The Right To Bear Arms & Multicultural Utopia….

I cannot imagine anything worse than the ability for force combined with bottomless, indisputable, idiocy.

Sadly this is a most distressing combo that people easily forget about and/or know nothing about, since they’ve never been directly exposed to it for a prolonged period of time….

I was first made aware of this phenomenon when I went to school over in the U.S.A.

I wasn’t particularly interested in being bullied around by kids from the ghetto who also had access to the school that I attended, in the name of egalitarianism I presume.

The danger of putting high achieving and/or privileged kids together with those from “projects” is that one group will easily take advantage of the inexperience and naiveté of the other….

A certain attitude is required to survive in particularly rough environments….

Inner-city roughness gives birth to, and enables the rise of “mini-dictators” and a certain prevailing rudeness of character that will see kids reared in privileged environments eaten alive if they aren’t careful….

Since I wasn’t interested in being one of the cowed I found myself in a situation where I was all of a sudden being “eyed” and pointed out by groups of “project kids.” It dawned upon me that America certainly wasn’t Norway (which used to be homogenous, high-trust, very safe and civic-minded, before government-approved “cultural enrichment” from tribal, low-trust, more violent, alien societies) and that a refusal to be bullied by low performing individuals, who’s greatest aspiration in life was to be some sort of “gangsta,” probably wasn’t so smart.

This experience certainly turned me into a big believer in the 2nd amendment since the only option for protection that I had was signing up for self-defence classes…. Something that I started doing out of necessity rather than having an innate desire for being Rambo.

On a couple of occasions I also overheard how other students would throw it out there that they wanted to “Columbine their entire school,” because the other students were “stupid,” whenever I then turned around to see who these potential delinquents were, they were always without exception: short, fat, ugly, female and white.

(God certainly has some bad days or maybe the Devil has some very good ones….)

I always felt very troubled when overhearing such “lone gunwoman” statements, because at what point do you call the authorities? Is it a joke? Is it just a saying? Is it just a way to vent?

Which is precisely why I always turned around so that I could scan their faces and know their names and why I also sharpened my ears further. I certainly kept an eye on these weirdos but reached the conclusion by observing them that they were harmless. Which I was right about. Thank God.

I realised back then that everybody hates and everyone is hated, and that those who don’t fall into one of the two categories are the exception to the rule. I even wrote a Metal song about it.

Even if some people espouse hate it doesn’t necessarily mean that they’ll stab or shoot the person that they openly loathe; that being said I take it as self-evident that the threshold is lower when it comes to kids from rougher environments. This is why you hear of people being beaten the crap out of just because they looked at someone weird or spoke up. These are prevalent stories on both sides of the Atlantic. The same can be said of white kids being targeted simply because they are “whities.” Something that I became very scared of myself. Wouldn’t it have been ironic if a Norwegian was beaten up or shot due to American segregation and slavery in the past? That is a bizarre thing to walk around and be afraid of.

Over here in Europe things have taken on a whole new form; I heard of a hate-crime story where African women physically attacked white Spanish women on the London underground, because “only English should be spoken here in England.”

So that means that if I speak Norwegian with my relatives when I go to the capital, then I might run the risk of African women beating the crap out of me, when I’m genetically closer to white people who live on this island than these Africans are????? Talk about strange. I’m actually more closely related to the natives in England since I’m actually a NATIVE EUROPEAN just like the Spaniards are. Talk about ridiculous.

Anyway … It greatly troubled me when I lived over in the U.S.A. that someone like myself, who knew what I wanted to do with my life, could all of a sudden end up the victim of either a school massacre and/or a targeted hate-crime assault committed by low performance losers with no goals and no purpose in life at all whatsoever.

When I later moved into a territory where MS-13 were expanding and recruiting new people, I certainly felt that my conclusions about egalitarianism-culture was well founded.

The same can certainly be said about “cultural enrichment” in Europe.

Thankfully I survived being exposed to “enforced egalitarianism” and “cultural enrichment,” but it certainly taught me how annoying it is that you can dream and plan about a career and a certain life, only to have it all taken from you in a second due to a no-gooder; who hates you because of presumed privilege, who hates you because of the colour of your skin, or hates God and all of mankind due to their own failures.

It is tragic, but it is sadly an aspect of life that is often overlooked and/or forgotten. People escape from cultural enrichment if they can. If people don’t like how their neighbourhood is changing they pack up as fast as they can and leave. Those who don’t know any better or cannot go anywhere have the option of being treated like crap, to join the newcomers by integrating into their culture, or to fight.

A good indicator of how Urban America can profoundly change a person was when I found myself out walking in London one evening and I heard loud hip-hop bass coming from a car driving up behind me. My hair was literally standing on edge, I quite frankly had goosebumps, and found myself scanning the environment for a place to seek refuge as I instinctively sensed danger and an attack.

