“The Reactionary Mind – Conservatism from Edmund Burke to Donald Trump“ by Corey Robin.

“The men and women killed on September 11 were not citizens of a democracy; they were earners, and rewards would be distributed accordingly. Virtually no one-not even the commentators and politicians who denounced the Feinberg calculus for other reasons-criticised this aspect of his decision.” (p.218)

Thankfully I did not receive any new books for Christmas this year (2018) which is great, considering that I still haven’t read the ones I received last year. 

After all of my political outbursts and writings there could hardly be a better title to end my “Things To Read“ section with in 2018 than Corey Robin’s “The Reactionary Mind- Conservatism from Edmund Burke to Donald Trump.“

I have a deep admiration for good writers displaying broad vocabulary usage, especially those who engage in extensive harvesting of information.

This is its own virtuosity for sure and I find it very impressive.

Characters like Robin would probably not be particularly gobsmacked by my own writings but see it as a source of opinions in a bundle of many.

That being said; Corey’s work is an analogue data-base of other people’s opinions presented to those of us who are not academics or to those who are hoping to climb that mountain.

He presents his collection of conservative thinkers brilliantly and convincingly argues his point.

It is particularly illuminating for someone like myself to read it; in fact I would go so far as to call it mandatory reading for anyone on the right spectrum of politics.

What really stood out to me and what I ended up highlighting in the book were sections regarding economics.

I was stunned to read quotes from Hobbes who would have greeted a 1984 super-state with open arms. His definition of free-will is something that I’ve come to consistently ridicule pointing out to my relatives when reading, talking or hearing about abusive behaviour: “well according to Hobbes this is free-will in action if you choose to be a victim!”

I was equally mortified by Edmund Burke’s view on labour but certainly saw in his writings the justification for wage-slavery in today’s modern world.

It is simply impossible for an individual to condemn chained-slavery in one sentence only to proclaim that one endorses freedom and liberty while endorsing Burke. There is no such thing.

Edmund Burke had no respect for the individual or humanity as quoted in Robin’s book. A terrifying individual whose theories should be held up as a horror-example of what one should fight against.

Likewise, I was angered when reading quotes from Ayn Rand who came across as a delusional fraud, the antichrist incarnate, without any concern for her fellow humans at all. Robin demonstrated this by comparing quotes from her with quotes from Hitler. They aligned perfectly.   

Thank God for Adam Smith who came across as the only sensible thinker in regards to labour.

View this post on Instagram

#adamsmith for the win! What #edmundburke is quoted as saying & defending in "The Reactionary Mind" is literally #slavery 😑 Not good. Here is a good quote from #Smith ❤️ "He describes that minimum as either a subsistence wage to procure the worker's survival or a family wage enabling not only to maintain and reproduce itself but also to advance itself. Not only must wages provide "the necessities and conveniences of life"; what constitutes those necessities and conveniences will depend upon the overall wealth of a society." 👍🏻 #economics #reading #ideas #politics #society #thereactionarymind #coreyrobin #trade #money #finance #labor #workers #wages #nations #peace

A post shared by The Commander In Chief (Berit) (@thecommanderinchief1) on

Obviously it all made me think about my own efforts in regards to my art and inspired me to initiate a new art-concept for this year (2019) named: “The Value of Labour.“ 

I will not go into great detail in describing this particular art-project until the end of the year.

“When labor becomes the norm, in both senses of the term, culture does not stand a chance.” (p.163)

I highlighted several quotes in the book that were of great interest, but I will not quote them all here since it dawned upon me during Christmas that I have a tendency to write rather large book-reviews and quote what I read to such an extent that it all becomes a bit too much.

Ultimately I want people to read the books that I mention but I also want to share information since we live in a time where people don’t seem to take reading seriously!

I have to say that it feels strange to read a book written in proper American. Rather than writing labour, the text goes for labor instead. The same can be said for the usage of the letter z or c vs. s. After having gotten used to the more French way of writing English words, it feels like I’m reading simplified English.

What I find troubling about “The Reactionary Mind“ is that Corey Robin is portraying Democrats and liberals as inherently peaceful and “lame” which couldn’t be further from the truth, he also fails in addressing current political movements such as: transgenderism, LGBTQ, 3rd wave feminism, racism, censorship and iconoclasm, and declarations of total war written by members of the political left, etc;

His criticism and portrayal of Trump also falls into the category of “Orange man bad,“ with the by now familiar name-calling. He adds to this by quoting “The Art Of The Deal,“ a book ghost written by Tony Schwartz.

It is difficult to find anything illuminating in regards to Trump’s character, barring the support of his children and friends of the family. After all of the negative articles that I’ve read (and openly ridiculed here on my blog) I’ve only come across three sources in regards to Trump’s personality that can be seen as plausible or informative. One is the video of Tony Schwartz in Oxford, another is the video interview with one of the women alleging that they had an affair, the other is a long article in The New Yorker written about his tv-show “The Apprentice.” What these three have in common is that they align and paint the sort of picture that would be credible considering Trump’s vast wealth and business accomplishments; all other critics are namely repeating the same words over and over without ever giving any reasons for why they are doing so…

That being said it is unlikely that anyone will care much for what Schwartz have to say for himself since Trump’s larger than life personality and star eclipses that of a journalist hired to write about another man’s accomplishments…

Trump’s magnitude is so immense that it is impossible to come across a media outlet not mentioning him (the publishing houses clearly see it as their mission to use any outlet to influence potential voters), impossible to come across anyone in the music industry who does not have an official opinion broadcasted on their social media (regardless of their size and influence), his very presence has driven his political adversaries to nothing but visible madness; it is not even possible to go to a random coffee-house in Cheltenham without overhearing the neighbouring table talk about Trump’s latest Tweets.

Such is his fame and such is his influence.  

He has made everyone reveal themselves and their true colours on an international scale.

Those who want: border security, a crack-down on gang-warfare, private guns, religion, jobs and a future for their families love the man and are his fans; those who hate him want: no borders, no jobs, no police, no private guns, no religion, and no children.

Yet those who oppose him do not really see this since all they chant is: “Orange man bad,“ they are fighting an unjust system presided over by a bigot – in their opinion.

His most devout fans burnt their Nike gear to show their contempt for “flag-disrespecter“ Colin Kaepernick. Meanwhile the political activism on the left increasingly resembles persecution with doxing and physical assaults a staple; it brings to mind “give us the man and we’ll find the crime.“

A most celebrated and respected investigative journalist referred to the spectacle by saying: “this is political war.“

It is also worth noting that liberals were terrified of a potential “military junta“ in the White House when Trump appointed retired Generals to certain positions. Once these characters were fired one by one, the very same people voiced their complaints, since they apparently wanted a military take-over if this take-over would stand opposed (even if just a little bit) to President Trump.

“… or, as the Kagans would later put it, “to intervene decisively in every critical region” of the world, “whether or not a visible threat exists there.” (p.213)

“… to ensure that no other power ever arose to challenge the United States and that no regional powers ever attained preeminence in their local theatres.” (p.214)

To conclude; 

There is a real danger of “state-worship“ both on the right and left side of politics. This is never in the interest of the people when contemplating the exploitative nature of the modern “state.“ There is also a danger of denial when people are clueless of past tensions between those who yearn for change and those who oppose this.

Right-wing people do have a tendency to greatly admire enforcement professions only to despise big-government and bureaucracy in the next sentence. I guess it is an admiration for being badass and for being patriotic. I certainly consider myself a fan of the military and others who keep us safe and know how to kick ass!

Ironically enough these enforcement professionals are in our times acting as agents of the very state that conservatives either loathe and/or doubt.

Those on the left side of politics meanwhile bemoans war-mongering from the right, while frequently calling for military interventions in the name of “saving humanity“ or “standing in solidarity“ with whomever. They greatly expand the state “for the greater good“ while simultaneously lamenting “power-abuse,“ “the patriarchy,“ and “hierarchies.“

It is immensely ironic that left-wing characters erect the very abuse time and time again that they criticise or see (whether legitimate or not) in already existing political structures. They do have a tendency of being very right in their analysis of what doesn’t work while failing spectacularly when enacting their remedy. Usually resulting in monumental losses in the millions. 

The use of language and grammar is an abuse of power in the mind of a true deconstructionist, yet the ideological children of these radical thinkers are the very ones who are forcing everyone in public academic settings to announce their pronouns and talk like fools.

On the other hand; conservatives regularly re-write and update their own history so that they will not be seen in an unflattering light by whatever modern standards. If you believed in maintaining the established order of your time and you lived in the American South, you would obviously have been pro-slavery, if you believed in maintaining the existing orders in Europe, you would obviously have been pro-Monarchy. If you believed in the captains of industry and this newly established elite you would have supported the suppression of workers, and so and so on.

Establishments and elites change.

I disagree with Corey Robin’s argument that violence is one of the pillars of the conservative mindset and would rather counter-argue that violence is at the heart of humanity as a whole.

Geneticists would obviously know more about the topic.

I take it as self-evident that most lust for power and that few would ever be able to resist the temptation of greatly expanding their spheres of influence if given the chance.

Inevitably this results in the infringement upon other people’s borders and rights to self-rule.

A right is only a right as long as humans decide to respect it, just like a law or a system is only operational as long as people decide to play along with it. The moment that people do not, it will simply cease to exist.

Political orders are living organisms which makes it ironic to be a conservative, unless ones definition of conservative aligns with mine; namely that conservatism means conserving any traces and tools of ones cultural heritage such as: texts, buildings, artefacts, music, practises, languages, etc; in addition to the protection of ones own population group from existential enemies both internal and external.

It would also make sense to include borders but this would not take into consideration our ancestors nomadic tendencies, which led them to move wherever they could find resources. Which grounds to be defended would be defined by the actual value to the tribe. This obviously includes farmland in these “modern“ times of ours.

