Having A Raison D’être & An End Game.

Standard

When reading about the Iraq war last year I was stunned to see the willingness to sacrifice the integrity of Europe on the altar of momentary territorial access needed in order to get into Iraq.

“Plan Of Attack” by Bob Woodward.

“Decision Points” by George W. Bush.

I was further mystified by the fact that 4-star Army General (ret.) Colin Powell came across as the one lone voice of reason, since he tried to raise awareness of tribalism and ethnic diversity in the targeted area.

The reading certainly gave me the impression that humans are simply being seen as replaceable cogs in the machinery by the establishment.

Culture and ethnicity simply doesn’t matter, it is all about momentary victory, without any overarching solid narrative selling a clearly defined End Game, that will be reached by many separate actions all serving the same underlying objective.

This is a startling realisation.

When reading “The Art Of War” I was surprised about what sort of advice it contained. Prolonged warfare with no end in sight is depicted as one of the worst projects that a Nation can ever engage in. A group that engages in warfare also have to ensure that they have access to an efficient supply line, taking advantage of whatever resources the group can get their hands on as they expand into a territory. A war effort should be swift and precise, without too much meddling from sovereigns located far away. The people who are on the ground need to be able to do what is necessary to reach their goal in a completely mobilised way, to the extent that this is possible.

All of this certainly made me question the sort of warfare that people my age have grown accustomed to. All of our Nations’ war efforts seem concentrated in “alien territories,” fighting and training “aliens” that might turn on the West later, and all of our Nations’ major war efforts seemingly drag out for ever…

No proper end game that logically makes sense is ever presented to the public and when getting an insight into the world of those who run these things, it doesn’t really seem like these characters know what the deal is either (unless a battle ground is simply needed in order to train soldiers and test new equipment).

Warriors & Citizens – American Views of Our Military edited by Kori Schake & Jim Mattis.

A parallel can be drawn to hacker activists, who don’t seem too concerned with allies. They’ll attack an enemy of the West one day only to target Western political and military structures the next, potentially jeopardising the integrity and safety of a Nation State or its military operations.

When reading about community organisers you see this pattern of behaviour once again.  A lot of left-wing activism simply cancels itself out, since the only common denominator seems to be emotionalism. Due to this you’ll get contradicting agitation and advocacy that will leave someone like myself slightly confused, as there is no End Game in sight anywhere.

If you look at Islamic agitation in Europe it is very easy to understand what their End Game and overarching goal is. They engage in demographic expansionism into Europe, which gradually gives them a political advantage. Wealthy Muslim power-players buy themselves into Western Corporations which gives them cultural influence and leverage. Street-level Muslims carve out their own territories and then defend these. Mosques are erected further cementing a claim to a specific territory boosting confidence, while a romanticized fantasy of Islamic Imperialism, appealing to people’s sense of identity and innate penchant for ancestry-worship, is promoted. Of course, as always, not all. But you don’t need every member of a specific group to behave in this particular fashion for it to have its desired effect. My impression of European Islamification is that there is a long-term vision, coupled with a willingness to commit to certain behaviours, in order to eventually reach a clearly defined outcome: Nation States that become compatible in their policies and in their cultures with the Muslim faith, preferably paving the way for a new “Golden-Age.” Of course it is of importance to point out the ethnic and racial diversity within Islam, and that there are numerous conflicting denominations within the faith as well. As an example: we can now clearly observe, imported tribal disagreements and feuds, in Europe, in addition to all of our own inter-ethnic issues that we had from before….

Inter-ethnic dissonance is very prevalent in Africa; which is generally referred to as the most diverse continent on the surface of the earth.

So what can be said of the West? What is our End Game? What can be observed and what conclusions can be drawn? 

What would make sense, instinctively,  would be to have common ancestry as the glue holding Europe together. Race has become way more inclusive than what it used to be, since we now largely see Race as something observable, while ethnic groups give us what has become our European Nation States, with its specific cultures and characteristics.  Back in the day these used to be chopped up into various tribes that probably displayed a lot of similar traits to one another, hence our generalisation regarding population groups contained within the boundaries of the modern Nation State: an extended family sharing common ancestry and a similar distribution of genetic traits on average.

It would make sense if our Nation States in Europe concerned themselves with the protection of our shared and individual cultural heritage, doing everything to ensure the survival and majority status of white children (and mixed whites) in the only territory that actually belongs a 100% to whites, protecting our continent’s borders and integrity.

A strong unified Europe and more broadly speaking, a strong unified West with the more multi-racial configurations found within territories conquered by whites, would in theory make sense.

Is this an End Game for what is collectively known as The West though? No.

This would be a racist objective. It would insinuate that Ethnic-Europeans have a natural claim to a specific territory and that conquest is a legitimate way to establish a Nation, which is what a white presence in all other territories other than Europe is a result of. (To my knowledge … It certainly looks that way when observing strange geographic settlements by Whites and the presence of dark-skinned indigenous groups).

The prevalent mythos championed in the West is this:

  1. that all other groups are minorities, even if Europe looks very small when compared to other continents, and we are outnumbered globally speaking.
  2. That the magic soil theory is truth, meaning that you’ll automatically become  Swedish by simply breathing the air in Sweden.
  3. That all human beings are born equal due to a blank slate, and that genetics simply don’t exist.
  4. That talking about genetics and genuine diversity is dangerous because that will instantly turn you into Hitler and result in a new Holocaust.
  5. That it makes sense to celebrate white ethnic groups becoming minorities, after years of civil-rights battles in the U.S.A. to ensure equal opportunity regardless of skin colour, and after years of Whites trying to do good towards previously marginalised and abused non-white minority groups within their domains. Not to forget: the constant focus on the challenges faced by so-called (and genuine) minorities within traditionally White-majority constructs. None of this paints minority-status in an appealing light … yet we should do everything in our power to lay the groundwork for our own marginalisation…. which is particularly interesting when reading about the merciless brutality in other parts of the world perpetrated by non-white majorities…
  6. That previous white expansionism will just be forgotten, since Whites have decided to “play nice,” which means that we no longer have any enemies and don’t really need any borders….
  7. That only white ethnic groups can be guilty of racism and imperialistic activity.
  8. That white ethnic groups are not under any circumstance “indigenous” and that there will at no point be any need to give any white demographic the status of “protected group.”
  9. That race and/or ethnicity is only real and only counts if/when dealing with “indigenous people,” who can under no circumstance be white. These “indigenous” groups are also the only ones entitled to certain territories that have to be protected in order to ensure their survival.
  10. That charity is only needed in the 3rd world as it is probably your own fault if you are poor and hungry in the superior, egalitarian, socialist inspired constructs that make up the Western World.
  11. That you have to import workers from Africa and The Middle East, rather than employing individuals from territories closer to your own, or within your own continent.
  12. That mixing on a massive scale is always peaceful and not the result of violent demographic change or militant conquest.
  13. That re-writing history and engaging in gas-lighting on a National and/or Continental level is perfectly alright in order to salvage vanity projects initiated by international organisations, that might look good on paper and in theory; until inserting the human factor into the equation actually implementing the idea.

Ok. So this doesn’t look too promising. Then what about Christianity? This is multi-racial, multiethnic and global. It is way more inclusive and has been used as a unifying factor in Europe before…

The West has continuously acted as an enemy to Christian groups in the Middle East, facilitating genocidal persecution of genuine Christian minority tribes. Western governments not only promote the build-down of Christianity within Europe and all other territories under White influence, they actively side with Nations and regimes known for violent Christian persecution.

What about human-rights, enlightenment ideas, world peace and the “human race”?

Western governments have repeatedly sided with regimes guilty of outrageous human rights abuses, making themselves guilty of gross hypocrisy since human rights and the protection of humanity as a whole has become the main narrative and general raison d’être of Western groups.

Portraying oneself as a defender of the human race also becomes tricky as you cannot possible go out there and claim that population group A needs more protection and privileges than population group B as this would be racist and undermine universal rights. And how on earth can you even say population group A and B when race/ethnicity isn’t even real? You cannot say that religious group A is more guilty of persecution than religious group B, because why would religious group B be more righteous or in need of more protection than the other? Are you a bigot or what?

Who are you to say that Terrorists don’t have rights or don’t have a point, when you claim to be a defender of all of humanity? And how on earth do you even define a “War on Terror” or “Terrorists”? Any person or group could fall into this category when nothing is specified.

These kind of points can be spinned indefinitely putting The West in a situation where none of its actions can be seen as righteous and/or legitimate.

It opens up the door for a potential legal, moral and PR nightmare where The West and its natural inhabitants never win.

It also puts Western Nation states in a situation where an enemy cannot be clearly defined, at least not in public, due to important exotic alliances and potential diplomatic disasters. By relying on exotic alliances for abstract military operations, the West paints  itself into a corner, where they cannot kick out subversive elements within their own nations if these stem from their good “friends and allies.”

The West is forced into a position where it cannot really look after the interests of its own inhabitants, nor enforce the heritage and integrity of itself.

Not to forget that The West is put into an incredibly awkward situation when Western leaders cannot clearly formulate anything, if interested in maintaining good international relationships.

This results in cringe worthy narratives that leaves all of those who don’t just parrot our “modern shared values” confused and puzzled. What are we all about really? Does anyone know?

What about Capitalism then? A support for this must surely be a constant factor from The Americans at least? 

No. Think again. The U.S.A. is willing to tolerate oppressive communist regimes that in the long run pose a threat to the American experiment and their global influence, as long as the U.S.A. can gain from such an alliance in the short run.

So what is The End Game of The West? 

Strangely and worryingly enough there doesn’t seem to be one……

At best it can be argued that there are forces within The West championing stability trough whatever means by expanding the police state and surveillance of their own citizens. This though is worked against by leaders who don’t want to acknowledge the effects of demographic change. In addition it facilitates the very form of governance that Western Nations are outspokenly against, not to forget that the identity destruction currently happening in The Western world work against any conservation efforts intended to protect our cultural and ethnic inheritance, while simultaneously compromising stability and security; in short, all of it compromises the survival of those people who occupy the territories that we collectively refer to as The West.

 

The Poisonous Nature of Plastics, DNA, Conversion-Therapy and other interesting articles.

Standard

Preview of an important article, linked to further down in my entry:

“Overall, the researchers found that about 76 percent of the effect of ethnicity on DNA methylation could be accounted for by controlling for genetic ancestry”

“But the new data showing that a large fraction of epigenetic signatures of ethnicity reflect something other than ancestry suggests that abandoning the idea of race and ethnicity altogether could sacrifice a lot of valuable information about the drivers of differences in health and disease between different communities.

Like a standard family history, ethnicity is association with disease for both genetic and environmental reasons,” Zaitlen said. “If your dad or mom had a heart attack, that tells doctors a lot about your risk for a heart attack. Part of that is genetic, but part of it is that your lifestyle is influenced heavily by your parents’ lifestyle. Your ethnic group is like a much bigger family — it’s partly a matter of genetics, but it also reflects the environment of your broader community.”

Denmark’s integration and immigration minister declares that “we’ve lost to Islam,” due to the violence that always ensues whenever the religion is criticised or made fun of. She points out how making a theatre play mocking “the Mormons” can happen without violent protests and agitation, while few dare to print the Mohammad cartoons in Europe today. This obviously results in Islam getting special treatment in the West, not because we respect it or see it as true, but due to the violence perpetrated by its most feverish practitioners. This happens in our part of the world, where we constantly praise the importance of “freedom of speech,” and our liberal values … Our continent also has a history of standing up to Islamic expansionism, so the current situation can at best be described as remarkable. Political, expansionist Islam, and Holy Islamic Warriors are not supposed to be our problem.

Social Media is addictive and can ruin your kids. Former Apple, Google and Facebook employees are sounding the alarm, stating that apps are designed “to get people hooked,” to paraphrase.

I’ve previously expressed my concern regarding micro plastics, and I’m doing what I can to help where I live. I’ve come across some new information about the topic, some good news and some really bad.

What’s uplifting to know is that there is an initiative in the works to clean up the oceans, thanks to an invention by a young-punk originally from Croatia, but with Dutch citizenship, who has taken matters into his own hands starting this company. Funny enough I noticed yesterday that some of my online contacts have already been sharing material about “The Ocean Cleanup” so I guess I’m late in hearing about this. Nevertheless this is precisely the sort of “individualism” and “innovation” our societies need, not only does it inspire hope, it also brings people together to solve one of the greatest threats we stand face to face with in our age. On their site they are looking for people to join their team and to contribute, check them out or share their posts! This is cool stuff!

On the other hand; it is equally important to spread the news that plastics/emballage is even more dangerous than a lot of us have probably known. The chemicals contained within our packaging leaks into our food! The health consequences are astonishing and contribute to the “fertility” problem we are currently facing among males in Europe, the side effects are equally alarming for women. Plastic bottles, tin cans, receipts from the store, it is everywhere…If you are concerned about what you put on your skin as well, then check out this entry of mine: “Skin Care. Red Flag Alert.

Quote from original article:

“Children and pregnant women are particularly susceptible to damage from ingesting the BPA chemical because they have vast amounts of growth and developmental hormones coursing through their bodies.

Worryingly, researchers have made strong associations between exposure to BPA when we are young and changes in behaviour, including disrupted brain development in children, along with increased probability of childhood asthma.

That said, the impact of early exposure to hormone-disrupting chemicals like BPA may not become apparent until much later in life. It can even affect future generations because it can have a damaging effect on female reproduction, and has the potential to affect male reproductive systems. A large number of scientific studies have associated BPA with numerous health problems including early puberty, obesity, infertility, the inhibition of insulin, hyperactivity and learning disabilities. It has also been connected to a possible increased risk of breast and prostate cancer, heart disease and type 2 diabetes.

Normally, if we were aware something could pose such a threat to our health, we would go to great lengths to avoid it. But BPA is so ubiquitous that that’s virtually impossible.

Researchers surmise that people all over the world of all ages are likely to have a measurable amount of BPA in their blood, urine or body tissue. Several government studies have detected BPA in large portions of the population, including 93 per cent of the US population aged six and older, and 99 per cent of the population in Germany aged 3-14. This new study into the high number of teenagers with BPA in their digestive system serves only to underscore that concern.”

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5351661/Chemicals-plastic-90-teenage-bodies.html#ixzz56ZU3Whxx
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

An astonishing admission published by a mainstream media outlet. One can only hope that truth will cease to be seen as inappropriate in our part of the world, as this mentality is not helping us in any kind of way. I’ve been guilty of sharing articles on this blog from one Asian scientist in particular, who unapologetically research the various frequencies in traits among different populations. A very interesting topic indeed, unless you’re in denial over genuine diversity. After all it is the plethora and variance of life that makes this planet so very intriguing, but alas. Hopefully there will be more articles published like this. *Applause* Applause* A sigh of relief *

“three-quarters of the epigenetic difference between the two ethnic subgroups could be accounted for by differences in the children’s genetic ancestry. The rest of the epigenetic differences, the authors suggest, may reflect a biological stamp made by the different experiences, practices, and environmental exposures distinct to the two ethnic subgroups.”

“Researchers and clinicians have known for many years that different racial and ethnic populations get diseases at different rates, respond differently to medications, and show very different results on standard clinical tests: “For a whole range of medical tests, whether your physician is told that your lab result is normal or abnormal depends entirely on the race/ethnicity box that you tick on an intake form,” Zaitlen said.”

ABC News covering the same story.

Another astonishing article from a mainstream media outlet. What on earth is happening?

A tweet from an expert on population groups trying to put the record straight.

survive the jive

This is a well-written article about current elitism and how it backfires and fails.

The U.S. shuts down spooky cyber crime ring.

More cyber crime. Watch out for online advertisers if you own a business.

Freemasons call for end to “discrimination” of members. (Maybe they are tired of being depicted as shapeshifting reptilians … I wonder why…..)

