The Heated Topic Of Immigration Wordlwide & What Sovereignty Actually Means.

There is a proposal on the table that apparently will be voted on and discussed later this month, concerning making it illegal to be a critic of mass-migration, and I guess its effects, which are notable (historically speaking). This is to be done in order to initialize and/or continue with mass migration into Europe without any criticism. I wonder if this makes it illegal to review and talk about History books and/or whether or not it will also make it illegal to write that Norway was converted by the sword, which was the case, only that it was the sword of Christianity. History gives us the key to who we are and what sort of challenges we might face as nations/individuals and how to tackle these …  Here is the video:

http://www.investmentwatchblog.com/criticism-of-immigration-will-be-banned-in-europe/

Ok … now over to what I was actually going to write about:

I was quite surprised when I read an article a while back about anti-immigration riots in South Africa. It was of interest since it depicted Africans demonstrating against other Africans entering into their territory. I linked to the article here on my site and here I’ve found a video about anti-immigration sentiments in Israel.

Once again it illustrates how we all tackle a lot of the same issues regardless of where we live. With our current technology it makes it increasingly easier to compare cultures and how different population groups react to the same challenges.

What is of particular interest in the video is how the two Israeli women start shouting at one another since they disagree about whether or not they should take in the migrants.

Attitudes and behaviours that Westerners seem to regard as outdated are well and alive in other parts of the world, which you quickly realise when reading about the persecution of Christians.

Enforcing certain values and a clear identity will not happened quietly as anything that falls on the outside of the spectrum has to be removed or silenced. This paints a brutal picture that feels foreign in today’s “liberated” Western world of “Thou What Thou Wilt.” It makes sense to say that “when you go to Rome you do as the Romans” and unless you do have an unhealthy fixation on, let’s say, Islam; it makes sense to say that if you live in a Muslim majority country, then once again “you do as the Romans.”

You are a guest; which is why you’ll have to pay your respects or re-locate.

When observing how “respecting other’s sovereignty” plays out in practise though it actually means that you quietly stand by as genuine minorities (such as LGBTQ characters in Russia) are treated poorly, while political dissenters are sent into camps  (China), while it also means silently supporting terrifying human-rights violations (Saudi Arabia) all in the name of respecting “sovereignty” and a claim to practise ones “identity.”

Even in Western societies that are officially trying to be “bring-your-own-beer-countries”; they do want to enforce something, which is a normless society. This means that if you actually do stand for what has traditionally been the identity of your territory, well then you must be a bad-guy. Having “no-identity” becomes the identity, in this strange, awkward case. There is no culture, there is no heritage, there is no history, there is no nothing. Only a territory that you define upon your arrival. 

Even though I’ve been writing about how important it is to respect a Nations sovereignty and identity, I have to admit that in this I’ve failed on a small-scale by sending words of comfort out to persecuted Christians who in some cases are breaking the rules of the territory that they find themselves in by possessing a Bible and/or being open about their beliefs.

I’m also failing at “bringing my own beer” into identity-less Western territories as I’ve always integrated. This though becomes an issue if you live in a territory where “a deconstruction” is taking place. It means that you are aligned with the old (what the territory used to be) rather than the new (what the territory is becoming).

This might then oddly enough transform you into a dissenter by you successfully integrating into an established identity that is being killed on purpose by whatever establishment…..

Another example of sovereignty violation is this: if environmental pollutants are to be fought against effectively it also means being “rude,” since boots on the ground will be necessary in Africa and Asia to crack down on the worst “climate-offenders;” so there goes your peace and respect for sovereignty!

I wonder sometimes if  outspoken celebrities and spokespeople truly understand the natural conclusion of what they are stating and supporting….If you are an actual eco-warrior, well then you can’t respect anyone’s Sovereignty!

Pollution is really and truly a global problem, and we in the West are not the worst offenders.

I’m mentioning this to showcase how difficult  it can be to have certain stated principles, only to realise that things might not be as easy as previously thought…

It might also be worth mentioning that global corporations can in some ways operate like “one world governments” for the simple reason that they are their own thing completely and are everywhere, regardless of Nation or Continent.

Their influence is greater than anything else I’m sure.