Expansion due to necessity would also have to be included if concerned with the survival of ones population group, since mass evacuations are sometimes a necessity. You have to be flexible and willing to re-locate if your current territory becomes inhabitable.

Borders follow the tribe.

Traditionalism on the other hand does in my opinion mean that you consciously re-enact past patterns of behaviour, which is something that a great deal of conservatives would not be interested in doing.

In this day and age conservatism is largely seen as a financial model which means that nothing is ever really seen as worth “conserving“ if it gets in the way of the sanctity of “the free market,“ socially there may be a little sprinkle of religion, but this is largely absent from the Nations of Europe.

Lately I’ve been thinking that globalism must appeal to those who see all humans as replaceable cogs in the industrial like state system. If 10 Swedes die tomorrow it makes no difference since 10 Nigerians can be imported to take their place. It is however interesting to note that the argument is never really reversed because then it becomes imperialistic and racist. Overpopulation in Africa can be solved by Europeans not having any kids, in the eyes of a globalist it makes no difference at all if China all of a sudden is swapped demographically with India. We are all just cogs in the machine. This is the only way I can think of to explain their thinking.

It is worth noting however that if celestial beings create humans to worship them you cannot simply exchange them for other creatures while expecting a continuation of praise. This will probably come as a rude awakening to many in the years to come.

When reading this book it is informative to see that conservative critics do have a tendency historically to lament the inertia of the establishment while both fearing and admiring the vitality of revolutionaries.

Like biblical prophets they warn of a looming danger, but a danger nonetheless that seems inevitable.

“What is important is not what freedom I personally would like to exercise but what freedom some person may need in order to do things beneficial to society; this freedom we can assure to the unknown person only by giving it to all.” Hayek (p.159)

 

The Heated Topic Of Immigration Wordlwide & What Sovereignty Actually Means.

There is a proposal on the table that apparently will be voted on and discussed later this month, concerning making it illegal to be a critic of mass-migration, and I guess its effects, which are notable (historically speaking). This is to be done in order to initialize and/or continue with mass migration into Europe without any criticism. I wonder if this makes it illegal to review and talk about History books and/or whether or not it will also make it illegal to write that Norway was converted by the sword, which was the case, only that it was the sword of Christianity. History gives us the key to who we are and what sort of challenges we might face as nations/individuals and how to tackle these …  Here is the video:

http://www.investmentwatchblog.com/criticism-of-immigration-will-be-banned-in-europe/

Ok … now over to what I was actually going to write about:

I was quite surprised when I read an article a while back about anti-immigration riots in South Africa. It was of interest since it depicted Africans demonstrating against other Africans entering into their territory. I linked to the article here on my site and here I’ve found a video about anti-immigration sentiments in Israel.

Once again it illustrates how we all tackle a lot of the same issues regardless of where we live. With our current technology it makes it increasingly easier to compare cultures and how different population groups react to the same challenges.

What is of particular interest in the video is how the two Israeli women start shouting at one another since they disagree about whether or not they should take in the migrants.

Attitudes and behaviours that Westerners seem to regard as outdated are well and alive in other parts of the world, which you quickly realise when reading about the persecution of Christians.

Enforcing certain values and a clear identity will not happened quietly as anything that falls on the outside of the spectrum has to be removed or silenced. This paints a brutal picture that feels foreign in today’s “liberated” Western world of “Thou What Thou Wilt.” It makes sense to say that “when you go to Rome you do as the Romans” and unless you do have an unhealthy fixation on, let’s say, Islam; it makes sense to say that if you live in a Muslim majority country, then once again “you do as the Romans.”

You are a guest; which is why you’ll have to pay your respects or re-locate.

When observing how “respecting other’s sovereignty” plays out in practise though it actually means that you quietly stand by as genuine minorities (such as LGBTQ characters in Russia) are treated poorly, while political dissenters are sent into camps  (China), while it also means silently supporting terrifying human-rights violations (Saudi Arabia) all in the name of respecting “sovereignty” and a claim to practise ones “identity.”

Even in Western societies that are officially trying to be “bring-your-own-beer-countries”; they do want to enforce something, which is a normless society. This means that if you actually do stand for what has traditionally been the identity of your territory, well then you must be a bad-guy. Having “no-identity” becomes the identity, in this strange, awkward case. There is no culture, there is no heritage, there is no history, there is no nothing. Only a territory that you define upon your arrival. 

Even though I’ve been writing about how important it is to respect a Nations sovereignty and identity, I have to admit that in this I’ve failed on a small-scale by sending words of comfort out to persecuted Christians who in some cases are breaking the rules of the territory that they find themselves in by possessing a Bible and/or being open about their beliefs.

I’m also failing at “bringing my own beer” into identity-less Western territories as I’ve always integrated. This though becomes an issue if you live in a territory where “a deconstruction” is taking place. It means that you are aligned with the old (what the territory used to be) rather than the new (what the territory is becoming).

This might then oddly enough transform you into a dissenter by you successfully integrating into an established identity that is being killed on purpose by whatever establishment…..

Another example of sovereignty violation is this: if environmental pollutants are to be fought against effectively it also means being “rude,” since boots on the ground will be necessary in Africa and Asia to crack down on the worst “climate-offenders;” so there goes your peace and respect for sovereignty!

I wonder sometimes if  outspoken celebrities and spokespeople truly understand the natural conclusion of what they are stating and supporting….If you are an actual eco-warrior, well then you can’t respect anyone’s Sovereignty!

Pollution is really and truly a global problem, and we in the West are not the worst offenders.

I’m mentioning this to showcase how difficult  it can be to have certain stated principles, only to realise that things might not be as easy as previously thought…

It might also be worth mentioning that global corporations can in some ways operate like “one world governments” for the simple reason that they are their own thing completely and are everywhere, regardless of Nation or Continent.

Their influence is greater than anything else I’m sure.

National Sovereignty is consistently disrespected by world leaders who initiate sanctions and/or declare war against the leadership of other Nations, who they deem unfit to rule. Hence, no respect for sovereignty, nor the enforcement of National Identity.

The reason for this is probably due to how painful it actually is to witness Nation-State enforcement of territorial identity and also (in most cases I’m guessing) how unprofitable it is if Nation States break away from unions where so-and-so is/are the decision maker/s and/or big player/s.

Back to the migration issue; people are protective of their environment because they don’t want to lose out on their resources, which is one of the reasons as to why people have trough the ages “fortified their positions.” Something that is illegal in today’s Western Europe, unless you are a member of the establishment…..

Previous enforcement of ones right to be in a territory is also why we have distinct population groups, because group such and such was not erased by being absorbed into someone else’s “thing.” Hence in order to have a Nation and secure the continuation of said Nation you actually have to exclude, which a lot of people instinctively do; but this is never going to look pretty, especially not on a large-scale, which is what I’m talking about in this entry.

This of course makes an “open world” scary since it is a dangerous illusion; nobody is really interested in being squeezed out, not even those who are initially “open and inclusive,” when all of a sudden they wake up to find out that they have become a minority and that their claim to whatever territory and influence is null and void.

Their definition of their territory that they once upon a time wanted to generously share with others, have slipped and doesn’t include them any more. They simply lost it.

(It might be an idea to note that citizenship also becomes bizarre in “an open world” since citizenship is merely a piece of paper in this case. You territory belongs to everyone, and anyone can be of your territory. The same can be said of legislation tackling digital abuse and scams online. What you get is digital-global-anarchy since a criminal operation from one Nation abusing the member of another cannot really be prosecuted. Which governing body is supposed to police human interactions over the global internet?)

There are those who clearly do not see the arrivals of large hordes of other population groups as problematic. This is precisely why the arguing becomes so ugly, because those who end up being exposed to these transformations have a tendency of being very loud and extremely upset when their home-areas change suddenly. Especially if trust breaks down and inter-racial and/or inter-ethnic violence (the targeting of those who are not part of your in-group) becomes a thing.

The same can be noted now with anti-immigration sentiments here on the continent, that would appear to be reserved for Africans and Arabs primarily, but are also extended to other European Nationalities as well, in addition to heated arguments between individuals who look just the same (due to being members of the same Nation), because of disagreements over whether or not EurAbia or EurAfrica ought to be forcefully created, regardless of the human cost in the process.

I think it can be argued with certainty that trying to unite Europeans was a challenge great enough, just like trying to unite Africa is a monumental challenge due to inter-Racial diversity.

Now it can be witnessed that it is all falling apart here in “Europe,” since it was simply “too much, too quickly, too soon.” Rather than admitting that this has all been a spectacular political failure (unless you want chaos) the political establishment in Brussels appear hellbent on forcing their vision on everyone else, regardless of whether or not people actually want this in great numbers…

Things are already getting ugly since the survival of one “ideological vision” in this case, means the destruction of the other.

The good news is: that this is how humans behave, regardless of where they might be….

Here is one case of internal dissent in Germany and a proposed solution by a French academic:

https://sputniknews.com/europe/201811101069694506-german-military-plot-spoiled/

https://foreignpolicy.com/2017/05/01/the-german-military-has-a-neo-nazi-problem-extremism-right-wing-terrorism/

http://freewestmedia.com/2017/11/18/french-academic-proposes-muslim-apartheid-state-in-france/

America’s Cultural Legacy, Division in the U.S.A., Morality vs. Strategy & Dumb White People.

Today I started off my day by reading celebrity statements from angry American stars, obviously yearning for some sort of revolution over in the U.S.A.

None of these characters ever formulate what they imagine will happen if total collapse ensues in said country. Which is something one certainly should think about if promoting and crying for war and destabilisation. Nor does it seem to me that they contemplate the possible source of America’s tremendous internal division. Nor do they suggest ways in which to fix it….

I’ve seen  for myself the fragmentation and tribalism across the pond and this is a most worrying issue. America depends on its citizens to leave their old alliances behind and literally pledge allegiance to their new country of residency if America is to work! America cannot afford to have separate population groups singing their own National Anthems, or population groups advocating solely and exclusively for their own group. America cannot afford ancestry worship in the long run, since they need Americans to see themselves as Americans 1st, which means that Americans have to mentally separate themselves from their country and culture of origin.

