Having A Raison D’être & An End Game – The Impression One Can Get.

Standard

When reading about the Iraq war last year I was stunned to see the willingness to sacrifice the integrity of Europe on the altar of momentary territorial access needed in order to get into Iraq.

“Plan Of Attack” by Bob Woodward.

“Decision Points” by George W. Bush.

I was further mystified by the fact that 4-star Army General (ret.) Colin Powell came across as the one lone voice of reason, since he tried to raise awareness of tribalism and ethnic diversity in the targeted area.

The reading certainly gave me the impression that humans are simply being seen as replaceable cogs in the machinery by the establishment.

Culture and ethnicity simply doesn’t matter, it is all about momentary victory, without any overarching solid narrative selling a clearly defined End Game, that will be reached by many separate actions all serving the same underlying objective.

This is a startling realisation.

When reading “The Art Of War” I was surprised about what sort of advice it contained. Prolonged warfare with no end in sight is depicted as one of the worst projects that a Nation can ever engage in. A group that engages in warfare also have to ensure that they have access to an efficient supply line, taking advantage of whatever resources the group can get their hands on as they expand into a territory. A war effort should be swift and precise, without too much meddling from sovereigns located far away. The people who are on the ground need to be able to do what is necessary to reach their goal in a completely mobilised way, to the extent that this is possible.

All of this certainly made me question the sort of warfare that people my age have grown accustomed to. All of our Nations’ war efforts seem concentrated in “alien territories,” fighting and training “aliens” that might turn on the West later, and all of our Nations’ major war efforts seemingly drag out for ever…

No proper end game that logically makes sense is ever presented to the public and when getting an insight into the world of those who run these things, it doesn’t really seem like these characters know what the deal is either (unless a battle ground is simply needed in order to train soldiers and test new equipment).

Warriors & Citizens – American Views of Our Military edited by Kori Schake & Jim Mattis.

A parallel can be drawn to hacker activists, who don’t seem too concerned with allies. They’ll attack an enemy of the West one day only to target Western political and military structures the next, potentially jeopardising the integrity and safety of a Nation State or its military operations.

When reading about community organisers you see this pattern of behaviour once again.  A lot of left-wing activism simply cancels itself out, since the only common denominator seems to be emotionalism. Due to this you’ll get contradicting agitation and advocacy that will leave someone like myself slightly confused, as there is no End Game in sight anywhere.

If you look at Islamic agitation in Europe it is very easy to understand what their End Game and overarching goal is. They engage in demographic expansionism into Europe, which gradually gives them a political advantage. Wealthy Muslim power-players buy themselves into Western Corporations which gives them cultural influence and leverage. Street-level Muslims carve out their own territories and then defend these. Mosques are erected further cementing a claim to a specific territory boosting confidence, while a romanticized fantasy of Islamic Imperialism, appealing to people’s sense of identity and innate penchant for ancestry-worship, is promoted. Of course, as always, not all. But you don’t need every member of a specific group to behave in this particular fashion for it to have its desired effect. My impression of European Islamification is that there is a long-term vision, coupled with a willingness to commit to certain behaviours, in order to eventually reach a clearly defined outcome: Nation States that become compatible in their policies and in their cultures with the Muslim faith, preferably paving the way for a new “Golden-Age.” Of course it is of importance to point out the ethnic and racial diversity within Islam, and that there are numerous conflicting denominations within the faith as well. As an example: we can now clearly observe, imported tribal disagreements and feuds, in Europe, in addition to all of our own inter-ethnic issues that we had from before….

Inter-ethnic dissonance is very prevalent in Africa; which is generally referred to as the most diverse continent on the surface of the earth.

So what can be said of the West? What is our End Game? What can be observed and what conclusions can be drawn? 

What would make sense, instinctively,  would be to have common ancestry as the glue holding Europe together. Race has become way more inclusive than what it used to be, since we now largely see Race as something observable, while ethnic groups give us what has become our European Nation States, with its specific cultures and characteristics.  Back in the day these used to be chopped up into various tribes that probably displayed a lot of similar traits to one another, hence our generalisation regarding population groups contained within the boundaries of the modern Nation State: an extended family sharing common ancestry and a similar distribution of genetic traits on average.

It would make sense if our Nation States in Europe concerned themselves with the protection of our shared and individual cultural heritage, doing everything to ensure the survival and majority status of white children (and mixed whites) in the only territory that actually belongs a 100% to whites, protecting our continent’s borders and integrity.

A strong unified Europe and more broadly speaking, a strong unified West with the more multi-racial configurations found within territories conquered by whites, would in theory make sense.

Is this an End Game for what is collectively known as The West though? No.

This would be a racist objective. It would insinuate that Ethnic-Europeans have a natural claim to a specific territory and that conquest is a legitimate way to establish a Nation, which is what a white presence in all other territories other than Europe is a result of. (To my knowledge … It certainly looks that way when observing strange geographic settlements by Whites and the presence of dark-skinned indigenous groups).

The prevalent mythos championed in the West is this:

  1. that all other groups are minorities, even if Europe looks very small when compared to other continents, and we are outnumbered globally speaking.
  2. That the magic soil theory is truth, meaning that you’ll automatically become  Swedish by simply breathing the air in Sweden.
  3. That all human beings are born equal due to a blank slate, and that genetics simply don’t exist.
  4. That talking about genetics and genuine diversity is dangerous because that will instantly turn you into Hitler and result in a new Holocaust.
  5. That it makes sense to celebrate white ethnic groups becoming minorities, after years of civil-rights battles in the U.S.A. to ensure equal opportunity regardless of skin colour, and after years of Whites trying to do good towards previously marginalised and abused non-white minority groups within their domains. Not to forget: the constant focus on the challenges faced by so-called (and genuine) minorities within traditionally White-majority constructs. None of this paints minority-status in an appealing light … yet we should do everything in our power to lay the groundwork for our own marginalisation…. which is particularly interesting when reading about the merciless brutality in other parts of the world perpetrated by non-white majorities…
  6. That previous white expansionism will just be forgotten, since Whites have decided to “play nice,” which means that we no longer have any enemies and don’t really need any borders….
  7. That only white ethnic groups can be guilty of racism and imperialistic activity.
  8. That white ethnic groups are not under any circumstance “indigenous” and that there will at no point be any need to give any white demographic the status of “protected group.”
  9. That race and/or ethnicity is only real and only counts if/when dealing with “indigenous people,” who can under no circumstance be white. These “indigenous” groups are also the only ones entitled to certain territories that have to be protected in order to ensure their survival.
  10. That charity is only needed in the 3rd world as it is probably your own fault if you are poor and hungry in the superior, egalitarian, socialist inspired constructs that make up the Western World.
  11. That you have to import workers from Africa and The Middle East, rather than employing individuals from territories closer to your own, or within your own continent.
  12. That mixing on a massive scale is always peaceful and not the result of violent demographic change or militant conquest.
  13. That re-writing history and engaging in gas-lighting on a National and/or Continental level is perfectly alright in order to salvage vanity projects initiated by international organisations, that might look good on paper and in theory; until inserting the human factor into the equation actually implementing the idea.

Ok. So this doesn’t look too promising. Then what about Christianity? This is multi-racial, multiethnic and global. It is way more inclusive and has been used as a unifying factor in Europe before…

The West has continuously acted as an enemy to Christian groups in the Middle East, facilitating genocidal persecution of genuine Christian minority tribes. Western governments not only promote the build-down of Christianity within Europe and all other territories under White influence, they actively side with Nations and regimes known for violent Christian persecution.

What about human-rights, enlightenment ideas, world peace and the “human race”?

Western governments have repeatedly sided with regimes guilty of outrageous human rights abuses, making themselves guilty of gross hypocrisy since human rights and the protection of humanity as a whole has become the main narrative and general raison d’être of Western groups.