National Sovereignty is consistently disrespected by world leaders who initiate sanctions and/or declare war against the leadership of other Nations, who they deem unfit to rule. Hence, no respect for sovereignty, nor the enforcement of National Identity.

The reason for this is probably due to how painful it actually is to witness Nation-State enforcement of territorial identity and also (in most cases I’m guessing) how unprofitable it is if Nation States break away from unions where so-and-so is/are the decision maker/s and/or big player/s.

Back to the migration issue; people are protective of their environment because they don’t want to lose out on their resources, which is one of the reasons as to why people have trough the ages “fortified their positions.” Something that is illegal in today’s Western Europe, unless you are a member of the establishment…..

Previous enforcement of ones right to be in a territory is also why we have distinct population groups, because group such and such was not erased by being absorbed into someone else’s “thing.” Hence in order to have a Nation and secure the continuation of said Nation you actually have to exclude, which a lot of people instinctively do; but this is never going to look pretty, especially not on a large-scale, which is what I’m talking about in this entry.

This of course makes an “open world” scary since it is a dangerous illusion; nobody is really interested in being squeezed out, not even those who are initially “open and inclusive,” when all of a sudden they wake up to find out that they have become a minority and that their claim to whatever territory and influence is null and void.

Their definition of their territory that they once upon a time wanted to generously share with others, have slipped and doesn’t include them any more. They simply lost it.

(It might be an idea to note that citizenship also becomes bizarre in “an open world” since citizenship is merely a piece of paper in this case. You territory belongs to everyone, and anyone can be of your territory. The same can be said of legislation tackling digital abuse and scams online. What you get is digital-global-anarchy since a criminal operation from one Nation abusing the member of another cannot really be prosecuted. Which governing body is supposed to police human interactions over the global internet?)

There are those who clearly do not see the arrivals of large hordes of other population groups as problematic. This is precisely why the arguing becomes so ugly, because those who end up being exposed to these transformations have a tendency of being very loud and extremely upset when their home-areas change suddenly. Especially if trust breaks down and inter-racial and/or inter-ethnic violence (the targeting of those who are not part of your in-group) becomes a thing.

The same can be noted now with anti-immigration sentiments here on the continent, that would appear to be reserved for Africans and Arabs primarily, but are also extended to other European Nationalities as well, in addition to heated arguments between individuals who look just the same (due to being members of the same Nation), because of disagreements over whether or not EurAbia or EurAfrica ought to be forcefully created, regardless of the human cost in the process.

I think it can be argued with certainty that trying to unite Europeans was a challenge great enough, just like trying to unite Africa is a monumental challenge due to inter-Racial diversity.

Now it can be witnessed that it is all falling apart here in “Europe,” since it was simply “too much, too quickly, too soon.” Rather than admitting that this has all been a spectacular political failure (unless you want chaos) the political establishment in Brussels appear hellbent on forcing their vision on everyone else, regardless of whether or not people actually want this in great numbers…

Things are already getting ugly since the survival of one “ideological vision” in this case, means the destruction of the other.

The good news is: that this is how humans behave, regardless of where they might be….

Here is one case of internal dissent in Germany and a proposed solution by a French academic:

https://sputniknews.com/europe/201811101069694506-german-military-plot-spoiled/

https://foreignpolicy.com/2017/05/01/the-german-military-has-a-neo-nazi-problem-extremism-right-wing-terrorism/

http://freewestmedia.com/2017/11/18/french-academic-proposes-muslim-apartheid-state-in-france/

Cellphone Usage Linked To Cancer, Cultural Enrichment in Germany, & A Friendly Reminder That Winter Is Coming!

That moment when it’s late in the evening and you think to yourself: “hey, I’m releasing a new album tomorrow & I think I need to remind my followers,” only to log into a social media account and be greeted by this:

growing pains

I guess that this falls under the category of “growing pains” in order to successfully establish EurAfrica or EurAbia or whatever they want to call the boat…

For some strange reason it brings back fond memories of an entry a wrote a while back, where I went back in time to describe why on earth I support an armed population.

You will never think about self-defence or weapons until you feel like you need them!

Just like Americans have dreams, well so do the various Nations of Europe have dreams; the people who live on this continent deserve to pursue happiness without having their paths obstructed by evil such as this: The People’s Democratic Republic of Europe.

