The Right To Bear Arms & Multicultural Utopia….

I cannot imagine anything worse than the ability for force combined with bottomless, indisputable, idiocy.

Sadly this is a most distressing combo that people easily forget about and/or know nothing about, since they’ve never been directly exposed to it for a prolonged period of time….

I was first made aware of this phenomenon when I went to school over in the U.S.A.

I wasn’t particularly interested in being bullied around by kids from the ghetto who also had access to the school that I attended, in the name of egalitarianism I presume.

The danger of putting high achieving and/or privileged kids together with those from “projects” is that one group will easily take advantage of the inexperience and naiveté of the other….

A certain attitude is required to survive in particularly rough environments….

Inner-city roughness gives birth to, and enables the rise of “mini-dictators” and a certain prevailing rudeness of character that will see kids reared in privileged environments eaten alive if they aren’t careful….

Since I wasn’t interested in being one of the cowed I found myself in a situation where I was all of a sudden being “eyed” and pointed out by groups of “project kids.” It dawned upon me that America certainly wasn’t Norway (which used to be homogenous, high-trust, very safe and civic-minded, before government-approved “cultural enrichment” from tribal, low-trust, more violent, alien societies) and that a refusal to be bullied by low performing individuals, who’s greatest aspiration in life was to be some sort of “gangsta,” probably wasn’t so smart.

This experience certainly turned me into a big believer in the 2nd amendment since the only option for protection that I had was signing up for self-defence classes…. Something that I started doing out of necessity rather than having an innate desire for being Rambo.

On a couple of occasions I also overheard how other students would throw it out there that they wanted to “Columbine their entire school,” because the other students were “stupid,” whenever I then turned around to see who these potential delinquents were, they were always without exception: short, fat, ugly, female and white.

(God certainly has some bad days or maybe the Devil has some very good ones….)

I always felt very troubled when overhearing such “lone gunwoman” statements, because at what point do you call the authorities? Is it a joke? Is it just a saying? Is it just a way to vent?

Which is precisely why I always turned around so that I could scan their faces and know their names and why I also sharpened my ears further. I certainly kept an eye on these weirdos but reached the conclusion by observing them that they were harmless. Which I was right about. Thank God.

I realised back then that everybody hates and everyone is hated, and that those who don’t fall into one of the two categories are the exception to the rule. I even wrote a Metal song about it.

Even if some people espouse hate it doesn’t necessarily mean that they’ll stab or shoot the person that they openly loathe; that being said I take it as self-evident that the threshold is lower when it comes to kids from rougher environments. This is why you hear of people being beaten the crap out of just because they looked at someone weird or spoke up. These are prevalent stories on both sides of the Atlantic. The same can be said of white kids being targeted simply because they are “whities.” Something that I became very scared of myself. Wouldn’t it have been ironic if a Norwegian was beaten up or shot due to American segregation and slavery in the past? That is a bizarre thing to walk around and be afraid of.

Over here in Europe things have taken on a whole new form; I heard of a hate-crime story where African women physically attacked white Spanish women on the London underground, because “only English should be spoken here in England.”

So that means that if I speak Norwegian with my relatives when I go to the capital, then I might run the risk of African women beating the crap out of me, when I’m genetically closer to white people who live on this island than these Africans are????? Talk about strange. I’m actually more closely related to the natives in England since I’m actually a NATIVE EUROPEAN just like the Spaniards are. Talk about ridiculous.

Anyway … It greatly troubled me when I lived over in the U.S.A. that someone like myself, who knew what I wanted to do with my life, could all of a sudden end up the victim of either a school massacre and/or a targeted hate-crime assault committed by low performance losers with no goals and no purpose in life at all whatsoever.

When I later moved into a territory where MS-13 were expanding and recruiting new people, I certainly felt that my conclusions about egalitarianism-culture was well founded.

The same can certainly be said about “cultural enrichment” in Europe.

Thankfully I survived being exposed to “enforced egalitarianism” and “cultural enrichment,” but it certainly taught me how annoying it is that you can dream and plan about a career and a certain life, only to have it all taken from you in a second due to a no-gooder; who hates you because of presumed privilege, who hates you because of the colour of your skin, or hates God and all of mankind due to their own failures.

It is tragic, but it is sadly an aspect of life that is often overlooked and/or forgotten. People escape from cultural enrichment if they can. If people don’t like how their neighbourhood is changing they pack up as fast as they can and leave. Those who don’t know any better or cannot go anywhere have the option of being treated like crap, to join the newcomers by integrating into their culture, or to fight.

A good indicator of how Urban America can profoundly change a person was when I found myself out walking in London one evening and I heard loud hip-hop bass coming from a car driving up behind me. My hair was literally standing on edge, I quite frankly had goosebumps, and found myself scanning the environment for a place to seek refuge as I instinctively sensed danger and an attack.

What I’m addressing in this entry is most important to keep in mind when initiating National or even worse, Continental social projects. When you open up the flood gates to other cultures that you arrogantly assume will just praise your values and automatically integrate into your societies, you might just end up being conquered.

So much for so-called high-performing populations, with all their tech and academic intellectuals..

It is all useless unless you’re prepared and equipped to deal with “so-called” low-performing population groups, who might not have your art and philosophy, but who’ll kick your ass left right and centre, both when it comes to violence and birth rates….