Portraying oneself as a defender of the human race also becomes tricky as you cannot possible go out there and claim that population group A needs more protection and privileges than population group B as this would be racist and undermine universal rights. And how on earth can you even say population group A and B when race/ethnicity isn’t even real? You cannot say that religious group A is more guilty of persecution than religious group B, because why would religious group B be more righteous or in need of more protection than the other? Are you a bigot or what?

Who are you to say that Terrorists don’t have rights or don’t have a point, when you claim to be a defender of all of humanity? And how on earth do you even define a “War on Terror” or “Terrorists”? Any person or group could fall into this category when nothing is specified.

These kind of points can be spinned indefinitely putting The West in a situation where none of its actions can be seen as righteous and/or legitimate.

It opens up the door for a potential legal, moral and PR nightmare where The West and its natural inhabitants never win.

It also puts Western Nation states in a situation where an enemy cannot be clearly defined, at least not in public, due to important exotic alliances and potential diplomatic disasters. By relying on exotic alliances for abstract military operations, the West paints  itself into a corner, where they cannot kick out subversive elements within their own nations if these stem from their good “friends and allies.”

The West is forced into a position where it cannot really look after the interests of its own inhabitants, nor enforce the heritage and integrity of itself.

Not to forget that The West is put into an incredibly awkward situation when Western leaders cannot clearly formulate anything, if interested in maintaining good international relationships.

This results in cringe worthy narratives that leaves all of those who don’t just parrot our “modern shared values” confused and puzzled. What are we all about really? Does anyone know?

What about Capitalism then? A support for this must surely be a constant factor from The Americans at least? 

No. Think again. The U.S.A. is willing to tolerate oppressive communist regimes that in the long run pose a threat to the American experiment and their global influence, as long as the U.S.A. can gain from such an alliance in the short run.

So what is The End Game of The West? 

Strangely and worryingly enough there doesn’t seem to be one……(but I might be very wrong, after all, who knows what goes on behind the scenes…).

At best it can be argued that there are forces within The West championing stability trough whatever means by expanding the police state and surveillance of their own citizens. This though is worked against by leaders who don’t want to acknowledge the effects of demographic change. In addition it facilitates the very form of governance that Western Nations are outspokenly against, not to forget that the identity destruction currently happening in The Western world work against any conservation efforts intended to protect our cultural and ethnic inheritance, while simultaneously compromising stability and security; in short, all of it compromises the survival of those people who occupy the territories that we collectively refer to as The West.

 

Blame It On The Russians…

Standard

Right.  So today I came across an article that seemed interesting and legit at first referring to an interview with the English Secretary of Defence. It certainly echoed other articles I’ve come across with Americans complaining about their military readiness and UK generals doing the same; complaints are publicly filed for the whole world to see from several western Nations.

Female participation is criticised since it makes the forces less combat effective, the attitude of (some I hope) students at military institutions are criticised on both sides of the Atlantic, there seems to be no end to the backlash or complaints made public, which I’m guessing is the result of people rejecting the politically correct culture enforced upon them by politicians and/or a cry for help when it comes to better equipment, more funding or maybe a better way to allocate funds.

A great deal of these things I’ve chosen not to share on my blog, such as a political correctness manual, where “subconscious bias” was fought against. Simply put: if a tiger jumps out of the bushes, you should first spend some time contemplating if the tiger is dangerous and a genuine threat before attacking it, because it could potentially be politically incorrect to do so. This of course refers to social issues within the military and a desire to make military culture more like civilian society, and more appealing to women and members of the LGBTQ community… However it does seem as if though normal human instincts should be fought against and further broken down, which leaves me wondering how a culture like this will affect people in combat?

This political correctness manual was so embarrassing to read, in fact so worrying to see as a civilian, that I decided not to publish it, as I thought of it as a disrespectful act to share something of this nature with anyone. Not to forget something that could potentially work against the recruitment of patriotic individuals and depict the military in an unflattering light. Can it potentially help our armed forces to share articles and pass these around? Can the public help or will it just damage reputation and morale? I certainly think that it can have the effect of pushing more young men into the private sector. This political correctness crusade can become a major issue in the future I think.

Yet, after coming across more and more and more complaints, I decided to do so anyway,    as part of an entry. This PC Manual is official and available for anyone to read and download….. I don’t know how smart that is, but I guess that it is from a post-modern perspective….

Yet the article I read today was, how should I put it, interesting (in lack of a better word) due to the headline pictured above, chosen by the journalist, I’m guessing. Or hoping.

The reason as to why I’m reluctant to share “the-Russians-are-coming-to-get-us-narratives” on my blog should not be surprising, as once again we are moving into “the-boy-who-cried-wolf-territory,” a dangerous narrative to peddle when you are a leader….or more correctly put: this seems to be the case when observing things from a citizen’s perspective, whether correct or not.

What I’m witnessing when travelling/moving around in Europe, what I have seen and heard, what other people are talking about, is apparently Russian propaganda. How can the civilian population take the Russia threat seriously, when the current, imported, internal, threat is not properly addressed by our leadership? It can easily seem (whether genuine or not) that Russia gets picked as a scapegoat, rather than addressing the very real issues and problems that the European population have to deal with everyday. Is Putin to blame for how the so-called migration crisis is handled by the European leadership? Are the Russians to blame for the cultural tensions that we are currently facing as a result of street level diversity and anti-western measures? Sure, who really knows who is behind a bomb going off here and there, but what do you do, when bombs, as I’ve said before, are just the tip of the iceberg? The problems that we Europeans have to deal with are real and genuine and not the result of Russian interference, unless they secretly run the entire world and we are all Russian puppets, which sounds nothing short of insane.

According to Hillary Clinton, Putin was the Godfather of the Alt-Right. As if though Nationalistic sentiments cannot emerge without Russian interference. Trump’s victory was also the result of Russian interference, and so is the general disgruntled air among the European populace, tired of losing their culture and countries to foreigners and politicians with their own strange agenda. I’m guessing that fragmentation within the U.S.A. as a result of criminal gangs and self-segregation, also can be pinned on the Russians. Social cohesion/trust actually breaks down the more ethnic/racial diversity you get within your borders……I’ve linked to articles and studies about this here on my blog, studies and articles by experts from various backgrounds.

Anyway… check this out: currently I’ve borrowed a whole bunch of books about roughly the same topic; in one of these I found a paragraph describing how fearful the English were of a 5th column during WW2. The intelligence community were not interested in German infiltration. Do I have to explain how absurd it this to read about this in the current year? Infiltration is welcomed into our societies, you’ll be called a bigot if you don’t want 5th columns. So if this is the impression civilians get, then how on earth can the Russia narrative be expected to be successful? Where are these Russians destroying us from within? I don’t see them, do you? I do however see expansionist militant Islam, and how new-Europeans carve out territories for themselves (while defending these from us) and as I’ve said before, how long does it take before these expand any further?

It might be that we will be taken by surprise, that Washington’s never-ending Russia paranoia finally will be proven to be right, but as a member of the civilian population, it is very awkward, strange and absurd to buy into this narrative, especially if it is promoted by people in official denial over the issues and problems that Ethnic-Europeans now face. While the people in power officially address China and Russia as our number one enemies, I think civilians will have a hard time to relate, while trying to live normal lives in an ever-changing Europe. Simply put, people are losing their sense of safety, not because of a Russian presence (at this time of writing) but because of the new arrivals into Europe and how scandalously this has been handled. Everything is changing and many are extremely disgruntled with our western leadership as a result, but I guess we should blame that on the Russians……..

 

Oh How You’ve Failed Us With Your “Fine” Ideas.

Standard

To read what inspired me to write this entry read here.

Or here. Or here.

