Having A Raison D’être & An End Game – The Impression One Can Get.

When reading about the Iraq war last year I was stunned to see the willingness to sacrifice the integrity of Europe on the altar of momentary territorial access needed in order to get into Iraq.

“Plan Of Attack” by Bob Woodward.

“Decision Points” by George W. Bush.

I was further mystified by the fact that 4-star Army General (ret.) Colin Powell came across as the one lone voice of reason, since he tried to raise awareness of tribalism and ethnic diversity in the targeted area.

The reading certainly gave me the impression that humans are simply being seen as replaceable cogs in the machinery by the establishment.

Culture and ethnicity simply doesn’t matter, it is all about momentary victory, without any overarching solid narrative selling a clearly defined End Game, that will be reached by many separate actions all serving the same underlying objective.

This is a startling realisation.

When reading “The Art Of War” I was surprised about what sort of advice it contained. Prolonged warfare with no end in sight is depicted as one of the worst projects that a Nation can ever engage in. A group that engages in warfare also have to ensure that they have access to an efficient supply line, taking advantage of whatever resources the group can get their hands on as they expand into a territory. A war effort should be swift and precise, without too much meddling from sovereigns located far away. The people who are on the ground need to be able to do what is necessary to reach their goal in a completely mobilised way, to the extent that this is possible.

All of this certainly made me question the sort of warfare that people my age have grown accustomed to. All of our Nations’ war efforts seem concentrated in “alien territories,” fighting and training “aliens” that might turn on the West later, and all of our Nations’ major war efforts seemingly drag out for ever…

No proper end game that logically makes sense is ever presented to the public and when getting an insight into the world of those who run these things, it doesn’t really seem like these characters know what the deal is either (unless a battle ground is simply needed in order to train soldiers and test new equipment).

Warriors & Citizens – American Views of Our Military edited by Kori Schake & Jim Mattis.

A parallel can be drawn to hacker activists, who don’t seem too concerned with allies. They’ll attack an enemy of the West one day only to target Western political and military structures the next, potentially jeopardising the integrity and safety of a Nation State or its military operations.

When reading about community organisers you see this pattern of behaviour once again.  A lot of left-wing activism simply cancels itself out, since the only common denominator seems to be emotionalism. Due to this you’ll get contradicting agitation and advocacy that will leave someone like myself slightly confused, as there is no End Game in sight anywhere.

If you look at Islamic agitation in Europe it is very easy to understand what their End Game and overarching goal is. They engage in demographic expansionism into Europe, which gradually gives them a political advantage. Wealthy Muslim power-players buy themselves into Western Corporations which gives them cultural influence and leverage. Street-level Muslims carve out their own territories and then defend these. Mosques are erected further cementing a claim to a specific territory boosting confidence, while a romanticized fantasy of Islamic Imperialism, appealing to people’s sense of identity and innate penchant for ancestry-worship, is promoted. Of course, as always, not all. But you don’t need every member of a specific group to behave in this particular fashion for it to have its desired effect. My impression of European Islamification is that there is a long-term vision, coupled with a willingness to commit to certain behaviours, in order to eventually reach a clearly defined outcome: Nation States that become compatible in their policies and in their cultures with the Muslim faith, preferably paving the way for a new “Golden-Age.” Of course it is of importance to point out the ethnic and racial diversity within Islam, and that there are numerous conflicting denominations within the faith as well. As an example: we can now clearly observe, imported tribal disagreements and feuds, in Europe, in addition to all of our own inter-ethnic issues that we had from before….

Inter-ethnic dissonance is very prevalent in Africa; which is generally referred to as the most diverse continent on the surface of the earth.

So what can be said of the West? What is our End Game? What can be observed and what conclusions can be drawn? 