I think the main issue is that American values; (the constitution, the founding fathers, the American flag, the American Anthem, etc,) are seen as White-American values, rather than America being seen as an Anglo-Saxon construct where a hand has been stretched out to other tribes and where doors have been opened to facilitate racial integration and unity. 

This is a great shame because it means that unity can only happen if one “sells out” or that unity can only happen if “the old order” is destroyed, since America as we’ve come to know it signifies oppression in the eyes of enough people. This means that there are forces at work who want to topple the whole thing and who will never be interested in walking through the doors that have been left open, nor to shake that hand which has been left outstretched.

While America has its share of internal political and cultural problems, they cannot afford large hordes of people settling in who don’t even bother to learn English, unless Afro-Americans, Euro-Americans, (and once again) Native-Americans want to see themselves squeezed out and marginalised, much like whites originally marginalised Native tribes in order to win the territory that we today refer to as America………..

Racial anxiety will probably shoot through the roof when the baby-boomers all of a sudden vanish. That will probably be the moment when a great deal of White Americans (and Afro-Americans) start freaking out big time since their birth rates, (much like European birth rates), aren’t that great. This drop, that is already becoming noticeable in certain States, is being widely celebrated by liberal Whites who cannot wait to be in a minority position. Apparently they assume that they will be respected if the tables are completely turned. Nobody ever really mention how Afro-Americans are being squeezed out in some areas as well, nor does anyone bother to contemplate whether some of their gang-culture has to do with protection and retaliation towards other gangs and groups infringing upon “their territory” and “their interests”….*cough**cough* Latino gangs anyone?

If people are serious about Afro-American communities in the U.S.A. there are certain changes that has to happen. I remember how elderly Afro-Americans were very much upset about the cultural glorification of the gang-culture in Urban America. Not only were they embarrassed at how Afro-Americans were being portrayed, they were also upset about the potential influence on young people. In this they are very right. It is an outrage that “gangsta-culture” is promoted to such an extent rather than focusing on successful Afro-American individuals, who’ve made a life for themselves, without selling drugs on the streets to other Afro-Americans. It is particularly macabre, when taking into consideration that those who suffer the most at the hands of Afro-American gang crime are other Afro-Americans. Peddling false narratives, lying to young Afro-Americans in order to continue race-hostilities doesn’t help matters either. How can you ever get any bridges built if young Afro-Americans are led to believe that White Americans invented slavery out of nowhere and jumped out of the woodwork in Africa to enslave the Black Man, since they were envious of their Wakanda and technological superiority?

There have been African empires, Ethiopia is one example, but the narrative that is being sold, is not one where African tribes sold other African tribes to the white man, nor are the Arabs ever mentioned, nor is African Ethnic Diversity mentioned. No. Sub-Saharan Africans were actually the Egyptians, and the White Man just came to Africa one day, and destroyed Egypt, that apparently is located in Sub-Sahara Africa, so that the White Man could finally settle his envy, and teach the snotty Black Man some sort of lesson…..

You don’t believe me? Well then go ahead and expose yourself to this kind of nonsense yourself.

Of course, not all, that would be a false thing to suggest, a false one indeed, but you don’t need all Afro-Americans to believe in these things for them to have a negative, cultural effect!

Slavery existed long before the TransAtlantic Slave Trade. For all I know maybe I have a slave as my ancestor somewhere since the Vikings took prisoners and engaged in the trading of slaves. Something that I didn’t know of until I made my “Viking Video,” which can be seen on my YouTube.

In fact, European tribes have been enslaved in the past by other European tribes, due to war, the same can be said of Africa, the Middle East and I’m assuming Asia as well (why would they be the exception to the rule?).

Whenever there are victorious Nations, there will obviously be losers. Norway as a Nation has been a loser. In fact I don’t understand why Afro-Americans have to water the plant of falsehood in order to feel better about themselves. Focus on what you can do as an individual and look at other successful individuals, from your own tribe and from other tribes. There is no need to steal and culturally appropriate other Nation’s success stories.

There is a time for grief and there is a time to move on.

And the time to move on is now if Americans are truly concerned about their Union!!!!!!  

If there are forces out there who feel clever about the ghettos and no-go-zones in America, then they will find themselves disappointed, as the crime in these areas spread and expand. Eventually you will not be safe regardless of where you might find yourself, which is why these issues have to be solved. 

What is interesting to note, when observing America’s angry celebrities, is that none of these eloquent soldiers of chaos are outspoken supporters of American Heritage, History and/or culture. What were their thoughts during the statue debate? Have any of these characters used their platform and star-power to promote America’s cultural legacy? Even though it would naturally pale to Europe’s due to America’s very young age, they are still old enough to have buildings, statues and sites of historical importance and value. They also have their share of writers, modern composers, and have been especially influential in terms of “the Golden age of Hollywood” and/or musicals (just think Disney). American culture exists, even though Europeans might not agree because it isn’t old or classic enough….

If American culture exists, which it does, it ought to be protected, and who can possibly be better advocates for American cultural legacy than its performers and artists?

Apparently they have no interest in such things, probably because a great deal of American celebrities aren’t technically equipped to handle even the most basic musical repertoire….

There. I said it.

They evidently have no concern nor “skin in the game” when it comes to American culture, nor is their modern contribution that spectacular (in most cases). In other words, a great number of these American stars aren’t really that great. What makes them great is their fame and that’s about it.

When looking at the academia, the student movements, the celebrities and the media it wouldn’t surprise me at all if we are to witness a Winter Palace moment in the U.S.A. It is wrong to believe that a majority is needed for a revolution to take place. You need the right people and you need patronage, something that the American opposition has since establishment politicians and advocacy groups openly endorse and promote the hostilities.

The boosting of the economy and the creation of jobs might help, but America’s challenges are deep, and cultural as well. 

Morality vs. Strategy.

Just like the distinction between street level diversity vs. elitist diversity is never mentioned by those who govern at all, they also fail to address the complex balance of morality and strategic interest…

A good and easy example is this:

If you are a Christian you are supposed to help your brothers and sisters in Christ. These brothers and sisters could be anyone, living anywhere in the world. Christians are widely persecuted so it makes sense that they should receive support from fellow Christians.

But a dilemma naturally presents itself…

1- “I’ll get involved with charity in Africa. I will do my best to use my energy on collecting goods for African Christians. I will not raise money for the unfortunate in my own territory, I will help African tribes instead, sending them medication and money if I’m wealthy enough. They believe in God, I strongly dislike our degenerate society, so I will side with those who have healthy and strong values. Take that silly Europe!

2- Over population becomes an issue in Africa. People start moving North in order to go where all the goods came from. They are now great in numbers due to Northern charity efforts and start pushing into your territory, compromising the safety and integrity of your own habitat. Crime levels explode, integration fails, and suddenly you find yourself a stranger in your own territory.

Which one would you choose: your fellow country men and neighbours or people of the faith regardless of where they might come from?

Or simply put: what comes first to you and what is most important? Race or faith/ideology?

You do not need a more complex example than this. Sadly we have leaders in our part of the world who never really take the time to explain the battle between what is good in  the moment and what might be better in the long run.

It might be an idea to address this and explain this to the population since it could reduce some of the hatred directed towards politicians and decision makers.

Retarded White People.

So today I saw this in my Twitter feed:

BBC being silly

Needless to say I commented on this.

If you want to eradicate Whites then this type of argument is sensible. I just happen to be white and live in Europe, which is the only territory that rightfully belongs to the so-called “Evil White Man” because this is where the “Evil White Man” comes from … the idea that we should have no borders while having no children is nothing short of insane.

I wasn’t really aware of how bad our situation is until last year when I was ill and had plenty of time on my hands to read and think.

Nobody ever sat me down and explained to me the National importance of marriage and children, quite on the contrary I was told to do my own thing and have a career.

When I was a tween the Defence Department in the country where I lived decided to use little girls magazines to recruit young girls to go out and fight, rather than to promote children and family life.

Ever since I started receiving mainstream exposure for my work as an artist I’ve been hailed as a fabulous female role model, since I’m a shred/virtuoso guitarist and since I initially started out in the male-dominated realm of heavy metal, contributing to the genre as a creative artist and kicking ass technically.

If young women in the U.S.A., Russia and/or Europe follow my example there will be no future for any of those territories since I’ve never been married and have no kids.

I’m still a fantastic role-model though apparently, or maybe not anymore, since I’ve realised how dangerous our culture actually is.

I guess that makes me a douchebag instead. Yeah probably.

 

Freedom in Europe & Tommy Robinson. Freedom in U.S.A. & Roseanne Barr.

I became greatly troubled when I heard the news of how Tommy Robinson had been sentenced to 13 months in prison for standing outside a courthouse streaming from yet another grooming case. What I found especially worrying was that no one in the press were allowed to report on it, until the ban was lifted today (Thank God). Now I do not consider myself to be a member of the press, but I’m a civilian Westerner who participate in our societies, which is what we are meant to be doing … I sign petitions that are being passed around the digital world, I’ve sent some emails to local representatives asking about MicroPlastics in our drinking water, I’m helping out in the local community and I registered myself as a voter last year and campaigned within the family to get as many votes with me as possible down to the Norwegian embassy in London. I also shared information on my blog regarding the election and promoted the whole ordeal everywhere in order to inspire my fellow Norwegians to participate in the democratic process!

I sent an email to the local Parish council wondering if I could be of help, since I knew that there was a position open and that they struggle to get new people in. I was not eligible due to the particular EU deal that my country of origin has – but if I had been eligible I would have been very happy to help! I live in a small village and feel that I’m experiencing the best of England. My experience of this country is nothing but good. That being said I am seriously considering investing in Medieval Chain Mail for my next London trip … since it is illegal for people to protect themselves in this country……

I myself don’t have to worry about “Trucks of Peace” at the local Christmas market where I live, but I also understand that there is no guarantee that this Utopia will continue….