What I’m addressing in this entry is most important to keep in mind when initiating National or even worse, Continental social projects. When you open up the flood gates to other cultures that you arrogantly assume will just praise your values and automatically integrate into your societies, you might just end up being conquered.

So much for so-called high-performing populations, with all their tech and academic intellectuals..

It is all useless unless you’re prepared and equipped to deal with “so-called” low-performing population groups, who might not have your art and philosophy, but who’ll kick your ass left right and centre, both when it comes to violence and birth rates….

What I’ve certainly taken away from all of this is this: Listen to your instincts – never the experts or the mainstream media narrative.

 

Having A Raison D’être & An End Game – The Impression One Can Get.

When reading about the Iraq war last year I was stunned to see the willingness to sacrifice the integrity of Europe on the altar of momentary territorial access needed in order to get into Iraq.

“Plan Of Attack” by Bob Woodward.

“Decision Points” by George W. Bush.

I was further mystified by the fact that 4-star Army General (ret.) Colin Powell came across as the one lone voice of reason, since he tried to raise awareness of tribalism and ethnic diversity in the targeted area.

The reading certainly gave me the impression that humans are simply being seen as replaceable cogs in the machinery by the establishment.

Culture and ethnicity simply doesn’t matter, it is all about momentary victory, without any overarching solid narrative selling a clearly defined End Game, that will be reached by many separate actions all serving the same underlying objective.

This is a startling realisation.

When reading “The Art Of War” I was surprised about what sort of advice it contained. Prolonged warfare with no end in sight is depicted as one of the worst projects that a Nation can ever engage in. A group that engages in warfare also have to ensure that they have access to an efficient supply line, taking advantage of whatever resources the group can get their hands on as they expand into a territory. A war effort should be swift and precise, without too much meddling from sovereigns located far away. The people who are on the ground need to be able to do what is necessary to reach their goal in a completely mobilised way, to the extent that this is possible.

All of this certainly made me question the sort of warfare that people my age have grown accustomed to. All of our Nations’ war efforts seem concentrated in “alien territories,” fighting and training “aliens” that might turn on the West later, and all of our Nations’ major war efforts seemingly drag out for ever…

No proper end game that logically makes sense is ever presented to the public and when getting an insight into the world of those who run these things, it doesn’t really seem like these characters know what the deal is either (unless a battle ground is simply needed in order to train soldiers and test new equipment).

Warriors & Citizens – American Views of Our Military edited by Kori Schake & Jim Mattis.

A parallel can be drawn to hacker activists, who don’t seem too concerned with allies. They’ll attack an enemy of the West one day only to target Western political and military structures the next, potentially jeopardising the integrity and safety of a Nation State or its military operations.

When reading about community organisers you see this pattern of behaviour once again.  A lot of left-wing activism simply cancels itself out, since the only common denominator seems to be emotionalism. Due to this you’ll get contradicting agitation and advocacy that will leave someone like myself slightly confused, as there is no End Game in sight anywhere.

If you look at Islamic agitation in Europe it is very easy to understand what their End Game and overarching goal is. They engage in demographic expansionism into Europe, which gradually gives them a political advantage. Wealthy Muslim power-players buy themselves into Western Corporations which gives them cultural influence and leverage. Street-level Muslims carve out their own territories and then defend these. Mosques are erected further cementing a claim to a specific territory boosting confidence, while a romanticized fantasy of Islamic Imperialism, appealing to people’s sense of identity and innate penchant for ancestry-worship, is promoted. Of course, as always, not all. But you don’t need every member of a specific group to behave in this particular fashion for it to have its desired effect. My impression of European Islamification is that there is a long-term vision, coupled with a willingness to commit to certain behaviours, in order to eventually reach a clearly defined outcome: Nation States that become compatible in their policies and in their cultures with the Muslim faith, preferably paving the way for a new “Golden-Age.” Of course it is of importance to point out the ethnic and racial diversity within Islam, and that there are numerous conflicting denominations within the faith as well. As an example: we can now clearly observe, imported tribal disagreements and feuds, in Europe, in addition to all of our own inter-ethnic issues that we had from before….

Inter-ethnic dissonance is very prevalent in Africa; which is generally referred to as the most diverse continent on the surface of the earth.

So what can be said of the West? What is our End Game? What can be observed and what conclusions can be drawn? 

What would make sense, instinctively,  would be to have common ancestry as the glue holding Europe together. Race has become way more inclusive than what it used to be, since we now largely see Race as something observable, while ethnic groups give us what has become our European Nation States, with its specific cultures and characteristics.  Back in the day these used to be chopped up into various tribes that probably displayed a lot of similar traits to one another, hence our generalisation regarding population groups contained within the boundaries of the modern Nation State: an extended family sharing common ancestry and a similar distribution of genetic traits on average.