I’ve been thinking for a while that we’ll probably miss these post-WW2 years, where all that could be sensed by those my age at least were the signs of a diseased society and the visible fractures in our constructs mercilessly reminding us of our former glorious splendour.

Observing the political landscape here in England these last days has reserved as a reminder, and a confirmation, as to how our institutions have fallen, and when reading this article that I just came across, it is obvious that the symptoms of continental societal illness are visible and clear to some.

I think we’ll miss those years from 1989 when the wall fell, and up until one specific event in the near future which will be of such magnitude that it will symbolically be the last nail in the coffin for the current European Utopia.

What our leadership leaves behind to people my age and younger are disputed territories, identity confusion, seemingly weak military constructs, outsourced labour, poor infrastructure, crumbling healthcare and lots of debt … in other words – nothing short of chaos. God only knows what will be raised in its stead, because the political visions will surely be many and radically diverse.

Some lessons can be learnt from Europe:

1-Do not mass import people from alien cultures.
2-Do not allow people in from countries you’ve bombed or occupied.
3-Never take loyalty for granted from the son if the immigrant father loves your country. Loyalty to identity and ancestry cannot be bought indefinitely.
4-Do not expect people to sell out their values for government benefits, after all, are you really so cheap that you would sell your beliefs for a BMW?
5-Do not allow people into power who prioritize other citizens over their own.
6-Never allow benefits to become the greatest financial burden of the state.
7-Be clear when it comes to the identity and configuration of your country and nation.
8-Do not forget the founders of your nation and those who died to protect it and build it.
9-Do not allow parallel societies to be established as it will only lead to trouble.
10-If you are to create a Union then create it between strong, independent, sovereign, nations, so that the stronger ones won’t be weakened by the poorer ones, or the weaker ones walked all over by the stronger ones. As both scenarios will sow resentment.
11-The number one duty of a government is to ensure military protection for its citizens.
12-Never de-militarize your society as it will render your country weak from the inside out alienating those willing to serve from the rest of the population.
13-Never create a national culture of guilt.
14-There are no such things as progressive policies, only good and bad ones, and sometimes the good ones are old and tried recipes which have stood the test of time.
15-Do not allow your nation to become a vassal state.
16-Do not allow your nation to be mismanaged for decades as it will probably take even longer to sort it all out.
17-Disrespect will grow if you espouse illegitimate or fake authority.
18-Everyone has to be equal under the law and the law has to be sensible.
19-If you allow one ethnic group to get away with things, do not expect that those who are “easy to police” will remain so for much longer.
20-Make an example out of those who stand for poor leadership – and remember that leadership has nothing to do with being “nice to all” or saying what is “politically correct.”
21-Do not let the roles in your society slip to such an extent that normal citizens have to take on the role as journalists and writers.
22-If the media are acting as tools for propaganda, let it at least be known and legally challenged with opposing propaganda.

Some articles of interest:

  1. This is actually a very important read, not necessarily because I’m against the idea of having “stay-behind-troops” (this is a good thing to have in place) nor that I’m against “anti-communist-measures” but it is the idea that is of interest here. Who stand to benefit from the weakening and downfall of your nation? And at the end of the day: who is really responsible? Is an attack only just that? Is it disguised targeting masked as random acts of terror? And why would you believe those who take official credit? Where does the funding come from if it can be traced?
  2. Word of mouth has it that Norway already has “Swedish Conditions” in certain areas. I also wrote a little while ago that our government had to agree to over 2.000 new quota-refugees in 2018. Still this interview with our immigration & integration minister is interesting.
  3. Dire news regarding England’s Police. Unbelievable both the downsizing and how the funds are being spent. Some months ago I read in an “analogue newspaper” that an ex-police chief was lamenting the current priorities of our police force, such as political correctness training and “bring all of you to work day” (to paraphrase). A transgender friendly initiative/day.
  4. Officially it  is said that this film is from the UK, it certainly looks like it. I’ve seen similar footage across social media from Birmingham and other areas in this country. I’ve also driven through neighbourhoods like this around London and other places in Europe. The New-Europe.  Not to forget what I’ve seen myself.
  5. People smugglers have an easy time in the UK as Border Patrol is suffering from budget cuts leaving the coastline open and vulnerable … incredible. There were people in 2016 who were calling for the resurrection of the “Home Guard,” what I find interesting is this quote that I found in a Wikipedia article about General Sir Anthony Heritage Farrar-Hockley recently: He declared to The Guardian that a secret arms network was established in Britain after the war, but refused to say if it still existed. He aroused controversy in 1983 when he became involved trying to organise a campaign for a new home guard against possible Soviet invasion and in 1990, following Italian Prime minister Giulio Andreotti’s October 1990 revelations concerning Operation Gladio, a NATO stay-behind network, he revealed that the armed anti-communist secret resistance network across western European had involved Britain.[1][5]. I have no idea why any of this would be controversial, especially the revival of the Home Guard? Why would this be looked upon as weird? Why??????????
  6.  A sanction only works if there are no back doors right? That’s what I’m thinking anyway. The Turkish leadership is problematic and their desire for EU membership certainly is as well. The size of their force is not good either. They represent a danger to Europe; not that this is something new. The amount of Turks within European nations as well pose a risk, demonstrated by Erdogan’s recent political agitation, which I wrote about somewhere on this blog 😛 It’s easy to find articles about this anyway…..
  7. Norway has to rent military equipment, sarcastic politicians wonder if we’ll have to rent soldiers as well since the Norwegian military has seen better days.
  8. The author of this article refers to it as provocative behaviour when right-wing activists march through English territory inhabited by Muslims and/or other alien immigrants, as we apparently should consider these zones to be theirs. I assume that we should consider these places lost and keep out of them? What do we do when they inevitably expand? Should Ethnic Britons and other European ethnic groups simply abandon the island, so as to not offend the aliens? The author also has the audacity to claim that you are part of a european ethnic group as long as you’re born here to immigrant parents. A direct assault on ethnic Europeans and our distinct populations, once again. This is a blatant lie. There are races, then there are ethnicities, then you got differences within your ethnic group partly or maybe entirely (?) as a result of your distribution through your own territory, and finally you have individual differences. And there might even be more variances. The fact that the claims in this article are supposed to be accepted as canon is bogus. Feel free to read my “How To Be Evil In 2017.,”entry or my Identity. entry or my Diversity – Why It Is A Complex Issue. entry or this Acid Attacks & Diversity In The UK.

I will share more articles and translate more horrible news articles from Scandinavia. There is one shocking story in particular from Sweden, that illustrates how rape is being used as a weapon against Ethnic European women.

Whatever that is left of the European spirit cannot be allowed to die. If everyone loses faith in Europe we are officially done; and by Europe I mean all of our individual nation states and their distinct European ethnic groups. Our shared and individual heritage is ours and we can not let it go. If we don’t care about our cultures anymore, then why should anyone else? Love your country, love your people, know your history, or you’ll perish.

Persecuted Christians, Racist Trudeau, Enforced Islamification in England, Subverted Institutions in The West, GQ Trying To Ruin Your Thanksgiving, Gaslighting, European Instability, Stalking, Explorers, Lonely Elders, An Angry Rider & Some Light Reading About Love, Among Other Things.

Standard

I’m proud to say that I wrote about the persecution of today’s Christians the second that I heard of it. This is not right. Why aren’t more people writing about the assault on Christianity? It’s a good thing that the Trump administration have mentioned this and that they did so as early as they did. This is an important issue which is strangely enough ignored by many. America to the rescue  & “Christianity is under unprecedented assault in those ancient lands where it first grew,” the vice president said. “Across the wider Middle East, we can now see a future in many areas without a Christian faith. But tonight, I came to tell you: Help is on the way.”

Taken from the article I pasted in at the top of this entry: “At a time in the West when there is increasing media focus on the rights of people regardless of gender, ethnicity or sexuality, it is ironic that in much of the secular media there should be such limited coverage of the massive persecution experienced by so many Christians.” 