View this post on Instagram

Today I saw #police officers with machine guns during church hours, standing right in front of where we had to walk to get to the morning service. "What on earth is this I thought? Is this how bad things have gotten?" I guess the security had a lot to do with what was being celebrated. #thebattleofbritain & the #royalairforce 💪🏻 Today we celebrated the #heroes of #ww2 & also saw young #cadets marching. Another insight into the best of #britain #england #uk #greatbritain #unitedkingdom #church #churchill #winstonchurchill #raf #rulebritannia 🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧 #churchofengland #queenelizabeth #thequeen

A post shared by The Commander In Chief (Berit) (@thecommanderinchief1) on

 

I live in one of the safest areas in the UK and can in many ways just turn a blind eye to the suffering and fears that other people in this country have to deal with, but I have not.

Whenever a person decides to voice their opinion there is usually a turning point and for me that was the one year anniversary for the attack on Charlie Hebdo in France.

Like many troublesome things … it all started with France…..

 

View this post on Instagram

#JeSuisCharlie #CharlieHebdo #Solidarity

A post shared by The Commander In Chief (Berit) (@thecommanderinchief1) on

You see … I lived there for a year and attended school there, so I know that you will never get any good grades at all, if you don’t participate in the exchange of ideas. Yes ladies and gentlemen, this is the beauty and the essence of France’s greatness. At least in my opinion. It is all about having your say and expressing yourself, being yourself, being YOU and celebrating liberté, égalité, fraternité!

Regardless of what you might want to believe, the French are fearless. They are not interested in their rights being taken from them, they are not interested in being treated unfairly, and will march out in the streets, throw their fist in the air, and let the whole world know what they think!

Sure, I do not envy anyone working within the French Government, as that must surely be a challenging endeavour. In fact, I would probably sleep in a bunker every single night if I was Macron.

Yet it is this passion and this celebration of individualism that makes France so very fascinating, even if the French are picky when it comes to how you speak their language….

A year after the vicious attack on Charlie Hebdo I couldn’t get over it, I couldn’t let it go. Nobody else seemed to care anymore. There were no hashtags, there were no flag-filters, people were busy with their own affairs and seemed like they had forgotten.

To me it was the day that I published my very first entry about the current continental crisis that we are standing face to face with in Europe today. At the time I didn’t know as much as I know now, I’ve changed somewhat, but I knew that I had to speak my mind and speak up for our part of the world, and whether people agree with my particular values or not; that is precisely what I did.

After this I’ve expressed my opinions online continuously and can’t understand for the love of God why Britain would be interested in deconstructing itself, a phenomenon that isn’t solely English, but a cultural and political issue that can be observed all over the Western world.

In fact I’ve started to wonder if there is a biological expiration date in the “coding” and whether or not this can be credited to the self-destruction mode that apparently has been activated among people with pale complexions all over the world regardless of geography….

But that would mean giving up on The West and I’m not willing to do that. 

I myself have never participated in any protests anywhere in the world and have absolutely no crime record at all whatsoever, anywhere. In fact, if one was to dig properly, nothing can be found, besides my opinions, my sense of humour and me sending slightly (in fact very) retarded messages to people I’ve considered my friends – because yes – I do like to troll people, and yes that will sometimes result in you falling flat on your face. That being said; if I know that I’ve been acting like a fool, I will also apologise.

The idea that I could all of a sudden be some kind of an enemy due to what I’ve liked on Facebook, re-grammed on Instagram or re-Tweeted on Twitter, seems absurd. If I was to be considered a criminal due to openly supporting the US President or for opposing deconstructionism in Europe, then we’ve officially dishonoured all of those who’ve died in the past to allegedly secure us our much envied freedoms…..

I’m asking myself why people have died for their countries if their legacy is to be overshadowed by “The People’s Democratic Republic of Europe,” and that is precisely the disgusting monstrum that we’ve degenerated into if you’ll get a SWAT team crashing through your front door at night for standing with your country of residency, rather than promoting the caliphate, burning the flag and/or demanding reparations due to some legitimate or un-legitimate offence in the past.

Am I asking the Germans for money? Am I suing them? Am I eating cake when Germans are killing themselves with their self-destructive policies? The answer to all of those questions is a resounding no. I am the last person interested in a German shouting at me, which they easily resort to it seems, but even though this is true I’m not popping the champagne when their Nation is going to shit. There are people out there who want reparations now because of the TransAtlantic slave-trade, there are people who try to play all kinds of cards due to colonisation: “Remove your flag – it is a sign of imperialistic oppression.” Do you want to import these type of attitudes into your country? Well not if you want your country to survive.

When I started sharing my concerns regarding Europe here on my blog I certainly didn’t sit here with a strategic master-plan. I’ve expressed my opinions as a European resident/citizen, and these concerns are legitimate. I do not have a go-bag underneath my bed, nor do I have 50 different fake passports in my safe, nor am I currently trying to destroy my own fingertips so as to make identification harder, nor do I have a stealth-Niqab at the ready.

If you live in a dictatorship you know that liking something on a social media platform, if you even have access to such a thing, can be the equivalence of firing a shot. There are a great number of Christians out there who live in constant fear that people will find out that they have a Bible in their household. People are afraid of speaking their minds all over the world and if one thing is to be said it is that you should never go into a fight or a battle if you are ill-prepared.

If the conclusion I reach regarding our current Europe is that you must have a grand strategy in place before you can even say something at all online, then we’ve already lost. Thankfully I read this evening that it is alright for people to share the news regarding Tommy Robinson’s arrest, and that was surely a great relief. 

Now; I’m not trying to say that Robinson is a Saint, I do not know the guy, have never met him, but I’ve seen some of his content. This man loves his country and hates what it is becoming, from what I can tell. He is also the last man who I would want to piss off, because believe me, if this man feels wronged or if he is on to something, he will not stop. I’ve seen how he has confronted those who try to bring him down and that is precisely why he is now in prison.  He displays the same drive and energy that can be witnessed when mainstream media people are running after a person they want to get hold of and/or target. He is obsessed with the future of his own country and has risked everything for his cause. By throwing him into prison he has automatically been given the martyr status that any sensible opposition should have avoided. Whether he survives his very long sentence or not; he has become a symboland symbols never die.

It was clumsy to silence the press, it drew instant attention and made the story go viral. I mean look at this: http://www.breitbart.com/london/2018/05/26/redacted-arrested-for-redacted-outside-redacted-leeds-crown-court-issues-media-ban/

Since I’m a Westerner, who lives in a free democratic world, with freedom of speech as one of its/our greatest virtues – I haven’t exactly prepared for a battle. I represent the very individualism that our part of the world champions, but this also means that I’m not exactly meeting in secrecy with unofficial organisations that will have my back if I’m all of a sudden considered an official threat for being pro-English, pro-Europe, pro-French, pro-Scandinavia, pro-American – in other words – pro-West.

Am I guilty for being curious? And am I guilty if I care about the well-being of this country? You see that is the impression one can easily get….

Yesterday I got pissed off when I saw a Tweet from Gad Saad. It is certainly rich to sit over in Canada and ask oneself why on earth people aren’t talking about Mr.Robinson over here in Europe when the media has officially been told to shut up about a non-ethno-Nationalist being thrown into prison, where he will probably end up getting killed! Gad Saad doesn’t even live here, and if you all of a sudden suspect that you’ve woken up in the new USSR, then it certainly isn’t risk-free to address our current challenges, especially if you officially stand alone without any firm and/or confirmed alliances. Apparently this hasn’t crossed the mind of someone like Saad … if the gag order had not been revoked I could have concluded a much shorter entry by making a point of:

“what Mr.Robinson? There never was a Mr.Robinson in Section E-42856? Welcome to The People’s Democratic Republic of Europe!”

Thankfully I’m not ending a blog entry with these words … or at least not yet.

In other news this evening I saw that Roseanne Barr was thrown under the bus today by everyone; even Breitbart, after she Tweeted something insulting to Valerie Jarrett using the word “ape.” Now I’ve actually referred to myself as an ape in one of my older entries. I do believe it was “pale nordic ape” … but then again I do think that all humans think too greatly of themselves … we are all silly little apes caught up in silly little arguments, wasting away, consumed with petty disagreements, but I guess this thinking of mine is worthless in an age where any comment, and especially any insult, can become lethal ammunition if used right.

Roseanne Barr’s comment was clumsy and I think the reason as to why I didn’t get really, really, angry is because I’ve referred to myself as an ape in the past. Then again I cannot really see myself calling a brown-skinned individual, or a minority person, for ape, because why on earth would I? It was a really silly or thoughtless move in an age where people are looking for racism and anything they can use anywhere!

Roseanne Barr gave the left what they wanted and what they are always on the look out for … I’m guessing that it would be catastrophic if President Trump now went out and defended Mrs. Barr, because the President has to deal with his own accusations of racism, something that he seems to be battling daily. (Record Low Unemployment Rates for Minorities in the U.S.A.)

This means that Roseanne has been disavowed by everyone which is a pity, because her show was much-needed. The opposition won, or at least this time around. Roseanne’s show has to come back because it was important, and people loved it. The fact that the left dictates what is allowed or not has to come to and end, because they insult and behave badly yet somehow manage to portray themselves as having the moral high-ground time after time. As of now there are lots of politicians all over the Western world who live in fear over what the media might write about them and this results in them having no balls, quite frankly.

The deconstructionists will win if they are allowed to dictate the rules of what one ought to talk about and what one ought not to even think about. 

Written by a pale, elusive Nordic ape in desperate need of sunshine.

Having A Raison D’être & An End Game – The Impression One Can Get.

When reading about the Iraq war last year I was stunned to see the willingness to sacrifice the integrity of Europe on the altar of momentary territorial access needed in order to get into Iraq.

“Plan Of Attack” by Bob Woodward.