On that note I’ll add a link to an article I saw a while back about cellphones being linked to cancer. An increasing number of young people are coming down with brain tumours. Not good, not good at all.

Beware of your phone!!!

With those things in mind I might add that I’ve been thinking lately that every generation has to deal with existential threats, the issue with today’s society is that we have been “domesticated” to such an extent as humans that we don’t necessarily see any. I somewhat touched upon our general vulnerability in this entry of mine 30 Reasons To Be Grateful And/Or Things To Look For… and hope that maybe that will alert some of my followers or others who might bump into this blog. My own foraging this year was not exactly successful, so I’m hoping that we’ll have a merciful winter, with plenty of food, water and power!

When You Try To Grow Pumpkins….

Oh yes … by the way … there is an album launch tomorrow & I’ll also be doing a LIVE stream on my YouTube channel on Friday! So see you then! Toodle-oo!

The Accuracy Of History.

I’m becoming increasingly worried about the accuracy of “History” when following the news cycle and witnessing how stories are pinned and framed. To say that I find this worrying would be a major understatement.

Certain events are re-furnished, re-packaged and visibly falsified, yet if you repeat something long enough, it sadly seems to stick, eventually reaching the status of “truth”.

I’m living in the hope that historians see beyond whatever popular chanting that is the norm in their time, and that we are actually looking at genuine truths when looking at the past. I’m starting to have my doubts if the behaviour we witness today is testimony  to what people have been up to before…  Hopefully there will be a small grain of truth left regarding how our present will be re-told to future generations….

American conservative politicians have already been physically attacked due to their political opinions. Violently attacked. I didn’t feature those news stories on here, but I followed them with great horror and worry.

Now there is a new cycle of street-level political-terror, but no one really seems to be putting this into the correct context, completely omitting that street-level political violence have been filmed and broadcasted from across the pond for a while actually, depicting people being physically attacked for wearing a MAGA hat, for example.

There’s been instances of anti-austerity protests in Europe that have gotten quite violent, with one of the strangest locations targeted for vandalism being the “Cereal Killer” “coffee shop” in London. Why such a place would attract such behaviour can only be explained in what they unknowingly or unwillingly represent: gentrification. Which simply means that safety is an illusion. You never know, and that’s all you’ll ever know.

There were scary riots in Croydon, there is a state of chaos in various French and Swedish territories due to cultural enrichment, but to claim that these hostilities and clashes are only race and/or ethnicity based is false. There is a political element that divides people who look just the same, whether you are looking at foreigners who bring their tribal feuds with them into Europe, various European tribes openly arguing about how to handle the invasion/migration crisis, and outrageously angry inter-group arguments due to profound ideological division. I therefore fail to see why there are some who seem so very keen on further destabilisation. In short: it already looks like a f*@% mess.

In fact, when looking at some of the material that is out there regarding inter-European arguing we can very well be approaching a specific point that triggers a whole domino effect of state initiated political-violence. In fact it is remarkable that it hasn’t happened already, all things considered. You can sense a certain dread, a disrespect, an annoyance, a contempt, between European decision makers when observing footage of them interacting, or reading about their whereabouts. The most troubling signs of a continent in total decay are actually the small things, because these bear witness of turbulent situations that are not under control but that are rather bubbling up to the surface, all of a sudden becoming visible in the mainstream. It’s all in the small side-comments, the sarcasm, the ridicule, accusations of mental disorders, threats of imprisonment, the hold back of money if people don’t take in more migrants, etc; It all looks like a landscape where everything will of a sudden be thrown into absolute turmoil, because it already is … under the surface.

It is vital to understand these situations. It is vital to look at the provocateurs, what causes the reaction, the poking, what stirs people. Yet we are apparently not supposed to do this, and this, ironically enough comes from those who would chant “Never Again” and that history has to be studied so that crimes against humanity are not repeated….

How can you expect history to stand still if you refuse to look at things critically and in-depth?

Why did Charlottesville happen? Why were there people there in the first place? Was it because there was a movement to remove a statue due to it being deemed politically incorrect? Isn’t it so that there are individuals over here who also want to remove culturally/historically offensive statues? Isn’t it so that there is a movement to de-whitefy our culture in a territory that isn’t even African or Arab? We are after all talking about European Nations. Our territories, population groups and cultures are old. Very old.

