when it comes to aggression towards women is being lowered when men start seeing women as their equals….
Just as it is curious to note that many of our European leaders don’t have children, it is equally curious to notice childless outspoken female celebrities who are lefties. They are not invested in our future themselves but are very much supportive of mass-migration. They are obviously not thinking about what sort of nation they leave behind for the next generation of whites in particular. I don’t have any kids either, but I live with my immediate family and we are many by modern western standards. I look at my siblings and I look at myself and I know that Europe will be left to us in a sorry state, I also know that we will have no other choice but to defend what is ours. I look at those who are elderly now and think about what kind of world they are leaving behind and think of myself as an old frail woman in the future surrounded by alien tribes who want me gone. I see Europe dying in slow motion and envision myself experiencing the last nails being hammered into the coffin of western civilisation. People who are ignorant of true multiculturalism will not understand, they will never understand. These people are so far into their ideology that they will never understand that they have done something wrong. Never. Female celebrities without children.
Maybe women who fail at being feminine and typically female, become full of aggression since they subconsciously register an internal failure? That is a controversial, but interesting question. It could explain why feminists are at war with beauty standards and motherhood. Thinking about how we all have pretty basic instincts it could explain a hell of a lot, another explanation can also be the lack of a good mother-figure or a desire to normalise one’s own preferences so as to not feel so alone or weird. A last proposed explanation from me is: resentment against nature due to being born a female rather than a male.
Speaking of which … yesterday I saw a viral story on Facebook about L’Oreal making history since they cast a transgender model for one of their campaigns. This woman was swiftly fired when it was discovered that she had fired her missiles at white people’s racism after Charlottesville on social media:
“Honestly I don’t have energy to talk about the racial violence of white people any more. Yes ALL white people. Because most of ya’ll don’t even realise or refuse to acknowledge that your existence, privilege and success as a race is built on the backs, blood and death of people of color. Your entire existence is drenched in racism. From micro-aggression to terrorism, you guys built the blueprint for this s—. Come see me when you realise that racism isn’t learned, it’s inherited and consciously or unconsciously passed down through privilege. Once white people begin to admit that their race is the most violent and oppressive force of nature on Earth… then we can talk.”
What I find interesting about the behaviour of the beauty brand is the fact that many will see them as complicit in championing the “New-Europe.” They are aligning themselves with the exact same ideology that Bergdorf champions. They provide the imagery, the confirmation and promotion of our transformed continent and market their products for a European territory emphasising whites as a minority in their own country. It therefore seems rather peculiar that they should be so surprised by Bergdorf’s online statements.
L’Oreal is just one of many brands advertising and normalizing our new society. In theory they should be featuring a majority of English people in an advertisement meant for the English market, yet they did not, as I’ve seen their ad. Was the hiring and firing of Bergdorf a calculated move by them to create buzz or were they genuinely surprised?
If they were genuinely surprised I’m actually saddened, as this displays a business world completely out of touch with reality, ignorant of what they are actually normalizing, promoting and aligning themselves with. Ignorant of the fact that they are celebrating the slow destruction of Europe, ignorant of the fact that they are actually championing racism.
I don’t think that Bergdorf should have been fired. The fact that she is transgender and expresses the opinions that she expresses makes her a perfect representative of our post-modern west. Even though she might have good intentions with the Facebook post she posted as a response to the controversy, she is completely off with her statements.
White privilege makes sense in a western territory as this is our continent for Christ sake! If you don’t have English privilege in England you will lose England – only friends of England should be allowed to live here if they are foreigners, preferably other Europeans who are more like the English so that there won’t be too much of a culture-clash – only those championing English culture in England should live here. If Swedish privilege ceases then that’s the end of Sweden as we know it. The reason as to why you see brands changing their marketing is because of this unprecedented influx of people from Africa and the Middle East!!!!!! Hello????? Anybody home? No.
She is out of touch completely and totally as she claims that England’s power and success is the direct result of abuse and slavery, when the fact is that these horrible Englishmen discovered territories without the intellectual help of Africans, invented machinery without the interference of inventive Africans and Bergdorf completely fails when she doesn’t mention the Arabic slave trade and African tribalism. Other empires don’t exist in the white-people-sucks narrative, because reality would debunk the hater’s much-needed myth. And they sorely need it.
You cannot step away from these lies whitout stating that the Muslims were up to no good, that the tribes of Africa were up to no good, that Native Americans were up to no good, that Asians were up to no good, that animals are up to no good, that nature is inherently brutal, and that the evil-white-male won because he was better at fighting and outsmarting his enemies – who were bush-men or unequipped with “prehistoric” weapons and technology. Not to forget the enemy within – those who sold out other tribes only to be stabbed in the back by their invaders later. A lesson to be learnt when you look at Europe today.
England kicked ass and for this they will always be hated. It sucks to lose, the world is filled with sore losers and just like it sucked for others to lose to England it will suck for us to lose to Arabs, Africans, or Asians. You do not want your nation or people to lose, you do not want this, YOU DO NOT WANT THIS; which is why modern leftism is cancerous. It promotes being a loser as something good, that making yourself as a nation weak makes you morally superior, this matters little if you are beaten to pulp by those who don’t give a damn about your politically-correct virtue signalling.
When looking at the glory of the west you look upon a truly fascinating race, occupying a tiny territory but literally ruling the world more or less like no other. When you look at China you see a nation that could have conquered, but ironically enough couldn’t be bothered! The Mongols stopped their imperialism because of their own customs, when their leader died, they had to go back in order to elect a new one. People can wonder how the world would have looked like if the Chinese or the Mongols had truly unleashed their power A 100%. Yet they did not. Europeans have a history filled with victories and technological breakthroughs, we are supposed to be ashamed of this as our inventions, art, music, literature, buildings and military successes make other tribes feel like losers, which is sad for them, because of this you see Sub-Saharan Africans for example trying to culturally appropriate the Egyptian culture or Jesus for that matter, even Giulio Cesare.
It sucks for a great amount of people to be reminded of the best of Europe which is why we have to be guilt-tripped big time, all of the time, constantly, so as to weaken the European spirit, in fact decimate it in order to turn Europeans so self-hating that we destroy ourselves. Bergdorf is a perfect example of the modern-left. Don’t worry nature can apparently be un-learnt as there is only one thing: social constructs. White people are evil, they always are, hey we invented terrorism … hmmm….I wonder how humanity as a whole has survived for all of these years? Yeah I bet it has everything to do with our ancestors being a construct of peace … Nobody who has EVER lived in the countryside, nobody who has ever owned and observed several pets will ever buy into the ridiculous myth that the state of nature is peaceful, nobody who has ever experienced real diversity will think of it as peaceful either, Bergdorf is in a tricky position as a minority. If she wants to fit in she could marry an English woman and father a mixed English child, raising this child to become as English as possible and then see his offspring married off to an English person. This is how you integrate. You become part of the fabric of that society, if not you will eventually have to leave when finding a partner and having kids. Where will the kids be raised? Which society should they be part of? You can of course choose to be a modern-nomad, but guess what? Those who travel an awful lot apparently become even more tribal and nationalistic funny enough.
People like Bergdorf are at war with nature, they hate it and refuse to resign to it so they want to transform it. The only way that they can do this is by genetically manipulating humans so that we cease to be humans. L’Oreal have seemingly no idea that they are firing up under hate and that self-hate is their brand and their core value as of today. Much like eBay’s commercial that I also saw today. They could might as well adapt a new slogan that says: L’Oreal – because you deserve to be replaced if you are white – death to Europe.