My deepest sympathies goes out to Lana Del Rey. Not cool.

The author of this article completely forgets to credit Christian values and influence when alluding to the philanthropy of the past. It is a funny read nonetheless.

I’m spiritual yes, but this article is nothing short of disturbing in my opinion. Of all the kids I was exposed to as little and out of all of the various individuals I’ve run into, there have been very few who’ve ever fallen into the category of being genuinely gay/differently oriented. There was never any doubt in my mind however that these few individuals “were born this way,” this is especially noticeable when encountering a kid who obviously has the “wrong” gender. This is a rarity to run into. It is also crucial to note, that chemicals can potentially alter our preferences and identities to a certain extent, which I’ve mentioned previously. If you mess around with a person’s hormones before/during puberty you are playing with fire and run the risk of someone “becoming another gender,” or in other words: becoming confused and “ruined” from a traditional (and probably also medical) perspective. So regardless of how you look at it, it is obvious that once the change has happened, whether in the womb or outside, there is no going back. (I base this opinion on individuals who were injected with hormones and all of a sudden started “identifying” as something else, even in one case having a gender-altering-operation, from what I’ve gathered).

I find it astonishing that there would be people out there believing that so-called conversion therapy can have any effect at all whatsoever. It seems clear that it only ruins people, much like messing around with hormones. It is also obvious that a blank-slate theory has to be in place for people to believe in this. Nobody who understands heritability or genetics, even if only scratching the surface of it, would ever believe in the absurdity of a blank slate. It is so out-of-date that is beggars belief that this myth is still around. If people are so concerned with fighting gayness, they would have to do that on a genetic level, and of course in that case you’ll always have the question of ethics. There are people who will not abort babies with downs because they value all life. I’ve seen a video of a man with Downs protecting his right to life. It is heartbreaking hearing people protecting their right to existence, arguing against those who want to permanently remove them from our midst.

Last time I checked eugenics as practised by the Nazis is seen as a dark chapter in our history, ironically enough it can be argued that it never went out of practise, but that it rather changed “character.” I heard a heart-breaking story of how a woman was advised to abort her pregnancy by her doctor, due to the genes of her offspring; the doctor claimed that the baby had certain traits commonly found within the prison population and that the child would probably become problematic in the future, posing a potential threat. Due to the mother’s old age, she was advised to get rid of the child, since he would have been “too much to handle for her.” These type of practises happens in this day and age, in our “tolerant” and “loving” societies, full of “acceptance” and “equality.”

Apparently there shouldn’t be equality for all when it comes to the right to life. An interesting thing to think about … especially when taking into consideration that people displaying psychopathic traits don’t necessarily end up being a menace to society. There are functional individuals out there with internal and external dysfunctions, in fact, I wonder how many individuals we are potentially looking at removing prematurely, when considering how widespread minor and major quirks are. The amount of individuals suffering from mental health issues, as I’ve also written about before, is predicted to increase. The older you get the more you increase the risk of a hitting the wall mentally as well due to negative life-experiences. So I wonder if modern eugenicists are thinking much about all of this? You’ll have no people left in the end…Unless we are to finalize the ubermensch fantasy with our new tech….and how will that play out?

The latest from the political correctness brigade & our post-modern culture:

The Norwegian Broadcasting Corporation are receiving complaints after an online show was aired where participants drank their own urine and made omelettes out of vomit which they then ate. (I couldn’t even watch the footage in this article). Ironically enough the NRK stated that “their aim is to create content that can appeal to the YouTube generation,” to paraphrase. So I guess that says an awful lot about what people think of young people and their interests … Many years ago I sounded the alarm after hearing from peers in Norway that they had baked cakes with vomit and served it to their teachers and principal… My warning was not listened to, as I guess it was uncomfortable to hear this. In fact I don’t think my complaint ever reached the principal. So maybe it isn’t strange that NRK would broadcast what they did……

More political correctness coming from Sweden. Swedish Males to contemplate their own white privilege….

Sweden appoints Pakistani Muslim Head of National Heritage Board.  Norwegians have always made jokes about Swedes being stupid, I always took this for friendly bantering … now I’m not so sure anymore … Scandinavian countries are constantly depicted as bastions of well-functioning liberalism … enough said.

Political correctness working retroactively … if you ever wanted a reason for not creating then check out these party-poopers. Makes me think of Tim Burton coming under fire due to his casting preferences. Lame.

A high school in America cancelled the screening of the legendary movie “Cool Runnings” since it was deemed politically incorrect …  I’ve seen it several times in the past and it depicts a Jamaican Bobsled Team kicking ass. I guess this is offensive….

Why is Liberal California the poverty capital of America?

These are some really bad undercover videos revealing a high school teacher’s absolute contempt for the U.S. Military. This is not good at all. One thing is to disagree with what the civilian leadership might be up to, but this portrayal of Military men as idiots is not only inaccurate it is also incredibly ungrateful. I feel for the young man who was singled out and made fun of in front of his entire class. If this is how the future of the U.S. Military is to be treated by the civilian population; picked on and singled out for mockery, then don’t expect much of a future. It is also important to add, that the UK Army are apparently experiencing a recruitment crisis….It is quite obvious that our Western Civilisation is struggling, on both sides of the Atlantic. 

The latest public hate-mail written to the Trump Administration: 

Silly argument, but a very funny acronym: “Preventing Allocation of Resources for Absurd Defense Expenditures

Vice President Mike Pence apparently needs to learn what American values are : I wonder if I’m a hero for coming out as straight?

More people hating on retired Marine General, now White House Chief of Staff, John Kelly. Quote from the author: “White House Chief of Staff John Kelly has just about shed his previous identity of presidential babysitter and taken on his final form, “just another bigoted Trump Administration loose cannon.” With his comments earlier this week calling Dreamers “lazy,” Kelly finally alienated the last remaining supporters he may have had amongst functional, literate Americans.

Some interesting videos to watch about tech giants potentially spying on you, excessive individualism and the rewriting of history…..

Oh How You’ve Failed Us With Your “Fine” Ideas.

Standard

To read what inspired me to write this entry read here.

Or here. Or here.

I’ve been thinking for a while that we’ll probably miss these post-WW2 years, where all that could be sensed by those my age at least were the signs of a diseased society and the visible fractures in our constructs mercilessly reminding us of our former glorious splendour.

Observing the political landscape here in England these last days has reserved as a reminder, and a confirmation, as to how our institutions have fallen, and when reading this article that I just came across, it is obvious that the symptoms of continental societal illness are visible and clear to some.

I think we’ll miss those years from 1989 when the wall fell, and up until one specific event in the near future which will be of such magnitude that it will symbolically be the last nail in the coffin for the current European Utopia.

What our leadership leaves behind to people my age and younger are disputed territories, identity confusion, seemingly weak military constructs, outsourced labour, poor infrastructure, crumbling healthcare and lots of debt … in other words – nothing short of chaos. God only knows what will be raised in its stead, because the political visions will surely be many and radically diverse.

Some lessons can be learnt from Europe:

1-Do not mass import people from alien cultures.
2-Do not allow people in from countries you’ve bombed or occupied.
3-Never take loyalty for granted from the son if the immigrant father loves your country. Loyalty to identity and ancestry cannot be bought indefinitely.
4-Do not expect people to sell out their values for government benefits, after all, are you really so cheap that you would sell your beliefs for a BMW?
5-Do not allow people into power who prioritize other citizens over their own.
6-Never allow benefits to become the greatest financial burden of the state.
7-Be clear when it comes to the identity and configuration of your country and nation.
8-Do not forget the founders of your nation and those who died to protect it and build it.
9-Do not allow parallel societies to be established as it will only lead to trouble.
10-If you are to create a Union then create it between strong, independent, sovereign, nations, so that the stronger ones won’t be weakened by the poorer ones, or the weaker ones walked all over by the stronger ones. As both scenarios will sow resentment.
11-The number one duty of a government is to ensure military protection for its citizens.
12-Never de-militarize your society as it will render your country weak from the inside out alienating those willing to serve from the rest of the population.
13-Never create a national culture of guilt.
14-There are no such things as progressive policies, only good and bad ones, and sometimes the good ones are old and tried recipes which have stood the test of time.
15-Do not allow your nation to become a vassal state.
16-Do not allow your nation to be mismanaged for decades as it will probably take even longer to sort it all out.
17-Disrespect will grow if you espouse illegitimate or fake authority.
18-Everyone has to be equal under the law and the law has to be sensible.
19-If you allow one ethnic group to get away with things, do not expect that those who are “easy to police” will remain so for much longer.
20-Make an example out of those who stand for poor leadership – and remember that leadership has nothing to do with being “nice to all” or saying what is “politically correct.”
21-Do not let the roles in your society slip to such an extent that normal citizens have to take on the role as journalists and writers.
22-If the media are acting as tools for propaganda, let it at least be known and legally challenged with opposing propaganda.

Some articles of interest:

  1. This is actually a very important read, not necessarily because I’m against the idea of having “stay-behind-troops” (this is a good thing to have in place) nor that I’m against “anti-communist-measures” but it is the idea that is of interest here. Who stand to benefit from the weakening and downfall of your nation? And at the end of the day: who is really responsible? Is an attack only just that? Is it disguised targeting masked as random acts of terror? And why would you believe those who take official credit? Where does the funding come from if it can be traced?
  2. Word of mouth has it that Norway already has “Swedish Conditions” in certain areas. I also wrote a little while ago that our government had to agree to over 2.000 new quota-refugees in 2018. Still this interview with our immigration & integration minister is interesting.
  3. Dire news regarding England’s Police. Unbelievable both the downsizing and how the funds are being spent. Some months ago I read in an “analogue newspaper” that an ex-police chief was lamenting the current priorities of our police force, such as political correctness training and “bring all of you to work day” (to paraphrase). A transgender friendly initiative/day.
  4. Officially it  is said that this film is from the UK, it certainly looks like it. I’ve seen similar footage across social media from Birmingham and other areas in this country. I’ve also driven through neighbourhoods like this around London and other places in Europe. The New-Europe.  Not to forget what I’ve seen myself.
  5. People smugglers have an easy time in the UK as Border Patrol is suffering from budget cuts leaving the coastline open and vulnerable … incredible. There were people in 2016 who were calling for the resurrection of the “Home Guard,” what I find interesting is this quote that I found in a Wikipedia article about General Sir Anthony Heritage Farrar-Hockley recently: He declared to The Guardian that a secret arms network was established in Britain after the war, but refused to say if it still existed. He aroused controversy in 1983 when he became involved trying to organise a campaign for a new home guard against possible Soviet invasion and in 1990, following Italian Prime minister Giulio Andreotti’s October 1990 revelations concerning Operation Gladio, a NATO stay-behind network, he revealed that the armed anti-communist secret resistance network across western European had involved Britain.[1][5]. I have no idea why any of this would be controversial, especially the revival of the Home Guard? Why would this be looked upon as weird? Why??????????
  6.  A sanction only works if there are no back doors right? That’s what I’m thinking anyway. The Turkish leadership is problematic and their desire for EU membership certainly is as well. The size of their force is not good either. They represent a danger to Europe; not that this is something new. The amount of Turks within European nations as well pose a risk, demonstrated by Erdogan’s recent political agitation, which I wrote about somewhere on this blog 😛 It’s easy to find articles about this anyway…..
  7. Norway has to rent military equipment, sarcastic politicians wonder if we’ll have to rent soldiers as well since the Norwegian military has seen better days.
  8. The author of this article refers to it as provocative behaviour when right-wing activists march through English territory inhabited by Muslims and/or other alien immigrants, as we apparently should consider these zones to be theirs. I assume that we should consider these places lost and keep out of them? What do we do when they inevitably expand? Should Ethnic Britons and other European ethnic groups simply abandon the island, so as to not offend the aliens? The author also has the audacity to claim that you are part of a european ethnic group as long as you’re born here to immigrant parents. A direct assault on ethnic Europeans and our distinct populations, once again. This is a blatant lie. There are races, then there are ethnicities, then you got differences within your ethnic group partly or maybe entirely (?) as a result of your distribution through your own territory, and finally you have individual differences. And there might even be more variances. The fact that the claims in this article are supposed to be accepted as canon is bogus. Feel free to read my “How To Be Evil In 2017.,”entry or my Identity. entry or my Diversity – Why It Is A Complex Issue. entry or this Acid Attacks & Diversity In The UK.

I will share more articles and translate more horrible news articles from Scandinavia. There is one shocking story in particular from Sweden, that illustrates how rape is being used as a weapon against Ethnic European women.

Whatever that is left of the European spirit cannot be allowed to die. If everyone loses faith in Europe we are officially done; and by Europe I mean all of our individual nation states and their distinct European ethnic groups. Our shared and individual heritage is ours and we can not let it go. If we don’t care about our cultures anymore, then why should anyone else? Love your country, love your people, know your history, or you’ll perish.

Coaching & Judging on the TV Show “Stjernekamp” once again!

Standard

Without a doubt the highlight of an extremely lame year.

I was asked if I would be interested in partaking in Norway’s Nr.1 Saturday Night TV Show this spring and got the call as I was biking on the French Riviera trying to forget my injured shoulder and poor overall health.

The offer was certainly a ray of light after a terrible start to the year where everything that could go wrong certainly did. As always silence and secrecy was demanded as is the case with serious music industry projects, so as the 007 that I am I didn’t reveal to anyone that I was going to Norway until some days prior and once I went I didn’t reveal to anyone what I was doing until I started promoting the Show on Social Media.

I brought my brother with me as I wasn’t particularly keen on travelling by myself for several reasons. First of all it was my health, second of all it was my security. I’ve had way too much time on my hands this year to read through way too much unflattering material about the current state of affairs in Scandinavia and the rest of Europe. As a petite, unarmed, female I wanted a chaperone.

Out & about ✈️ #terminal2 #heathrow #heathrowairport @heathrow_airport #flying

A post shared by The Commander In Chief (@thecommanderinchief1) on

Birdwatching volume II @heathrow_airport #flying #airportbird #aviator

A post shared by The Commander In Chief (@thecommanderinchief1) on

IMG_4286

I couldn’t believe my eyes when I saw this. When did Europeans all of a sudden need these type of instructions? Absolutely ridiculous. Makes me think of this idiotic sign over in London :

IMG_7616

IMG_4289

I found several typos in SAS’s inflight magazine 😮 The things I see…

IMG_4294

Yummy! The first thing I ate after landing in Norway 😛 Yum – yum!!!

That being said I contemplated temporarily making my blog private before I set out to travel since the entertainment industry appears to be extremely far-left-leaning, at least that’s the general impression, and after all, maybe things aren’t really that bad in Europe. It might be Russian propaganda … at least it is according to Angela Merkel …

I made the decision to let it all stand in case my flight crashed since I’ve posted what I’ve posted in order to warn and help other people. When I found myself on the train leaving Oslo International Airport I certainly felt that I had done the right thing as a ridiculous news story broke of how American tourists had been attacked with acid in Marseille. Why oh why any white person would go into that part of France baffles me, since it was commonly known as a territory you avoided 15 years ago when I lived in Southern France … I was one of the first bloggers out there to share articles about the current Acid-epidemic in England the second that these stories were shared by the mainstream media, as a result I’ve had lots of readers checking out those entries, and it has increased, as the new Acid-reality has become part of everyday life. The most dangerous areas in London are predominantly non-English territories; the most common victims are white men. Apparently it has all grown from there, turning petty criminals into Acid-attackers since it is an effective way to mug people…These are things that tourists need to know!  Acid Attacks In The UK.

After seeing more news of cultural enrichment we switched to a bus which took us right past a brand  new looking Mega-Mosque that appeared out of nowhere and looked completely out-of-place in Norway, we were then greeted by a young Norwegian relative who updated us on life in the New-Norway, confirming all of our worst expectations, aligning perfectly with what I’ve observed myself in England and France, what I’ve heard from others, and also what I’ve read online … 😦

There is simply no escape from the New-Europe. Not even an innocent show-biz trip to Norway can shield you from the new reality. Not-even-that.