It would make sense if our Nation States in Europe concerned themselves with the protection of our shared and individual cultural heritage, doing everything to ensure the survival and majority status of white children (and mixed whites) in the only territory that actually belongs a 100% to whites, protecting our continent’s borders and integrity.

A strong unified Europe and more broadly speaking, a strong unified West with the more multi-racial configurations found within territories conquered by whites, would in theory make sense.

Is this an End Game for what is collectively known as The West though? No.

This would be a racist objective. It would insinuate that Ethnic-Europeans have a natural claim to a specific territory and that conquest is a legitimate way to establish a Nation, which is what a white presence in all other territories other than Europe is a result of. (To my knowledge … It certainly looks that way when observing strange geographic settlements by Whites and the presence of dark-skinned indigenous groups).

The prevalent mythos championed in the West is this:

  1. that all other groups are minorities, even if Europe looks very small when compared to other continents, and we are outnumbered globally speaking.
  2. That the magic soil theory is truth, meaning that you’ll automatically become  Swedish by simply breathing the air in Sweden.
  3. That all human beings are born equal due to a blank slate, and that genetics simply don’t exist.
  4. That talking about genetics and genuine diversity is dangerous because that will instantly turn you into Hitler and result in a new Holocaust.
  5. That it makes sense to celebrate white ethnic groups becoming minorities, after years of civil-rights battles in the U.S.A. to ensure equal opportunity regardless of skin colour, and after years of Whites trying to do good towards previously marginalised and abused non-white minority groups within their domains. Not to forget: the constant focus on the challenges faced by so-called (and genuine) minorities within traditionally White-majority constructs. None of this paints minority-status in an appealing light … yet we should do everything in our power to lay the groundwork for our own marginalisation…. which is particularly interesting when reading about the merciless brutality in other parts of the world perpetrated by non-white majorities…
  6. That previous white expansionism will just be forgotten, since Whites have decided to “play nice,” which means that we no longer have any enemies and don’t really need any borders….
  7. That only white ethnic groups can be guilty of racism and imperialistic activity.
  8. That white ethnic groups are not under any circumstance “indigenous” and that there will at no point be any need to give any white demographic the status of “protected group.”
  9. That race and/or ethnicity is only real and only counts if/when dealing with “indigenous people,” who can under no circumstance be white. These “indigenous” groups are also the only ones entitled to certain territories that have to be protected in order to ensure their survival.
  10. That charity is only needed in the 3rd world as it is probably your own fault if you are poor and hungry in the superior, egalitarian, socialist inspired constructs that make up the Western World.
  11. That you have to import workers from Africa and The Middle East, rather than employing individuals from territories closer to your own, or within your own continent.
  12. That mixing on a massive scale is always peaceful and not the result of violent demographic change or militant conquest.
  13. That re-writing history and engaging in gas-lighting on a National and/or Continental level is perfectly alright in order to salvage vanity projects initiated by international organisations, that might look good on paper and in theory; until inserting the human factor into the equation actually implementing the idea.

Ok. So this doesn’t look too promising. Then what about Christianity? This is multi-racial, multiethnic and global. It is way more inclusive and has been used as a unifying factor in Europe before…

The West has continuously acted as an enemy to Christian groups in the Middle East, facilitating genocidal persecution of genuine Christian minority tribes. Western governments not only promote the build-down of Christianity within Europe and all other territories under White influence, they actively side with Nations and regimes known for violent Christian persecution.

What about human-rights, enlightenment ideas, world peace and the “human race”?

Western governments have repeatedly sided with regimes guilty of outrageous human rights abuses, making themselves guilty of gross hypocrisy since human rights and the protection of humanity as a whole has become the main narrative and general raison d’être of Western groups.

Portraying oneself as a defender of the human race also becomes tricky as you cannot possible go out there and claim that population group A needs more protection and privileges than population group B as this would be racist and undermine universal rights. And how on earth can you even say population group A and B when race/ethnicity isn’t even real? You cannot say that religious group A is more guilty of persecution than religious group B, because why would religious group B be more righteous or in need of more protection than the other? Are you a bigot or what?

Who are you to say that Terrorists don’t have rights or don’t have a point, when you claim to be a defender of all of humanity? And how on earth do you even define a “War on Terror” or “Terrorists”? Any person or group could fall into this category when nothing is specified.

These kind of points can be spinned indefinitely putting The West in a situation where none of its actions can be seen as righteous and/or legitimate.

It opens up the door for a potential legal, moral and PR nightmare where The West and its natural inhabitants never win.

It also puts Western Nation states in a situation where an enemy cannot be clearly defined, at least not in public, due to important exotic alliances and potential diplomatic disasters. By relying on exotic alliances for abstract military operations, the West paints  itself into a corner, where they cannot kick out subversive elements within their own nations if these stem from their good “friends and allies.”