Why did people vote from President Donald J.Trump? What is it really like to live in the U.S.A.? What is it like to live in Urban-America? Did America look like a country that was doing well for itself, financially, culturally, before Trump? Or did it seem like a country on its deathbed?

How is it like to live in the territory commonly referred to as Europe? Why are people angry? Are they angry perhaps since they are being forced to share living space with imported people who don’t come from Eastern Europe or other parts of the continent, but people who come from Africa and the Middle East? Are people upset perhaps because they are losing their Nations and their cultures? Are people maybe upset because they end up being the targets of violence? Because they feel wronged, forgotten?Or are people upset because they sense that their safety is rocked due to what they see and/or hear about from other territories and then align this with their own situation?

It is rather difficult to not get upset if several parts of your continent is being recklessly compromised. It is unrealistic to expect complacency. What is also dangerous are those who in a state of panic start suggesting all sorts of petitions that are worded clumsily, because they don’t dare to call a spade a spade, potentially throwing a great deal of people under the bus, by formulating suggestions for legislation that would incriminate pretty much everyone. The pitfalls are endless, innumerable.

Yet if you understand President Donald J.Trump’s popularity or you support him you are allegedly an enemy of the people….

No.

You are not, but I think that there is one enemy who’ll always be loathed more than any other, and it is that brother or sister of yours who tells you the truth or God forbid: that you are wrong.

In practise that individual isn’t really you’re enemy, but you’ll perceive it as such when you feel slighted, and it is precisely in a moment like that, when “the slighted” might feel like striking back; and it is in the response to a reaction such as that, that it is determined whether you are going to war or not.

Preferably not.

Yet with humans being so profoundly irrational, then what can ever be expected?

The Right To Bear Arms & Multicultural Utopia….

I cannot imagine anything worse than the ability for force combined with bottomless, indisputable, idiocy.

Sadly this is a most distressing combo that people easily forget about and/or know nothing about, since they’ve never been directly exposed to it for a prolonged period of time….

I was first made aware of this phenomenon when I went to school over in the U.S.A.

I wasn’t particularly interested in being bullied around by kids from the ghetto who also had access to the school that I attended, in the name of egalitarianism I presume.

The danger of putting high achieving and/or privileged kids together with those from “projects” is that one group will easily take advantage of the inexperience and naiveté of the other….

A certain attitude is required to survive in particularly rough environments….

Inner-city roughness gives birth to, and enables the rise of “mini-dictators” and a certain prevailing rudeness of character that will see kids reared in privileged environments eaten alive if they aren’t careful….

Since I wasn’t interested in being one of the cowed I found myself in a situation where I was all of a sudden being “eyed” and pointed out by groups of “project kids.” It dawned upon me that America certainly wasn’t Norway (which used to be homogenous, high-trust, very safe and civic-minded, before government-approved “cultural enrichment” from tribal, low-trust, more violent, alien societies) and that a refusal to be bullied by low performing individuals, who’s greatest aspiration in life was to be some sort of “gangsta,” probably wasn’t so smart.

This experience certainly turned me into a big believer in the 2nd amendment since the only option for protection that I had was signing up for self-defence classes…. Something that I started doing out of necessity rather than having an innate desire for being Rambo.

On a couple of occasions I also overheard how other students would throw it out there that they wanted to “Columbine their entire school,” because the other students were “stupid,” whenever I then turned around to see who these potential delinquents were, they were always without exception: short, fat, ugly, female and white.

(God certainly has some bad days or maybe the Devil has some very good ones….)

I always felt very troubled when overhearing such “lone gunwoman” statements, because at what point do you call the authorities? Is it a joke? Is it just a saying? Is it just a way to vent?

Which is precisely why I always turned around so that I could scan their faces and know their names and why I also sharpened my ears further. I certainly kept an eye on these weirdos but reached the conclusion by observing them that they were harmless. Which I was right about. Thank God.

I realised back then that everybody hates and everyone is hated, and that those who don’t fall into one of the two categories are the exception to the rule. I even wrote a Metal song about it.