The report said: “Governments in the West and the UN failed to offer Christians in countries such as Iraq and Syria the emergency help they needed as genocide got underway.

If Christian organisations and other institutions had not filled the gap, the Christian presence could already have disappeared in Iraq and other parts of the Middle East.”

Report editor John Pontifex said: “In terms of the numbers of people involved, the gravity of the crimes committed and their impact, it is clear that the persecution of Christians is today worse than at any time in history.

“Not only are Christians more persecuted than any other faith group, but ever-increasing numbers are experiencing the very worst forms of persecution.”

An article in GQ Magazine calls it a “civic duty” to destroy Thanksgiving if your relatives are Trump supporters. This is outrageous, which is why I’m pasting this in. Click on the link in the text below to read the original text. Incredible.

“A piece in GQ Magazine calls on readers to make Thanksgiving Day “hell” for any relatives who support President Donald Trump.

“It’s time to ruin your Trump-supporting family’s Thanksgiving—for America!” Joe Berkowitz wrote.

“If you’re headed home to a household that still thinks a sex-offending game show host in rapid cognitive decline was the best choice for a president, it is your civic duty to filibuster Thanksgiving,” he argued.

He offered several suggestions for how to ruin Thanksgiving dinner, including not showing up, showing up and being a jerk and going “scorched earth.” Berkowitz wrote that this isn’t just about spite, but potentially “chipping away” at Trump’s base.

 “If your family is unmoved after a ruined Thanksgiving, though, that’s fine too. After all, next year’s Thanksgiving falls just after the 2018 midterms, and if your true believer parents still feel the way they do now, you might ruin their holiday in another way,” he concluded. 

According to a new NPR/PBS NewsHour/Marist poll, 58 percent of people are dreading having to talk politics around the dinner table. Just 31 percent said they were eager to discuss the latest news with family and friends, while 11 percent are unsure.

Here are some out-takes from the original, hateful, text:

“Trump has spent the entire year performing one long, clumsy touchdown dance atop the wreckage of America’s former norms and values.”

Which values exactly? Post-modern far-left values? Or the massive focus on Christianity that has been brought back, thanks in part if not entirely to super Christians Mike Pence and Dr. Ben Carson? The left don’t own western values, unless this writer is talking about “our modern shared values,” you know those flimsy values “openness and tolerance” that cannot define or represent a nation at all whatsoever…..

“Any parents still riding the Trump Train at this point have thereby signaled that nothing is sacred.”

Nothing is sacred, such as life you mean? Or traditional women? Because I seem to remember that conservative women are vilified in the mainstream media and that no sympathy should be given to any woman who supports the President or his administration. Is this writer trying to say that radical post-modernists are the ones who know what is sacred or not?

“Don’t show up. For some parents, your absence will speak louder than any sodden arguments over the density of pumpkin pie. If you can’t even look them in the eye, they’ll know you mean business. Besides, Friendsgiving rules.”

The cultural Marxists hate families, so of course it would be preferable if you fall out with your own parents and never talk to your own blood relatives anymore because of Trump. I can’t believe these people are for real. Talk about being hateful.

Someone told me the other day that Justin Trudeau allegedly said that it was horrid that Canada was a European construct and that he would make it his mission to destroy Canada’s “whiteness.” I couldn’t find a quote like this or an article along those lines, I did however come across this.

“As G.K. Chesterton once said, condemning nationalism because it can lead to war is like condemning love because it can lead to murder.”

idiot.jpg

Trudeau also has an interesting way of dealing with terrorism in his nation … after a Somali, Muslim woman was guilty of terrorism he went out  and condemned white-supremacists instead…. A typical modern “leader” in other words, with no love, empathy or concern for his own people and no sense of respect for those who built the nation and the institutions which he now presides over.

The Norwegian right-wing government have been forced to agree with more immigrants being taken into Norway. After stating that Norway is one of those Nations that have taken in too many migrants in relation to our own population numbers, the right-wing party had to let go of one of the most crucial issues facing all European nations.

“Høyre og Frp godtok at Norge skal ta imot 1.000 flere kvoteflyktninger neste år, noe som er nær en fordobling. Til sammen blir kvoten neste år 2.120 personer, noe som er lavere enn antallet Norge har tatt imot de siste to årene, men høyt sammenlignet med tidligere år.”

“The Right and The Progress Party agreed that Norway will take in 1.000 more migrants next year, something that will be a doubling. In total the quota will be 2.120 people, something that is lower than the amount Norway has taken in the two last years, but high in comparison to previous years.”

The Norwegian government decided to increase the fee on sugar and gas/bubbles as used in soft drinks and candy in order to raise 2 billion Kroner for the government. Who would have thought that you could get that much money by going after small things like that? Incredible. The ministers hope that this will not affect the consumers. I find it all very intriguing actually.

The government also decided to partly axe the machine-tax but calculated that it would mean 1,2 billion Kroner in lost revenue. It will be especially hard for municipalities in industry areas, so the government officials have apparently agreed on measures to compensate for this lack of tax-income.

Loneliness is a problem not just among the elderly, but among young people as well, even though it isn’t spoken that much about. Old and alone.(This article is in Norwegian).

It is so easy to tell when you’re reading something written by a 3rd wave feminist, or modern radical. Everything from the west is a symbol of oppression. Read this critique of badass English explorers. Don’t let party-poopers like this ruin everything.

“White men such as Benedict Allen should cease their meaningless, problematic “explorations” and focus instead on the ways they can counter the privileges they inhabit, at home and abroad.”

The Anti-European Deconstructionists are always hard at work. They never rest. Never. There is always something new. All of our institutions seem derelict at this point, rotten from within, in need of a resurrection. If they are not brought back in alignment with pro-European values then we’ve officially lost our European Nations. The Cultural Marxists Will Never Rest Until They’ve Had Their Total Revolution.

I mentioned organised pedophilia at a public school in this entry of mine: Europe & America’s Transformation Due To Migration – My Observations as A European Globetrotter.I’m bringing it up again as it is quite a scenario to have tax-payers money used to pay for child molestation toward tweens who are sent to public schools since their parents cannot afford anything else. It can in many ways be seen as the ultimate form of humiliation. Much like the enforced LGBTQX culture described in the article above.

Most have to have a two income family. They have no choice. Their kids will therefore have to be sent to public institutions and as an ultimate act of spite these institutions will brainwash your children and expose them to individuals who hate kids (in some instances) paid for by the “tax cattle.” It is nothing else but morbid. A totally mockery of the general population.

“The chairman of the Campaign for Real Education told the Sunday Times: “w should not be placing ‘mother’ and ‘father’ on a list of forbidden words.

“We should, instead, be accommodating these cherished foundation stones of our civilisation. The decision to remove them is profoundly undemocratic and illiberal and is a capitulation to a form of politically correct fascism.”

It is probably a good idea to move to the east or the west before lots of people are in a hurry to do so if the situation in Europe worsens. Just follow a simple rule. Don’t let your enemy into your country. Simple as that. Look at these ridiculous pictures of our Christmas Markets. I’m glad I live in a proper English area where we don’t have these type of problems, or at least not yet. Diversity is our strength – repeat after me.

The people of Austria are tired and want their country back. God bless them.

Watching the latest season of AHS really got to me when I saw the scenes of Sarah Paulson’s character and how “the cult” ganged up on her, doing everything to drive her insane while simultaneously officially discrediting her. I wonder why? Read this article if you want a good reason for staying alone. It is incredible what people get away just because good people stay silent. After all what is the point of speaking up if people don’t believe you? Evidence; you always need evidence; which is why you have to be careful when it comes to accusing others of abuse or wrongdoings online. There are many who are doing so now, especially with the whole #MeToo campaign, what I wonder is this though: can’t you be sued for defamation and slander if you don’t have your evidence in order? Would you have enough proof to satisfy law-enforcement and how would your accusations hold up in court? If your answer is no, then you got a pretty shitty case.