What I’ve certainly taken away from all of this is this: Listen to your instincts – never the experts or the mainstream media narrative.

 

Having A Raison D’être & An End Game – The Impression One Can Get.

When reading about the Iraq war last year I was stunned to see the willingness to sacrifice the integrity of Europe on the altar of momentary territorial access needed in order to get into Iraq.

“Plan Of Attack” by Bob Woodward.

“Decision Points” by George W. Bush.

I was further mystified by the fact that 4-star Army General (ret.) Colin Powell came across as the one lone voice of reason, since he tried to raise awareness of tribalism and ethnic diversity in the targeted area.

The reading certainly gave me the impression that humans are simply being seen as replaceable cogs in the machinery by the establishment.

Culture and ethnicity simply doesn’t matter, it is all about momentary victory, without any overarching solid narrative selling a clearly defined End Game, that will be reached by many separate actions all serving the same underlying objective.

This is a startling realisation.

When reading “The Art Of War” I was surprised about what sort of advice it contained. Prolonged warfare with no end in sight is depicted as one of the worst projects that a Nation can ever engage in. A group that engages in warfare also have to ensure that they have access to an efficient supply line, taking advantage of whatever resources the group can get their hands on as they expand into a territory. A war effort should be swift and precise, without too much meddling from sovereigns located far away. The people who are on the ground need to be able to do what is necessary to reach their goal in a completely mobilised way, to the extent that this is possible.

All of this certainly made me question the sort of warfare that people my age have grown accustomed to. All of our Nations’ war efforts seem concentrated in “alien territories,” fighting and training “aliens” that might turn on the West later, and all of our Nations’ major war efforts seemingly drag out for ever…

No proper end game that logically makes sense is ever presented to the public and when getting an insight into the world of those who run these things, it doesn’t really seem like these characters know what the deal is either (unless a battle ground is simply needed in order to train soldiers and test new equipment).

Warriors & Citizens – American Views of Our Military edited by Kori Schake & Jim Mattis.

A parallel can be drawn to hacker activists, who don’t seem too concerned with allies. They’ll attack an enemy of the West one day only to target Western political and military structures the next, potentially jeopardising the integrity and safety of a Nation State or its military operations.

When reading about community organisers you see this pattern of behaviour once again.  A lot of left-wing activism simply cancels itself out, since the only common denominator seems to be emotionalism. Due to this you’ll get contradicting agitation and advocacy that will leave someone like myself slightly confused, as there is no End Game in sight anywhere.

If you look at Islamic agitation in Europe it is very easy to understand what their End Game and overarching goal is. They engage in demographic expansionism into Europe, which gradually gives them a political advantage. Wealthy Muslim power-players buy themselves into Western Corporations which gives them cultural influence and leverage. Street-level Muslims carve out their own territories and then defend these. Mosques are erected further cementing a claim to a specific territory boosting confidence, while a romanticized fantasy of Islamic Imperialism, appealing to people’s sense of identity and innate penchant for ancestry-worship, is promoted. Of course, as always, not all. But you don’t need every member of a specific group to behave in this particular fashion for it to have its desired effect. My impression of European Islamification is that there is a long-term vision, coupled with a willingness to commit to certain behaviours, in order to eventually reach a clearly defined outcome: Nation States that become compatible in their policies and in their cultures with the Muslim faith, preferably paving the way for a new “Golden-Age.” Of course it is of importance to point out the ethnic and racial diversity within Islam, and that there are numerous conflicting denominations within the faith as well. As an example: we can now clearly observe, imported tribal disagreements and feuds, in Europe, in addition to all of our own inter-ethnic issues that we had from before….

Inter-ethnic dissonance is very prevalent in Africa; which is generally referred to as the most diverse continent on the surface of the earth.

So what can be said of the West? What is our End Game? What can be observed and what conclusions can be drawn? 

What would make sense, instinctively,  would be to have common ancestry as the glue holding Europe together. Race has become way more inclusive than what it used to be, since we now largely see Race as something observable, while ethnic groups give us what has become our European Nation States, with its specific cultures and characteristics.  Back in the day these used to be chopped up into various tribes that probably displayed a lot of similar traits to one another, hence our generalisation regarding population groups contained within the boundaries of the modern Nation State: an extended family sharing common ancestry and a similar distribution of genetic traits on average.

It would make sense if our Nation States in Europe concerned themselves with the protection of our shared and individual cultural heritage, doing everything to ensure the survival and majority status of white children (and mixed whites) in the only territory that actually belongs a 100% to whites, protecting our continent’s borders and integrity.

A strong unified Europe and more broadly speaking, a strong unified West with the more multi-racial configurations found within territories conquered by whites, would in theory make sense.

Is this an End Game for what is collectively known as The West though? No.

This would be a racist objective. It would insinuate that Ethnic-Europeans have a natural claim to a specific territory and that conquest is a legitimate way to establish a Nation, which is what a white presence in all other territories other than Europe is a result of. (To my knowledge … It certainly looks that way when observing strange geographic settlements by Whites and the presence of dark-skinned indigenous groups).