Yet there are plenty of Norwegians who defend the fundamental cultural transformation even proudly and loudly promoting replacement migration, without worrying about the consequences, since differences between various ethnic groups is a mirage apparently. It is a bit difficult to buy into this if talking to those who actually live or work in the New-Norway, or the New-Sweden for that matter, even more difficult if you’ve experienced it yourself….but oh well … each to their own I guess. People’s values and convictions seem immovable. Unless you want to fall out with people you just have to accept that you fundamentally disagree about what Norway/Europe is and what it should be. The viewpoints are irreconcilable. Only respect, maturity, and love, can smooth out heated discussions.

Reality aside, the sun always shines on TV, so it was nice to coach some talented people and bury my head in entertainment, which is  what most people do anyway. It’s probably a way better activity to partake in, it’s not like awareness makes you happy or anything.

Anyway, the TV-Team were lovely and had been notified of my reduced state, so I was even provided with a place where I could rest as I coached an interesting assortment of Norway’s entertainment elite…

IMG_4296

The first one up was a guy called Didrik Solli-Tangen who looked like your prototypical classical musician in terms of how he was dressed and groomed with the mandatory oversized scarf and all. He won Norway’s Eurovision Song contest and does classical crossover with his opera singing brother among other things. After I worked with him I also found out that he has been touring Norway singing Norwegian patriotic songs from the National Romantic era which surprised me as I thought that I was the only one championing National Romanticism in the “current year.” Isn’t the old Norway dead???? Apparently not.

As I shook his hand I wondered if he knew about “alt”-Berit, which was something I asked myself each time I greeted a new artist. I guess this is the drawback of not being a Che Guevara loving, flag burning, short-haired, Palestine-scarf wearing, socialist-revolutionary. You instantly wonder: “does this person know that I’m an outspoken, anti-globalist, pro-borders, nationalist?” *Ta-ta-tam* (insert dark music). There are lots of conservative & classical liberal people out there, it’s just that it isn’t equally represented in the media or in show biz, nationalism is also portrayed as outdated, in addition to being vilified by the mainstream press, so you can easily feel like you are throwing rocks into glass houses. Even if this is not the case. The current political landscape is therefore not portrayed accurately I believe. Division and hate seem to be the goal of many dark forces. After having been on “Stjernekamp” I also found out that Gaute Ormåsen is featured on a track called “The Fatherland.” Huh????What on earth is this??? Maybe the winds are changing or maybe Norway is different. One can hope……

Waiting is always mandatory when it comes to anything show-biz related so when the team finally were ready I did an interview explaining what heavy metal is, before we headed into the rehearsal area where I spent most of my time.

Solli-Tangen only had to do one vocalise for me to realise that he was really good. That is the advantage of being classically trained. So I have to admit that I was pretty biased before his rehearsal was over. He also had a really cool attitude. Don’t get me wrong, the others were cool as well, but it’s a technical thing. If you spend years training your ears in classical music etc; it does affect what you prefer I’m afraid 😛

The next one up was a pretty girl called Lisa Børud a big Christian singer in Norway; I thought that was kind of cool since Christianity is having a very hard time all over Europe these days. On the other hand I was also slightly worried about what her view on rock’n’roll would be, since Satanism is so closely linked and associated with the genre. I stopped myself from telling her to flash the horns for example, because even though this is a sign meant to ward off evil spirits, it is by modern standards seen as a Satanic gesture…..She had a pretty voice and was solid but had made a horrible song choice, something that I heard right away. I thought that this was a great shame and would have preferred if something else could have been chosen instead. I didn’t have a lot to work with so this was the coaching session that took the longest. I was genuinely worried, because your job as a coach is to be in the corner of the artist and help the artist shine regardless of your personal preferences. I did my best but felt sad on Lisa’s behalf as I was convinced that she would be voted out due to the song-choice.

IMG_4498

The next contestant was Adam Douglas who actually won the entire competition. Apparently he was relatively unknown before participating in “Stjernekamp.” He had picked a fantastic song for his voice type and technique, I therefore didn’t really have much to tell him vocally, besides cutting down on some absolutely, out of place, spastic, wobble. The greatest challenge with this contestant was his stage presence and body language. This certainly seemed problematic as being tough and owning the stage is part and parcel of doing rock or hard rock. It is an interesting thing to note how different temperaments and energy levels draw musicians to such different genres…

And speaking of which … Gaute Ormåsen was the next name on the list and he is a huge star in Norway. He certainly looked like a movie star but had the most docile charisma I think I’ve ever encountered 😛 He was able to get the rocker out of himself and sounded tough; I was just very surprised at the total lack of attitude and the negative mentality. He entered the room without any confidence and seemed hell-bent on losing, not because of lack of talent but because of a lack of self-belief and fighting spirit, of all things. A very strange thing to observe to be honest, especially for someone that big. He left the rehearsal way too early as well, so I was wondering if he really wanted to be there or if he was just tired of the whole tv-show and wanted out. :/ Who knows? Nice guy though. Cool voice \m/

The last person to enter the rehearsal space was international rockstar Ida Maria, who graced the front cover of NME the first year I lived in London and haunted the rock charts with her hit song “I like you so much better when you’re naked.” I had no doubts that she would be smashing since she is 100% rock’n’roll; she also thought it was cool to meet me, another rock chick which was kind of cool. She had made an excellent song choice. Covering Lemmy gave her the opportunity to show off her rock’n’rollness, she literally lit the rehearsal space on fire. It was fun and a joy to watch. I didn’t really correct much on her vocally, because Ida as I’ve already said is a rocker, a rocker with a raspy Lemmy-like voice, the sort that would fit perfectly in a sweaty rock club filled with angry dissenters who hate the system and want to tear it down. I was convinced that she would win the audience over completely, and even though Didrik was the most accomplished singer technically out of the bunch, I also had Ida on top of my list due to her attitude and undisputed rock’n’roll charisma. No wonder she has collaborated with Iggy Pop to put it that way. Here we talk attitude with huge capital letters.

I made a new friend.

After an exhausting day we returned back to our lair. Again I must say I was blown away by the professionalism of the Monster team; they were extremely sweet and understanding and did everything to make my day as smooth as possible. I was very happy and grateful for the treatment. A real top-team!

What followed were some days of relaxation rather than the original idea of me flying back and forth between England and Norway. I think that would have been way too exhausting. There were many people I wanted to visit and many things I wanted to see while staying in a suburb outside Oslo, yet I had to rein in my excitement and stay put, since I had to have the energy for my live-tv performance as an expert judge later that week.

IMG_4384IMG_4393

Whoever said Norway was cold?

 

IMG_4401

It’s an interesting thing to note how integrated “allergies” have become into our pop-culture … Once upon a time nobody really knew how to handle people with food problems. It is good to see that it is now taken seriously on the other hand it is alarming that auto-immune diseases seem to be increasing. I wonder when it will be revealed what the triggers are? It is in the interests of the public and future parents to know this. A person’s life can be completely shattered if they go into a proper shock. Food allergy is a chronic, life-threatening, dangerous disease.

Norway is apparently so sexist that only men care about Science, Hunting & History. If I was a 3rd wave feminist I would demand that these types of publications ought to be placed in “gender neutral territory.” It is kind of funny though. In the women’s section you got gossip magazines, fashion publications, erotic fiction and magazines about the house and home. Hilarious. Where are the activists when you need them?

That embarrassing moment when you think that you’ve spotted a Norwegian wild-cat outside, and run out to catch a glimpse of it, only to realise that it is a normal, house cat. Lol. Ridiculous.

That moment when you realise that someone looking like Putin is part of your relative’s family tree.

When you proudly show off that your hair is so long that you don’t need a hair band to keep it up 😀 ha-ha! Check me out! Berit-long-hair.

Fast forward to Saturday……

Toxic masculinity in the background.

Walking around the venue….The Voice also shoots there in case you wondered.

…….and the live show was amazing. I really enjoyed it. It’s a fun show. I find it strange that the concept hasn’t been adopted by foreign broadcasters actually … I’m sure a show like this could be a big hit in a country like England or America. You can see footage with translations from the show below:

Freaking badass. I totally dig this. So cool.

ATTITUDE!!!!!!!!!

Great song choice & a convincing performance. I would have had this guy up there with Didrik if it wasn’t for Ida Maria’s attitude and rawness \m/

Gaute managed to look like a bad guy 😀 he-he-he 😛 Mission accomplished. He did a good job \m/ \m/ \m/  I couldn’t believe that he seemed so indifferent after being voted out :/ Weird. I wonder if he ever gets angry?

I did not look very excited during Lisa’s performance. I feel a bit bad about that. My face is way too easy to read. Lovely girl though and a lovely voice. I feel bad about my tragic face.

 

Fun fact: nobody wanted to hang out after the show! Besides the drummer in the band 😛 My brother and I certainly had our jokes about how everyone were probably avoiding us 😛 Who knows 😛 You don’t need a lot of people to have a good time though 😛 ha-ha

Do you see what I see?

Illuminati confirmed! 😛 hahahaha

It was a cool experience to be part of “Stjernekamp.” It was so last time and it was so this time as well. The people behind the show are extraordinarily good! It is a great privilege to be part of a major production, it’s a lot of fun I must say. I wouldn’t mind doing more stuff like this.

I enjoyed my stay in Norway a lot. As I already said we were staying in a quiet suburb and also had the opportunity to spend time with Norwegian relatives. I ate lots of good Norwegian food which always makes my day 😛

The day after the live show we were on our way back home to “Rule Britannia, Britannia rule the waves.”

Is Christianity & Islam Compatible?

Standard

Politicians and the mainstream media are constantly telling us that the two religions are the best of friends. These days it isn’t uncommon to hear of Islamic prayers being held within the walls of Christian churches, I even attended a lecture myself about persecuted Christians where the lecturer told me that Muslims and Christians should stand more together. This was something he said after delivering a presentation where he explained that the most common persecutors of Christians are Muslims … This speaker labeled the secularists as the greatest evil. His endorsement of Islam came after he had described how Muslims didn’t want to walk past him when he was out walking his dog, as Muslims detest these animals….He also stated that Jihadis will stop with their murderous activity when given BMWs and other materialist goods here in Europe … since welfare and exposure to convenience will eradicate Militant Islam.

It seemed like the audience was slightly bewildered, as some certainly were supportive of his conclusion due to mixed grandchildren or after having attended Interfaith events; in contrast there were those speaking of how Muslims had harassed them here in England, and they did not seem very happy nor convinced. Not that long ago I attended a service where the priest highlighted at every opportunity, how unique Christianity is and how this faith is the most peaceful one. A shocking thing to hear in these politically correct times. Thou Shall Only Have One God? Really? We even prayed for the Jihadis here in England; that they may find enlightenment in Jesus Christ. So we basically prayed for their conversion so that they will stop killing Europeans. Hilarious, I couldn’t believe it. Where is the media when you need them? Another service that I attended at another church a while back was more directed towards young people, they had speakers rather than preachers, and the one we heard, spoke of how Muslims were harassing her and making fun of her Christian faith. This girl looked like she came from India and thanked her church for providing her with enough information through their Bible Study Group, so that she could defend her faith from Muslims humiliating Jesus.

So … what happens when you Google what I wrote in the title of this entry? What does Islam say about Christianity? What is the relationship between the two, since we are so similar according to our politicians and journalists?

This is what you’ll find, written by those who’ve read the Muslim & Christian texts:

Islam vs. Christianity – A very good comparison.

Islam vs. Christianity 2

Islam vs. Christianity 3

Islam vs. Christianity 4

Islam vs. Christianity 5

When you are done looking at those you can read what a Mainstream Media Outlet Thinks.

 

“Decision Points” by George W. Bush.

Standard

“I had no desire to turn the NSA into an Orwellian Big Brother. I knew that the Kennedy brothers had teamed up with J.Edgar Hoover to listen illegally to the conversations of innocent people, including Martin Luther King, Jr. Lyndon Johnson had continued the practice. I thought that was a sad chapter in our history, and I wasn’t going to repeat it.” (p.164)

This book offers a crucial insight into how American enlightenment principles colour the world view and drive the foreign policy of Washington. It can be seen in the small sentences – as quoted and commented on by me further down in this long entry. Please read this book. It is a must read for those of us who want to understand. 

When my mother suggested to me some years ago that I should read “Decision Points,” I was less than enthusiastic in my response. It probably resembled more of a grunt. Why would I be interested in reading a book authored by a President my peers and I, along with all of our teachers, the entertainment industry and (eventually) the mainstream media had disliked to such an extent? Anti-war protesters young and old were risking imprisonment all in the name of publicly displaying their dissent loud and clear. Michael Moore was on the war path spreading his propaganda far and wide, Europeans rolled their eyes at “Cowboy-politics” from the USA while “anti-Bush” songs became almost a music industry standard in the last years of Bush’s presidency. I guess it displays maturity to expose oneself to something authored by those one disagrees with. Just as it would be wise to read up on Marxist literature and the Quran.

To anyone who lived in the USA during and after 9-11, like myself,  Bush’s book proves an emotional read as the reader is reminded of a bleak time when the US was united in grief and anger. The vocabulary and flow of the book is straightforward and easy, but for anyone who remembers that fateful day in September, the Anthrax threat that followed, preachers visiting schools and fathers getting ready to go to war; it will be impossible to not shed a tear or two. For a President that was so widely vilified and hated in the  later years of his presidency – it should be made mandatory to get a peek at the President’s perspective – from the man himself. I also started criticising the “Bush regime” at a certain point due to water boarding as approved by the Bush administration, the damning photos leaked depicting abuse towards muslim prisoners, the War in Iraq and the lack of weapons of mass-destruction + the potential for violation of civil rights due to the much criticised Patriot Act. Did I read the Act myself? No funny enough I did not; yet I was against it as the narrative of America turning into Orwell’s dystopian 1984 prevailed everywhere. You could get sent to Guantanamo without a trial. Protests were rampant. The Bush administration was hated just as much on both sides of the Atlantic. Many were peddling the viewpoint that the USA Inc. only wanted the oil in Iraq, many Americans even started believing that 9-11 was planned and executed by their very own government….

IMG_3503

“I knew that an interrogation program this sensitive and controversial would one day become public. When it did, we would open ourselves up to criticism that America had compromised our moral values. I would have preferred that we get the information another way. But the choice between security and values was real. Had I not authorised waterboarding on senior al Qaeda leaders, I would have had to accept a greater risk that the country would be attacked. In the wake of 9/11, that was a risk I was unwilling to take.” (p.169)

Yet here we are again with a conservative administration in power. Iran & North-Korea are once again defined as enemies, the axis of evil is back into the public discourse, the war on Islamic terrorism has gotten worse and the Obama administration now seems like some awkward intermezzo. Much like The Ministry Of Magic in Harry Potter denying the return of Voldemort and Professor Dolores Umbridge seeing no need in teaching her students how to defend themselves as there are no dangers, there are no threats. Much of the general hatred towards Bush had to deal with the fact that he was a conservative I’m sure. Dick Cheney was Darth Vader, Karl Rove was the grim reaper; now Steve Bannon has taken over “the grim reaper torch” while Trump is the new Hitler, just like Bush was back in the day….