“Have you ever felt like you were going insane? Well, it might be because someone was trying to make you feel that way. One of the most common ways abusers keep control of their victims is to have them discredited to the point that they question their own sanity, feel terrible about themselves, and also can’t figure out what the truth is and what isn’t anymore. This tactic is called gaslighting, and it’s named after a 1950s movie that focuses on a man who has managed to trick a woman into thinking she’s going crazy.

It’s one of the worst mind games out there, and everyone needs to know about it. If you’ve been finding yourself questioning.. yourself.. and your relationship more frequently these days, you need to read this.

Have you ever heard about gaslighting before?

Gaslighting Is A Term Used To Describe Emotional Abuse. In particular, it’s emotional abuse that makes you question what really happened, how you really feel about things, and whether you should be angry about actions that your partner may have done.”

Good heavens … I just came across an article about a female nurse pretending to be a male doctor in order to get women to send her explicit photos of themselves. This lady also stole another person’s address apparently and prowled around social media to find victims to literally troll. Talk about weirdo. It’s easy to fall flat on your face sometimes with social media, but this chick was seemingly unstoppable in her quest for “setting people up.” Crazy really. I’m wondering if she was addicted to this kind of behaviour or if she was bored? Peculiar to say the least: Female Serial Stalker. 

When reading more about her actions here it reminds me a bit of childish pranks … you know … prank calling, trolling people, etc; This is what kids or tweens usually engage in for a limited time period; which makes me wonder: if abstract identity movements can partially be blamed for lack of “make-believe” play when little, then can this type of anti-social actions, as displayed by Adele Rennie, be partially blamed on a lack of healthy peer relationships in youth? Once again her pattern of action is infantile and immature. It would have been interesting to know the conclusion reached by a professional profiler.

Cool to see another artist defending Europe ❤ I don’t necessarily agree with other statements from this guy, but this was cool to see! It’s funny actually that I voice concern for Germany and Sweden; because if I was to be like all of these individuals who are still screeching about past-slavery in America for example, I would be happy to see Sweden and Germany being destroyed from within – but I’m not. Even though these two countries either betrayed or occupied us, it is unfair to wish harm upon their populations. I sincerely hope that European identities will survive the massive changes forced upon them by higher powers. This isn’t really the time to be pessimistic in a way. Sure we need to be honest about the changes and the problems, but we cannot let this deflate our spirits. Being a patriot has never been more important.

Hmmm….cavalry vs. infantry……

Oh the French, always angry protesting something … En Grève is one of the first things you learn the meaning of when you live there. I’m assuming that they must be one of the hardest populations in Europe to manage. I was never a supporter of Macron really, but he won the election, and when that is the case you just have to hope for the best. Wishing for a politician in power to fail is nuts, as it would mean devastation in one way or the other for the population in question. I’ve personally spoken favourably about labour unions in the past, I believe that we have to look after our own. Outsourcing, labour-migration, but also, over-taxation on small businesses which leads to unemployment or bankruptcy is a great, great shame. I wish it was possible to solve the equation of perfect governance, sadly it seems impossible. People management whether big or small will never be easy. Protests against Macron.

This headline and article is absolutely outrageous: Parents Were Ordered To Send Their Children To A Workshop On Islam Or Have Them Labeled As Racist For The Rest of Their School Career.

“Mothers and fathers were warned: ‘Refusal to allow your child to attend will result in a Racial Discrimination note being attached to your child’s education record, which will remain on this file throughout their school career.

‘All absences on this day will be investigated for their credibility and will only be sanctioned with a GP sick note.’
Yesterday parents at Littleton Green Community School in Huntington, Staffordshire, said the threat to the pupils aged between eight and 11 was ‘ludicrous’. Gillian Claridge, 55, said: ‘How dare they threaten to brand the children racist at such a young age? It’s going to make them feel like little criminals.”

Offended Muslim caught in US lunch scandal.

The imported challenges we now have to deal with, unless we start sending people home.

You can apparently get into trouble with an Anti-Hate speech police unit in this country, if someone’s feelings are hurt. I have truly no idea why the English are so keen on giving away and destroying their identity and nation. There must be a diagnosis for something like this.

While racial tensions in Europe escalate, Norwegian celebrities create pro-immigration propaganda videos as a response to 18 year olds being sent back home to the Middle East. To translate a quote from Norway’s immigration and integration minister:

– Jeg vil vel heller stille spørsmål ved om det ikke er flaut at norske kjendiser er så navlebeskuende at de kun ser de få asylsøkerne som kommer til Norge, hvorav mange ikke har krav på beskyttelse, mens de ikke ser de 65 millionene av mennesker som har flyktet fra krig og konflikt som vi bør hjelpe rundt omkring i verden, sier innvandrings- og integreringsminister Sylvi Listhaug til VG.

– I would rather question whether it isn’t embarrassing that Norwegian celebrities are so narrow-minded that they only see the few asylum seekers who come to Norway, of which many have no right to protection, while they don’t see the 65 million people who’ve fled from war and conflict who we should help around the world, says the immigration and integration minister Sylvi Listhaug to VG. 

Here is another link to an article about some other protests in Paris … What I’m wondering is this: how many of these protestors are paid to be there and how many of them are just trouble seeking punks? It would be naive not to think that no-good thugs wouldn’t be attracted to these type of things.

Unless you want to be fired as a politician, remember – do not touch a woman’s knee! The funniest thing about this article are the comments below. Haha.

funny comments

Interesting article about love. Read this if you feel like it and have time to kill.

Such an ugly and horrible man. Weinstein’s Show-biz abuse.

Annabella Sciorra.

Illuminati confirmed I guess.

Go to the beach if you can. God’s healing tools.

Yes, I’m a very honest person. Funny test.

President Trump’s Thanksgiving.

Nobody ever wants to admit anything in Russia. There was a leak from a Nuclear plant, but not really. It happened though, and the logical conclusion must be that it came from one of these two plants, only that it didn’t. Because nothing really happened, even though it actually did. And this cloud of radioactive pollution over Europe, is nothing to worry about, because reasons.

Football coach fed up with entitled parents in Beverly Hills.

This is what happens to you if you stay neutral as an artist. You will still be hated and attacked.

Today’s England & Denmark.

Standard

Is Christianity & Islam Compatible?

Standard

Politicians and the mainstream media are constantly telling us that the two religions are the best of friends. These days it isn’t uncommon to hear of Islamic prayers being held within the walls of Christian churches, I even attended a lecture myself about persecuted Christians where the lecturer told me that Muslims and Christians should stand more together. This was something he said after delivering a presentation where he explained that the most common persecutors of Christians are Muslims … This speaker labeled the secularists as the greatest evil. His endorsement of Islam came after he had described how Muslims didn’t want to walk past him when he was out walking his dog, as Muslims detest these animals….He also stated that Jihadis will stop with their murderous activity when given BMWs and other materialist goods here in Europe … since welfare and exposure to convenience will eradicate Militant Islam.

It seemed like the audience was slightly bewildered, as some certainly were supportive of his conclusion due to mixed grandchildren or after having attended Interfaith events; in contrast there were those speaking of how Muslims had harassed them here in England, and they did not seem very happy nor convinced. Not that long ago I attended a service where the priest highlighted at every opportunity, how unique Christianity is and how this faith is the most peaceful one. A shocking thing to hear in these politically correct times. Thou Shall Only Have One God? Really? We even prayed for the Jihadis here in England; that they may find enlightenment in Jesus Christ. So we basically prayed for their conversion so that they will stop killing Europeans. Hilarious, I couldn’t believe it. Where is the media when you need them? Another service that I attended at another church a while back was more directed towards young people, they had speakers rather than preachers, and the one we heard, spoke of how Muslims were harassing her and making fun of her Christian faith. This girl looked like she came from India and thanked her church for providing her with enough information through their Bible Study Group, so that she could defend her faith from Muslims humiliating Jesus.