The prevalent mythos championed in the West is this:

  1. that all other groups are minorities, even if Europe looks very small when compared to other continents, and we are outnumbered globally speaking.
  2. That the magic soil theory is truth, meaning that you’ll automatically become  Swedish by simply breathing the air in Sweden.
  3. That all human beings are born equal due to a blank slate, and that genetics simply don’t exist.
  4. That talking about genetics and genuine diversity is dangerous because that will instantly turn you into Hitler and result in a new Holocaust.
  5. That it makes sense to celebrate white ethnic groups becoming minorities, after years of civil-rights battles in the U.S.A. to ensure equal opportunity regardless of skin colour, and after years of Whites trying to do good towards previously marginalised and abused non-white minority groups within their domains. Not to forget: the constant focus on the challenges faced by so-called (and genuine) minorities within traditionally White-majority constructs. None of this paints minority-status in an appealing light … yet we should do everything in our power to lay the groundwork for our own marginalisation…. which is particularly interesting when reading about the merciless brutality in other parts of the world perpetrated by non-white majorities…
  6. That previous white expansionism will just be forgotten, since Whites have decided to “play nice,” which means that we no longer have any enemies and don’t really need any borders….
  7. That only white ethnic groups can be guilty of racism and imperialistic activity.
  8. That white ethnic groups are not under any circumstance “indigenous” and that there will at no point be any need to give any white demographic the status of “protected group.”
  9. That race and/or ethnicity is only real and only counts if/when dealing with “indigenous people,” who can under no circumstance be white. These “indigenous” groups are also the only ones entitled to certain territories that have to be protected in order to ensure their survival.
  10. That charity is only needed in the 3rd world as it is probably your own fault if you are poor and hungry in the superior, egalitarian, socialist inspired constructs that make up the Western World.
  11. That you have to import workers from Africa and The Middle East, rather than employing individuals from territories closer to your own, or within your own continent.
  12. That mixing on a massive scale is always peaceful and not the result of violent demographic change or militant conquest.
  13. That re-writing history and engaging in gas-lighting on a National and/or Continental level is perfectly alright in order to salvage vanity projects initiated by international organisations, that might look good on paper and in theory; until inserting the human factor into the equation actually implementing the idea.

Ok. So this doesn’t look too promising. Then what about Christianity? This is multi-racial, multiethnic and global. It is way more inclusive and has been used as a unifying factor in Europe before…

The West has continuously acted as an enemy to Christian groups in the Middle East, facilitating genocidal persecution of genuine Christian minority tribes. Western governments not only promote the build-down of Christianity within Europe and all other territories under White influence, they actively side with Nations and regimes known for violent Christian persecution.

What about human-rights, enlightenment ideas, world peace and the “human race”?

Western governments have repeatedly sided with regimes guilty of outrageous human rights abuses, making themselves guilty of gross hypocrisy since human rights and the protection of humanity as a whole has become the main narrative and general raison d’être of Western groups.

Portraying oneself as a defender of the human race also becomes tricky as you cannot possible go out there and claim that population group A needs more protection and privileges than population group B as this would be racist and undermine universal rights. And how on earth can you even say population group A and B when race/ethnicity isn’t even real? You cannot say that religious group A is more guilty of persecution than religious group B, because why would religious group B be more righteous or in need of more protection than the other? Are you a bigot or what?

Who are you to say that Terrorists don’t have rights or don’t have a point, when you claim to be a defender of all of humanity? And how on earth do you even define a “War on Terror” or “Terrorists”? Any person or group could fall into this category when nothing is specified.

These kind of points can be spinned indefinitely putting The West in a situation where none of its actions can be seen as righteous and/or legitimate.

It opens up the door for a potential legal, moral and PR nightmare where The West and its natural inhabitants never win.

It also puts Western Nation states in a situation where an enemy cannot be clearly defined, at least not in public, due to important exotic alliances and potential diplomatic disasters. By relying on exotic alliances for abstract military operations, the West paints  itself into a corner, where they cannot kick out subversive elements within their own nations if these stem from their good “friends and allies.”

The West is forced into a position where it cannot really look after the interests of its own inhabitants, nor enforce the heritage and integrity of itself.

Not to forget that The West is put into an incredibly awkward situation when Western leaders cannot clearly formulate anything, if interested in maintaining good international relationships.

This results in cringe worthy narratives that leaves all of those who don’t just parrot our “modern shared values” confused and puzzled. What are we all about really? Does anyone know?

What about Capitalism then? A support for this must surely be a constant factor from The Americans at least? 

No. Think again. The U.S.A. is willing to tolerate oppressive communist regimes that in the long run pose a threat to the American experiment and their global influence, as long as the U.S.A. can gain from such an alliance in the short run.

So what is The End Game of The West? 

Strangely and worryingly enough there doesn’t seem to be one……(but I might be very wrong, after all, who knows what goes on behind the scenes…).

At best it can be argued that there are forces within The West championing stability trough whatever means by expanding the police state and surveillance of their own citizens. This though is worked against by leaders who don’t want to acknowledge the effects of demographic change. In addition it facilitates the very form of governance that Western Nations are outspokenly against, not to forget that the identity destruction currently happening in The Western world work against any conservation efforts intended to protect our cultural and ethnic inheritance, while simultaneously compromising stability and security; in short, all of it compromises the survival of those people who occupy the territories that we collectively refer to as The West.

 

Radicals On A Non-Stop Crusade.

I lately made the decision to write opinion pieces by hand; with the intention of digitalizing and publishing them after some days/weeks of further reflection. However I came across a peculiar article this evening displaying how profound the wish is to wage a non-stop war against everything our shared heritage is.