“Decision Points” by George W. Bush.

I was further mystified by the fact that 4-star Army General (ret.) Colin Powell came across as the one lone voice of reason, since he tried to raise awareness of tribalism and ethnic diversity in the targeted area.

The reading certainly gave me the impression that humans are simply being seen as replaceable cogs in the machinery by the establishment.

Culture and ethnicity simply doesn’t matter, it is all about momentary victory, without any overarching solid narrative selling a clearly defined End Game, that will be reached by many separate actions all serving the same underlying objective.

This is a startling realisation.

When reading “The Art Of War” I was surprised about what sort of advice it contained. Prolonged warfare with no end in sight is depicted as one of the worst projects that a Nation can ever engage in. A group that engages in warfare also have to ensure that they have access to an efficient supply line, taking advantage of whatever resources the group can get their hands on as they expand into a territory. A war effort should be swift and precise, without too much meddling from sovereigns located far away. The people who are on the ground need to be able to do what is necessary to reach their goal in a completely mobilised way, to the extent that this is possible.

All of this certainly made me question the sort of warfare that people my age have grown accustomed to. All of our Nations’ war efforts seem concentrated in “alien territories,” fighting and training “aliens” that might turn on the West later, and all of our Nations’ major war efforts seemingly drag out for ever…

No proper end game that logically makes sense is ever presented to the public and when getting an insight into the world of those who run these things, it doesn’t really seem like these characters know what the deal is either (unless a battle ground is simply needed in order to train soldiers and test new equipment).

Warriors & Citizens – American Views of Our Military edited by Kori Schake & Jim Mattis.

A parallel can be drawn to hacker activists, who don’t seem too concerned with allies. They’ll attack an enemy of the West one day only to target Western political and military structures the next, potentially jeopardising the integrity and safety of a Nation State or its military operations.

When reading about community organisers you see this pattern of behaviour once again.  A lot of left-wing activism simply cancels itself out, since the only common denominator seems to be emotionalism. Due to this you’ll get contradicting agitation and advocacy that will leave someone like myself slightly confused, as there is no End Game in sight anywhere.

If you look at Islamic agitation in Europe it is very easy to understand what their End Game and overarching goal is. They engage in demographic expansionism into Europe, which gradually gives them a political advantage. Wealthy Muslim power-players buy themselves into Western Corporations which gives them cultural influence and leverage. Street-level Muslims carve out their own territories and then defend these. Mosques are erected further cementing a claim to a specific territory boosting confidence, while a romanticized fantasy of Islamic Imperialism, appealing to people’s sense of identity and innate penchant for ancestry-worship, is promoted. Of course, as always, not all. But you don’t need every member of a specific group to behave in this particular fashion for it to have its desired effect. My impression of European Islamification is that there is a long-term vision, coupled with a willingness to commit to certain behaviours, in order to eventually reach a clearly defined outcome: Nation States that become compatible in their policies and in their cultures with the Muslim faith, preferably paving the way for a new “Golden-Age.” Of course it is of importance to point out the ethnic and racial diversity within Islam, and that there are numerous conflicting denominations within the faith as well. As an example: we can now clearly observe, imported tribal disagreements and feuds, in Europe, in addition to all of our own inter-ethnic issues that we had from before….

Inter-ethnic dissonance is very prevalent in Africa; which is generally referred to as the most diverse continent on the surface of the earth.

So what can be said of the West? What is our End Game? What can be observed and what conclusions can be drawn? 

What would make sense, instinctively,  would be to have common ancestry as the glue holding Europe together. Race has become way more inclusive than what it used to be, since we now largely see Race as something observable, while ethnic groups give us what has become our European Nation States, with its specific cultures and characteristics.  Back in the day these used to be chopped up into various tribes that probably displayed a lot of similar traits to one another, hence our generalisation regarding population groups contained within the boundaries of the modern Nation State: an extended family sharing common ancestry and a similar distribution of genetic traits on average.

It would make sense if our Nation States in Europe concerned themselves with the protection of our shared and individual cultural heritage, doing everything to ensure the survival and majority status of white children (and mixed whites) in the only territory that actually belongs a 100% to whites, protecting our continent’s borders and integrity.

A strong unified Europe and more broadly speaking, a strong unified West with the more multi-racial configurations found within territories conquered by whites, would in theory make sense.

Is this an End Game for what is collectively known as The West though? No.

This would be a racist objective. It would insinuate that Ethnic-Europeans have a natural claim to a specific territory and that conquest is a legitimate way to establish a Nation, which is what a white presence in all other territories other than Europe is a result of. (To my knowledge … It certainly looks that way when observing strange geographic settlements by Whites and the presence of dark-skinned indigenous groups).

The prevalent mythos championed in the West is this:

  1. that all other groups are minorities, even if Europe looks very small when compared to other continents, and we are outnumbered globally speaking.
  2. That the magic soil theory is truth, meaning that you’ll automatically become  Swedish by simply breathing the air in Sweden.
  3. That all human beings are born equal due to a blank slate, and that genetics simply don’t exist.
  4. That talking about genetics and genuine diversity is dangerous because that will instantly turn you into Hitler and result in a new Holocaust.
  5. That it makes sense to celebrate white ethnic groups becoming minorities, after years of civil-rights battles in the U.S.A. to ensure equal opportunity regardless of skin colour, and after years of Whites trying to do good towards previously marginalised and abused non-white minority groups within their domains. Not to forget: the constant focus on the challenges faced by so-called (and genuine) minorities within traditionally White-majority constructs. None of this paints minority-status in an appealing light … yet we should do everything in our power to lay the groundwork for our own marginalisation…. which is particularly interesting when reading about the merciless brutality in other parts of the world perpetrated by non-white majorities…
  6. That previous white expansionism will just be forgotten, since Whites have decided to “play nice,” which means that we no longer have any enemies and don’t really need any borders….
  7. That only white ethnic groups can be guilty of racism and imperialistic activity.
  8. That white ethnic groups are not under any circumstance “indigenous” and that there will at no point be any need to give any white demographic the status of “protected group.”
  9. That race and/or ethnicity is only real and only counts if/when dealing with “indigenous people,” who can under no circumstance be white. These “indigenous” groups are also the only ones entitled to certain territories that have to be protected in order to ensure their survival.
  10. That charity is only needed in the 3rd world as it is probably your own fault if you are poor and hungry in the superior, egalitarian, socialist inspired constructs that make up the Western World.
  11. That you have to import workers from Africa and The Middle East, rather than employing individuals from territories closer to your own, or within your own continent.
  12. That mixing on a massive scale is always peaceful and not the result of violent demographic change or militant conquest.
  13. That re-writing history and engaging in gas-lighting on a National and/or Continental level is perfectly alright in order to salvage vanity projects initiated by international organisations, that might look good on paper and in theory; until inserting the human factor into the equation actually implementing the idea.

Ok. So this doesn’t look too promising. Then what about Christianity? This is multi-racial, multiethnic and global. It is way more inclusive and has been used as a unifying factor in Europe before…

The West has continuously acted as an enemy to Christian groups in the Middle East, facilitating genocidal persecution of genuine Christian minority tribes. Western governments not only promote the build-down of Christianity within Europe and all other territories under White influence, they actively side with Nations and regimes known for violent Christian persecution.

What about human-rights, enlightenment ideas, world peace and the “human race”?

Western governments have repeatedly sided with regimes guilty of outrageous human rights abuses, making themselves guilty of gross hypocrisy since human rights and the protection of humanity as a whole has become the main narrative and general raison d’être of Western groups.

Portraying oneself as a defender of the human race also becomes tricky as you cannot possible go out there and claim that population group A needs more protection and privileges than population group B as this would be racist and undermine universal rights. And how on earth can you even say population group A and B when race/ethnicity isn’t even real? You cannot say that religious group A is more guilty of persecution than religious group B, because why would religious group B be more righteous or in need of more protection than the other? Are you a bigot or what?

Who are you to say that Terrorists don’t have rights or don’t have a point, when you claim to be a defender of all of humanity? And how on earth do you even define a “War on Terror” or “Terrorists”? Any person or group could fall into this category when nothing is specified.

These kind of points can be spinned indefinitely putting The West in a situation where none of its actions can be seen as righteous and/or legitimate.

It opens up the door for a potential legal, moral and PR nightmare where The West and its natural inhabitants never win.

It also puts Western Nation states in a situation where an enemy cannot be clearly defined, at least not in public, due to important exotic alliances and potential diplomatic disasters. By relying on exotic alliances for abstract military operations, the West paints  itself into a corner, where they cannot kick out subversive elements within their own nations if these stem from their good “friends and allies.”

The West is forced into a position where it cannot really look after the interests of its own inhabitants, nor enforce the heritage and integrity of itself.

Not to forget that The West is put into an incredibly awkward situation when Western leaders cannot clearly formulate anything, if interested in maintaining good international relationships.

This results in cringe worthy narratives that leaves all of those who don’t just parrot our “modern shared values” confused and puzzled. What are we all about really? Does anyone know?

What about Capitalism then? A support for this must surely be a constant factor from The Americans at least? 

No. Think again. The U.S.A. is willing to tolerate oppressive communist regimes that in the long run pose a threat to the American experiment and their global influence, as long as the U.S.A. can gain from such an alliance in the short run.

So what is The End Game of The West? 

Strangely and worryingly enough there doesn’t seem to be one……(but I might be very wrong, after all, who knows what goes on behind the scenes…).

At best it can be argued that there are forces within The West championing stability trough whatever means by expanding the police state and surveillance of their own citizens. This though is worked against by leaders who don’t want to acknowledge the effects of demographic change. In addition it facilitates the very form of governance that Western Nations are outspokenly against, not to forget that the identity destruction currently happening in The Western world work against any conservation efforts intended to protect our cultural and ethnic inheritance, while simultaneously compromising stability and security; in short, all of it compromises the survival of those people who occupy the territories that we collectively refer to as The West.