What would make sense, instinctively,  would be to have common ancestry as the glue holding Europe together. Race has become way more inclusive than what it used to be, since we now largely see Race as something observable, while ethnic groups give us what has become our European Nation States, with its specific cultures and characteristics.  Back in the day these used to be chopped up into various tribes that probably displayed a lot of similar traits to one another, hence our generalisation regarding population groups contained within the boundaries of the modern Nation State: an extended family sharing common ancestry and a similar distribution of genetic traits on average.

It would make sense if our Nation States in Europe concerned themselves with the protection of our shared and individual cultural heritage, doing everything to ensure the survival and majority status of white children (and mixed whites) in the only territory that actually belongs a 100% to whites, protecting our continent’s borders and integrity.

A strong unified Europe and more broadly speaking, a strong unified West with the more multi-racial configurations found within territories conquered by whites, would in theory make sense.

Is this an End Game for what is collectively known as The West though? No.

This would be a racist objective. It would insinuate that Ethnic-Europeans have a natural claim to a specific territory and that conquest is a legitimate way to establish a Nation, which is what a white presence in all other territories other than Europe is a result of. (To my knowledge … It certainly looks that way when observing strange geographic settlements by Whites and the presence of dark-skinned indigenous groups).

The prevalent mythos championed in the West is this:

  1. that all other groups are minorities, even if Europe looks very small when compared to other continents, and we are outnumbered globally speaking.
  2. That the magic soil theory is truth, meaning that you’ll automatically become  Swedish by simply breathing the air in Sweden.
  3. That all human beings are born equal due to a blank slate, and that genetics simply don’t exist.
  4. That talking about genetics and genuine diversity is dangerous because that will instantly turn you into Hitler and result in a new Holocaust.
  5. That it makes sense to celebrate white ethnic groups becoming minorities, after years of civil-rights battles in the U.S.A. to ensure equal opportunity regardless of skin colour, and after years of Whites trying to do good towards previously marginalised and abused non-white minority groups within their domains. Not to forget: the constant focus on the challenges faced by so-called (and genuine) minorities within traditionally White-majority constructs. None of this paints minority-status in an appealing light … yet we should do everything in our power to lay the groundwork for our own marginalisation…. which is particularly interesting when reading about the merciless brutality in other parts of the world perpetrated by non-white majorities…
  6. That previous white expansionism will just be forgotten, since Whites have decided to “play nice,” which means that we no longer have any enemies and don’t really need any borders….
  7. That only white ethnic groups can be guilty of racism and imperialistic activity.
  8. That white ethnic groups are not under any circumstance “indigenous” and that there will at no point be any need to give any white demographic the status of “protected group.”
  9. That race and/or ethnicity is only real and only counts if/when dealing with “indigenous people,” who can under no circumstance be white. These “indigenous” groups are also the only ones entitled to certain territories that have to be protected in order to ensure their survival.
  10. That charity is only needed in the 3rd world as it is probably your own fault if you are poor and hungry in the superior, egalitarian, socialist inspired constructs that make up the Western World.
  11. That you have to import workers from Africa and The Middle East, rather than employing individuals from territories closer to your own, or within your own continent.
  12. That mixing on a massive scale is always peaceful and not the result of violent demographic change or militant conquest.
  13. That re-writing history and engaging in gas-lighting on a National and/or Continental level is perfectly alright in order to salvage vanity projects initiated by international organisations, that might look good on paper and in theory; until inserting the human factor into the equation actually implementing the idea.

Ok. So this doesn’t look too promising. Then what about Christianity? This is multi-racial, multiethnic and global. It is way more inclusive and has been used as a unifying factor in Europe before…

The West has continuously acted as an enemy to Christian groups in the Middle East, facilitating genocidal persecution of genuine Christian minority tribes. Western governments not only promote the build-down of Christianity within Europe and all other territories under White influence, they actively side with Nations and regimes known for violent Christian persecution.

What about human-rights, enlightenment ideas, world peace and the “human race”?

Western governments have repeatedly sided with regimes guilty of outrageous human rights abuses, making themselves guilty of gross hypocrisy since human rights and the protection of humanity as a whole has become the main narrative and general raison d’être of Western groups.