I find this to be very saddening as there seems to be a complete lack of will to calm down this well-organised crusade. In one of my latest opinion pieces (which I wrote in an analogue fashion) I described a political drama unfolding in Norway; where a very popular political figure was squeezed out by the bureaucracy & the opposition (who had one of their worst election years ever), based on a Facebook post. Their actions showed a total lack of respect towards the democratic will of the people, and that they, as part of the establishment will do anything to get “roadblocks” out-of-the-way. Nothing can be allowed to disrupt the silent, fundamental, core, transformation. (As a side note it is of interest to mention that another radical Norwegian politician suggested that the time has come for a new National Anthem, that can reflect Norway as it is today…)

Anyway back to the other story; The Facebook post that provoked all of this, was very short and called for the withdrawal of citizenship IF citizens fight with foreign terrorist groups, (to summarise)…I read one opinion piece about the matter, where it was argued that the viewpoint was a “slippery slope,” which it is, IF the targeted enemy groups are not clearly identified in the legislation. BUT the Facebook post is only made complicated due to how post-modernist societies define citizenship….This definition is, as of today, completely open to interpretation – but this was not always the case!

One would think that people would react with gratitude and be incredulously happy when given the opportunity to participate in societies that do not belong to them; not even by proxy, geographic proximity, or through “free-float-of-goods-and-people.”

But alas, I guess this is all wishful thinking.

Whenever the member of a minority group is officially elected to hold office in a foreign territory, this can in many ways be seen as the ultimate victory dance by those who adopted said alien. There is no greater victory than to get the children of those you have bombed or marginalised in the past to fight your cause, or promote the interests of your Nation. Yet our arrogance and conviction of our values’ superiority is proving to be our own undoing. We feel fantastic and proud in our egalitarianism,  but this shot at equality will not result in equilibrium if there is no gratitude or assimilation from the other end. Rather you’ll find yourself as the duped party, standing there in all your self-congratulatory might, only to realise that your days are numbered; and that you are sandwiched between an enemy you aided into power and a raging fury from your very own men.

On that note I’m pasting in what inspired me to write this evening.

It is of great interest that radical, fundamentally, Anti-American, groups and individuals, are still active in the U.S.A. today. I’ve written before and I’ll say it again; it appeared to me when I lived there (many years ago) that these groups are the only ones who are really and truly well-organised. There is apparently no end to the funding as they bus people in from the whole country; they have their community organisers out, who’ll easily crash non-communist, peaceful, pro-American groups, all in the name of recruitment. They’ll get you to sign your name in good faith unto petitions and seemingly well-intended initiatives, only to phone you up later, hoping that maybe they can recruit you as a foot soldier – whether you are a citizen or not. Deception is key. These people have their passports and have their rights, but rather than leaving their country behind, they make the decision to stay, for the simple reason that they want to fight the beast from within. They remain and get their hands dirty politically, since they are on a mission. They do not like their country, in fact they abhor it! Completely and totally.

This “mission” evidently has supporters and foot soldiers within all levels of society, which is precisely why an article like the one above can even be a thing.

Considering how much our societies have changed in The West, to appease all sorts of various movements, it could be an idea to at least contemplate, even if it is just for a second, how very fortunate we are. Apparently there is no desire for such a thing.

 

The Best Video To Be Made In Our Age! – When the truth can only be told by comedians!

This video is a must watch for anyone. Spot on. No wonder we Norwegians have our jokes about the Swedes! And they are not the only ones who match this portrayal!

Incase the video is removed by the tech-Gestapo/STASI then you can search for Jonatan Spang and his sketch regarding Swedish political correctness, I haven’t laughed this much in ages! A must see for anyone! But I guess the female officer “was just following orders,” I wonder which other group used that as an excuse after a certain World War! I wonder who?

Nut-Jobs with Manifestos…

Yesterday I watched a short documentary about Norway’s most notorious gun man, in addition to watching a documentary about genuine right-wing extremists in Germany. It was interesting to note that German authorities first believed that murdered Muslims had been taken out due to their involvement with organised crime before they pondered the possibility of racism being the cause of their demise. If paying attention it certainly seemed like a scenario of white German thugs killing Muslim thugs. I decided to check out these documentaries since I was asking myself this: “do genuine racists and right-wing extremist pose a legitimate threat to Europe, and should we worry?” (I answer what I think in the last 9 paragraphs of this entry, if you don’t want to read everything in between.)

I think the main problem with the “right-wing-extremist” narrative is the fact that regular conservatives, centrists and classical liberals are all tossed into the “racist” camp, all you have to do in order to gain that label is to simply disagree with what I just call “the modern left.” Who are the modern-left? Those traditionally labeled as the “far-left” or “left-wing-radicals,” it seems. Simply put they are revolutionaries, who in our case: vehemently hate Europe, unless they can create a “New-Europe.” They can also be labeled as “deconstructionists.”

(I’m guessing that extreme-capitalists also gain somehow on the New-Europe).

Thanks to their way of arguing it doesn’t really mean anything anymore to call someone “literally Hitler.” The meaning of the word racist has also been diluted, same thing with fascist.

So when government officials are screeching about the “racist-right” it is hard to believe them, as anyone who criticise the radical core change we currently experience in Europe will wrongfully be accused of bigotry, xenophobia, bla-bla-bla, you name it.