“I was amazed the Times couldn’t wait even a month to tag Afghanistan with the Vietnam label.” (p.199)

“We killed the PATRIOT Act,” Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid, who had voted for the law in 2001, bragged at a political rally.” (p.177)

“Perceptions are shaped by the clarity of hindsight. In the moment of decision, you don’t have that advantage.” (p.180)

It is particularly illuminating and revealing to read about the accusations of “bigotry,” “racism,” and “xenophobia” that were thrown around at the time, directed towards Bush’s associates, most of whom you’ve probably never heard of or remember. It is also interesting to note that Bush’s legitimacy was questioned in addition to calls for his impeachment. After witnessing a couple of Presidential elections and how different politicians are treated by the press, the cultural elite and the protesters on the streets; it becomes a bit easier to see the bigger picture. I remember very clearly that a good friend of mine who was very active politically, told me that protest organisers in the US didn’t really care about the War in Iraq. They engaged in “inter-sectionalism” recruiting “foot soldiers” from various disgruntled groups so that they could descend upon Washington great in numbers. How unpopular the Bush “regime” really was I guess we’ll never know too clearly, since anti-Americans and radical-revolutionaries seized the “recruitment” opportunity presented to them back then. We see it all again now with all of these anti-Trump protests, accusations of his illegitimacy and calls for murder and impeachment.

“Our national security was tied directly to human suffering. Societies mired in poverty and disease foster hopelessness. And hopelessness leaves people ripe for recruitment by terrorists and extremists.” (p.336)

What is most striking about Bush’s chapter about the War in Iraq is/was his idealistic vision of the world, something which he shared and probably still shares with his pal Tony Blair. Some of the segments in this book display a blind belief that more current experiences with Islamism in Europe surely must have dispelled … “People who could choose their leaders at the ballot box would be less likely to turn to violence. Young people growing up with hope in the future would not search for meaning in the ideology of terror. Once liberty took root in one society, it could spread to others.” The highlighting of that quote was my doing, but I find it crucial to bring attention to it due to its ignorance. It is precisely due to this type of thinking that Europe will lose against Islamists. We have no understanding of convictions … we believe that materialism will miraculously satisfy the hunger for a cause, something to stand for, something to fight for, and most crucially the enormous importance of identity and fundamental tribalism. Only those with a deep understanding of the true meaning of diversity and the deep-seated need for masculine-honour will be up to the modern challenges we face. We have to ask ourselves what our “shared values” really are, clearly articulate and define them while establishing a National or Continental objective – a common purpose. What do we really stand for? What are we aiming for? What are we fighting for?

“One of the most effective forms of diplomacy is to show the good heart of America to the world.” (p.214)

The idea that dropping democracy into people heads will change the world into a peaceful global utopia is in my opinion absurd. It is also a questionable action to empower and enrich other competing nations that might not adhere to such strong morals as us in the west. It might force us into very unfavourable situations in the future.  Another interesting quote is this: “For months, we had been pressing the Turks to give us access to their territory so that we could send fifteen thousand troops from the Fourth Infantry Division to enter Iraq from the north. We promised to provide economic and military aid, help Turkey access key programs from the International Monetary Fund, and maintain our strong support for Turkey’s admission to the European Union.” The highlight was mine once again. This quote openly displays black on white America’s lack of knowledge or carelessness when it comes to European heritage and cultural interests. If Turkey gets access to the EU and the “free float of people” we are officially done. That will be the end of us. Completely. The fact that the US would actually promise to engage in lobbying intended to sell out Europe in order to have strategic access into Iraq – speaks volumes, when you think about the long-term consequences a EU membership for a Muslim nation would entail – it is surely not the act of friends and display dubious intentions on behalf of the US or an inability to foresee long-term negative consequences.

I suppose that my predictions and writings have been true – that we really and truly do stand alone. All alone as a continent. With enemies in the East, in the South, in addition to indifference or ignorance from the West. There you have Europe.

“I left the clinic inspired. The patients reaffirmed my conviction that every life has dignity and value, because every person bears the mark of Almighty God.” (p.333)

On the other hand a conclusion can be drawn that Bush was one hell of a “domestic president,” maybe even a visionary, as he tackled sensitive national issues head on rather than looking away. He tried to change social security that was heading for bankruptcy and was willing to put his head on the chopping block politically as he was more concerned with the future of America rather than instant popularity and elections. He also tackled the immigration crisis and tried to stretch out his hand to the Democrats in an attempt to again solve a sensitive and controversial, in fact divisive issue. He managed to change healthcare to a certain degree for those who were forced to work in their old age to pay for drugs. He managed to keep schools accountable for their performance levels in a political climate where money spent was seen as more important than actual tangible results. He was particularly focused on levelling the playing field for forgotten minorities, so the accusations he had to endure about his “racist nature” seem dubious and unfounded. All in all I think that Bush would have been a phenomenal success if he had kept to his vision of being the education president, instead he became the war president. His face branded by the media as that of a modern Satan character. After reading Bush’s book there is no doubt in my mind that he would have thrived as the domestic CEO of USA Inc. rather than a global exporter of well-intentioned enlightenment principles.

Reading about Bush’s initiative to save sub-Saharan countries from the AIDS epidemic, the Malaria maladie and whatnot, proves an interesting read taking into account the migration crisis Europe currently faces from those regions…. We as a continent are in deep shit in lack of better words and matters will only get worse. Yet another example of how well-intentioned charity can turn lethal and dangerous in the long run. I know it isn’t a popular thing to say, but it is true. Europeans are not guilty of over population. Far from it. If we don’t get more kids and become more militant in the protection of our borders, we are doomed.

“The last thing I wanted to do was bail out Wall Street.” (p.460)

After reading about Bono’s visit at the Bush White House where he praised Bush’s Africa initiative I’ve reached the conclusion that Bono & celebrities like J.K.Rowling should be sent down to the Mediterranean or elsewhere on the Southern border, so that they can be the “first responders” when the real Tsunami of the African zombie-apocalypse hits us. No wonder people are furious all over the western world, when righteous celebrities who :

  1. hide behind their armed security guards
  2. hide behind high walls on their estate
  3. hide within fortified buildings when travelling
  4. do everything to avoid the taxes they want to impose on everyone else

voice their opinions and even lobby for their culturally suicidal endeavours. You wonder why people are angry? It’s easy to see why. Of course Bono would appear out of nowhere to praise the strengthening of Sub-Saharan Africa – I bet he supports the current migrant crisis as well. Idiots. Go talk to ethnic-Europeans or go look at all of those areas that are now ruined. Of course a familiar name pops up too: “I later learned that one of his major funders, ultra-liberal investor George Soros, had excoriated Bono for joining me at the MCA event without getting more in return.” The highlighting was mine. Soros pops up further down in this long entry, in the “quotes section” as well.

Bush also includes some of his speech after a trip to see a grim “slave museum” in Africa: “At this place, liberty and life were stolen and sold. Human beings were delivered and sorted, and weighted, and branded with the marks of commercial enterprises, and loaded as cargo on a voyage without return.” Yes it is good that we acknowledge history and refrain from repeating atrocities, but we cannot let our guard down and expect others to be as civil. A day may come when Europeans are enslaved after being subjugated either by an alien population reaching majority status within our continent or by foreign invaders breaching our depleted defences….It is naive to expect gratitude or that western charity will be reciprocated. We should never take friendliness for granted or expect that the rest of the world put their arms down just because we do it. People are still kidnapped and sold into slavery by international organised crime cartels today. Women and children are forced into prostitution. Human beings are subjected to illegal “organ harvesting.” Militant muslim fighters re-opened ancient slave markets. If anything there should be an intellectual awakening in the west to the violent and dangerous nature of man. Especially in regards to the hate directed towards us. Only then will we be equipped to confront future challenges.

“I am always amazed when I hear Democrats say the financial crisis happened because Republicans pushed deregulation.” (p.455)

BOMBSHELL→ I intended to paste this quote further down in my entry. But since the general attention span in today’s society equals nil I had to put it here: “West Germany emerged as the engine of European prosperity and a vital beacon of freedom during the Cold War. Japan grew into the world’s second-larger economy and the lynchpin of security in the Pacific. South Korea became one of our largest trading partners and a strategic bulwark against its neighbour to the north. All three countries benefited from relatively homogenous populations and peaceful postwar environments. In Iraq, the journey would be more difficult.” (my highlighting) Ha! Take that. Everyone with more than two brain cells know the pitfalls of multiculturalism. But what is this? On page 357 Bush finally reveals the inevitable challenges posed by the glorified multi-ethnic utopia that political forces have fought so hard to implement upon us Europeans? H-y-s-t-e-r-i-c-a-l. There goes your post-modern enlightenment values straight out of the window. Or down the toilet. It took me 357 pages to finally find a truthful sentence about the difficulty of implementing post-modern bliss around the world. People are different. Races are different. Ethnicities are different. We create the systems and adapt the values that resonates the most with our genetic inheritance. Thank you Bush. I can’t believe you actually wrote that. “With time and steadfast American support, I had confidence that democracy in Iraq would succeed. That confidence was tested daily.” (My highlight)…ehhh…whatever…when someone is strong in the faith I guess there is no turning back. Whatever. I will celebrate the fact that there at least was some sort of admission about the fallibility of multiculturalism…that is more than what our current European leadership will give us…

I see my country & continent die in slow-motion. Only isolation can spare me the reminder of our perdition. Only self-imposed ignorance can muffle my sadness – but nothing can kill my spirit when faced with the truth – and all truth bequests me is fury and anger.

On a positive note, at least from an American perspective, this book highlights America’s impressive military capabilities and conveys some truly touching stories of the commitment and attitude of American soldiers who hailed Bush as their leader and dedicated all of their strength physically and psychologically to take down America’s enemies and win the war on terror. It is impossible to not get emotional when reading some of these stories.

Of course it is understandable that fighting abroad was justifiable in the name of national security when a primitive looking ensemble broadcasting from what looked like a cave or something over in the impoverished country of Afghanistan could wreak such havoc upon the USA. Bush describes his encounters with troops wounded in battle and grieving families imploring him to keep on going, as they didn’t want their sons or spouses to have died in vain. Bush describes one mother who became an anti-war protester: “She is a mother who clearly loved her son. The grief caused by his loss was so profound that it consumed her life. My hope is that one day she and all the families of our fallen troops will be comforted to see a free Iraq and a more peaceful world as a fitting memorial to the sacrifice of their loved ones.”

After reading that section I couldn’t help but wonder if such a sentiment will ever take hold when there is such a vast geographical distance? That is a question I will not even attempt to answer.

“I wished there were some way to hold individual firms to account while sparing the rest of the country. But every economist I trusted told me that was impossible. The well-being of Main Street was directly linked to the fate of Wall Street.” (p.460)

Bush describes their military victories in Iraq and the Iraqi people’s desire for freedom. This hunger for liberation seceded though when faced with the gruelling fear of terror. Bush writes on page 371: “I read accounts of sectarian extremists torturing civilians with power drills, kidnapping patients from hospitals, and blowing up worshippers during Friday prayers.” A grizzly account for sure. While violence was rampant Americans kept pushing for elections and the apparent success of democracy. According to this book the problem was fortification. Maintaining strongholds. The strategy was to train the Iraqis to look after themselves. This failed and a new strategy was therefore needed.

What is especially interesting to note, was intercepted communication from one of the extremist leaders in Iraq, where it was obvious that their objective was to prolong the war effort by dividing the various tribes in Iraq further. It is obvious that they wanted to drag “the unbelievers” into a drawn-out quagmire.

Touchingly Bush writes on page 373: “I marvelled at the contrast between a regime so brutal that it would hack off men’s hands and a society so compassionate that it would help restore their dignity. I believed the Iraqi man who wrote those words spoke for millions of his fellow citizens. They were grateful to America for their liberation. They wanted to live in freedom. And I would not give up on them.”

“I had opposed Jimmy Carter’s bailout of Chrysler in 1979 and believed strongly that government should stay out of the auto business. Yet the economy was extremely fragile, and my economic advisers had warned the immediate bankruptcy of the Big Three could cost more than a million jobs, decrease tax revenues by $150 billion, and set back America’s GDP by hundreds of billions of dollars.” (p.468)

Bush describes the success of the legendary General Petraeus: “Lincoln discovered Generals Grant and Sherman. Roosevelt had Eisenhower and Bradley. I found David Petraeus and Ray Odierno.” And concludes his “Surge” chapter with:

“A free and peaceful Iraq is in our vital strategic interest. It can be a valuable ally at the heart of the Middle East, a source of stability in the region, and a beacon of hope to political reformers in its neighbourhood and around the world. Like the democracies we helped build in Germany, Japan, and South Korea, a free Iraq will make us safer for generations to come.” Hmm….all I could think about when reading that was of the current mess in Germany and the nationalist uprising in Japan. But oh well…..

There is no doubt that the US military kicks ass and that the famous surge at the command of Petraeus worked. I guess the issue was that highly skilled and competent US warriors thought or were told that Iraqis would be equipped to just take over. Why people would think that when reading about how quickly the US military could successfully take over both Afghanistan and Iraq beats me. There is an obvious diversity between the best America has to offer and whatever it is that dysfunctional low-performing societies in the middle east can conjure. It is obvious that the militant Islamist have some impressive strategists and masterminds behind their operations, but as a group of people I personally think that their situation looks dire if modern science and cluster imaging of traits is to be believed. Which it should be, since it is based on scientific facts. The US military is an elite and a damn impressive one. It surely cannot be claimed that such a force can be easily replaced?

Bush offers some crucial facts about the 9/11 attack:

“The toll of 9/11 will always be measured by the 2,973 lives stolen and many others devastated. But the economic cost was shattering as well. The New York Stock Exchange shut down for four days, the longest suspension of trading since the Great Depression. When the markets reopened, the Dow Jones plunged 684 points, the biggest single-day drop in history – to that point. …

By the end of the year, more than a million Americans had lost their jobs. “The United States and the rest of the world are likely to experience a full-blown recession now,” one economist predicted.

That was what the terrorists intended. “Al Qaeda spent $500,000 on the event,” Osama bin Laden later bragged, “while America . . . lost – according to the lowest estimate – $500 billion.” He outlined what he called a “bleed-until-bankruptcy” strategy and said, “It is very important to concentrate on hitting the U.S. economy through all possible means.” (p.443)

On Palestinian elections in 2005 Bush writes: “Some interpreted the results as a setback for peace. I wasn’t so sure. Hamas had run on a platform of clean government and efficient public services, not war with Israel.” Why should we assume honesty? Is this a symptom of our high-trust societies, that we venture forth into the world clad from top to toe in idealism? “We sent financial assistance and deployed a high-ranking general to help train the Palestinian security forces.” We display open palms with trust as our currency, offering a peaceful handshake while expecting low-trust societies to respond to this in the same manner that our own kin would. This can explain our blind immigration policy in Europe, feminist politics in Sweden, resulting in their loss of control over their own territory. A European inability to enforce the law of individual nations within every inch of their territory. This can explain bewildered politicians expressing in Norwegian newspapers the importance of getting Norwegian born Jihadis back to Norwegian soil to offer them psychological help. Obama’s ignorant belief that jobs could destroy terrorism, when well-integrated, well-adjusted, high-achieving Jihadis left comfortable England to fight a holy war.

This also explains how I can live in the countryside of England where neighbours simply put up a sign saying how much money to leave behind when picking up eggs, cards, newspapers, or drinks that are neither guarded by people or locked away in cupboards.

IMG_7251.jpg

The church is always open where I live, all interactions are based on trust – people will reciprocate this trust and stay true to their word. (I don’t live in a particularly diverse area by the way). In London this level of trust is absent. Water bottles that had been set out for runners during the London marathon some years ago were stolen. The other day I saw an interesting article about how a transport system somewhere in the western world wouldn’t release CCTV footage or reveal the ethnicity of those guilty of crimes on their transport network, as apparently they saw this as racist or building up around subconscious bias. In Sweden they’ve stopped collecting crime data, since the findings are “racist,” in Norway officers are instructed to compare criminals with the crime-level of their countries of origin, since it is fairer to compare an Afghan criminal to crime levels in Afghanistan than to those of Norwegians. Welcome to multicultural, political correct hell.

IMG_7615

A public toilet in London … Toilet usage has all of a sudden become a major issue all over Europe.