Even if some people espouse hate it doesn’t necessarily mean that they’ll stab or shoot the person that they openly loathe; that being said I take it as self-evident that the threshold is lower when it comes to kids from rougher environments. This is why you hear of people being beaten the crap out of just because they looked at someone weird or spoke up. These are prevalent stories on both sides of the Atlantic. The same can be said of white kids being targeted simply because they are “whities.” Something that I became very scared of myself. Wouldn’t it have been ironic if a Norwegian was beaten up or shot due to American segregation and slavery in the past? That is a bizarre thing to walk around and be afraid of.

Over here in Europe things have taken on a whole new form; I heard of a hate-crime story where African women physically attacked white Spanish women on the London underground, because “only English should be spoken here in England.”

So that means that if I speak Norwegian with my relatives when I go to the capital, then I might run the risk of African women beating the crap out of me, when I’m genetically closer to white people who live on this island than these Africans are????? Talk about strange. I’m actually more closely related to the natives in England since I’m actually a NATIVE EUROPEAN just like the Spaniards are. Talk about ridiculous.

Anyway … It greatly troubled me when I lived over in the U.S.A. that someone like myself, who knew what I wanted to do with my life, could all of a sudden end up the victim of either a school massacre and/or a targeted hate-crime assault committed by low performance losers with no goals and no purpose in life at all whatsoever.

When I later moved into a territory where MS-13 were expanding and recruiting new people, I certainly felt that my conclusions about egalitarianism-culture was well founded.

The same can certainly be said about “cultural enrichment” in Europe.

Thankfully I survived being exposed to “enforced egalitarianism” and “cultural enrichment,” but it certainly taught me how annoying it is that you can dream and plan about a career and a certain life, only to have it all taken from you in a second due to a no-gooder; who hates you because of presumed privilege, who hates you because of the colour of your skin, or hates God and all of mankind due to their own failures.

It is tragic, but it is sadly an aspect of life that is often overlooked and/or forgotten. People escape from cultural enrichment if they can. If people don’t like how their neighbourhood is changing they pack up as fast as they can and leave. Those who don’t know any better or cannot go anywhere have the option of being treated like crap, to join the newcomers by integrating into their culture, or to fight.

A good indicator of how Urban America can profoundly change a person was when I found myself out walking in London one evening and I heard loud hip-hop bass coming from a car driving up behind me. My hair was literally standing on edge, I quite frankly had goosebumps, and found myself scanning the environment for a place to seek refuge as I instinctively sensed danger and an attack.

What I’m addressing in this entry is most important to keep in mind when initiating National or even worse, Continental social projects. When you open up the flood gates to other cultures that you arrogantly assume will just praise your values and automatically integrate into your societies, you might just end up being conquered.

So much for so-called high-performing populations, with all their tech and academic intellectuals..

It is all useless unless you’re prepared and equipped to deal with “so-called” low-performing population groups, who might not have your art and philosophy, but who’ll kick your ass left right and centre, both when it comes to violence and birth rates….

What I’ve certainly taken away from all of this is this: Listen to your instincts – never the experts or the mainstream media narrative.

 

Having A Raison D’être & An End Game – The Impression One Can Get.

When reading about the Iraq war last year I was stunned to see the willingness to sacrifice the integrity of Europe on the altar of momentary territorial access needed in order to get into Iraq.

“Plan Of Attack” by Bob Woodward.

“Decision Points” by George W. Bush.

I was further mystified by the fact that 4-star Army General (ret.) Colin Powell came across as the one lone voice of reason, since he tried to raise awareness of tribalism and ethnic diversity in the targeted area.

The reading certainly gave me the impression that humans are simply being seen as replaceable cogs in the machinery by the establishment.

Culture and ethnicity simply doesn’t matter, it is all about momentary victory, without any overarching solid narrative selling a clearly defined End Game, that will be reached by many separate actions all serving the same underlying objective.

This is a startling realisation.

When reading “The Art Of War” I was surprised about what sort of advice it contained. Prolonged warfare with no end in sight is depicted as one of the worst projects that a Nation can ever engage in. A group that engages in warfare also have to ensure that they have access to an efficient supply line, taking advantage of whatever resources the group can get their hands on as they expand into a territory. A war effort should be swift and precise, without too much meddling from sovereigns located far away. The people who are on the ground need to be able to do what is necessary to reach their goal in a completely mobilised way, to the extent that this is possible.