In fact I’m currently reading the latest issue of The Spectator where Theresa May’s “institutional racism witch-hunt” is being ridiculed left-right-and-centre, and why shouldn’t it? Rather than stating that PEOPLE ARE DIFFERENT and that this can result in different life-outcomes on average, people prefer to hide behind the “institutional-racism-myth” because this appears to be more comfortable….(being unlucky/lucky, etc; regardless of ones race, is of course also part of how a life can play out, it is not all merit-based of course, but what I’m referring to here are averages – generalisations simply put. Exceptional individuals can be found anywhere and will probably have more in common with one another than the group that they originally hail from)…

If more coloured people end up behind bars for violent crime in England then it is probably because the justice system is at fault, according to the institutional racism theory, the fact that this reflects what is also happening in the current non-segregationist  U.S.A. or other places in Europe ought to be ignored; we are all racists apparently presiding over biased systems. Obviously there have been stories of race being used in the past to lock up innocent Afro-Americans, but my main focus is on Europe, and as I’ve stated countless times before, we are in a completely different situation.

Some people will probably look at the topic and only see economics and financial difficulties as the source of the problem, maybe even contemplating that impoverishing certain neighbourhoods is done deliberately; there is no end to how a topic like this one can be elaborated upon I’m sure.

But different population groups do have different trait frequencies, once again: on average. The idea that some foreign tribes might fail within our social constructs, or might feel downright miserable within our over-the-top micro-managed social-constructs, (since our systems reflect those who built them for their own descendants), is a point that is never brought up by anyone.

I instinctively suspect that the depression rate has to be high when people depart and re-settle into a territory that is fundamentally alien to them….

Why would someone from the Middle East or Africa be happy in the most Northern part of Norway, for example, where the sun doesn’t shine for large parts of the year, where the nutrition is so vastly different, and where there are only pale, drunk, white folks with a culture radically different to let’s say; Somalia?

Would you be happy if you woke up in an African or Middle Eastern Nation tomorrow? Or would you do everything to get the hell out, or if unable to: fall into a deep depression?

Thank God for Munira Mirza for bringing some sense into the “institutional-racism” debate over here in England, whoever this individual is…

I’m taking it for granted and predict that many are growing tired of the gender and race debate.

I’ve certainly grown tired of it, which is why I’ve stopped writing about it.

In fact I don’t think you need any propaganda on the right at all to gain supporters at this point in time, all you need is to give the members of “the modern left” a microphone and a camera, in a lot of cases.

That being said; this entry is supposed to be about the real-far-right, so….

I know what I don’t like about the far-right and I can also guess why those on the genuine far-right wouldn’t like me, an interesting thing to keep in mind for those who think that everyone on the right is “literally Hitler”:

  1. I have a mixed race brother.
  2. I have nothing against one well-integrated migrant here and there, what I oppose is replacement migration and demographic warfare. This is serious and would be widely opposed and condemned if it occurred elsewhere in the world. I’ve lived through a completely unprecedented demographic transformation in Europe and it is both sad and infuriating to officially be labeled: “Ethnic-European.” I was not born an “Ethnic-Norwegian” but now (due to an extreme influx of people from radically different alien territories) I’ve become an Ethnic-European, as I’m part of the old Europe just like other “living relics,” or at least that’s how it sounds like, and how it looks like in certain areas…. This radical change has happened very quickly and should come to a halt equally quickly, as an out-of-control situation should of course be seen as undesirable, unless you are evil or delusional.
  3. I write about racism towards whites while also writing about racism towards other groups; I have to say though that I’m surprised at the one-sided narrative that has been allowed to dominate the media landscape. It puts people in danger to not know the real risks out there. Political correctness kills. Literally; and I’m wondering why that has been allowed to happen.
  4. I have nothing against inter-racial relationships, but find it bizarre that this is now being promoted in the European-Media as the “new-standard” as it is relatively uncommon, completely unprecedented as “mainstream”, and “alien” to our territory.  All relationships should happen naturally without social-conditioning efforts from an establishment eager to fundamentally change an entire continent. Funny enough there will be plenty of people arguing that we are already conditioned artificially to accept straight-relationships; to those who peddle this narrative I ask: “how can humanity exist and how come we haven’t died out already, if straight-relationships isn’t what we are meant for biologically speaking?” Here is another one: “if gender is not biological, then how come transgenders need hormones after their transitioning?”
  5. Believing in ethno-nationalism in the U.S.A. is absurd, in my opinion, since Modern-America was a multi-racial (Africans & Native American Tribes) construct from the start, built and designed by Anglo-Saxon (White) immigrants. This doesn’t mean that they shouldn’t be strict on immigration now, it simply means that: ethno-nationalism is unobtainable and never really existed in the first place. America is a country featuring many different nations (ethnic & racial tribes), and because of this you cannot really use “American” as a racial/ethnic description. This is why race and ethnicity is constantly emphasised when going to the doctor or dealing with public offices as ticking off “American” isn’t sufficient information. It is also an interesting fact to note that White Americans are of European descent and therefore live in a territory that can be correctly referred to as “genetically-alien” to them if one wants to be very specific. There is a White majority in the U.S.A. as of today, due to successful conquest, something that a great number of people either don’t know, or don’t want to think about. If an Ethno-State was the desired outcome then I question why diversity and parallel societies always was a factor, and why there were “allowed” to be “survivors.” These are my reasons for finding American Ethno-Nationalism bizarre; the U.S.A. is not Europe.
  6. Women should be allowed to have a say in my opinion. I’ve seen that there are right-wingers out there who truly hate women. They channel their hatred towards feminist-politics on all women,which is quite frankly disturbing to read if you are a woman….
  7. I’ve criticised WW2 Nazism, but believe that our European leadership have been reckless with guarding the peace that was obtained since we now stand face to face with an imported enemy. I do find this to be very disappointing. 
  8. I have nothing against the Jewish people.
  9. Contrary to what some might think I don’t hate all Muslims or Islam, but I don’t endorse Muslim expansionism and rightfully criticise what is currently happening in Europe as people should adapt when they move somewhere else and never be allowed in, in such great numbers as to marginalize the natives. Islam is also alien to our territory historically speaking, we are culturally Christian, this is not synonymous with a hate towards all, or a belief that Muslim Countries should be converted, attacked or occupied. It is a critique towards either incompetent and/or vicious leadership in Europe, combined with imperialistic, expansionist and supremacist elements imported into our midst. I believe that those who are incompatible with our societies should be offered a ticket back home.
  10. In a democratic construct you’re awarded certain liberties that can enable you to influence the course of your Country/Nation. Such as voting, protesting, writing letters to representatives, sharing information and viewpoints and signing petitions. You can join a political party, a charity organisation, an activist group or start your own groups.
  11.  Everything should be done to obtain equilibrium and to keep your country operational. Chaos is the greatest evil; at least from a civilian perspective.