Only those who have been exposed to street level diversity and those officers in the streets tasked to deal with “unfortunate crimes that could jeopardise the utopian vision” know the truth. Diversity is not unity. It is the equivalence of division and hate. The multicultural utopia can only be held together with l-i-e-s. A failure to realise this seals the fate of what is left of Europe and also the USA. Our constructs will wither, like those we left behind in Africa. Our culture will be erased. Everything our forefathers built will be left in ruins. Some smart folks might say that Europe has waged war against its own countless times before, but I dare to say that no threats have ever been greater than those we face today as there is no interest to conserve even a smidgen of what is ours.

 

” . . . I had to safeguard American workers and families from a widespread collapse. I also had my successor in mind. I decided to treat him the way I would like to have been treated if I were in his position.” (p.469)

“. . . my administration and the regulators underestimated the extent of the risks taken by Wall Street.” (p.470)

Ok – time for some humour courtesy of Bush. On page 412 Bush describes meeting Angela Merkel. Apparently she complained about how horrible it was to grow up in communist East Germany where “her mother constantly warned her not to mention family discussions in public. The secret police, the Stasi, were everywhere.” Ha-ha-ha-ha … That is rich as hell coming from Merkel who appointed an ex-Stasi official to spy on the “evil-alt-right.” Fantastic. Bush continues: “It was hard to believe that less than twenty years had passed since tens of millions of Europeans lived like that.” Øhø…If you are looking for an alt-right propaganda tool look no further than George W.Bush’s “Decisions Points.” I’ve highlighted this whole section due to its importance. I really hope that people bother to read this entry and the whole book. And if people do I hope that they read it paying attention to the things that are popping out to me. Angela Merkel complaining about not being allowed to express her political opinions in Stasi Germany is f—– priceless.

Bush finally departs from his naiveté when describing the Iranian and North Korean leaderships:

“Ahmadinejad called Israel “a stinking corpse” that should be “wiped off the map.” He dismissed the Holocaust as a “myth.” He used a United Nations speech to predict that the hidden imam would reappear to save the world. I started to worry we were dealing with more than just a dangerous leader. This guy could be nuts.” (p.416)

“When I took office in 2001, an estimated one million North Koreans had died of starvation in the preceding six years. Meanwhile, Kim Jong-il cultivated his appetite for fine cognac, luxury Mercedes, and foreign films. He built a cult of personality that required North Koreans to worship him  as a godlike leader. His propaganda machine claimed that he could control the weather, had written six renewed operas, and had scored five holes in one during his first round of golf.” (p.423)

“I told my national security team that dealing with Kim Jong-il reminded me of raising children.” (p.423)

This work is a fascinating read to say the least. To call it a page-turner would be an understatement.

It is particularly interesting to read about how the former President weighted his decisions. About all of the various input from advisors, how tough it is to run for office, how chance/luck always plays a major role and how active Bush Jr, was in his youth. Nobody can surely claim that G.W.Bush was inexperienced regardless of whether one chooses to agree with him in hindsight. The former president illustrates perfectly what a daunting undertaking it is to be the President of The United States. This is certainly a book that I would strongly recommend. It should be read by all regardless of their political convictions. I would also like to add that this is the first book I’ve read in a very long time without any typos at all.

“History can debate the decisions I made, the policies I chose, and the tools I left behind. But there can be no debate about one fact: After the nightmare of September 11, America went seven and a half years without another successful terrorist attack on our soil. If I had to summarise my most meaningful accomplishment as president in one sentence, that would be it.” (p.181)

What follows are some very interesting quotes from George W. Bush himself; as always I recommend that people read the work in its entirety, but for those of you who can’t be bothered and in the name of sharing crucial information; well here we go:

While visiting his father in China Bush observed:

” In 1975, China was emerging from the Cultural Revolution, its government’s effort to purify and revitalise society. Communist officials had set up indoctrination programs, broadcast propaganda over omnipresent loudspeakers, and sought to stamp out any evidence of China’s ancient history. Mobs of young people lashed out against their elders and attacked the intellectual elite. The society was divided against itself and cascading into anarchy.” (pp. 22-23)

Bush on the art of campaigning:

“On the Fourth of July, we campaigned in Muleshoe, in the far northern part of the district. In the May primary, I had received 6 of the 230 votes cast in Bailey County. The way I saw it, I had plenty of room for improvement. Laura and I smiled and waved at the spectators from the back of our white pickup truck. Nobody cheered. Nobody even waved. People looked at us like we were aliens. By the end I was convinced the only supporter I had in Muleshoe was the one sitting next to me.” (p.41)

“I learned that allowing your opponent to define you is one of the biggest mistakes you can make in a campaign. And I discovered that I could accept defeat and move on.” (p.41)

This reminds me of the last Presidential election. Both how “grab a pussy” was revealed at a point when those who published the conversation obviously thought that it would yield the greatest impact and the re-opening of the Clinton investigation:

“Then, four days before the election, Lawrence Walsh, the prosecutor investigating the Iran-Contra scandal of the Reagan administration, dropped an indictment on former defence secretary Caspar Weinberger. The indictment dominated the news and halted the campaign’s momentum. Democratic lawyer Robert Bennett, who represented Cap, later called the indictment “one of the greatest abuses of prosecutorial power I have ever encountered.”” (pp.49-50)

This reminds me of all of Hillary Clinton’s celebrity endorsements:

” Ross Perot weighed in on the race, endorsing Ann Richards. It didn’t bother me. I’ve always thought that endorsements in politics are overrated. They rarely help, and sometimes they hurt. ” (p.55)

Bush on describing his team:

“While Dick helped with important parts of our base, he had become a lightning rod for criticism from the media and the left. He was seen as dark and heartless – the Darth Vader of the administration. Dick didn’t care much about his image – which I liked – but that allowed the caricatures to stick. One myth was that Dick was actually running the White House. Everyone inside the building, including the vice president, knew that was not true. But the impression was out there.” (p.87)

“Colin (Powell) and Don (Rumsfeld) were always respectful to each other in my presence. Over time I realised they were like a pair of old duelers who kept their own pistols in their holsters, but let their seconds and thirds fire away.” (p.87)

” Colin Powell made it easier for me. That same spring of 2004, he told me he was ready to move on. He had served three tough years and was naturally fatigued. He was also a sensitive man who had been wounded by the infighting and discouraged by the failure to find weapons of mass destructions in Iraq.” (p.90)

” I felt for Don (Rumsfeld)  again in the spring of 2006, when a group of retired generals launched a barrage of public criticism against him. While I was still considering a personal change, there was no way I was going to let a group of retired officers bully me into pushing out the civilian secretary of defence. It would have looked like a military coup and would have set a disastrous precedent.” (p.93)

“It seems to me that there was another argument against Harriet, one that went largely unspoken: How could I name someone who did not run in elite legal circles? Harriet had not gone to an Ivy League law school. Her personal style compounded the doubts. She is not glib. She is not fancy. She thinks hard before she speaks – a trait so rare in Washington that it was mistaken for intellectual slowness.” (p.101)

“While the idea of selecting a woman still appealed to me, I could not find any as qualified as Sam Alito. … Our critics knew they would not be able to block Sam’s confirmation, but they subjected him to a nasty hearing anyway. They tried to paint him as a racist, a radical, a bigot, anything they could think of – all based on zero evidence. I was disgusted by the demagoguery. As one senator recounted the false charges, Sam’s wife, Martha Ann, broke into tears. Her reaction was so genuine that even some Democrats realised they had gone too far.” (p.102)

Bush on dealing with embryo based research:

“That  scene was not the creation of Jay Lefkowitz, the bright lawyer reading aloud to me in the Oval Office in 2001. It came from Aldous Huxley’s 1932 novel, Brave New World. With the recent breakthroughs in biotechnology and genetics, the book now seemed chillingly relevant. So did its lesson: For all its efficiency, Huxley’s utopian world seemed sterile, joyless, and empty of meaning. The quest to perfect humanity ended in the loss of humanity.” (p.106)

“That same day, I also met with representatives of National Right to Life. They opposed any research that destroyed embryos. They pointed out that each tiny stem cell cluster had the potential to grow into a person. In fact, all of us had started our lives in this early state. As evidence, they pointed to a new program run by Nightlight Christian Adoptions. The agency secured permission from IVF participants to place their unused frozen embryos up for adoption. Loving mothers had the embryos implanted in them and carried the babies – known as snowflakes – to term. The message was unmistakable: Within every frozen embryo were the beginnings of a child.” (p.115)

“As one put it, “The fact that a being is going to die does not entitle us to use it as a natural resource for exploitation.” (p.115)

“Many of the first to turn against the policy were scientists. By providing some federal funding, I had whetted their appetite for more. In the spring of 2002, I addressed a major complaint by allowing privately funded embryonic stem cell research to be conducted at facilities that received federal dollars. It was an important step, but it did not satisfy the scientists, who constantly demanded more … Politicians recognised that they, too, could capitalise on the issue. By 2004, Democrats had concluded that stem cell research was a political winner. … Nonetheless, Kerry’s campaign used stem cell research as the foundation for a broader attack, labelling my positions “anti-science.” The charge was false. I had supported science by funding alternative stem cell research, promoting clean energy development, increasing federal spending on technology research, and launching a global AIDS initiative. Yet the demagoguery continued all the way up to the election. The low point came in October, when Kerry’s running mate, Senator John Edwards, told  a political rally in Iowa that if Kerry became president, “people like Christopher Reeve will get up out of that wheelchair and walk again.” (pp.120-121)

This segment was of such interest that I made the decision to quote it in its entirety:

“The stem cell debate was an introduction to a phenomenon I witnessed throughout my presidency: highly personal criticism. Partisan opponents and commentators questioned my legitimacy, my accent, and my religious beliefs. I was labeled a Nazi, a war criminal, and Satan himself. That last one came from a foreign leader, Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez. One lawmaker called me both a loser and a liar. He became majority leader of the U.S. Senate.

In some ways, I wasn’t surprised. I had endured plenty of rough politics in Texas. I had seen Dad and Bill Clinton derided by their opponents and the media. Abraham Lincoln was compared to a baboon. Even George Washington became so unpopular that political cartoons showed the hero of the American Revolution being marched to a guillotine. Yet the death spiral of decency during my time in office, exacerbated by the advent of twenty-four-hour cable news and hyper-partisan political blogs, was deeply disappointing. The toxic atmosphere in American politics discourages good people from running for office.

Over time, the petty insults and name-calling hardened into conventional wisdom. Some have said I should have pushed back harder against the caricatures. But I felt it would debase the presidency to stoop to the critics’ level. I had run on a promise to change the tone in Washington. I took that vow seriously and tried to do my part, but I rarely succeeded. The shrill debate never affected my decisions. I read a lot of history, and was struck by how many presidents had endured harsh criticism. The measure of their character, and often their success, was how they responded. Those who based decisions on principle, to some snapshot of public opinion, were often vindicated over time.

George Washington once wrote that leading by conviction gave him “a consolation within that no earthly efforts can deprive me of.” He continued: “The arrows of malevolence, however barbed and well pointed, never can reach the most vulnerable part of me.” I read those words in Presidential Courage, written by historian Michael Beschloss in 2007. As I told Laura, if they’re still assessing George Washington’s legacy more than two centuries after he left office, this George W. doesn’t have to worry about today’s headlines.” (pp.121-122)

This quote is particularly valid in today’s political environment, take note:

“Congress’s response to my veto was not so warm. The Democratic sponsor of the bill erupted with a statement claiming that my veto was based on “cynical political gain.” It was hard to see how, since most polls showed my stem cell stance was not popular. As punishment for my veto, Democrats refused to pass legislation supporting research into alternative sources of stem cells. The message was that if they couldn’t fund stem cell research that destroyed embryos, they would prefer to fund none at all. So much for their passionate desire to see new cures.” (p.124) – [the highlighting is my own] – [I just wanted to bring attention to how caring the “caring-party” truly is] –

On dealing with 9/11 & the new rules of engagement in a modern era:

“Senator Tom Daschle, the Democratic majority leader, issued one cautionary note. He said I should be careful about the word war because it had such powerful implications. I listened to his concerns, but I disagreed. If four coordinated attacks by a terrorist network that had pledged to kill as many Americans as possible was not an act of war, then what was it? A breach of diplomatic protocol?” (p.142)

“Late in  the afternoon of September 12, I made the short trip across the Potomac to the Pentagon. The building was smoldering, and there were still bodies inside. Don Rumsfeld and I walked   the crash site and thanked the work crews for their devotion. At one point, a team of workers  atop the building unfurled a giant American flag. It was a sign of defiance and resolve, exactly what the nation needed to see.” (p.142)

“The CIA believed that there were more al Qaeda operatives in the United States and that they wanted to attack America with biological, chemical, or nuclear weapons. It was hard to imagine anything more devastating than 9/11, but a terrorist attack with weapons of mass destruction would qualify.” (p.144)

“On 9/11, it was obvious the law enforcement approach to terrorism  had failed. Suicidal men willing to fly passenger planes into buildings were not common criminals. They could not be deterred by the threat of prosecution. … The war would be different from any America had fought in the past. We had to uncover the terrorists’ plots. We had to track their movements and disrupt their operations.” (p.154)

“I was frustrated that Democrats would delay an urgent security measure to placate labor unions.” (p.156)

“Striking the right balance between alerting and alarming the public remained a challenge for the rest of the administration. As time passed, some critics charged that we inflated the threat or manipulated alert levels for political benefit. They were flat wrong. We took the intelligence seriously and did the best we could to keep the American people informed and safe.” (p.159)

On the PATRIOT Act:

“The last thing I wanted was to allow the freedom and access to information provided by American libraries to be utilised against us by al Qaeda.

Lawmakers recognised the urgency of the threat and passed the PATRIOT Act 98 to 1 in the Senate and 357 to 66 in the House. I signed the bill into law on October 26, 2001. “We took time to look at it, we took time to read it, and we took time to remove those parts that were unconstitutional and those parts that would have actually  hurt liberties of all Americans,” Democratic Senator Patrick Leahy of Vermont said. His Democratic colleague, Senator Chuck Schumer of New York, added, “If there is one key word that underscores this bill, it is ‘balance.’ In the new post-September 11 society we face, balance is going to be a key word….Balance and reason have prevailed.”

Over the next five years, the PATRIOT Act helped us break up potential terror cells in New York, Oregon, Virginia, and Florida.” (p.161)

“As the freshness of 9/11 faded, so did the overwhelming congressional support for the PATRIOT Act. Civil liberties advocates and commentators on the wings of both parties mischaracterized the law as a stand-in for everything they disliked about the war on terror. … My one regret about the PATRIOT Act is its name. When my administration sent the bill to Capitol Hill, it was initially called the Anti-Terrorism Act of 2001. Congress got clever and renamed it. As a result, there was an implication that people who opposed the law were unpatriotic. That was not what I intended. I should have pushed Congress to change the name of the bill before I signed it.” (p.162)

“….if a terrorist in Afghanistan contacted a terrorist in Pakistan, NSA could intercept their conversation. But if the same terrorist called someone in the United States, or sent an email that touched an American computer server, NSA had to apply for a court order. That made no sense. Why would it be tougher to monitor al Qaeda communications with terrorists inside the United States than with their associates overseas?” (p.163)

When extending  the authority of the NSA Bush explains:

“They concluded that conducting surveillance against our enemies in war fell within the authorities granted by the congressional war resolution and the constitutional authority of the commander in chief. Abraham Lincoln had wiretapped telegraph machines during the Civil War. Woodrow Wilson had ordered the interception of virtually every telephone and telegraph message going into or out of the United States during World War I. Franklin Roosevelt had allowed the military to read and censor communications during World War II.” (p.163)

“They assured me the Terrorist Surveillance Program had been carefully designed to protect the civil liberties of innocent people. The purpose of the program was to monitor so-called dirty numbers, which intelligence professionals had reason to believe belonged to al Qaeda operatives. Many had been found in the cell phones or computers of terrorists captured on the battlefield. If we inadvertently intercepted any portion of purely domestic communications, the violation would be reported to the Justice Department for investigation. To be sure the program was used only as long as necessary, it had to be regulated reassessed and reapproved.