So … what happens when you Google what I wrote in the title of this entry? What does Islam say about Christianity? What is the relationship between the two, since we are so similar according to our politicians and journalists?

This is what you’ll find, written by those who’ve read the Muslim & Christian texts:

Islam vs. Christianity – A very good comparison.

Islam vs. Christianity 2

Islam vs. Christianity 3

Islam vs. Christianity 4

Islam vs. Christianity 5

When you are done looking at those you can read what a Mainstream Media Outlet Thinks.

 

Nut-Jobs with Manifestos…

Standard

Yesterday I watched a short documentary about Norway’s most notorious gun man, in addition to watching a documentary about genuine right-wing extremists in Germany. It was interesting to note that German authorities first believed that murdered Muslims had been taken out due to their involvement with organised crime before they pondered the possibility of racism being the cause of their demise. If paying attention it certainly seemed like a scenario of white German thugs killing Muslim thugs. I decided to check out these documentaries since I was asking myself this: “do genuine racists and right-wing extremist pose a legitimate threat to Europe, and should we worry?” (I answer what I think in the last 9 paragraphs of this entry, if you don’t want to read everything in between.)

I think the main problem with the “right-wing-extremist” narrative is the fact that regular conservatives, centrists and classical liberals are all tossed into the “racist” camp, all you have to do in order to gain that label is to simply disagree with what I just call “the modern left.” Who are the modern-left? Those traditionally labeled as the “far-left” or “left-wing-radicals,” it seems. Simply put they are revolutionaries, who in our case: vehemently hate Europe, unless they can create a “New-Europe.” They can also be labeled as “deconstructionists.”

(I’m guessing that extreme-capitalists also gain somehow on the New-Europe).

Thanks to their way of arguing it doesn’t really mean anything anymore to call someone “literally Hitler.” The meaning of the word racist has also been diluted, same thing with fascist.

So when government officials are screeching about the “racist-right” it is hard to believe them, as anyone who criticise the radical core change we currently experience in Europe will wrongfully be accused of bigotry, xenophobia, bla-bla-bla, you name it.

In fact I’m currently reading the latest issue of The Spectator where Theresa May’s “institutional racism witch-hunt” is being ridiculed left-right-and-centre, and why shouldn’t it? Rather than stating that PEOPLE ARE DIFFERENT and that this can result in different life-outcomes on average, people prefer to hide behind the “institutional-racism-myth” because this appears to be more comfortable….(being unlucky/lucky, etc; regardless of ones race, is of course also part of how a life can play out, it is not all merit-based of course, but what I’m referring to here are averages – generalisations simply put. Exceptional individuals can be found anywhere and will probably have more in common with one another than the group that they originally hail from)…

If more coloured people end up behind bars for violent crime in England then it is probably because the justice system is at fault, according to the institutional racism theory, the fact that this reflects what is also happening in the current non-segregationist  U.S.A. or other places in Europe ought to be ignored; we are all racists apparently presiding over biased systems. Obviously there have been stories of race being used in the past to lock up innocent Afro-Americans, but my main focus is on Europe, and as I’ve stated countless times before, we are in a completely different situation.

Some people will probably look at the topic and only see economics and financial difficulties as the source of the problem, maybe even contemplating that impoverishing certain neighbourhoods is done deliberately; there is no end to how a topic like this one can be elaborated upon I’m sure.

But different population groups do have different trait frequencies, once again: on average. The idea that some foreign tribes might fail within our social constructs, or might feel downright miserable within our over-the-top micro-managed social-constructs, (since our systems reflect those who built them for their own descendants), is a point that is never brought up by anyone.

I instinctively suspect that the depression rate has to be high when people depart and re-settle into a territory that is fundamentally alien to them….

Why would someone from the Middle East or Africa be happy in the most Northern part of Norway, for example, where the sun doesn’t shine for large parts of the year, where the nutrition is so vastly different, and where there are only pale, drunk, white folks with a culture radically different to let’s say; Somalia?

Would you be happy if you woke up in an African or Middle Eastern Nation tomorrow? Or would you do everything to get the hell out, or if unable to: fall into a deep depression?

Thank God for Munira Mirza for bringing some sense into the “institutional-racism” debate over here in England, whoever this individual is…

I’m taking it for granted and predict that many are growing tired of the gender and race debate.

I’ve certainly grown tired of it, which is why I’ve stopped writing about it.

In fact I don’t think you need any propaganda on the right at all to gain supporters at this point in time, all you need is to give the members of “the modern left” a microphone and a camera, in a lot of cases.

That being said; this entry is supposed to be about the real-far-right, so….

I know what I don’t like about the far-right and I can also guess why those on the genuine far-right wouldn’t like me, an interesting thing to keep in mind for those who think that everyone on the right is “literally Hitler”:

  1. I have a mixed race brother.
  2. I have nothing against one well-integrated migrant here and there, what I oppose is replacement migration and demographic warfare. This is serious and would be widely opposed and condemned if it occurred elsewhere in the world. I’ve lived through a completely unprecedented demographic transformation in Europe and it is both sad and infuriating to officially be labeled: “Ethnic-European.” I was not born an “Ethnic-Norwegian” but now (due to an extreme influx of people from radically different alien territories) I’ve become an Ethnic-European, as I’m part of the old Europe just like other “living relics,” or at least that’s how it sounds like, and how it looks like in certain areas…. This radical change has happened very quickly and should come to a halt equally quickly, as an out-of-control situation should of course be seen as undesirable, unless you are evil or delusional.
  3. I write about racism towards whites while also writing about racism towards other groups; I have to say though that I’m surprised at the one-sided narrative that has been allowed to dominate the media landscape. It puts people in danger to not know the real risks out there. Political correctness kills. Literally; and I’m wondering why that has been allowed to happen.
  4. I have nothing against inter-racial relationships, but find it bizarre that this is now being promoted in the European-Media as the “new-standard” as it is relatively uncommon, completely unprecedented as “mainstream”, and “alien” to our territory.  All relationships should happen naturally without social-conditioning efforts from an establishment eager to fundamentally change an entire continent. Funny enough there will be plenty of people arguing that we are already conditioned artificially to accept straight-relationships; to those who peddle this narrative I ask: “how can humanity exist and how come we haven’t died out already, if straight-relationships isn’t what we are meant for biologically speaking?” Here is another one: “if gender is not biological, then how come transgenders need hormones after their transitioning?”
  5. Believing in ethno-nationalism in the U.S.A. is absurd, in my opinion, since Modern-America was a multi-racial (Africans & Native American Tribes) construct from the start, built and designed by Anglo-Saxon (White) immigrants. This doesn’t mean that they shouldn’t be strict on immigration now, it simply means that: ethno-nationalism is unobtainable and never really existed in the first place. America is a country featuring many different nations (ethnic & racial tribes), and because of this you cannot really use “American” as a racial/ethnic description. This is why race and ethnicity is constantly emphasised when going to the doctor or dealing with public offices as ticking off “American” isn’t sufficient information. It is also an interesting fact to note that White Americans are of European descent and therefore live in a territory that can be correctly referred to as “genetically-alien” to them if one wants to be very specific. There is a White majority in the U.S.A. as of today, due to successful conquest, something that a great number of people either don’t know, or don’t want to think about. If an Ethno-State was the desired outcome then I question why diversity and parallel societies always was a factor, and why there were “allowed” to be “survivors.” These are my reasons for finding American Ethno-Nationalism bizarre; the U.S.A. is not Europe.
  6. Women should be allowed to have a say in my opinion. I’ve seen that there are right-wingers out there who truly hate women. They channel their hatred towards feminist-politics on all women,which is quite frankly disturbing to read if you are a woman….
  7. I’ve criticised WW2 Nazism, but believe that our European leadership have been reckless with guarding the peace that was obtained since we now stand face to face with an imported enemy. I do find this to be very disappointing. 
  8. I have nothing against the Jewish people.
  9. Contrary to what some might think I don’t hate all Muslims or Islam, but I don’t endorse Muslim expansionism and rightfully criticise what is currently happening in Europe as people should adapt when they move somewhere else and never be allowed in, in such great numbers as to marginalize the natives. Islam is also alien to our territory historically speaking, we are culturally Christian, this is not synonymous with a hate towards all, or a belief that Muslim Countries should be converted, attacked or occupied. It is a critique towards either incompetent and/or vicious leadership in Europe, combined with imperialistic, expansionist and supremacist elements imported into our midst. I believe that those who are incompatible with our societies should be offered a ticket back home.
  10. In a democratic construct you’re awarded certain liberties that can enable you to influence the course of your Country/Nation. Such as voting, protesting, writing letters to representatives, sharing information and viewpoints and signing petitions. You can join a political party, a charity organisation, an activist group or start your own groups.
  11.  Everything should be done to obtain equilibrium and to keep your country operational. Chaos is the greatest evil; at least from a civilian perspective.