What a true right-wing-extremist would probably think:

  1. They abhor mixed-race individuals. This is not exclusively a white phenomena funny enough, as there are Afro-Americans for example, who also think this way.
  2. They hate all immigrants and don’t want to see a single one. If they cannot hate an African, they’ll hate another European.
  3. They will only write about racism towards white people, as they secretly or openly endorse racist acts against other groups. They wouldn’t really give a damn if hearing about another ethnic or racial group suffering.
  4. They hate inter-racial relationships and would probably physically attack those who engage in such things (if they could get away with it).
  5. They believe in ethno-Nationalism even if it doesn’t make any sense within their country as it would mean purging large chunks of people who have been in their territory for just as long as they have.
  6. They see women without children as useless, failures; since women should focus on  having families exclusively. Women should never lead anything according to what I’ve understood, as it seems abhorrent to those on the far-right if a woman holds any authority over a man. Because of failed feminist politics, it seems like they believe that all women should be punished by being kept away from political debate and positions of influence. Something to keep in mind.
  7.  Some far-right extremists like Hitler and will walk around with Swastikas, clearly branding themselves as supporters for all to see. They are not ashamed but feel comfortable displaying their support for the Reich. You will not be in doubt if you read the writings or see footage of a Neo-Nazi. They are unapologetic, out and proud. They are in denial as German supremacy was exactly just that, even Norwegians were “beneath” the German super race, according to the German Nazis. Yet it is not uncommon to see pictures of “dark looking” Neo-Nazis, something that will never cease to amaze me.
  8. Neo-Nazis hate the Jewish people and believe in all sorts of conspiracy theories about how the Jewish elite run the entire world. They will  promote these views far and wide, deny that the Holocaust ever happen and protest outside Israeli-embassies. Once again, it should be fairly easy to spot a genuine Neo-Nazi. Islamists also enjoy protesting against the Jewish people and seemingly get away with it.
  9. Right-wing-extremist don’t waste their breath or their time emphasising how they don’t hate Islam or all Muslims. They hate them all and will not waste any time sugar-coating the matter. If they are agitated when writing or discussing Islam it is not the result of repeated attacks from Muslims directed towards Europeans or awareness of failed integration, it is an underlying hatred that would have been there anyway, regardless of events and terrorism.
  10. Right-wing-extremists might believe that voting is pointless as all political parties are the same to them. They’ll refrain from casting their vote or being active citizens, with the exception of protesting and marching. While they are in these marches they might display their open loyalty to Hitler if they are Neo-Nazis or shout offensive words since they hate all foreigners. They sometimes believe in taking matters into their own hands as they feel that the political establishment isn’t acting quickly enough, rather than running for office or putting pressure on politicians, they might dream about violently executing political leaders, and might even give it a go. This though is something that they share with the far-left and other groups.
  11. They believe that everything should be done so that their vision can dominate. Chaos should be given a little push if they can climb the ladder it offers. This is of course a sentiment that they share with a number of other groups as well.

Far-left, far-right, far-Islam, far-whatever; it’s all looks spooky to me when I look at it due to the uncompromising nature of it, yet it is difficult to take the current witch-hunt seriously as anyone to the right of the “modern-left” will be accused of being a bigot.

As I’ve said before you’re not a racist for believing in your own country or nation.