I gave the order to proceed with the program. We considered going to Congress to get legislation, but key members from both parties who received highly classified briefings on the program agreed that the surveillance was necessary and that a legislative debate was not possible without exposing our methods to the enemy.

I knew the Terrorist Surveillance Program would prove controversial one day. Yet I believed it was necessary. The rubble at the World Trade Centre was still smoldering. Every morning I received intelligence reports about another possible attack. Monitoring terrorist communications into the United States was essential to keeping the American people safe.” (p.164)

About the Islamic shoe-bomber:

“Reid’s case made clear we needed a new policy for dealing with captured terrorists. In this new kind of war, there is no more valuable source of intelligence on potential attacks than the terrorists themselves. Amid the steady stream of threats after 9/11, I grappled with three of the most critical decisions I would make in the war on terror: where to hold captured enemy fighters, how to determine their legal status and ensure they eventually faced justice, and how to learn what they knew about future attacks so we could protect the American people.” (p.165)

Bush describing Guantanamo Bay:

“At Guantanamo, detainees were given clean and safe shelter, three meals a day, a personal copy of the Koran, the opportunity to pray five times daily, and the same medical care their guards received. They had access to exercise space and a library stocked with books and DVDs. One of the most popular was an Arabic translation of Harry Potter.

Over the years, we invited members of Congress, journalists, and international observers to visit Guantanamo and see the conditions for themselves. Many came away surprised by what they found. A Belgian official inspected Guantanamo five times and called it a “model prison” that offered detainees better treatment than Belgian prisons.” (p.166)

Bush on the Geneva Conventions & al Qaeda:

“The purpose of Geneva was to provide incentives for nation-state to fight wars by an agreed set of rules that protect human  dignity and innocent life – and to punish warriors who do not. But the terrorists did not represent a nation-state. They had not signed the Geneva Conventions. Their entire mode of operation – intentionally killing the innocent – defied the principles of Geneva. And if al Qaeda captured an American, there was little chance they would treat him humanely.” (p.167)

On negotiating with terrorists:

“America has a longstanding policy of not negotiating with terrorists, and I continued it. I knew that if I accepted one terrorist’s demands, it would only encourage more kidnappings. Our military and intelligence assets were searching urgently for Pearl, but they couldn’t make it in time. In his final moments, Danny Pearl said, “My father is Jewish, my mother is Jewish, I am Jewish.” Then his al Qaeda captors slit his throat.

On the trial of terrorists:

As I made my decision on Geneva protection, I also decided to create a legal system to determine the innocence or guilt of detainees. George Washington, Abraham Lincoln, William McKinley, and Franklin Roosevelt had faced similar dilemmas of how to bring captured enemy combatants to justice during wartime. All had reached the same conclusion: a court operated by the military” (p.167)

On “enhanced interrogation”:

“Zubaydah later explained to interrogators why he started answering questions again. His understanding of Islam was that he had to resist interrogation only up to a certain point. Waterboarding was the technique that allowed him to reach that threshold, fulfil his religious duty, and then cooperate. “You must do this for all the brothers,” he said. (p.169)

This whole segment was of such interest that I had to quote the whole thing:

“Of the thousands of terrorists we captured in the years after 9/11, about a hundred were placed into the CIA program. About a third of those were questioned using enhanced techniques. Three were waterboarded. The information the detainees in the CIA program revealed constituted more than half of what the CIA knew about al Qaeda.

Their interrogations helped break up plots to attack American military and diplomatic facilities abroad, Heathrow Airport and Canary Wharf in London, and multiple targets in the United States. Experts in the intelligence community told me that without the CIA program, there would have been another attack on the United States.

After we implemented the CIA program, we briefed a small number of lawmakers from both parties on its existence. At the time, some were concerned we weren’t pushing hard enough. But years later, once the threat seemed less urgent and the political winds had shifted, many lawmakers became fierce critics. They charged that Americans had committed unlawful torture. That was not true. I had asked the most senior legal officers in the U.S. government to review the interrogation methods, and they had assured me they did not constitute torture.

To suggest that our intelligence personnel violated the law by following the legal guidance they received is insulting and wrong. The CIA interrogation program saved lives. Had we captured more al Qaeda operatives with significant intelligence value, I would have used the program for them as well.” (p.171)

On dealing with the media and opposition:

“I was disappointed in the Times and angry at whoever had betrayed their country by leaking the story. … The left responded with hysteria.” (p.176)

“Other lawmakers compared the conduct of our military and CIA professionals to the Taliban and Saddam Hussein.” (p.179)

“While I believe opening Guantanamo after 9/11 was necessary, the detention facility had become a propaganda tool for our enemies and a distraction for our allies.” (p.180)

“From the beginning, I knew the public reaction to my decisions would be coloured by whether there was another attack. If none happened, whatever I did would probably look like an overreaction. If we were attacked again, people would demand to know why I hadn’t done more.” (p.180)

After describing a remarkably swift and impressive victory in Afghanistan hailed by the international community, Bush goes on to describe how the project started spiralling downwards in the “nation building phase”:

“There was little coordination between countries, and no one devoted enough resources to the effort. The German initiative to build the national police had fallen short. The Italian mission to reform the justice system had failed. The British-led counternarcotics campaign showed results in some areas, but drug production had boomed in fertile southern provinces like Helmand.

The Afghan National Army that America trained had improved, but in an attempt to keep the Afghan government from taking on an unsustainable expense we had kept the army too small. The multilateral military mission proved a disappointment as well. Every member of NATO had sent troops to Afghanistan. So had more than a dozen other countries. But many parliaments imposed heavy  restrictions – known as national caveats – on what their troops were permitted to do. Some were not allowed to patrol at night. Others could not engage in combat. The result was a disorganised and ineffective force, with troops fighting by different rules and many not fighting at all.

Failures in the Afghan government contributed to the problem. While I liked and respected President Karzai, there was too much corruption. Warlords pocketed large amounts of customs revenue that should have gone to Kabul. Others took a cut of the profits from the drug trade.

The result was that Afghans lost faith in their government. With nowhere else to turn, many Afghans relied on the Taliban and ruthless extremist commanders like Gulbuddin Hekmatyar and Jalaluddin Haqqani.” (p.211)

Bush on the “Pakistani issue”:

“The primary cause of the trouble did not originate in Afghanistan or, as some suggested, in Iraq. It came from Pakistan.” (p.212)

“Over time, it became clear that Musharraf either would not or could not fulfil all his promises. Part of the problem was Pakistan’s obsession with India. In almost every conversation we had, Musharraf accused India of wrongdoing. Four days after 9/11, he told me the Indians were “trying to equate us with terrorists and trying to influence your mind.” As a result, the Pakistani military spent most of its resources preparing for war with India. Its troops were trained to wage a conventional battle with its neighbour, not counterterrorism operations in the tribal areas. The fight against extremists came second.

A related problem was that Pakistani forces pursued the Taliban much less aggressively than they pursued al Qaeda. Some in the Pakistani intelligence service, the ISI, retained close ties to Taliban officials. Others wanted an insurance policy in case America abandoned Afghanistan and India tried to gain influence there.” (pp.213-214)

Bush on the hostile relationship between Pakistan and Afghanistan:

“I invited Karzai and Musharraf to dinner at the White House in September 2006. When I welcomed them in the Rose Garden, they refused to shake hands or even look at each other. The mood did not improve when we sat down for dinner in the Old Family Dining Room. Dick Cheney, Condi Rice, Steve Hadley, and I watched as Karzai and Musharraf traded barbs. At one point, Karzai accused Musharraf of harbouring the Taliban.

“Tell me where they are!” Musharraf responded testily. “You know where they are!” Karzai fired back. “If I did, I would get them” said Musharraf. “Go do it!” Karzai persisted. I started to wonder whether this dinner had been a mistake. I told Musharraf and Karzai that the stakes were too high for personal bickering. I kept the dinner going for two and a half hours, trying to help them find common ground.” (pp.215-216)

Bush on Pakistan’s “improved strategy” and commitment to anti-terrorist military actions:

“While well intentioned, the strategy failed. The tribes did not have the will or the capacity to control the extremists. Some estimates indicated that the flow of Taliban fighters into Afghanistan increased fourfold.” (p.216)

By the middle of 2008, I was tired of reading intelligence reports about extremist sanctuaries in Pakistan. I thought back to a meeting I’d had with Special Forces in Afghanistan in 2006.

“Are you guys getting everything you need?” I asked. One SEAL raised his hand and said, “No, sir.” I wondered what his problem might be. “Mr.President,” he said, “we need permission to go kick some ass inside Pakistan.” (p.217)

Bush recounts a touching moment, displaying the admirable commitment and sense of duty among American soldiers:

“There in that lonely hangar, in the nation where 9/11 was planned, in the eighth year of a war to protect America, these men on the front lines chose to reenlist.” (p.221)

Leading up to the infamous Iraq War:

“By early 2001, Saddam Hussein was waging a low-grade war against the United States. In 1999 and 2000, his forces had fired seven hundred times at our pilots patrolling the no-fly zones.” (p.228)

“Saddam Hussein wasn’t just a sworn enemy of America. He had fired at our aircraft, issued a statement praising 9/11, and made an assassination attempt on a former president, my father.” (p.228)

“Saddam Hussein didn’t just violate international demands. He had defied sixteen UN resolutions, dating back to the Gulf War. (p.228)

Here comes an interesting segment; I lived in France when America decided to “invade” Iraq (pretty much everyone referred to it as an invasion). I read in the French papers that the government were against the initiative due to their business dealings with Saddam, this of course shed doubt on their “moral” justification for opposing the war:

“Vladimir Putin didn’t consider Saddam a threat. It seemed to me that part of the reason was Putin didn’t want to jeopardise Russia’s lucrative oil contracts. France also had significant economic interest in Iraq.” (p.233)

“But when the German elections arrived later that year, Schroeder had a different take. He denounced the possibility of using force against Iraq. His justice minister said, “Bush wants to divert attention from domestic political problems . . . Hitler also did that.” I was shocked and furious. It was hard to think of anything more insulting than being compared to Hitler by a German official. I continued to work with Gerhard Schroeder on areas of mutual interest. But as someone who valued personal diplomacy, I put a high premium on trust. Once that trust was violated, it was hard to have a constructive relationship again.” (p.234)

When Bush spoke in front of the UN Security Council asking for a new UN resolution forcing Saddam to reveal his WMD:

“The vote was unanimous, 15 to 0. Not only had France voted for the resolution, but so had Russia, China, and Syria. The world was now on record: Saddam had a “final opportunity to comply” with his obligation to disclose and disarm. If he did not, he would face “serious consequences.” (p.241)

Pushed by Tony Blair who recommended Bush to address the Security Council once more when Saddam still proved to be difficult, Colin Powell delivered his infamous speech about Iraq’s WMD. Probably one of the most famous moments of the Bush administration. It seemed like the Security Council weren’t particularly interested in enforcing the “serious consequences” they had warned about:

“We are both moral men,” Jaques Chirac told me after Colin’s speech. “But in this case, we see morality differently.” I replied politely, but I thought to myself: If a dictator who tortures and gasses his people is not immoral, then who is? Three days later, Chirac stepped in front of the cameras and said, “Nothing today justifies war.” He, Gerhard Schroeder, and Vladimir Putin issued a joint statement of opposition. All three of them sat on the Security Council. The odds of a second resolution looked bleak.” (p.245)

It is an interesting thing to note that Bush writes: ” gasses his people.” The Kurds weren’t part of Saddam’s tribe, so what worth did they have to him? Again we get a glimpse of a fundamental lack of understanding of low-trust, extreme-tribal societies far removed from the excessively civic-minded, high-trust societies of Europe. Something that must have lingered on in certain parts of America as Bush described his childhood home in Texas as a place where no one locked their front doors…These type of statements lend an incredible insight into the “American mindset” where introduction to enlightenment ideas will automatically convert people to our way of life. If one operates under the belief that “all men are created equal” well then there isn’t much hope that western interference will ever come to a halt or that our own societies will survive – as massive immigration will be justified, since we are all the same and can function perfectly within a democratic, western, social construct. Bush goes on to share his take on the Iraq War critics:

“I’ve always wondered why many critics of the war did not acknowledge the moral argument made by people like Elie Wiesel. Many of those who demonstrated against military action in Iraq were devoted advocates of human rights. Yet they condemned me for using force to remove the man who had gassed the Kurds, mowed down the Shia by helicopter gunship, massacred the Marsh Arabs, and sent tens of thousands to mass graves. I understood why people might disagree on the threat Saddam Hussein posed to the United States. But I didn’t see how anyone could deny that liberating Iraq advanced the cause of human rights.” (p.248)

After the Americans and their allies had delivered yet another quick and impressive “take over” matters got ugly both in terms of PR and chaos in Baghdad:

“I hadn’t noticed the large banner my staff had placed on the bridge of the ship, positioned for TV. It read “Mission Accomplished.” It was intended as a tribute to the folks aboard the Lincoln, which had just completed the longest deployment for an aircraft carrier of its class. Instead, it looked like I was doing the victory dance I had warned against.” (p.257)

“In the weeks after liberation, Baghdad descended into a state of lawlessness. … Part of the explanation was that Saddam had released tens of thousands of criminals shortly before the war. But the problem was deeper than that. Saddam had warped the psychology of Iraqis in a way we didn’t fully understand.” (p.258)

“In some ways, the orders achieved their objectives. Iraq’s Shia and Kurds – the majority of the population – welcomed the clean break from Saddam. But the orders had a psychological impact I did not foresee. Many Sunnis took them as a signal they would have no place in Iraq’s future. This was especially dangerous in the case of the army. Instead of signing up for the new military, many joined the insurgency. In retrospect, I should have insisted on more debate on Jerry’s orders, especially on what message disbanding the army would send and how many Sunnis the de-Baathification would affect.” (p.259)

Here is an interesting thought. Was America as a nation played? And if so by who? After reading the following pages one can start to wonder…Bush writes in his book that everyone had intelligence about Saddam’s WMD. So did he ship them somewhere? Or did he lie? Was it all part of a grand scheme where Saddam behaved as if though he had something to hide – knowing that the Americans would come after him? Luring them into a situation he thought would cripple them? Was Saddam just the bait? These quotes, in fact these pages are of great interest:

“Their strategy was to present an image of Iraq as hopeless and unwinnable, swinging American public opinion against the war and forcing us to withdraw as we had in Vietnam.”

“When Saddam didn’t use WMD on our troops, I was relieved. When we didn’t discover the stockpile soon after the fall of Baghdad, I was surprised. When the whole summer passed without finding any, I was alarmed. The press corps constantly raised the question, “Where are the WMD?” I was asking the same thing.” (p.261)

“Nobody was lying. We were all wrong.” (p.262)

“No one was more shocked or angry than I was when we didn’t find the weapons.” (p.262)

On receiving Saddam’s pistol in a glass box from the Delta Team that captured him Bush writes:

“The pistol always reminded me that a brutal dictator, responsible for so much death and suffering, had surrendered to our troops while cowering in a hole.” (p.267)

These are some very interesting quotes from Bush:

“One of the ironies of the war is that we were criticized harshly by the left and some in the international community for wanting to build an empire in Iraq. We never sought that. In fact, we were so averse to anything that looked like an empire that we made our job far more difficult. By reducing our troop presence and focusing on training Iraqis, we inadvertently allowed the insurgency to gain momentum. Then al Qaeda fighters flocked to Iraq seeking a new safe haven, which made our mission both more difficult and more important.” (p.268)

“Every psychological profile I had read told me Saddam was a survivor. If he cared so much about staying in power, why would he gamble his regime by pretending to have WMD?