 

Diversity – Why It Is A Complex Issue.

Several times I’ve received great expertise and service at the hands of personnel of immigrant background in the UK. I’ve ran into successful mixed couples, my own family is at this point multi-ethnic and an old childhood friend of mine has converted to Islam, even adopting a “foreign” way of speaking her native language …

On the other hand; there is an over-representation of immigrants when it comes to crime, prisons in the UK are recruitment grounds for Islamists, territories are becoming no-gone zones for European natives and European nations are constantly being undermined in terms of their cultural identity and heritage in order to be “open” and “inclusive.” Quotas are enforced, killing off the idea of a meritocracy, racial targeting of “whites” is rampant when it comes to sex-attacks committed by Muslims not to mention the well documented struggle a great amount of migrants face when trying to function within a western democratic societal structure.

It is easy to become sceptical towards diversity when focusing on the latter, but equally easy to feel guilty about these feelings when encountering likeable and/or high achieving individuals from the same group as mentioned above. It is equally disappointing if stereotypes are re-inforced and confirmed by the behaviour of those of immigrant background as one lives in the hope that all of these are the products of biased, out of date, prejudiced thinking.  It must surely be beneficial to “import” high achievers into ones society as long as these individuals don’t engage in cultural subversion, just as it cannot possibly be in the interest of any reasonable ruler to flood their nation with the very worst from other cultures.

It is especially interesting to note that certain European leaders threaten those who don’t want to listen to them, with sending in more migrants. By referring to these people like they are some sort of a weapon, these politicians display that they are conscious and fully aware of the current “European issue” which of course can make one question their motives and end goal with importing even more aliens indiscriminately . 

It is easier to call someone out on their “funky business” when dubious leaders are impeded from hiding behind foreigners … My father for example, explained how “cultural marxists” wished to destroy an old Norwegian fortress of historical significance, erecting housing projects in its stead. Why tear down a monument of military significance if not to dismantle parts of a nations cultural heritage? Again, the agenda of the “deconstructionists” become apparent when they don’t have Islam and/or any other alien group to hide behind…..

How can the current cultural crisis be solved in Europe? That is a very good question as one cannot forget or deny the bad, nor can generalisation be allowed to destroy and undermine valuable contributions from individuals. There is no reason to be filled with antipathy when running into a well integrated, well functioning foreigner, but there is also a serious danger to the integrity and safety of a nation if the “common-will” is to “give up” ones territory entirely, especially when this happens voluntarily, willingly … which surely must be unprecedented, historically speaking….

If one is to follow the current progressive agenda, it means undermining and de-valuing blood spilled by previous generations who died in battle to preserve the dignity, borders and future of Europe’s various indigenous ethnic groups. It is a sensitive and problematic issue, that can neither be brushed under the carpet or be entirely presented in a grim light. In my opinion it is crucial that immigration is halted completely from cultures alien to the European continent as of now, in order to stabilise a very unstable situation. If it could become illegal by law for future immigrants to self-segragate then maybe this could help as well. Massive responsibility rests on the shoulders of our civilian leadership that have as of now failed miserably by not being more critical as well as modest when opening up the “gates.”

As flawed and divisive as multiculturalism is, it has become our reality and with that reality comes an avalanche of social issues that has to be addressed in a balanced and nuanced way, without destroying the integrity and validity of western societies, without altering and falsifying history in order to sell fictious modern narratives, without diminishing western authority or smashing any hopes of future prosperity for those law abiding, well integrated aliens who would be unethical, immoral and unheard of to deport.

  1. A very important and accurate article. If you have limited time then please read this and the article mentioned about Western Civilisation, below. ↓
  2. An equally important article about a topic that should concern us all: The Crisis of Western Civ.
  3. The President of the German police union, admits that “integration” has failed ever since Germany initiated their “multiculturalism project.” For 30 years we’ve proven that it can’t be done – the Video has English subtitles.
  4. This is part II of an extremely interesting article concerning “high-trust” vs. “low-trust” cultures. This is a must read for all of those who don’t believe in borders and who don’t want to admit that “genuine diversity” exists. It also presents a completely different perspective in the migrant debate: Why are those who chased away Europeans risking their lives to get back under Euro-rule? A very awkward scenario for sure.
  5. This is a very intriguing article about (drumroll) Sweden … It is the descendants of immigrants who are guilty of the crime wave. Who would have thought?
  6. This is an alarming video. A must see as it talks about future migrant predictions. Any individual who justify strengthening other continents and nations, should think about the repercussions this can have for our future.Our future problem with Africa.
  7. A shocking article about:Totalitarian Sweden. This is a story of a couple who unfortunately found themselves in the middle of altercations between “new-Swedes” and the police. They filmed the ordeal and uttered “anti-migrant-sentiments” which isn’t strange considering how Sweden is currently suffering under the “humanitarian-load.” The result? They were asked to denounce their quips by admitting to having “unsound minds” due to mental health. It is an interesting thing to note that mental disorders are increasingly stigmatised in order to cover up both “terrorist-activity” and “resentment towards migrants.” An ugly reality. Very ugly and utterly oppressive. The couple was fired and had their equipment confiscated. 
  8. Erdogan addressed an issue that those on the right (and probably the police & the military) have been concerned  about for a long time. – Look at us we are so many, & look at you, you are so few…. – Turkish Agitation Europe.
  9. This is an article about the same problem, the quotes are in English, but the main text is in Norwegian. Foreign agitation.
  10. This is the second video I’ve seen of an Italian reporter being chased by migrants when reporting on their ordeal. One of the videos I linked to here on my blog was from the satirical news-program”Striscia La Notizia” who were creating a  critical story about the “new arrivals” and their criminal activity, but this video , depicts a female reporter for a serious tv-program creating a sympathetic portrayal of the hardships of the migrants before an alien man tries to attack her and she is thankfully rescued by a taxi driver… In the (now)removed video you can hear her saying that the “refugees” are heading north…..Nice.
  11. According to this reportage this lady understands “Arabic.” This made it possible for her to understand what “the new arrivals” were saying as she witnessed the alien masses streaming into the continent. An interesting watch.
  12.  A couple of articles about the tragedy that is “modern-Sweden.” Our neighbours have become a cautionary tale for anyone who might feel inclined to support “feminist politics” or the idea of being “a humanitarian superpower.” This article is in English but this other article that is very descriptive of the deep cultural issue is in Swedish. Hate-crimes are a very “real-thing” but not quite how the mainstream might imagine it. Racism is rampant towards ethnic locals. Now how to you explain or justify that?
  13. The online-behaviour depicted in this article is spot on. Anyone reacting to the recent terrorists attacks in England with anger “reacted wrong.” It is of course understandable that individuals with limited knowledge about the current “ice-berg-issue-with-immigrants” will perceive terrorism in Europe as the “act-of-evil-people” not as the ‘visible-tip-of-a-gigantic-ice-berg.” If the mainstream media were more vocal and if people paid more attention to mainstream and independent news, they would be mortified. Never before has an enemy been more excused or loved.
  14. Ariana Grande is more equipped than the Pentagon to handle the terror threat apparently….It’s the end of the world as we know it, & I don’t feel fine.
  15. The best anti-west propaganda ever. This video is a must watch!
  16. A peaceful Muslim doing the right thing.
  17. 23.000 Jihadis are strolling around in the streets of Britain, taking it easy. The quotes in this article are in English, so it is possible to understand the issue, the rest of the text is in Norwegian. The mess.
  18. Aesthetic perimeters in France. Yes. It is not nice to call a spade a spade. I remember walking underneath the Eiffel tower taking lots of breathtaking pictures in 2007. Shame that I don’t know where those photos are anymore.
  19. A very interesting “Macron-leak” if it is genuine. Apparently it is. I remember having to frequent “mandatory French classes for non-French speakers” when I attended school in France. I was the only non-muslim and beside one Arab boy and myself nobody else even bothered to put in any effort to learn French. They were just killing time, mocking the initiative. Taking into consideration that the EU apparently envisions “the new-European man” these documents shouldn’t come as a surprise. 😦
  20. If you feel like going for a swim in Europe.
  21. What really happened at the Bataclan?
  22. A very good article presented in a very professional manner about modern-Europe.
  23. The Catholic Church’s Involvement with Immigration. This is why people lose faith. At least in the organised-established-corruptible-bureaucratic-structure.
  24. A tragic video about the destruction of English identity … the worst part is that you can’t make this up.
  25. It is predicted that “Swedish-conditions” will contaminate our nation as well. It is said than coming generations will be worse. This article is about crime committed by immigrants/aliens in Norway.
  26. Norway’s official conservative newspaper declaring that “Europe is not primarily a Christian continent” before they continue with their ethno-masochism in order to protect Islam.
  27. A Norwegian independent news website, set the record straight regarding our cultural heritage and ancestry. The title of this article translates into ” Aftenposten have chosen submission.”
  28. A shocking article from Norway’s official statistics bureau revealing that we have more Polish immigrants in Norway than people from “alien cultures.” This is very revealing when one considers how representative other cultures are in terms of crime and racist activity directed towards locals…A surprising find…
  29. Yet if one looks closely … Population predictions Norway…do we have reason to worry? Absolutely if one looks closely at the methods of the bureau; at a certain point you are considered a “Norwegian” even though you are technically a foreigner.
  30. This is very bad news about Norway’s “welfare-bubble,” contrary to what our leaders like to delude their voters into believing, Norway is not the world’s richest country and needs to wake up!
  31. This theory could very well be why we’ve deluded ourselves:The Noble Savage
  32. A very interesting article with this off-putting title:”Breivik’s Norway.” It is a worthy read and especially interesting if what ABB wrote is actually true. Wether it is or not is hard to tell, unless he contacted the authorities each time he bore witness to a hate-crime.
  33. A video about the current ordeal in our part of the world:”Diversity in Europe.”
  34. A disturbing article that everyone should read. I’ve shared it several times and will probably continue doing so:”Racism towards Whites.
  35. Here are some videos/articles from Tommy Robinson. He is commonly depicted as a “right-wing-extremist” but this does not seem particularly accurate. Please take the time to check out this:”Justice for Chelsey.” This is a very good video that anyone should take the time to watch: “Maajid Nawas vs. Tommy Robinson.” This is Robinson making videos about how upset he is about racist violence in England:”Tommy Robinson” & “Tommy Robinson Again.
  36. This might be the reason as to why “integration” has failed in Europe. We’ve created  specific systems for ourselves and there is no guarantee that other people will neither like our constructs nor function within them: “All traits are heritable.
  37. More about our genetic heritage: “Replicants.”
  38. Evolution is happening faster than what we thought … we are becoming even more different to one another: “We Are All Mutants.
  39. A very interesting read that should be made mandatory:”The Race FAQ.”
  40. Another article along the same lines:”Such a thing as Race.”
  41. How the world reacts to unconventional truths:”The Ugliness of reality.”
  42. How to write an article meant to condemn only to sound like you’re endorsing “the enemy” since what ‘the bad-guy” said makes sense …Charles Murray.
  43. Genes… notice how the picture in this article, published by a mainstream media outlet has been removed by The New York Times….I took a screen shot of it ↓Diversity
  44. A very interesting guy sharing lots of relevant information. I’ve checked out all of these:”Information Processing – Several Articles.
  45. 100 Years of Ideology. This is quite interesting. It’s in all in the blood as our ancestors said.
  46. More of the same:”Bowling with our own.”
  47. How a brilliant man lost everything due to his lack of political correctness:”Watson.”
  48. Nixon talking about IQ:”Nixon phone conversation.
  49. Here are a coupe of articles about “The Alt-Right.” I don’t know enough about this guy to have an opinion, some say he is a right-wing extremist, others say he is not. I’m certainly not endorsing neo-nazis but the articles I’ve linked to are worthy a read. “Why is the alt-right so threatening?” & “The long history of “Nazi punching.”
  50. A Donald Trump supporter losing his love for The President. I still like the Trump administration, but it’s interesting to read/see other perspectives….
  51. I don’t like the style of this YouTuber at all, but he has some interesting points. So even though I find his presentation vulgar, it doesn’t hurt checking it out: “This week in stupid.”
  52. An interesting video about the skeptic community. It is very true that people construct their very own carefully designed echo-chambers. Trying to open people’s eyes to untraditional narratives is a hopeless operation. I’ve officially given up. There will be no more entries about “the Islamist-threat” coming from me after this. I’ve said a lot, I’ve proposed solutions, I think the only next step would be to 1)write petitions &/or 2) run for office. “The End of the Skeptic Community.
  53. Since this entry is about diversity it makes sense to include this intriguing video about: “The Kurdish Question.” This is very informative and eye-opening. Please check it out!
  54. I will finish off this long entry with links to a number of articles from Norway; some of these I’ve been thinking about translating. I will publish at least one of them in English, in due time….  “Politics vs. Emotionalism.” this article describes how the west has fallen for “the emotional” rather than the “boring, factual, realpolitik.” It was very enlightening to read it actually as it is very easy to recognise where/how we are failing. In my opinion it should be: 1)illegal to promise unrealistic policy-changes that cannot be fulfilled & 2)illegal to drastically alter war-efforts, initiated by the outgoing administration, if it is detrimental to the desired outcome of the involvement. No wonder the world is as messy as it is when one administration can initiate a war-effort and a new, incoming administration has the power to just abruptly halt it. If you have made the decision to overthrow a regime – then you better make sure that you got things under control maintaining a presence in the region. It’s not about popularity or at least it shouldn’t be. It is about what is best for the country. This next article is about how the “mainstream” try to sell a narrative about how Norway used to have Sharia-law… if you ever wondered how deep we’ve sunk into denial over our own identity then look no further than here: “Re-defining what it means to be ethnic-Norwegian,” uff…excuse me if I vomit. Our police-force is being nannied by “sociologists” who will probably succeed in making officers quit in protest. They do everything in their power not only to undermine Norwegian identity but to deny Norway’s problems with crime due to our “cultural enrichment.” When you try to be a cop … in a politically correct climate…
  55. The title of this article is: Europeans will lose the only place on the planet, that they call “theirs.” & Europe the proud, has become an old lady tired of life who refuses to eat. Very good articles that should be translated into English….
  56. Here is an overview of Norwegians killed by foreigners in Norway between 1981-2008. At least 58 individuals were killed in this time-period a pretty  big number compared to the 4-5 foreigners killed by Norwegians in the same time-frame. I have written about the racist murder on Benjamin Hermann before, but I had no idea that the number of murders directed towards “100%” Norwegians looked like this…it is a very different story than the one presented by the major media-outlets out there. Where is SOS Racism when ethnic-Norwegians are the victims? (Si det….man kan jo spoerre seg…)Due to how unconventional-facts have a tendency to disappear, (just look at the article I shared concerning the police) I’ll paste in the article in its entirety below. This is not mine in any way, I’m just spreading this information and making sure that if it gets deleted, well…then there is a backup here (I’ve added the highlights):“Frem fra glemselen”