It is particularly interesting to keep in mind that:

  1. European right-wing-extremists display the same toxic-masculinity that can be seen within Muslim communities.
  2. Feminists are at war with White-Male-Aggression while importing unrestrained Arabic & African Male-Aggression.
  3. The uncompromising anger seen when looking at far-right-extremists is the same as can be seen from Islamists, their critique of post-modern Europe seem to match on certain points. But the groups differ in their loyalty as right-wing-extremists are obsessed with  Europe while Islamists are obsessed with the Caliphate.
  4. Toxic masculinity from alien tribes has to be fought with toxic masculinity from your own tribe, something that our general leadership seems to have forgotten.
  5. Islamists are not in the receiving end of a witch-hunt, as you’ll instantly be branded an Islamophobe if you get upset with the current situation in Europe.
  6. Nobody seems to understand this kind of thinking: ” if Muslims get away with disrespecting Western-laws, then why should anybody else follow the rules? If our political establishment isn’t respected by the newcomers, then why should the Natives listen to them?”
  7. The worst thing that could happen to Europe is if genuine right-wing-extremists and white-toxic-masculinity convert and  join the Islamists. Then we are totally screwed, I think.
  8. There are also anti-austerity Anarchist groups in Europe hating on everything and everyone, not to forget traditionalist Christian patriots adhering to “Deus Vult” due to the current Islamist threat. When looking at the alt-lite, alt-right, alt-reich spectrum online, you see what appears to be internal arguing and disorder. There are veterans in Europe who aren’t particularly happy with the current Islam-mess, and disillusioned law enforcement officers out of a job. In fact there are many who are angry and upset, not to forget an enraged general population screeching in the comment sections and whatnot on social media due to the Islamists. Yet there doesn’t seem to be much agreement or unity in terms of “what Europe really is, or what it should be.”
  9. If the European situation escalates, resulting in a total breakdown of order, we will need all the toxic-masculinity that we can possibly find in what will probably be an urban, guerrilla war against militant Islamists, who I assume will be joined by clueless lefties who seem convinced that their secularism can use Islam as a weapon against Christianity or European Patriotism, but I might be wrong. (Hopefully). It is difficult to predict what all of these groups really like or who they might join forces with (?) There are actually many separate agendas, from those who want more European Christian traditionalism, to those who yearn for totalitarian communism, from those who want Anarchy and chaos, to those who want more extreme-capitalism, from those who actually want fascism, to those who want nothing, from those who want borders and the protection of cultures, to those who want no flags, no borders, no nations, without really knowing what this means, not to forget imported ethnic disputes among immigrants, in addition to the dissonance that occurs in the host nations between new-comers and Natives, and the big, expanding, dark cloud of Islamism. When looking at all of the political disputes that we have in our parliaments across Europe, I find it awkward that anyone would believe even for a second that a total breakdown of our nations would guarantee anything in terms of Europe’s new political direction. If our parliaments are messy they are nothing in comparison to all of those sentiments found on the outside of our democratic governments.

People are on a whole different plateau of idealism if they think that their political victory is guaranteed. 

Humans are seemingly wired for nothing but arguments and will constantly find something petty to fight over whether in the court-room or in the streets, whether online or politically.

It beats me why humanity is so profoundly enamoured with conflict regardless of the form that it takes.

You would think that people would tire of it.

To answer the question at the beginning of this very long entry: Do I believe that right-wing-extremists pose a risk to Europe as of now?

They pose a threat to communists and Islamists I believe, but could potentially pose a threat to innocent mixed individuals or well-integrated foreigners. Yet we do stand face to face with a shitty situation as it is impossible to distinguish who the Jihadis are, since many of these “sleeper cells” look westernised and are perfectly integrated.

This is a very annoying factor that cannot be forgotten or overlooked.

We’ve been put in a hopeless situation where the “collateral damage” will be devastating due to the difficulty in distinguishing between the good and the bad.

I assume that this is the reason as to why there are those who at this point in time “self-deport.” They’ve seen the ghettos, they’ve seen the escalation, and do not wish to be in the crossfire.

Right-wing extremists pose a major threat to the political establishment, first and foremost, as they see them as ruining Europe (a very right conclusion that many non-extremists would agree with) which can be the only reason as to why the political establishment seem so fixated on the “right-wing-extremist-threat,” I suspect that it is rather a desire to protect themselves against well-earned scrutiny and absolute contempt. 

It is hard to imagine that much mercy will be shown towards those who opened up the flood-gates, indirectly initiating a demographic assault on their own Working- (and in some cases) Middle-class.

I do not believe that this will end well, because it has been written and immortalised in official records, who’s been responsible. And when changes that are this radical in nature are imposed upon an entire continent, it cannot be expected that such acts will be forgotten or forgiven.

The future looks dark indeed, as it is naive to believe even for a second that people will think straight and act straight if “shit-hits-the-fan.”

For all I know it very well might be that ANTIFA is all of a sudden running things in the future, and in that sort of a scenario we can might as well wave goodbye to our cultural heritage, as I assume that it would be in their interest to torch it all.

Right-wing extremists pose a potential threat to those who look alien to the European continent, which means that they do not pose a risk to Ethnic-Europeans as of now unless they are visibly communists, (I guess), and/or singling themselves out with “refugees welcome” signs.

If the political situation is rocked however and everything is thrown into chaos they will pose a greater risk, as those on the moderate-right will not agree with straight up racism and would not be interested in waging an actual war against women. It is therefore reasonable to conclude that there would be major infighting among those on the right, as this is already the case.

Not to forget those on the left, who are already in attack mode against anyone slightly to the right.

In fact it would not surprise me at all if in-fighting would handicap Native-Europeans completely.