Part of the explanation came after Saddam’s capture, when he was debriefed by the FBI. He told agents that he was more worried about looking weak to Iran than being removed by the coalition.” (P.269)

“Had Saddam followed through on that intention, the world would likely have witnessed a nuclear arms race between Iraq and Iran. .. Instead, as a result of our actions in Iraq, one of America’s most committed and dangerous enemies stopped threatening us forever. The most volatile region in the world lost one of its greatest sources of violence and mayhem.” (p.270)

Our favourite Moriarty character makes a guest appearance: 

“Wealthy donors like investment mogul George Soros gave Kerry huge amounts of money….” (p.290)

Bush on the looming financial meltdown:

“By the summer of 2008, I had publicly called for GSE reform seventeen times. It turned out the eighteenth was the charm. All it took was the prospect of a global financial meltdown.” (p.455)

Bush’s account of the impending financial collapse and the repercussions for not only Americans but the “global economy” makes for a terrifying read. Bush describes trying to rescue the “sinking Titanic” a hopeless mission requiring federal interference through the purchasing and selling of public companies. This went completely against Bush’s free-market stance, but he saw himself as forced to “bail out Wall Street” due to the severe consequences that would manifest themselves as a result of bankruptcy upon bankruptcy among humongous businesses entrenched in all sort of enterprises far and wide. These pages read like a high-pace action thriller, where you’ll find yourself on the edge of your seat as a reader. The fact that major corporations are so sensitively interlinked in terms of their finances and investments/speculations is alarming for all, regardless of who they are or where they might live.

As we near the end of these 481 pages Bush writes:

“When I hung up the phone, I said a prayer that all would be well during my successor’s time. I thought about one of my favourite presidential quotes, from a letter John Adams wrote to his wife, Abigail: “I pray Heaven to bestow the best blessings on this house and all that shall hereafter inhabit it. May none but honest and wise men ever rule under this roof.” His words are carved into the mantel above the fireplace of the State Dining Room.” (p.467)

Finally Bush closes with a wonderful epilogue and a touching acknowledgments section. All I can say is what a book. 10/10 for sure. Magnificent!

jon snow

Winter Is Coming.

 

Diversity – Why It Is A Complex Issue.

Standard

Several times I’ve received great expertise and service at the hands of personnel of immigrant background in the UK. I’ve ran into successful mixed couples, my own family is at this point multi-ethnic and an old childhood friend of mine has converted to Islam, even adopting a “foreign” way of speaking her native language …

On the other hand; there is an over-representation of immigrants when it comes to crime, prisons in the UK are recruitment grounds for Islamists, territories are becoming no-gone zones for European natives and European nations are constantly being undermined in terms of their cultural identity and heritage in order to be “open” and “inclusive.” Quotas are enforced, killing off the idea of a meritocracy, racial targeting of “whites” is rampant when it comes to sex-attacks committed by Muslims not to mention the well documented struggle a great amount of migrants face when trying to function within a western democratic societal structure.

It is easy to become sceptical towards diversity when focusing on the latter, but equally easy to feel guilty about these feelings when encountering likeable and/or high achieving individuals from the same group as mentioned above. It is equally disappointing if stereotypes are re-inforced and confirmed by the behaviour of those of immigrant background as one lives in the hope that all of these are the products of biased, out of date, prejudiced thinking.  It must surely be beneficial to “import” high achievers into ones society as long as these individuals don’t engage in cultural subversion, just as it cannot possibly be in the interest of any reasonable ruler to flood their nation with the very worst from other cultures.

It is especially interesting to note that certain European leaders threaten those who don’t want to listen to them, with sending in more migrants. By referring to these people like they are some sort of a weapon, these politicians display that they are conscious and fully aware of the current “European issue” which of course can make one question their motives and end goal with importing even more aliens indiscriminately . 

It is easier to call someone out on their “funky business” when dubious leaders are impeded from hiding behind foreigners … My father for example, explained how “cultural marxists” wished to destroy an old Norwegian fortress of historical significance, erecting housing projects in its stead. Why tear down a monument of military significance if not to dismantle parts of a nations cultural heritage? Again, the agenda of the “deconstructionists” become apparent when they don’t have Islam and/or any other alien group to hide behind…..

How can the current cultural crisis be solved in Europe? That is a very good question as one cannot forget or deny the bad, nor can generalisation be allowed to destroy and undermine valuable contributions from individuals. There is no reason to be filled with antipathy when running into a well integrated, well functioning foreigner, but there is also a serious danger to the integrity and safety of a nation if the “common-will” is to “give up” ones territory entirely, especially when this happens voluntarily, willingly … which surely must be unprecedented, historically speaking….

If one is to follow the current progressive agenda, it means undermining and de-valuing blood spilled by previous generations who died in battle to preserve the dignity, borders and future of Europe’s various indigenous ethnic groups. It is a sensitive and problematic issue, that can neither be brushed under the carpet or be entirely presented in a grim light. In my opinion it is crucial that immigration is halted completely from cultures alien to the European continent as of now, in order to stabilise a very unstable situation. If it could become illegal by law for future immigrants to self-segragate then maybe this could help as well. Massive responsibility rests on the shoulders of our civilian leadership that have as of now failed miserably by not being more critical as well as modest when opening up the “gates.”

As flawed and divisive as multiculturalism is, it has become our reality and with that reality comes an avalanche of social issues that has to be addressed in a balanced and nuanced way, without destroying the integrity and validity of western societies, without altering and falsifying history in order to sell fictious modern narratives, without diminishing western authority or smashing any hopes of future prosperity for those law abiding, well integrated aliens who would be unethical, immoral and unheard of to deport.

  1. A very important and accurate article. If you have limited time then please read this and the article mentioned about Western Civilisation, below. ↓
  2. An equally important article about a topic that should concern us all: The Crisis of Western Civ.
  3. The President of the German police union, admits that “integration” has failed ever since Germany initiated their “multiculturalism project.” For 30 years we’ve proven that it can’t be done – the Video has English subtitles.
  4. This is part II of an extremely interesting article concerning “high-trust” vs. “low-trust” cultures. This is a must read for all of those who don’t believe in borders and who don’t want to admit that “genuine diversity” exists. It also presents a completely different perspective in the migrant debate: Why are those who chased away Europeans risking their lives to get back under Euro-rule? A very awkward scenario for sure.
  5. This is a very intriguing article about (drumroll) Sweden … It is the descendants of immigrants who are guilty of the crime wave. Who would have thought?
  6. This is an alarming video. A must see as it talks about future migrant predictions. Any individual who justify strengthening other continents and nations, should think about the repercussions this can have for our future.Our future problem with Africa.
  7. A shocking article about:Totalitarian Sweden. This is a story of a couple who unfortunately found themselves in the middle of altercations between “new-Swedes” and the police. They filmed the ordeal and uttered “anti-migrant-sentiments” which isn’t strange considering how Sweden is currently suffering under the “humanitarian-load.” The result? They were asked to denounce their quips by admitting to having “unsound minds” due to mental health. It is an interesting thing to note that mental disorders are increasingly stigmatised in order to cover up both “terrorist-activity” and “resentment towards migrants.” An ugly reality. Very ugly and utterly oppressive. The couple was fired and had their equipment confiscated. 
  8. Erdogan addressed an issue that those on the right (and probably the police & the military) have been concerned  about for a long time. – Look at us we are so many, & look at you, you are so few…. – Turkish Agitation Europe.
  9. This is an article about the same problem, the quotes are in English, but the main text is in Norwegian. Foreign agitation.
  10. This is the second video I’ve seen of an Italian reporter being chased by migrants when reporting on their ordeal. One of the videos I linked to here on my blog was from the satirical news-program”Striscia La Notizia” who were creating a  critical story about the “new arrivals” and their criminal activity, but this video , depicts a female reporter for a serious tv-program creating a sympathetic portrayal of the hardships of the migrants before an alien man tries to attack her and she is thankfully rescued by a taxi driver… In the (now)removed video you can hear her saying that the “refugees” are heading north…..Nice.
  11. According to this reportage this lady understands “Arabic.” This made it possible for her to understand what “the new arrivals” were saying as she witnessed the alien masses streaming into the continent. An interesting watch.
  12.  A couple of articles about the tragedy that is “modern-Sweden.” Our neighbours have become a cautionary tale for anyone who might feel inclined to support “feminist politics” or the idea of being “a humanitarian superpower.” This article is in English but this other article that is very descriptive of the deep cultural issue is in Swedish. Hate-crimes are a very “real-thing” but not quite how the mainstream might imagine it. Racism is rampant towards ethnic locals. Now how to you explain or justify that?
  13. The online-behaviour depicted in this article is spot on. Anyone reacting to the recent terrorists attacks in England with anger “reacted wrong.” It is of course understandable that individuals with limited knowledge about the current “ice-berg-issue-with-immigrants” will perceive terrorism in Europe as the “act-of-evil-people” not as the ‘visible-tip-of-a-gigantic-ice-berg.” If the mainstream media were more vocal and if people paid more attention to mainstream and independent news, they would be mortified. Never before has an enemy been more excused or loved.
  14. Ariana Grande is more equipped than the Pentagon to handle the terror threat apparently….It’s the end of the world as we know it, & I don’t feel fine.
  15. The best anti-west propaganda ever. This video is a must watch!
  16. A peaceful Muslim doing the right thing.
  17. 23.000 Jihadis are strolling around in the streets of Britain, taking it easy. The quotes in this article are in English, so it is possible to understand the issue, the rest of the text is in Norwegian. The mess.
  18. Aesthetic perimeters in France. Yes. It is not nice to call a spade a spade. I remember walking underneath the Eiffel tower taking lots of breathtaking pictures in 2007. Shame that I don’t know where those photos are anymore.
  19. A very interesting “Macron-leak” if it is genuine. Apparently it is. I remember having to frequent “mandatory French classes for non-French speakers” when I attended school in France. I was the only non-muslim and beside one Arab boy and myself nobody else even bothered to put in any effort to learn French. They were just killing time, mocking the initiative. Taking into consideration that the EU apparently envisions “the new-European man” these documents shouldn’t come as a surprise. 😦
  20. If you feel like going for a swim in Europe.
  21. What really happened at the Bataclan?
  22. A very good article presented in a very professional manner about modern-Europe.
  23. The Catholic Church’s Involvement with Immigration. This is why people lose faith. At least in the organised-established-corruptible-bureaucratic-structure.
  24. A tragic video about the destruction of English identity … the worst part is that you can’t make this up.
  25. It is predicted that “Swedish-conditions” will contaminate our nation as well. It is said than coming generations will be worse. This article is about crime committed by immigrants/aliens in Norway.
  26. Norway’s official conservative newspaper declaring that “Europe is not primarily a Christian continent” before they continue with their ethno-masochism in order to protect Islam.
  27. A Norwegian independent news website, set the record straight regarding our cultural heritage and ancestry. The title of this article translates into ” Aftenposten have chosen submission.”
  28. A shocking article from Norway’s official statistics bureau revealing that we have more Polish immigrants in Norway than people from “alien cultures.” This is very revealing when one considers how representative other cultures are in terms of crime and racist activity directed towards locals…A surprising find…
  29. Yet if one looks closely … Population predictions Norway…do we have reason to worry? Absolutely if one looks closely at the methods of the bureau; at a certain point you are considered a “Norwegian” even though you are technically a foreigner.
  30. This is very bad news about Norway’s “welfare-bubble,” contrary to what our leaders like to delude their voters into believing, Norway is not the world’s richest country and needs to wake up!
  31. This theory could very well be why we’ve deluded ourselves:The Noble Savage
  32. A very interesting article with this off-putting title:”Breivik’s Norway.” It is a worthy read and especially interesting if what ABB wrote is actually true. Wether it is or not is hard to tell, unless he contacted the authorities each time he bore witness to a hate-crime.
  33. A video about the current ordeal in our part of the world:”Diversity in Europe.”
  34. A disturbing article that everyone should read. I’ve shared it several times and will probably continue doing so:”Racism towards Whites.
  35. Here are some videos/articles from Tommy Robinson. He is commonly depicted as a “right-wing-extremist” but this does not seem particularly accurate. Please take the time to check out this:”Justice for Chelsey.” This is a very good video that anyone should take the time to watch: “Maajid Nawas vs. Tommy Robinson.” This is Robinson making videos about how upset he is about racist violence in England:”Tommy Robinson” & “Tommy Robinson Again.
  36. This might be the reason as to why “integration” has failed in Europe. We’ve created  specific systems for ourselves and there is no guarantee that other people will neither like our constructs nor function within them: “All traits are heritable.
  37. More about our genetic heritage: “Replicants.”
  38. Evolution is happening faster than what we thought … we are becoming even more different to one another: “We Are All Mutants.
  39. A very interesting read that should be made mandatory:”The Race FAQ.”
  40. Another article along the same lines:”Such a thing as Race.”
  41. How the world reacts to unconventional truths:”The Ugliness of reality.”
  42. How to write an article meant to condemn only to sound like you’re endorsing “the enemy” since what ‘the bad-guy” said makes sense …Charles Murray.
  43. Genes… notice how the picture in this article, published by a mainstream media outlet has been removed by The New York Times….I took a screen shot of it ↓Diversity
  44. A very interesting guy sharing lots of relevant information. I’ve checked out all of these:”Information Processing – Several Articles.
  45. 100 Years of Ideology. This is quite interesting. It’s in all in the blood as our ancestors said.
  46. More of the same:”Bowling with our own.”
  47. How a brilliant man lost everything due to his lack of political correctness:”Watson.”
  48. Nixon talking about IQ:”Nixon phone conversation.
  49. Here are a coupe of articles about “The Alt-Right.” I don’t know enough about this guy to have an opinion, some say he is a right-wing extremist, others say he is not. I’m certainly not endorsing neo-nazis but the articles I’ve linked to are worthy a read. “Why is the alt-right so threatening?” & “The long history of “Nazi punching.”
  50. A Donald Trump supporter losing his love for The President. I still like the Trump administration, but it’s interesting to read/see other perspectives….
  51. I don’t like the style of this YouTuber at all, but he has some interesting points. So even though I find his presentation vulgar, it doesn’t hurt checking it out: “This week in stupid.”
  52. An interesting video about the skeptic community. It is very true that people construct their very own carefully designed echo-chambers. Trying to open people’s eyes to untraditional narratives is a hopeless operation. I’ve officially given up. There will be no more entries about “the Islamist-threat” coming from me after this. I’ve said a lot, I’ve proposed solutions, I think the only next step would be to 1)write petitions &/or 2) run for office. “The End of the Skeptic Community.
  53. Since this entry is about diversity it makes sense to include this intriguing video about: “The Kurdish Question.” This is very informative and eye-opening. Please check it out!
  54. I will finish off this long entry with links to a number of articles from Norway; some of these I’ve been thinking about translating. I will publish at least one of them in English, in due time….  “Politics vs. Emotionalism.” this article describes how the west has fallen for “the emotional” rather than the “boring, factual, realpolitik.” It was very enlightening to read it actually as it is very easy to recognise where/how we are failing. In my opinion it should be: 1)illegal to promise unrealistic policy-changes that cannot be fulfilled & 2)illegal to drastically alter war-efforts, initiated by the outgoing administration, if it is detrimental to the desired outcome of the involvement. No wonder the world is as messy as it is when one administration can initiate a war-effort and a new, incoming administration has the power to just abruptly halt it. If you have made the decision to overthrow a regime – then you better make sure that you got things under control maintaining a presence in the region. It’s not about popularity or at least it shouldn’t be. It is about what is best for the country. This next article is about how the “mainstream” try to sell a narrative about how Norway used to have Sharia-law… if you ever wondered how deep we’ve sunk into denial over our own identity then look no further than here: “Re-defining what it means to be ethnic-Norwegian,” uff…excuse me if I vomit. Our police-force is being nannied by “sociologists” who will probably succeed in making officers quit in protest. They do everything in their power not only to undermine Norwegian identity but to deny Norway’s problems with crime due to our “cultural enrichment.” When you try to be a cop … in a politically correct climate…
  55. The title of this article is: Europeans will lose the only place on the planet, that they call “theirs.” & Europe the proud, has become an old lady tired of life who refuses to eat. Very good articles that should be translated into English….
  56. Here is an overview of Norwegians killed by foreigners in Norway between 1981-2008. At least 58 individuals were killed in this time-period a pretty  big number compared to the 4-5 foreigners killed by Norwegians in the same time-frame. I have written about the racist murder on Benjamin Hermann before, but I had no idea that the number of murders directed towards “100%” Norwegians looked like this…it is a very different story than the one presented by the major media-outlets out there. Where is SOS Racism when ethnic-Norwegians are the victims? (Si det….man kan jo spoerre seg…)Due to how unconventional-facts have a tendency to disappear, (just look at the article I shared concerning the police) I’ll paste in the article in its entirety below. This is not mine in any way, I’m just spreading this information and making sure that if it gets deleted, well…then there is a backup here (I’ve added the highlights):“Frem fra glemselen”

    Siden 1981 til og med 2008, er minst 58 norske menn og kvinner blitt drept i Norge av utlendinger eller noen med innvandrerbakgrunn. Det er en lang rekke av drap som hver gang knapt fikk en avisnotis og i dag er fortiet og glemt. I samme tidsrom er 4-5 innvandrere blitt drept av nordmenn.