Portraying oneself as a defender of the human race also becomes tricky as you cannot possible go out there and claim that population group A needs more protection and privileges than population group B as this would be racist and undermine universal rights. And how on earth can you even say population group A and B when race/ethnicity isn’t even real? You cannot say that religious group A is more guilty of persecution than religious group B, because why would religious group B be more righteous or in need of more protection than the other? Are you a bigot or what?

Who are you to say that Terrorists don’t have rights or don’t have a point, when you claim to be a defender of all of humanity? And how on earth do you even define a “War on Terror” or “Terrorists”? Any person or group could fall into this category when nothing is specified.

These kind of points can be spinned indefinitely putting The West in a situation where none of its actions can be seen as righteous and/or legitimate.

It opens up the door for a potential legal, moral and PR nightmare where The West and its natural inhabitants never win.

It also puts Western Nation states in a situation where an enemy cannot be clearly defined, at least not in public, due to important exotic alliances and potential diplomatic disasters. By relying on exotic alliances for abstract military operations, the West paints  itself into a corner, where they cannot kick out subversive elements within their own nations if these stem from their good “friends and allies.”

The West is forced into a position where it cannot really look after the interests of its own inhabitants, nor enforce the heritage and integrity of itself.

Not to forget that The West is put into an incredibly awkward situation when Western leaders cannot clearly formulate anything, if interested in maintaining good international relationships.

This results in cringe worthy narratives that leaves all of those who don’t just parrot our “modern shared values” confused and puzzled. What are we all about really? Does anyone know?

What about Capitalism then? A support for this must surely be a constant factor from The Americans at least? 

No. Think again. The U.S.A. is willing to tolerate oppressive communist regimes that in the long run pose a threat to the American experiment and their global influence, as long as the U.S.A. can gain from such an alliance in the short run.

So what is The End Game of The West? 

Strangely and worryingly enough there doesn’t seem to be one……(but I might be very wrong, after all, who knows what goes on behind the scenes…).

At best it can be argued that there are forces within The West championing stability trough whatever means by expanding the police state and surveillance of their own citizens. This though is worked against by leaders who don’t want to acknowledge the effects of demographic change. In addition it facilitates the very form of governance that Western Nations are outspokenly against, not to forget that the identity destruction currently happening in The Western world work against any conservation efforts intended to protect our cultural and ethnic inheritance, while simultaneously compromising stability and security; in short, all of it compromises the survival of those people who occupy the territories that we collectively refer to as The West.

 

My Last Entry About The European & American Situation – for now.

“The struggle to erase Swedish history, break down Swedish culture and force the Swedes to assimilate into the multicultural phenomenon is going according to plan.

Following the revelations of one of its angry archaeologists, it emerges that the curators of Stockholms Länsmuseum have been ordering the systematic destruction of newly found artifacts from the Iron Age and the Viking period under the guise that it would be too burdensome to process.

Coins, arrow heads, ritual amulets, weapons, jewellery and weights that were kept in the past are now directly dumped into metal recycling bins upon discovery instead of being treasured and displayed.” – Excerpt from the article below.

(Read The Full Article Here).

9 out 10 rapists in the Norwegian city of Stavanger are foreigners, mostly Africans.

This will be my last entry featuring online articles for a little while as I’m currently reading the Holy Bible! I have also decided to take a break writing about the current situation in Europe as I have in many ways said all that there is to say about our cultural turbulence. There are those who are aware and understand what is at stake, but there are equally many if not even more who are in complete and total denial. These type of people will take offence if anyone rightly suggests that “when in Rome do as the Roman’s do” as this statement will be seen as “bigoted,” “xenophobic,” you name it.  Of course you have to be a racist and probably a Nazi if you state that countries of the west should protect and enforce their own culture, if Churchill was around today he would have been branded a brown-shirt, in fact anyone willing to protect their European nation back in WW2 would have been branded a “white-supremacist” today, mark my words. Having revealed and shared as much information as I have there should be more than enough material for people to go through for a while, sadly though I do have the impression that people prefer their own little echo-chambers, so those who are alert and aware of our crisis will keep and eye on things while those who are in denial will screech and throw a hissy fit if they have to see a picture of America’s President and/or engage in dramatic virtue-signalling if exposed to the new European reality when reading a blog.