All of this certainly made me question the sort of warfare that people my age have grown accustomed to. All of our Nations’ war efforts seem concentrated in “alien territories,” fighting and training “aliens” that might turn on the West later, and all of our Nations’ major war efforts seemingly drag out for ever…

No proper end game that logically makes sense is ever presented to the public and when getting an insight into the world of those who run these things, it doesn’t really seem like these characters know what the deal is either (unless a battle ground is simply needed in order to train soldiers and test new equipment).

Warriors & Citizens – American Views of Our Military edited by Kori Schake & Jim Mattis.

A parallel can be drawn to hacker activists, who don’t seem too concerned with allies. They’ll attack an enemy of the West one day only to target Western political and military structures the next, potentially jeopardising the integrity and safety of a Nation State or its military operations.

When reading about community organisers you see this pattern of behaviour once again.  A lot of left-wing activism simply cancels itself out, since the only common denominator seems to be emotionalism. Due to this you’ll get contradicting agitation and advocacy that will leave someone like myself slightly confused, as there is no End Game in sight anywhere.

If you look at Islamic agitation in Europe it is very easy to understand what their End Game and overarching goal is. They engage in demographic expansionism into Europe, which gradually gives them a political advantage. Wealthy Muslim power-players buy themselves into Western Corporations which gives them cultural influence and leverage. Street-level Muslims carve out their own territories and then defend these. Mosques are erected further cementing a claim to a specific territory boosting confidence, while a romanticized fantasy of Islamic Imperialism, appealing to people’s sense of identity and innate penchant for ancestry-worship, is promoted. Of course, as always, not all. But you don’t need every member of a specific group to behave in this particular fashion for it to have its desired effect. My impression of European Islamification is that there is a long-term vision, coupled with a willingness to commit to certain behaviours, in order to eventually reach a clearly defined outcome: Nation States that become compatible in their policies and in their cultures with the Muslim faith, preferably paving the way for a new “Golden-Age.” Of course it is of importance to point out the ethnic and racial diversity within Islam, and that there are numerous conflicting denominations within the faith as well. As an example: we can now clearly observe, imported tribal disagreements and feuds, in Europe, in addition to all of our own inter-ethnic issues that we had from before….

Inter-ethnic dissonance is very prevalent in Africa; which is generally referred to as the most diverse continent on the surface of the earth.

So what can be said of the West? What is our End Game? What can be observed and what conclusions can be drawn? 

What would make sense, instinctively,  would be to have common ancestry as the glue holding Europe together. Race has become way more inclusive than what it used to be, since we now largely see Race as something observable, while ethnic groups give us what has become our European Nation States, with its specific cultures and characteristics.  Back in the day these used to be chopped up into various tribes that probably displayed a lot of similar traits to one another, hence our generalisation regarding population groups contained within the boundaries of the modern Nation State: an extended family sharing common ancestry and a similar distribution of genetic traits on average.

It would make sense if our Nation States in Europe concerned themselves with the protection of our shared and individual cultural heritage, doing everything to ensure the survival and majority status of white children (and mixed whites) in the only territory that actually belongs a 100% to whites, protecting our continent’s borders and integrity.

A strong unified Europe and more broadly speaking, a strong unified West with the more multi-racial configurations found within territories conquered by whites, would in theory make sense.

Is this an End Game for what is collectively known as The West though? No.

This would be a racist objective. It would insinuate that Ethnic-Europeans have a natural claim to a specific territory and that conquest is a legitimate way to establish a Nation, which is what a white presence in all other territories other than Europe is a result of. (To my knowledge … It certainly looks that way when observing strange geographic settlements by Whites and the presence of dark-skinned indigenous groups).