    Siden 1981 til og med 2008, er minst 58 norske menn og kvinner blitt drept i Norge av utlendinger eller noen med innvandrerbakgrunn. Det er en lang rekke av drap som hver gang knapt fikk en avisnotis og i dag er fortiet og glemt. I samme tidsrom er 4-5 innvandrere blitt drept av nordmenn.

    1 1981, sommer, Bjørn Erik Solberg, Oslo, 24 år, skulle hjelpe en kvinne som ble trakassert av sin mann, men ble i stedet knivdrept av mannen som var en innvandrer fra Nord-Afrika

    2 1991, ? mars, Gunvor Refsdal, forgiftet med timetylklorid i vin av sin mann Hani Abdullah.

    3 1991, 3. sept. Tage Ansethmoen, Oslo, lege, drept med 20 knivstikk i sitt hjem av en marokkaner.

    4 1991, 14. des. Jarle Næss, Bergen, 23 år, dørvakt og bokser. Skutt midt i hjertet og drept med en halvautomatisk 11,25 Remington US Army, av marokkaneren Nour-Eddin Khouya, utenfor utestedet Maxime i Bergen. Marokkaneren kom til Norge i aug. 1990, og får midlertidig oppholdstillatelse. Kameraten til Næss, Bård Trones (25) blir skutt i magen, men overlever.

    5 1992, 26. jan. Tore A. Holthe, Gjøvik, 27 år, knivdrept av to marokkanere – 24 og 31 år.

    6 1992, 14. aug. Paul Gamlem, 31 år, ble sparket til døde i Oslo av to pakistanere – 17 og 19 år.

    7 1993, 7. mars, Berit Backer, sos. arbeider, ble kvalt i sitt hjem av en innvandrer fra Kosovo. Drapsmannen ble idømt sikring, men fikk senere norsk statsborgerskap og oppholdstillatelse i 2001.

    8 1993, 24. april, Linda M. Sandvik, 24 år, Oslo, Kvalt av en iraker, – også tiltalt for flere voldtekter.

    9 1994, 21. juli, en nordmann ble knivdrept i Larvik av en palestiner. (Nærmere detaljer mangler).

    10 1995, 13. okt. Kvinne, 57 år, sos. arbeider – brent inne da en iraner tente på Veitvedt sosialkontor.

    11 1996, 17. des. Heidi S. Sørli, drept av sin jugoslaviske mann som rømte, – er ikke pågrepet.

    12 1997, 3. mars, Randi Rastad, Høybråten, 61 år ble dyttet ned i kjelleren av utlendinger fra Brumunddal og døde av sjokk/ hjerteattakk.

    13 1997, (6.?) nov. Hilmar Jarle Fjørtoft 68 år, pensjonert sjømann fra Ålesund, ble funnet drept i sin egen leilighet i Latinskolegata 6. Fjørtoft var blitt utsatt for grov stump vold. Gjerningsmannen var tamilen Sivaguru som kom som asylsøker til Hareid i 1987. Tamilen fikk 12 års fengsel pluss sikring. Straffen omfattet også voldtekt, seksuelle overgrep og grov vold. Han slapp ut tre år før tiden. Nå er han tiltalt for to nye voldtekter i Ålesund (aug. 2007).

    14 1998, 1. mai, Tom Halvorsen, Rogaland, 18 år, drept ved tvangsdrukning. Vietnamesisk aksjon.

    15 1998, 21. mai, Ken-Gøran Abrahamsen, Balsfjord, 28 år, sparket i hjel i Oslo av 17 årig pakistaner.

    16 1998, ? ? En ung nordmann kom tilfeldig i ildlinjen mellom to innv. gjenger i Oslo og ble skutt.

    17 1998, 15. juli, Marie Louise Bendiksen, Sjøvegan, drept og brent. En 20 årig tamil pågrepet.

    18 1998, 26. juni, Bernt Chr. Reppe, Moelv, 24 år, skutt av en pakistaner i Rosenkratzgt, Oslo.

    19 1998, 31. okt. Rune Åge Berg, sparket i hjel av en 16-årig makedoner i Akersgata, Oslo.

    20 1998, 14. nov. Ulf Bråthen, 42 år, taxisjåfør skutt i bilen av to utlendinger (19 og 23 år) på Godlia.

    21 1998, 10. des. Ola Wangen, 33 år, knivdrept på Grunerløkka av en sinnssyk iraner på frifot.

    22 1999, 17. mai, Barbro Zhedini, Oslo, drept av sin tunisiske mann Hassa Zhedini og dumpet i Gjersjøen. En arm avskjært. Hassa Zhedinis bror var med på ugjerningen.

    23 2000, 31. jan. Vegar Midtveit, 18 år – jaget av utlendinger utfor en skrent ved Kristiansand – og døde.