The West is forced into a position where it cannot really look after the interests of its own inhabitants, nor enforce the heritage and integrity of itself.

Not to forget that The West is put into an incredibly awkward situation when Western leaders cannot clearly formulate anything, if interested in maintaining good international relationships.

This results in cringe worthy narratives that leaves all of those who don’t just parrot our “modern shared values” confused and puzzled. What are we all about really? Does anyone know?

What about Capitalism then? A support for this must surely be a constant factor from The Americans at least? 

No. Think again. The U.S.A. is willing to tolerate oppressive communist regimes that in the long run pose a threat to the American experiment and their global influence, as long as the U.S.A. can gain from such an alliance in the short run.

So what is The End Game of The West? 

Strangely and worryingly enough there doesn’t seem to be one……(but I might be very wrong, after all, who knows what goes on behind the scenes…).

At best it can be argued that there are forces within The West championing stability trough whatever means by expanding the police state and surveillance of their own citizens. This though is worked against by leaders who don’t want to acknowledge the effects of demographic change. In addition it facilitates the very form of governance that Western Nations are outspokenly against, not to forget that the identity destruction currently happening in The Western world work against any conservation efforts intended to protect our cultural and ethnic inheritance, while simultaneously compromising stability and security; in short, all of it compromises the survival of those people who occupy the territories that we collectively refer to as The West.

 

The Best Video To Be Made In Our Age! – When the truth can only be told by comedians!

This video is a must watch for anyone. Spot on. No wonder we Norwegians have our jokes about the Swedes! And they are not the only ones who match this portrayal!

Incase the video is removed by the tech-Gestapo/STASI then you can search for Jonatan Spang and his sketch regarding Swedish political correctness, I haven’t laughed this much in ages! A must see for anyone! But I guess the female officer “was just following orders,” I wonder which other group used that as an excuse after a certain World War! I wonder who?

The Myth of Independence.

Move out, get a job and become independent – is a commonly heard chant –  but how does this work when renting is too expensive, jobs are few and far between and/or independence is unobtainable?

Whereas people in England and America have understood that the times have changed, it seems like Norwegians are still stuck in a fantasy. Norwegian households are some of the most indebted in the world. ( Read this if interested in detailsAn Insight Into The State of A European Nation – Election in Norway/Valg i Norge 2017.) Benefit payments is also the greatest financial burden for the Norwegian state. It is said that the nation is currently experiencing a mental-health epidemic as well and that this is set to increase; too bad for Norway Inc; as this will mean more young people officially labeled as “unfit to work,” which means even less circulation of cash within the welfare project.

Years ago I remember looking into how expensive it would be for me to move out. What were my options? How would my life change? What I found out was that it would only change for the worse.

First of all it would mean sharing living space with other people; strangers. Like having a room in another family’s house, or living in a collective with strangers, or even worse sharing room with a stranger which is now perfectly common in a big city such as London. Even living small would have cost a fortune and certainly not offered any sort of independence or freedom in terms of what I could have done with my time.

Not to forget that it is potentially unsafe, as “independence” in a European country either means:

  1. co-living with others in a “cheap” area inhabited by immigrants. Which is dangerous in the current Europe, unless you convert and/or date a New-European for protection. Not to forget that you’ll have no free time to do anything that you want to do, as you’ll literally be a wage slave; unless you can think of a clever way out. You’ll also be soaked in debt and probably possess a fancy sounding degree that you cannot use for anything.
  2. live off the government, which will give you a substantial income, but drain the resources of your nation. There are many who live like this. It is perfectly accepted and not looked down upon. Many a times I wondered in the past how my female friends could buy themselves new clothes and fine things – well they got the cash from the Norwegian state.

This is basically what baby-boomers in particular mean when they talk about independence, because when they were young, they had their own places, had time to do fun stuff and seemingly had cash raining down on them from somewhere magical. They therefore champion “finding oneself” (which you will not have the money or the time to do if living on your own) and getting a degree (which will give you lots of debt and no guarantees for future employment).

It is not uncommon to run into people in their late twenties and early thirties who still live at home with their parents even though they have a job and/or are building their own business, in fact it would probably surprise you how many there are. In fact it is the norm to hear of people who bravely moved out only to move back home shortly afterwards, because they just couldn’t afford it.

People don’t really know what they talk about when they chant about independence, it is “false advertising” from individuals who don’t seem to comprehend that you’ll be furthered tied to the state (which is not beneficial for the nation) or stuck in the gutter (which will not make you happy or keep you safe).

The best option in most cases is therefore to live with family while studying, working and/or building a business. This is not uncommon to see in southern Europe, in fact there it is perfectly normal to do so until marriage. In the North however it is generally frowned upon if you live with your parents, even if you are not a burden on the much worshipped welfare state.