    1 1981, sommer, Bjørn Erik Solberg, Oslo, 24 år, skulle hjelpe en kvinne som ble trakassert av sin mann, men ble i stedet knivdrept av mannen som var en innvandrer fra Nord-Afrika

    2 1991, ? mars, Gunvor Refsdal, forgiftet med timetylklorid i vin av sin mann Hani Abdullah.

    3 1991, 3. sept. Tage Ansethmoen, Oslo, lege, drept med 20 knivstikk i sitt hjem av en marokkaner.

    4 1991, 14. des. Jarle Næss, Bergen, 23 år, dørvakt og bokser. Skutt midt i hjertet og drept med en halvautomatisk 11,25 Remington US Army, av marokkaneren Nour-Eddin Khouya, utenfor utestedet Maxime i Bergen. Marokkaneren kom til Norge i aug. 1990, og får midlertidig oppholdstillatelse. Kameraten til Næss, Bård Trones (25) blir skutt i magen, men overlever.

    5 1992, 26. jan. Tore A. Holthe, Gjøvik, 27 år, knivdrept av to marokkanere – 24 og 31 år.

    6 1992, 14. aug. Paul Gamlem, 31 år, ble sparket til døde i Oslo av to pakistanere – 17 og 19 år.

    7 1993, 7. mars, Berit Backer, sos. arbeider, ble kvalt i sitt hjem av en innvandrer fra Kosovo. Drapsmannen ble idømt sikring, men fikk senere norsk statsborgerskap og oppholdstillatelse i 2001.

    8 1993, 24. april, Linda M. Sandvik, 24 år, Oslo, Kvalt av en iraker, – også tiltalt for flere voldtekter.

    9 1994, 21. juli, en nordmann ble knivdrept i Larvik av en palestiner. (Nærmere detaljer mangler).

    10 1995, 13. okt. Kvinne, 57 år, sos. arbeider – brent inne da en iraner tente på Veitvedt sosialkontor.

    11 1996, 17. des. Heidi S. Sørli, drept av sin jugoslaviske mann som rømte, – er ikke pågrepet.

    12 1997, 3. mars, Randi Rastad, Høybråten, 61 år ble dyttet ned i kjelleren av utlendinger fra Brumunddal og døde av sjokk/ hjerteattakk.

    13 1997, (6.?) nov. Hilmar Jarle Fjørtoft 68 år, pensjonert sjømann fra Ålesund, ble funnet drept i sin egen leilighet i Latinskolegata 6. Fjørtoft var blitt utsatt for grov stump vold. Gjerningsmannen var tamilen Sivaguru som kom som asylsøker til Hareid i 1987. Tamilen fikk 12 års fengsel pluss sikring. Straffen omfattet også voldtekt, seksuelle overgrep og grov vold. Han slapp ut tre år før tiden. Nå er han tiltalt for to nye voldtekter i Ålesund (aug. 2007).

    14 1998, 1. mai, Tom Halvorsen, Rogaland, 18 år, drept ved tvangsdrukning. Vietnamesisk aksjon.

    15 1998, 21. mai, Ken-Gøran Abrahamsen, Balsfjord, 28 år, sparket i hjel i Oslo av 17 årig pakistaner.

    16 1998, ? ? En ung nordmann kom tilfeldig i ildlinjen mellom to innv. gjenger i Oslo og ble skutt.

    17 1998, 15. juli, Marie Louise Bendiksen, Sjøvegan, drept og brent. En 20 årig tamil pågrepet.

    18 1998, 26. juni, Bernt Chr. Reppe, Moelv, 24 år, skutt av en pakistaner i Rosenkratzgt, Oslo.

    19 1998, 31. okt. Rune Åge Berg, sparket i hjel av en 16-årig makedoner i Akersgata, Oslo.

    20 1998, 14. nov. Ulf Bråthen, 42 år, taxisjåfør skutt i bilen av to utlendinger (19 og 23 år) på Godlia.

    21 1998, 10. des. Ola Wangen, 33 år, knivdrept på Grunerløkka av en sinnssyk iraner på frifot.

    22 1999, 17. mai, Barbro Zhedini, Oslo, drept av sin tunisiske mann Hassa Zhedini og dumpet i Gjersjøen. En arm avskjært. Hassa Zhedinis bror var med på ugjerningen.

    23 2000, 31. jan. Vegar Midtveit, 18 år – jaget av utlendinger utfor en skrent ved Kristiansand – og døde.

    24 2001, ?. jan. Gry Husein, funnet i Skienselva, kvalt av sin palestinske mann Gamal – fra Israel.

    25 2001, 20. jan. Kennet Alexander Otnes, Larvik, 20 år, øksedrept, partert og lagt i dypfryser av en 18 årig afrikaner.

    26 2001, 27. juli, Hanne Kristine Olsen, Bergen, 29 år, ble kjørt ned og drept av sin palestinske samboer, Yasin Jabr, 40 år. Deres barn ble hardt skadd.

    27 2001, 8. aug. Gunn Sivertsen, Haramsøy, og hennes 3 barn ble mordbrendt av sin chilenske samboer.

    28 2001, Gunn Sivertsens første barn.

    29 2001, Gunn Sivertsens andre barn.

    30 2001, Gunn Sivertsens tredje barn.

    31 2001, 26. aug. Gunn Merete Lode, 32 år, knivdrept av en 42 årig gift trebarns far fra Danmark.

    32 2002, 20. jan. Kristoffer I. Bastesen, 19 år, knivdrept i Kr. Augusts gt, Oslo av sin thailandske kamerat.

    33 2002, 13. apr. Einar T. Rønning, Råde, 23 år, dørvakt på Chez, knivstukket i lysken av 4 muslimer.

    34 2002, 13. apr. Martin Morisse, Jessheim, 26 år, dørvakt på Chez, knivstukket i lysken av 4 muslimer.

    35 2002, 9. okt. Kjell P. Dahlberg, 48 år, knivdrept på Bogerud T-bane i Oslo av en chilensk asylsøker.

    36 2002, 18. okt. Inger Sund, Sognsvn. Oslo, 69 år, ranet og drept i sitt hjem av to asylsøkere som hadde fulgte etter Inger etter at hun hadde vunnet 30.000 på bingo. Drapsmannen, Moez Ben Noureddeine Rouissi, klarte å rømme ut av Norge. Via Tyskland ble drapsmannens identitet oppsporet. Han hadde blitt retunert til Tunisia av tyske myndigheter, der han ble idømt 15 års fengsel for drapet, i 2007.

    37 2002, 3. nov. Johnny Øvergård, Balsfjord, 43 år. Drept av sin somaliske drosjesjåfør på Frogner.

    38 2002, 13. des. Henry Simonsen, Alta, 56 år, drept med øks av sin russiske kone, Elizaveta Georgienna Sytnik.

    39 2003, 17. feb. Audun Bøland, 39 år, bussjåfør, knivdrept på Valdresbussen av en asylsøker fra Etiopia. Etioperen hadde samme dag drept en annen asylsøker på et asylmottak i Valdres.

    40 2003, 15. juni, Anie B. Olsvik, Haugesund, 83 år, drept om natten i sin seng av to innv. fra Libya.

    41 2003, ? des. Cathrine Halvorsen, Kongsvinger, 34 år, drept av en iraker. Azad Ghaleb Ali som er siktet, klarte å rømme. Politiet er derimot sikre på at det er Ghaleb Ali som er gjerningsmannen.

    42 2004, 19. febr. Eli S. Høyland, Stavanger, 49 år, kvalt i sitt hjem av en Tysker, 29 år.

    43 2004, 3. aug. Terje Mjåland, Skien, 23 år, døv, knivdrept på trikk 17 i Oslo av en somalier, 41 år.

    44 2004, 25. aug. Helge Nylund, 34 år, skutt av en sjalu 52 åring fra Afghanistan. Han skjøt seg selv.

    45 2004, 4. sept. Marita Strøm, Namsos, 38 år, skutt i en bil i Irak av sin mann Osman Omar Osman fra Irak.

    46 2004, ? sept. Lise Johanni Johanson, drept på Teisen i Oslo av en mann fra Irak, 23 år.

    47 2004, 28. okt. Hedda Karterudseter, Seljord, 19 år, kvalt i Sogndal av den gifte somalieren Hassan Samriye Hashin, 35 år.

    48 2005, ? jan. Mary Ann Hansen, Bodø, 42 år, knivdrept av en algirer 31 år, mens hun holdt deres felles barn i armene. Algireren fikk første gang avslag på asylsøknaden i nov. 2002, og endelig avslag, med beskjed om å forlate Norge, i mars 2003.

    49 2006, 20. (?) feb. Finn Abelseth, Oslo, opprinnelig fra Ålesund. I begynnelsen av 30-årene. Mandag 20. feb. ble han funnet bevisstløs utenfor boligen sin i Schønings gate 32. Døde senere på sykehus. Han skal ha blitt banket opp av en gjeng pakistanere natt til søndag 19. Dette i følge en kamerat som Abelseth ringte til før han mistet bevisstheten.

    50 2006, 29. mars, Stein Sjaastad, Oslo, lege 58 år, brutalt stukket ned og drept på sitt kontor av asylsøkeren Kamel Mellah 37 år, fra Algerie.

    51 2006, 25. juni, Anne Marit Søgård, Torshov i Oslo, 41 år, skutt og drept i sin leilighet med 6-8 skudd fra håndvåpen av to pakistanere med norsk statsborgerskap, Haidar Hussain 21 år og Ali Ayaz Shafa 19 år. Søgårds kjæreste ble også forsøkt drept, men overlevde. Hussain ble i nov. 2005 dømt til 2 år ubetinget fengsel for flere brudd på narkotikalovgivningen. Begge pakistanerne ble dømt til fengsel i 13 år, 27. mars 2008. En tredje person ble frifunnet.

    52 2007, 31. jan. Arild Lund, Drammen, 56 år, drept av tre litauere i sitt hjem.

    53 2007, 30. april, Anne Grete Vollum, Overhalla i Nord-Trøndelag, 35 år, gravid med tvillinger i 8. måned, drept av sin tidligere mann asylsøkeren Bahadir Mirzaolimov 26 år fra Usbekistan. Mirzaolimov kom til Norge i 2005, men fikk avslag på sin asylsøknad i 2006.

    54 2007, 30. april, Anne Grete Vollums ufødte barn (tvilling).

    55 2007, 30. april, Anne Grete Vollums ufødte barn (tvilling).

    56 2007, 30. april, Cicilie Watnan Lian, Overhalla i Nord-Trøndelag, 7 år og Anne Grete Vollums niese, drept av Bahadir Mirzaolimov. Vollums ti år gammle datter var også i huset. Hun ble bundet fast under ugjerningene. En av småpikene skal også ha blitt voldtatt av asylsøkeren.

    57 2008, 8. desember, Jonas Pedersen, Oslo, 31 år. Drept av to polakker, 48 og 45 år, etter spark mot hodet i basketak på Europarådets plass i Oslo sentrum. Hendelsen skjedde 6. desember, men Pedersen døde av skadene 8. Den ene av de to ble frikjent, samt en tredje polakk, 36 år, som kjørte bilen.

    58 2008, 16. desember, Ann-Mari Solås, Mørkved utenfor Bodø, 32 år og tobarnsmor. Drept med flere knivstikk utenfor sitt hjem av en iraner, 43 år, som kom til Norge i 1991 som asylsøker gjennom FN. Iraneren ble norsk statsborger i 1998.

    Anmerkning – kommentar til ”Frem fra glemselen”

    Denne lista, med 58 drepte nordmenn fram til og med året 2008, er en konsentrat av notater ved R. Halgjern, Odd Lønø, Torfinn Hellandsvik, Agnar Andersen og Bjørnar Røyset. Lista omfatter kun nordmenn og kvinner som er drept i Norge av noen med innvandrer bakgrunn. Derfor er det ikke tatt med utlendinger som er kommet til Norge og blitt drept her av våre innvandrere/ asylsøkere, heller ikke er tatt med nordmenn som drar til andre land og blir drept der.

    Lista viser at i 10-års periode fra og med 1995 – til og med 2004, er 34 norske blitt drept i Norge av innv. utlendinger (i gjennomsnitt 30 stk.). I samme tiårs periode er det registrert 3 (tre) drap på innvandrere i Norge som er begått av nordmenn.

    Denne drapslista gir fullverdig grunnlag for beregning av denne makabre utviklingen (prognoser) i lang tid framover – og hvem som er mest kriminell.

    Innvandrerbefolkningen, ca. 400.000 (i 2005) (inkl. svensker), utgjør bare ca 1/12 del av Norges totale befolkning Allikevel blir altså i gjennomsnitt ca. 10 nordmenn i dag drept for hver innvandrer som blir drept av nordmenn.

    Dersom innvandrerbefolkningen blir like stor som den etnisk norske befolkning om ca. 45 år – uten å endre sin kriminelle tendens – vil altså drapslista vise 12 ganger flere drepte nordmenn – med ca. 360 per 10 år, mens nordmenn vil gjøre seg skyld i 3 drap på innvandrerbefolkningen i samme 10-års periode. Dette fordi antallet etniske nordmenn ikke vil bli høyere enn i dag..

    Dersom man med grunnlag i nevnte tallfakta vil beregne den prosentvise andel av denne kriminaliteten i forhold til størrelsen på dem nevne folkegrupper – for dermed å se hvem som er mest kriminell – har jeg kommet fram til følgende reelle prosentsats:

    Innvandrerne står 99,17 prosent og nordmennene står for 0,83 prosent av alle drepte i denne sammenheng.

    Nevnte prosentsats vil ikke endre seg selv om innvandrerbefolkningen blir like stor eller høyere enn den opprinnelige norske befolkningen omkring år 2045 – slik realistiske antropologer har forutsett. Når det gjelder voldtekt, ran og mishandlinger, er antakelig den prosentvise andel omtrent det samme.

    Ovenstående fakta og prognoser blir den bitre virkelighet dersom utviklingen får fortsette i samme spor som nå. Hvis man vil unngå, eller stoppe utviklingen mot en slik virkelighet om ca. 45 år, – må noe drastisk og effektivt iverksettes – og det straks! Noe å tenke på for våre naive og tafatte politikere!

    Agnar Andersen