The prevalent mythos championed in the West is this:

  1. that all other groups are minorities, even if Europe looks very small when compared to other continents, and we are outnumbered globally speaking.
  2. That the magic soil theory is truth, meaning that you’ll automatically become  Swedish by simply breathing the air in Sweden.
  3. That all human beings are born equal due to a blank slate, and that genetics simply don’t exist.
  4. That talking about genetics and genuine diversity is dangerous because that will instantly turn you into Hitler and result in a new Holocaust.
  5. That it makes sense to celebrate white ethnic groups becoming minorities, after years of civil-rights battles in the U.S.A. to ensure equal opportunity regardless of skin colour, and after years of Whites trying to do good towards previously marginalised and abused non-white minority groups within their domains. Not to forget: the constant focus on the challenges faced by so-called (and genuine) minorities within traditionally White-majority constructs. None of this paints minority-status in an appealing light … yet we should do everything in our power to lay the groundwork for our own marginalisation…. which is particularly interesting when reading about the merciless brutality in other parts of the world perpetrated by non-white majorities…
  6. That previous white expansionism will just be forgotten, since Whites have decided to “play nice,” which means that we no longer have any enemies and don’t really need any borders….
  7. That only white ethnic groups can be guilty of racism and imperialistic activity.
  8. That white ethnic groups are not under any circumstance “indigenous” and that there will at no point be any need to give any white demographic the status of “protected group.”
  9. That race and/or ethnicity is only real and only counts if/when dealing with “indigenous people,” who can under no circumstance be white. These “indigenous” groups are also the only ones entitled to certain territories that have to be protected in order to ensure their survival.
  10. That charity is only needed in the 3rd world as it is probably your own fault if you are poor and hungry in the superior, egalitarian, socialist inspired constructs that make up the Western World.
  11. That you have to import workers from Africa and The Middle East, rather than employing individuals from territories closer to your own, or within your own continent.
  12. That mixing on a massive scale is always peaceful and not the result of violent demographic change or militant conquest.
  13. That re-writing history and engaging in gas-lighting on a National and/or Continental level is perfectly alright in order to salvage vanity projects initiated by international organisations, that might look good on paper and in theory; until inserting the human factor into the equation actually implementing the idea.

Ok. So this doesn’t look too promising. Then what about Christianity? This is multi-racial, multiethnic and global. It is way more inclusive and has been used as a unifying factor in Europe before…

The West has continuously acted as an enemy to Christian groups in the Middle East, facilitating genocidal persecution of genuine Christian minority tribes. Western governments not only promote the build-down of Christianity within Europe and all other territories under White influence, they actively side with Nations and regimes known for violent Christian persecution.

What about human-rights, enlightenment ideas, world peace and the “human race”?

Western governments have repeatedly sided with regimes guilty of outrageous human rights abuses, making themselves guilty of gross hypocrisy since human rights and the protection of humanity as a whole has become the main narrative and general raison d’être of Western groups.

Portraying oneself as a defender of the human race also becomes tricky as you cannot possible go out there and claim that population group A needs more protection and privileges than population group B as this would be racist and undermine universal rights. And how on earth can you even say population group A and B when race/ethnicity isn’t even real? You cannot say that religious group A is more guilty of persecution than religious group B, because why would religious group B be more righteous or in need of more protection than the other? Are you a bigot or what?

Who are you to say that Terrorists don’t have rights or don’t have a point, when you claim to be a defender of all of humanity? And how on earth do you even define a “War on Terror” or “Terrorists”? Any person or group could fall into this category when nothing is specified.

These kind of points can be spinned indefinitely putting The West in a situation where none of its actions can be seen as righteous and/or legitimate.

It opens up the door for a potential legal, moral and PR nightmare where The West and its natural inhabitants never win.

It also puts Western Nation states in a situation where an enemy cannot be clearly defined, at least not in public, due to important exotic alliances and potential diplomatic disasters. By relying on exotic alliances for abstract military operations, the West paints  itself into a corner, where they cannot kick out subversive elements within their own nations if these stem from their good “friends and allies.”

The West is forced into a position where it cannot really look after the interests of its own inhabitants, nor enforce the heritage and integrity of itself.

Not to forget that The West is put into an incredibly awkward situation when Western leaders cannot clearly formulate anything, if interested in maintaining good international relationships.

This results in cringe worthy narratives that leaves all of those who don’t just parrot our “modern shared values” confused and puzzled. What are we all about really? Does anyone know?

What about Capitalism then? A support for this must surely be a constant factor from The Americans at least? 

No. Think again. The U.S.A. is willing to tolerate oppressive communist regimes that in the long run pose a threat to the American experiment and their global influence, as long as the U.S.A. can gain from such an alliance in the short run.