What a true right-wing-extremist would probably think:

  1. They abhor mixed-race individuals. This is not exclusively a white phenomena funny enough, as there are Afro-Americans for example, who also think this way.
  2. They hate all immigrants and don’t want to see a single one. If they cannot hate an African, they’ll hate another European.
  3. They will only write about racism towards white people, as they secretly or openly endorse racist acts against other groups. They wouldn’t really give a damn if hearing about another ethnic or racial group suffering.
  4. They hate inter-racial relationships and would probably physically attack those who engage in such things (if they could get away with it).
  5. They believe in ethno-Nationalism even if it doesn’t make any sense within their country as it would mean purging large chunks of people who have been in their territory for just as long as they have.
  6. They see women without children as useless, failures; since women should focus on  having families exclusively. Women should never lead anything according to what I’ve understood, as it seems abhorrent to those on the far-right if a woman holds any authority over a man. Because of failed feminist politics, it seems like they believe that all women should be punished by being kept away from political debate and positions of influence. Something to keep in mind.
  7.  Some far-right extremists like Hitler and will walk around with Swastikas, clearly branding themselves as supporters for all to see. They are not ashamed but feel comfortable displaying their support for the Reich. You will not be in doubt if you read the writings or see footage of a Neo-Nazi. They are unapologetic, out and proud. They are in denial as German supremacy was exactly just that, even Norwegians were “beneath” the German super race, according to the German Nazis. Yet it is not uncommon to see pictures of “dark looking” Neo-Nazis, something that will never cease to amaze me.
  8. Neo-Nazis hate the Jewish people and believe in all sorts of conspiracy theories about how the Jewish elite run the entire world. They will  promote these views far and wide, deny that the Holocaust ever happen and protest outside Israeli-embassies. Once again, it should be fairly easy to spot a genuine Neo-Nazi. Islamists also enjoy protesting against the Jewish people and seemingly get away with it.
  9. Right-wing-extremist don’t waste their breath or their time emphasising how they don’t hate Islam or all Muslims. They hate them all and will not waste any time sugar-coating the matter. If they are agitated when writing or discussing Islam it is not the result of repeated attacks from Muslims directed towards Europeans or awareness of failed integration, it is an underlying hatred that would have been there anyway, regardless of events and terrorism.
  10. Right-wing-extremists might believe that voting is pointless as all political parties are the same to them. They’ll refrain from casting their vote or being active citizens, with the exception of protesting and marching. While they are in these marches they might display their open loyalty to Hitler if they are Neo-Nazis or shout offensive words since they hate all foreigners. They sometimes believe in taking matters into their own hands as they feel that the political establishment isn’t acting quickly enough, rather than running for office or putting pressure on politicians, they might dream about violently executing political leaders, and might even give it a go. This though is something that they share with the far-left and other groups.
  11. They believe that everything should be done so that their vision can dominate. Chaos should be given a little push if they can climb the ladder it offers. This is of course a sentiment that they share with a number of other groups as well.

Far-left, far-right, far-Islam, far-whatever; it’s all looks spooky to me when I look at it due to the uncompromising nature of it, yet it is difficult to take the current witch-hunt seriously as anyone to the right of the “modern-left” will be accused of being a bigot.

As I’ve said before you’re not a racist for believing in your own country or nation.

It is particularly interesting to keep in mind that:

  1. European right-wing-extremists display the same toxic-masculinity that can be seen within Muslim communities.
  2. Feminists are at war with White-Male-Aggression while importing unrestrained Arabic & African Male-Aggression.
  3. The uncompromising anger seen when looking at far-right-extremists is the same as can be seen from Islamists, their critique of post-modern Europe seem to match on certain points. But the groups differ in their loyalty as right-wing-extremists are obsessed with  Europe while Islamists are obsessed with the Caliphate.
  4. Toxic masculinity from alien tribes has to be fought with toxic masculinity from your own tribe, something that our general leadership seems to have forgotten.
  5. Islamists are not in the receiving end of a witch-hunt, as you’ll instantly be branded an Islamophobe if you get upset with the current situation in Europe.
  6. Nobody seems to understand this kind of thinking: ” if Muslims get away with disrespecting Western-laws, then why should anybody else follow the rules? If our political establishment isn’t respected by the newcomers, then why should the Natives listen to them?”
  7. The worst thing that could happen to Europe is if genuine right-wing-extremists and white-toxic-masculinity convert and  join the Islamists. Then we are totally screwed, I think.
  8. There are also anti-austerity Anarchist groups in Europe hating on everything and everyone, not to forget traditionalist Christian patriots adhering to “Deus Vult” due to the current Islamist threat. When looking at the alt-lite, alt-right, alt-reich spectrum online, you see what appears to be internal arguing and disorder. There are veterans in Europe who aren’t particularly happy with the current Islam-mess, and disillusioned law enforcement officers out of a job. In fact there are many who are angry and upset, not to forget an enraged general population screeching in the comment sections and whatnot on social media due to the Islamists. Yet there doesn’t seem to be much agreement or unity in terms of “what Europe really is, or what it should be.”
  9. If the European situation escalates, resulting in a total breakdown of order, we will need all the toxic-masculinity that we can possibly find in what will probably be an urban, guerrilla war against militant Islamists, who I assume will be joined by clueless lefties who seem convinced that their secularism can use Islam as a weapon against Christianity or European Patriotism, but I might be wrong. (Hopefully). It is difficult to predict what all of these groups really like or who they might join forces with (?) There are actually many separate agendas, from those who want more European Christian traditionalism, to those who yearn for totalitarian communism, from those who want Anarchy and chaos, to those who want more extreme-capitalism, from those who actually want fascism, to those who want nothing, from those who want borders and the protection of cultures, to those who want no flags, no borders, no nations, without really knowing what this means, not to forget imported ethnic disputes among immigrants, in addition to the dissonance that occurs in the host nations between new-comers and Natives, and the big, expanding, dark cloud of Islamism. When looking at all of the political disputes that we have in our parliaments across Europe, I find it awkward that anyone would believe even for a second that a total breakdown of our nations would guarantee anything in terms of Europe’s new political direction. If our parliaments are messy they are nothing in comparison to all of those sentiments found on the outside of our democratic governments.

People are on a whole different plateau of idealism if they think that their political victory is guaranteed. 

Humans are seemingly wired for nothing but arguments and will constantly find something petty to fight over whether in the court-room or in the streets, whether online or politically.