It is particularly telling that my most popular blog-entry this year has so far been an entry about Skin Care. Yes you read that right. I have commented on it before and will repeat again that people truly enjoy gossip, entries about clothes, make-up, exercising – these type of things – rather than book reviews, social commentaries, etc; Even though I have people visiting my blog every single day, it is interesting to note that there is more actual interaction on posts that are in many ways mundane. Don’t get me wrong, skin care is important to most women, but it is lame that people aren’t more interested in what they are voting for, for example, or even more importantly: why.

I will admit that I was mistaken in thinking that people would be interested in discussing ideas, it is obvious that this doesn’t have a broad appeal; people will either tell you to run for office if they agree with you, or get upset without ever revealing why they disagree with you, or you will have to deal with something even more disappointing: people who just don’t comprehend what you are writing. Yes – of all things.

So it is obvious that it is hard to find the kind of environment online that I’m a part of in the real world. Over here we discuss quantitative, empirical, scientific findings, theories, societal structures, ideas, in addition to reading aloud. We play strategy board games and go for long walks discussing the one intriguing topic after the other. I guess it was silly of me to think that this would interest the general public (take this as evidence that I’m not particularly arrogant, as I have been genuinely surprised and disappointed).

Bear in mind that what I am specifically referring to is the current European crisis, and that I will not abandon my style completely, as that would obviously be quite fake. I’m not the least interested in watching TV or what Hollywood starlets are wearing. In fact there are many things that I find to be boring. Open up your eyes and start observing rather than just seeing, open up your ears and start listening and you will probably see what I’ve seen, especially if you travel around if not, you can read this, as I’ve done the observing and travelling for you: Europe & America’s Transformation Due To Migration – My Observations as A European Globetrotter.

https://www.facebook.com/plugins/video.php?href=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2F1686934311564090%2Fvideos%2F1918477548409764%2F&show_text=0&width=560

If I was to describe my personal impression of how things are now, I would sum it up like this: If you have a deep bleeding wound you would ideally go to the emergency room. Modern politics basically means placing a sparkly, pretty, looking band-aid on said wound as this is politically correct and less offensive. What will inevitably happen as a result is that said wound will become full of pus, it will become increasingly infected – but hey don’t worry- we’ll just put on some bandage without ever really sorting out the wound. Obviously you will go septic as things turn sour, but don’t you worry! You’ll be in the receiving end of morphine! Which is what is given to dying hospital patients to ease their suffering! This way you’ll be “healed” in a politically correct fashion and given drugs so that you can pass away without too much pain! Sounds good right? This is a perfect description of European politics in my opinion.

The time has come for people to embrace the fact that the peace in Europe has been broken. This didn’t have to happen, but it has. We now have an arsenal of “imported issues” in addition to widely promoted self-hate from the “enemy within.”

Today we are out buying local produce as our supermarket foods could potentially be poisoned by our “misunderstood,” “not-really” enemies, as our colourful “friends” have declared that killing us with cyanide is something that they would fancy. Maybe, just maybe, there are politically correct people out there who have realised that “traitor” and “enemy” are two words that don’t really exist anymore in the western world, as it would of course be racist to suggest that there could be people from the outside, pushing inwards who are our enemies, or foreigners within our nations being our enemies and natives aiding and facilitating all of this- only conservatives are foes since they stand up against progress and are bigoted – l-m-a-o. We are buying local probably because of unjustified paranoia … or *drumroll* racism …

It is also interesting to observe that Transgender Athletes will apparently be allowed to compete in the next Olympics. It is obvious that we have sunk so deep into political correct Soviet ideology, that only falling flat on our faces, can potentially wake us up from the lunacy. Female athletes will have to have their ass kicked left, right and centre for the egalitarianism-police, to maybe, just maybe, go: ooooops, perhaps this was a bad idea? And that is a big maybe. Trans Athletes in the 2018 Winter Olympics!