Those who wish to infiltrate us and do us harm have their friends and benefactors, while those who are standing against all of this appear to be fragmented.

A new leader-type like the ones we used to have back in the day, who thinks in a continental fashion and is eminent in alliance building, is what will be needed, or an unofficial network of like-minded individuals each going for their own territory, standing united against the fundamental transformation that we are currently witnessing, might do the trick.

I’m guessing that a proper backlash will more likely come from those with combat or “street-fighting” experience, it would make sense that it would surface among those who’ve been sent into the “no-go-zones” of Europe and are sandwiched between a faulty establishment and broken, increasingly dangerous ghettos….Or people with access to intelligence who are aware of how bad the situation truly is, or a group formed by these type of characters.

Back to these “right-wing-extremists;” they do seem to have a certain “loose-cannon” element to them, illustrated by the actions of Norway’s Breivik. How he could even for a moment think that his actions would commence a war against Muslims, when he – a blond, white, male – opened fire against teens of all races, executing them due to their political affiliation, beats logic. Unless he just wanted to get attention and “martyr” himself somehow. No one will endorse you regardless of what you believe in if you murder children/teens during a time of “perceived peace,” even during war-time I think that you would have a hard time getting away with it. Executing the future leaders of the Norwegian Worker’s Party did not make them weak, it gained them a lot of sympathy actually, something that they themselves squandered with bad politics, so even if you want to try to look at Breivik’s actions in a cold fashion, he failed at reaching his objective. To assume that his actions would bring attention from the general populace towards his enormously long Manifesto is equally bizarre and display a lack of basic human understanding.

People don’t read…

Or maybe he was just aiming for the right recipient; apparently he actually thought that this huge, gigantic work of his would be read by many… I suspect that very few ever bothered to check it out. Something that extensive can never be expected to go viral.

People want slogans and simplified messages.

Memes.

Humour.

Battle cries.

Imagery.

It is of particular interest that The Progress Party (a right-wing political party) that Breivik had been associated with for several years as a member, won during the 2013 Parliamentary Election as the 3rd biggest party in Norway,  finally getting into government for the first time. The reason as to why I find this to be of such interest is that  the Worker’s Party received an enormous amount of sympathy after the political terror operation by Breivik in 2011. Even though there were, and still are, many Norwegians harbouring a deep-seated hatred towards Stoltenberg, he was perceived as a great uniter, and funny enough was pictured in Mosques reaching out to Muslims and whatnot. Yet we saw the socialists squeezed out politically only two years after Breivik’s condemned actions, which in my opinion illustrates profound political problems, that not even Breivik’s terrorism could overshadow. It is also shocking to read that the Progress Party was Norway’s 2nd largest political party in 1997, 2005 and 2009 without getting into government, as nobody wanted to go into a coalition with them. The reason as to why I never voted until this year as a Norwegian citizen was that I had a clear impression of the democratic will being ignored in Norway,  but I had no clue that it had actually been this bad. Yet all of a sudden the democratic will was accepted and despite the cult of political correctness The Progress Party is still Norway’s 3rd largest political party remaining in government after a victorious election in 2017.

The future might judge Breivik’s actions differently, but this hinges on how things will develop in Norway and the European continent. Simply put; whether or not Europe will descend into chaos, etc; As of today he claims that Hitler’s Mein Kamf keeps him alive behind bars, that this work gives him strength to deal with his ordeal, prison has apparently radicalised him (go figure), he has also declared that he would apologise to the families of his victims if he would be allowed to start a fascist political party from behind bars. A total weirdo in other words. He previously stated that the fact that he had come to enjoy the TV-Show Paradise Hotel was evidence of him becoming mentally retarded in captivity………..

If what he wanted was to trigger “Deus Vult” it would have made sense to murder Norwegian children while placing the blame on the Muslim community, and even then there is a very high probability that nobody would have reacted violently against other Muslims. Mass rape, acid attacks, pimping of little girls, terrorist actions, and a refusal to follow the laws of European Nations have yet to spark a mass violent backlash against the Muslim communities of Europe. If anything the conclusion can be drawn that Ethnic-Europeans are surprisingly patient, restrained or psychologically subdued.

There have been cases of Ethnic-Europeans officially and publicly forgiving their Muslim-assailants, such as a Norwegian man who was raped by a Somali and then felt guilty when this individual was deported. Just like there seems to be an innate desire to help alien tribes among the people of the west, it appears that forgiveness towards criminals and assailants alike is very widespread, whether in the case of secularists trying to understand the person violating them, or people praying for the soul of the one transgressing against them, as can be seen in a recent Facebook post published by one of the American girls attacked with acid in Marseille, France.

Anyway – this “loose-cannon” element, as described above, on the extreme-right, this “unknown-factor,” makes it difficult to know what to think of the genuine far-right, especially since there is little, to no unity within this perceived “movement;” we are currently experiencing attacks from Islamists, and other new-comers, all over our continent, so it would be awkward to not see this imported threat as way more alarming for everybody regardless of ethnicity, race and ideology.

I’m assuming that right-wing-extremists are more “precision-focused” while Islamists just want to take out anyone and everyone, creating as much damage as possible. This makes it obvious which one poses the greatest threat to Europe and Europeans.

Here you have an interesting article featuring: Nut-jobs with Manifestos.