So what is The End Game of The West? 

Strangely and worryingly enough there doesn’t seem to be one……(but I might be very wrong, after all, who knows what goes on behind the scenes…).

At best it can be argued that there are forces within The West championing stability trough whatever means by expanding the police state and surveillance of their own citizens. This though is worked against by leaders who don’t want to acknowledge the effects of demographic change. In addition it facilitates the very form of governance that Western Nations are outspokenly against, not to forget that the identity destruction currently happening in The Western world work against any conservation efforts intended to protect our cultural and ethnic inheritance, while simultaneously compromising stability and security; in short, all of it compromises the survival of those people who occupy the territories that we collectively refer to as The West.

 

Radicals On A Non-Stop Crusade.

I lately made the decision to write opinion pieces by hand; with the intention of digitalizing and publishing them after some days/weeks of further reflection. However I came across a peculiar article this evening displaying how profound the wish is to wage a non-stop war against everything our shared heritage is.

I find this to be very saddening as there seems to be a complete lack of will to calm down this well-organised crusade. In one of my latest opinion pieces (which I wrote in an analogue fashion) I described a political drama unfolding in Norway; where a very popular political figure was squeezed out by the bureaucracy & the opposition (who had one of their worst election years ever), based on a Facebook post. Their actions showed a total lack of respect towards the democratic will of the people, and that they, as part of the establishment will do anything to get “roadblocks” out-of-the-way. Nothing can be allowed to disrupt the silent, fundamental, core, transformation. (As a side note it is of interest to mention that another radical Norwegian politician suggested that the time has come for a new National Anthem, that can reflect Norway as it is today…)

Anyway back to the other story; The Facebook post that provoked all of this, was very short and called for the withdrawal of citizenship IF citizens fight with foreign terrorist groups, (to summarise)…I read one opinion piece about the matter, where it was argued that the viewpoint was a “slippery slope,” which it is, IF the targeted enemy groups are not clearly identified in the legislation. BUT the Facebook post is only made complicated due to how post-modernist societies define citizenship….This definition is, as of today, completely open to interpretation – but this was not always the case!

One would think that people would react with gratitude and be incredulously happy when given the opportunity to participate in societies that do not belong to them; not even by proxy, geographic proximity, or through “free-float-of-goods-and-people.”

But alas, I guess this is all wishful thinking.

Whenever the member of a minority group is officially elected to hold office in a foreign territory, this can in many ways be seen as the ultimate victory dance by those who adopted said alien. There is no greater victory than to get the children of those you have bombed or marginalised in the past to fight your cause, or promote the interests of your Nation. Yet our arrogance and conviction of our values’ superiority is proving to be our own undoing. We feel fantastic and proud in our egalitarianism,  but this shot at equality will not result in equilibrium if there is no gratitude or assimilation from the other end. Rather you’ll find yourself as the duped party, standing there in all your self-congratulatory might, only to realise that your days are numbered; and that you are sandwiched between an enemy you aided into power and a raging fury from your very own men.

On that note I’m pasting in what inspired me to write this evening.

It is of great interest that radical, fundamentally, Anti-American, groups and individuals, are still active in the U.S.A. today. I’ve written before and I’ll say it again; it appeared to me when I lived there (many years ago) that these groups are the only ones who are really and truly well-organised. There is apparently no end to the funding as they bus people in from the whole country; they have their community organisers out, who’ll easily crash non-communist, peaceful, pro-American groups, all in the name of recruitment. They’ll get you to sign your name in good faith unto petitions and seemingly well-intended initiatives, only to phone you up later, hoping that maybe they can recruit you as a foot soldier – whether you are a citizen or not. Deception is key. These people have their passports and have their rights, but rather than leaving their country behind, they make the decision to stay, for the simple reason that they want to fight the beast from within. They remain and get their hands dirty politically, since they are on a mission. They do not like their country, in fact they abhor it! Completely and totally.

This “mission” evidently has supporters and foot soldiers within all levels of society, which is precisely why an article like the one above can even be a thing.

Considering how much our societies have changed in The West, to appease all sorts of various movements, it could be an idea to at least contemplate, even if it is just for a second, how very fortunate we are. Apparently there is no desire for such a thing.