It beats me why humanity is so profoundly enamoured with conflict regardless of the form that it takes.

You would think that people would tire of it.

To answer the question at the beginning of this very long entry: Do I believe that right-wing-extremists pose a risk to Europe as of now?

They pose a threat to communists and Islamists I believe, but could potentially pose a threat to innocent mixed individuals or well-integrated foreigners. Yet we do stand face to face with a shitty situation as it is impossible to distinguish who the Jihadis are, since many of these “sleeper cells” look westernised and are perfectly integrated.

This is a very annoying factor that cannot be forgotten or overlooked.

We’ve been put in a hopeless situation where the “collateral damage” will be devastating due to the difficulty in distinguishing between the good and the bad.

I assume that this is the reason as to why there are those who at this point in time “self-deport.” They’ve seen the ghettos, they’ve seen the escalation, and do not wish to be in the crossfire.

Right-wing extremists pose a major threat to the political establishment, first and foremost, as they see them as ruining Europe (a very right conclusion that many non-extremists would agree with) which can be the only reason as to why the political establishment seem so fixated on the “right-wing-extremist-threat,” I suspect that it is rather a desire to protect themselves against well-earned scrutiny and absolute contempt. 

It is hard to imagine that much mercy will be shown towards those who opened up the flood-gates, indirectly initiating a demographic assault on their own Working- (and in some cases) Middle-class.

I do not believe that this will end well, because it has been written and immortalised in official records, who’s been responsible. And when changes that are this radical in nature are imposed upon an entire continent, it cannot be expected that such acts will be forgotten or forgiven.

The future looks dark indeed, as it is naive to believe even for a second that people will think straight and act straight if “shit-hits-the-fan.”

For all I know it very well might be that ANTIFA is all of a sudden running things in the future, and in that sort of a scenario we can might as well wave goodbye to our cultural heritage, as I assume that it would be in their interest to torch it all.

Right-wing extremists pose a potential threat to those who look alien to the European continent, which means that they do not pose a risk to Ethnic-Europeans as of now unless they are visibly communists, (I guess), and/or singling themselves out with “refugees welcome” signs.

If the political situation is rocked however and everything is thrown into chaos they will pose a greater risk, as those on the moderate-right will not agree with straight up racism and would not be interested in waging an actual war against women. It is therefore reasonable to conclude that there would be major infighting among those on the right, as this is already the case.

Not to forget those on the left, who are already in attack mode against anyone slightly to the right.

In fact it would not surprise me at all if in-fighting would handicap Native-Europeans completely.

Those who wish to infiltrate us and do us harm have their friends and benefactors, while those who are standing against all of this appear to be fragmented.

A new leader-type like the ones we used to have back in the day, who thinks in a continental fashion and is eminent in alliance building, is what will be needed, or an unofficial network of like-minded individuals each going for their own territory, standing united against the fundamental transformation that we are currently witnessing, might do the trick.

I’m guessing that a proper backlash will more likely come from those with combat or “street-fighting” experience, it would make sense that it would surface among those who’ve been sent into the “no-go-zones” of Europe and are sandwiched between a faulty establishment and broken, increasingly dangerous ghettos….Or people with access to intelligence who are aware of how bad the situation truly is, or a group formed by these type of characters.

Back to these “right-wing-extremists;” they do seem to have a certain “loose-cannon” element to them, illustrated by the actions of Norway’s Breivik. How he could even for a moment think that his actions would commence a war against Muslims, when he – a blond, white, male – opened fire against teens of all races, executing them due to their political affiliation, beats logic. Unless he just wanted to get attention and “martyr” himself somehow. No one will endorse you regardless of what you believe in if you murder children/teens during a time of “perceived peace,” even during war-time I think that you would have a hard time getting away with it. Executing the future leaders of the Norwegian Worker’s Party did not make them weak, it gained them a lot of sympathy actually, something that they themselves squandered with bad politics, so even if you want to try to look at Breivik’s actions in a cold fashion, he failed at reaching his objective. To assume that his actions would bring attention from the general populace towards his enormously long Manifesto is equally bizarre and display a lack of basic human understanding.

People don’t read…

Or maybe he was just aiming for the right recipient; apparently he actually thought that this huge, gigantic work of his would be read by many… I suspect that very few ever bothered to check it out. Something that extensive can never be expected to go viral.

People want slogans and simplified messages.

Memes.

Humour.

Battle cries.

Imagery.

It is of particular interest that The Progress Party (a right-wing political party) that Breivik had been associated with for several years as a member, won during the 2013 Parliamentary Election as the 3rd biggest party in Norway,  finally getting into government for the first time. The reason as to why I find this to be of such interest is that  the Worker’s Party received an enormous amount of sympathy after the political terror operation by Breivik in 2011. Even though there were, and still are, many Norwegians harbouring a deep-seated hatred towards Stoltenberg, he was perceived as a great uniter, and funny enough was pictured in Mosques reaching out to Muslims and whatnot. Yet we saw the socialists squeezed out politically only two years after Breivik’s condemned actions, which in my opinion illustrates profound political problems, that not even Breivik’s terrorism could overshadow. It is also shocking to read that the Progress Party was Norway’s 2nd largest political party in 1997, 2005 and 2009 without getting into government, as nobody wanted to go into a coalition with them. The reason as to why I never voted until this year as a Norwegian citizen was that I had a clear impression of the democratic will being ignored in Norway,  but I had no clue that it had actually been this bad. Yet all of a sudden the democratic will was accepted and despite the cult of political correctness The Progress Party is still Norway’s 3rd largest political party remaining in government after a victorious election in 2017.

The future might judge Breivik’s actions differently, but this hinges on how things will develop in Norway and the European continent. Simply put; whether or not Europe will descend into chaos, etc; As of today he claims that Hitler’s Mein Kamf keeps him alive behind bars, that this work gives him strength to deal with his ordeal, prison has apparently radicalised him (go figure), he has also declared that he would apologise to the families of his victims if he would be allowed to start a fascist political party from behind bars. A total weirdo in other words. He previously stated that the fact that he had come to enjoy the TV-Show Paradise Hotel was evidence of him becoming mentally retarded in captivity………..

If what he wanted was to trigger “Deus Vult” it would have made sense to murder Norwegian children while placing the blame on the Muslim community, and even then there is a very high probability that nobody would have reacted violently against other Muslims. Mass rape, acid attacks, pimping of little girls, terrorist actions, and a refusal to follow the laws of European Nations have yet to spark a mass violent backlash against the Muslim communities of Europe. If anything the conclusion can be drawn that Ethnic-Europeans are surprisingly patient, restrained or psychologically subdued.

There have been cases of Ethnic-Europeans officially and publicly forgiving their Muslim-assailants, such as a Norwegian man who was raped by a Somali and then felt guilty when this individual was deported. Just like there seems to be an innate desire to help alien tribes among the people of the west, it appears that forgiveness towards criminals and assailants alike is very widespread, whether in the case of secularists trying to understand the person violating them, or people praying for the soul of the one transgressing against them, as can be seen in a recent Facebook post published by one of the American girls attacked with acid in Marseille, France.

Anyway – this “loose-cannon” element, as described above, on the extreme-right, this “unknown-factor,” makes it difficult to know what to think of the genuine far-right, especially since there is little, to no unity within this perceived “movement;” we are currently experiencing attacks from Islamists, and other new-comers, all over our continent, so it would be awkward to not see this imported threat as way more alarming for everybody regardless of ethnicity, race and ideology.

I’m assuming that right-wing-extremists are more “precision-focused” while Islamists just want to take out anyone and everyone, creating as much damage as possible. This makes it obvious which one poses the greatest threat to Europe and Europeans.

Here you have an interesting article featuring: Nut-jobs with Manifestos.