    24 2001, ?. jan. Gry Husein, funnet i Skienselva, kvalt av sin palestinske mann Gamal – fra Israel.

    25 2001, 20. jan. Kennet Alexander Otnes, Larvik, 20 år, øksedrept, partert og lagt i dypfryser av en 18 årig afrikaner.

    26 2001, 27. juli, Hanne Kristine Olsen, Bergen, 29 år, ble kjørt ned og drept av sin palestinske samboer, Yasin Jabr, 40 år. Deres barn ble hardt skadd.

    27 2001, 8. aug. Gunn Sivertsen, Haramsøy, og hennes 3 barn ble mordbrendt av sin chilenske samboer.

    28 2001, Gunn Sivertsens første barn.

    29 2001, Gunn Sivertsens andre barn.

    30 2001, Gunn Sivertsens tredje barn.

    31 2001, 26. aug. Gunn Merete Lode, 32 år, knivdrept av en 42 årig gift trebarns far fra Danmark.

    32 2002, 20. jan. Kristoffer I. Bastesen, 19 år, knivdrept i Kr. Augusts gt, Oslo av sin thailandske kamerat.

    33 2002, 13. apr. Einar T. Rønning, Råde, 23 år, dørvakt på Chez, knivstukket i lysken av 4 muslimer.

    34 2002, 13. apr. Martin Morisse, Jessheim, 26 år, dørvakt på Chez, knivstukket i lysken av 4 muslimer.

    35 2002, 9. okt. Kjell P. Dahlberg, 48 år, knivdrept på Bogerud T-bane i Oslo av en chilensk asylsøker.

    36 2002, 18. okt. Inger Sund, Sognsvn. Oslo, 69 år, ranet og drept i sitt hjem av to asylsøkere som hadde fulgte etter Inger etter at hun hadde vunnet 30.000 på bingo. Drapsmannen, Moez Ben Noureddeine Rouissi, klarte å rømme ut av Norge. Via Tyskland ble drapsmannens identitet oppsporet. Han hadde blitt retunert til Tunisia av tyske myndigheter, der han ble idømt 15 års fengsel for drapet, i 2007.

    37 2002, 3. nov. Johnny Øvergård, Balsfjord, 43 år. Drept av sin somaliske drosjesjåfør på Frogner.

    38 2002, 13. des. Henry Simonsen, Alta, 56 år, drept med øks av sin russiske kone, Elizaveta Georgienna Sytnik.

    39 2003, 17. feb. Audun Bøland, 39 år, bussjåfør, knivdrept på Valdresbussen av en asylsøker fra Etiopia. Etioperen hadde samme dag drept en annen asylsøker på et asylmottak i Valdres.

    40 2003, 15. juni, Anie B. Olsvik, Haugesund, 83 år, drept om natten i sin seng av to innv. fra Libya.

    41 2003, ? des. Cathrine Halvorsen, Kongsvinger, 34 år, drept av en iraker. Azad Ghaleb Ali som er siktet, klarte å rømme. Politiet er derimot sikre på at det er Ghaleb Ali som er gjerningsmannen.

    42 2004, 19. febr. Eli S. Høyland, Stavanger, 49 år, kvalt i sitt hjem av en Tysker, 29 år.

    43 2004, 3. aug. Terje Mjåland, Skien, 23 år, døv, knivdrept på trikk 17 i Oslo av en somalier, 41 år.

    44 2004, 25. aug. Helge Nylund, 34 år, skutt av en sjalu 52 åring fra Afghanistan. Han skjøt seg selv.

    45 2004, 4. sept. Marita Strøm, Namsos, 38 år, skutt i en bil i Irak av sin mann Osman Omar Osman fra Irak.

    46 2004, ? sept. Lise Johanni Johanson, drept på Teisen i Oslo av en mann fra Irak, 23 år.

    47 2004, 28. okt. Hedda Karterudseter, Seljord, 19 år, kvalt i Sogndal av den gifte somalieren Hassan Samriye Hashin, 35 år.

    48 2005, ? jan. Mary Ann Hansen, Bodø, 42 år, knivdrept av en algirer 31 år, mens hun holdt deres felles barn i armene. Algireren fikk første gang avslag på asylsøknaden i nov. 2002, og endelig avslag, med beskjed om å forlate Norge, i mars 2003.

    49 2006, 20. (?) feb. Finn Abelseth, Oslo, opprinnelig fra Ålesund. I begynnelsen av 30-årene. Mandag 20. feb. ble han funnet bevisstløs utenfor boligen sin i Schønings gate 32. Døde senere på sykehus. Han skal ha blitt banket opp av en gjeng pakistanere natt til søndag 19. Dette i følge en kamerat som Abelseth ringte til før han mistet bevisstheten.

    50 2006, 29. mars, Stein Sjaastad, Oslo, lege 58 år, brutalt stukket ned og drept på sitt kontor av asylsøkeren Kamel Mellah 37 år, fra Algerie.

    51 2006, 25. juni, Anne Marit Søgård, Torshov i Oslo, 41 år, skutt og drept i sin leilighet med 6-8 skudd fra håndvåpen av to pakistanere med norsk statsborgerskap, Haidar Hussain 21 år og Ali Ayaz Shafa 19 år. Søgårds kjæreste ble også forsøkt drept, men overlevde. Hussain ble i nov. 2005 dømt til 2 år ubetinget fengsel for flere brudd på narkotikalovgivningen. Begge pakistanerne ble dømt til fengsel i 13 år, 27. mars 2008. En tredje person ble frifunnet.

    52 2007, 31. jan. Arild Lund, Drammen, 56 år, drept av tre litauere i sitt hjem.

    53 2007, 30. april, Anne Grete Vollum, Overhalla i Nord-Trøndelag, 35 år, gravid med tvillinger i 8. måned, drept av sin tidligere mann asylsøkeren Bahadir Mirzaolimov 26 år fra Usbekistan. Mirzaolimov kom til Norge i 2005, men fikk avslag på sin asylsøknad i 2006.

    54 2007, 30. april, Anne Grete Vollums ufødte barn (tvilling).

    55 2007, 30. april, Anne Grete Vollums ufødte barn (tvilling).

    56 2007, 30. april, Cicilie Watnan Lian, Overhalla i Nord-Trøndelag, 7 år og Anne Grete Vollums niese, drept av Bahadir Mirzaolimov. Vollums ti år gammle datter var også i huset. Hun ble bundet fast under ugjerningene. En av småpikene skal også ha blitt voldtatt av asylsøkeren.

    57 2008, 8. desember, Jonas Pedersen, Oslo, 31 år. Drept av to polakker, 48 og 45 år, etter spark mot hodet i basketak på Europarådets plass i Oslo sentrum. Hendelsen skjedde 6. desember, men Pedersen døde av skadene 8. Den ene av de to ble frikjent, samt en tredje polakk, 36 år, som kjørte bilen.

    58 2008, 16. desember, Ann-Mari Solås, Mørkved utenfor Bodø, 32 år og tobarnsmor. Drept med flere knivstikk utenfor sitt hjem av en iraner, 43 år, som kom til Norge i 1991 som asylsøker gjennom FN. Iraneren ble norsk statsborger i 1998.

    Anmerkning – kommentar til ”Frem fra glemselen”

    Denne lista, med 58 drepte nordmenn fram til og med året 2008, er en konsentrat av notater ved R. Halgjern, Odd Lønø, Torfinn Hellandsvik, Agnar Andersen og Bjørnar Røyset. Lista omfatter kun nordmenn og kvinner som er drept i Norge av noen med innvandrer bakgrunn. Derfor er det ikke tatt med utlendinger som er kommet til Norge og blitt drept her av våre innvandrere/ asylsøkere, heller ikke er tatt med nordmenn som drar til andre land og blir drept der.

    Lista viser at i 10-års periode fra og med 1995 – til og med 2004, er 34 norske blitt drept i Norge av innv. utlendinger (i gjennomsnitt 30 stk.). I samme tiårs periode er det registrert 3 (tre) drap på innvandrere i Norge som er begått av nordmenn.

    Denne drapslista gir fullverdig grunnlag for beregning av denne makabre utviklingen (prognoser) i lang tid framover – og hvem som er mest kriminell.

    Innvandrerbefolkningen, ca. 400.000 (i 2005) (inkl. svensker), utgjør bare ca 1/12 del av Norges totale befolkning Allikevel blir altså i gjennomsnitt ca. 10 nordmenn i dag drept for hver innvandrer som blir drept av nordmenn.

    Dersom innvandrerbefolkningen blir like stor som den etnisk norske befolkning om ca. 45 år – uten å endre sin kriminelle tendens – vil altså drapslista vise 12 ganger flere drepte nordmenn – med ca. 360 per 10 år, mens nordmenn vil gjøre seg skyld i 3 drap på innvandrerbefolkningen i samme 10-års periode. Dette fordi antallet etniske nordmenn ikke vil bli høyere enn i dag..

    Dersom man med grunnlag i nevnte tallfakta vil beregne den prosentvise andel av denne kriminaliteten i forhold til størrelsen på dem nevne folkegrupper – for dermed å se hvem som er mest kriminell – har jeg kommet fram til følgende reelle prosentsats:

    Innvandrerne står 99,17 prosent og nordmennene står for 0,83 prosent av alle drepte i denne sammenheng.

    Nevnte prosentsats vil ikke endre seg selv om innvandrerbefolkningen blir like stor eller høyere enn den opprinnelige norske befolkningen omkring år 2045 – slik realistiske antropologer har forutsett. Når det gjelder voldtekt, ran og mishandlinger, er antakelig den prosentvise andel omtrent det samme.

    Ovenstående fakta og prognoser blir den bitre virkelighet dersom utviklingen får fortsette i samme spor som nå. Hvis man vil unngå, eller stoppe utviklingen mot en slik virkelighet om ca. 45 år, – må noe drastisk og effektivt iverksettes – og det straks! Noe å tenke på for våre naive og tafatte politikere!

    Agnar Andersen