“The response follows controversy that sparked after 800-meter South African runner Caster Semenya won gold at the 2016 Summer Olympics in Brazil. Semenya’s intersex condition causes her to produce more testosterone (hyperandrogenism) than most women, prompting questions about whether she had an unfair biological advantage.” – Excerpt from the article above.

The Real Danger of The KKK in the U.S.A.

“Meanwhile, the victims of the notorious KKK seem rather fewer in number. The Wikipedia entry for the KKK is over twice as long as that for Communism, and hardly seeks to airbrush the misdeeds of that violent organization, but only manages to provide some 15 murder victims, all listed by name, drawn from the combined decades of the 1950s and 1960s, which represented the height of the Klan’s modern power. This apparent gap between 15 deaths and perhaps 70,000,000 or so seems rather wide.” – Excerpt from the article above.

The American situation.

“Continually, the networks portray what happened Saturday as simply the manifestation of extremism and bigotry from the Right. And practically the only voice that got even remotely close to a rational perspective came from, quite ironically, a black professor, Carol Swain at Vanderbilt University, who distinguished between the very legitimate desires, aspirations and fears of America’s under-attack white majority and the misapprehension that somehow those desires equal inevitably “white racism” or “white supremacy.” As Swain indicated, what has happened during the past few decades is a palpable marginalization of millions of hard working Americans, mostly white and mostly Christian, who have been sidelined and left behind by the advancing progressivist revolution (these last words are mine). They are not naturally “racists” or even “white supremacists,” but rather they seek to guarantee their own survival, and the survival of their families, their communities, and their culture. They have seen the standards, beliefs, traditions, morality and customs that they inherited and have cherished—they have seen them attacked, ridiculed, and, in many cases, banned, even criminalized.”  – Excerpt from the article above.

What The Alt-Right Is.

“In the interest of developing a core Alternative Right philosophy upon which others can build.

  1. The Alt Right is of the political right in both the American and the European sense of the term. Socialists are not Alt Right. Progressives are not Alt Right. Liberals are not Alt Right. Communists, Marxists, Marxians, cultural Marxists, and neocons are not Alt Right. National Socialists are not Alt Right.
  2. The Alt Right is an ALTERNATIVE to the mainstream conservative movement in the USA that is nominally encapsulated by Russel Kirk’s 10 Conservative Principles, but in reality has devolved towards progressivism. It is also an alternative to libertarianism.
  3. The Alt Right is not a defensive attitude and rejects the concept of noble and principled defeat. It is a forward-thinking philosophy of offense, in every sense of that term. The Alt Right believes in victory through persistence and remaining in harmony with science, reality, cultural tradition, and the lessons of history.
  4. The Alt Right believes Western civilization is the pinnacle of human achievement and supports its three foundational pillars: Christianity, the European nations, and the Graeco-Roman legacy.
  5. The Alt Right is openly and avowedly nationalist. It supports all nationalisms and the right of all nations to exist, homogeneous and unadulterated by foreign invasion and immigration.
  6. The Alt Right is anti-globalist. It opposes all groups who work for globalist ideals or globalist objectives.
  7. The Alt Right is anti-equalitarian. It rejects the idea of equality for the same reason it rejects the ideas of unicorns and leprechauns, noting that human equality does not exist in any observable scientific, legal, material, intellectual, sexual, or spiritual form.
  8. The Alt Right is scientodific. It presumptively accepts the current conclusions of the scientific method (scientody), while understanding a) these conclusions are liable to future revision, b) that scientistry is susceptible to corruption, and c) that the so-called scientific consensus is not based on scientody, but democracy, and is therefore intrinsically unscientific.
  9. The Alt Right believes identity > culture > politics.
  10. The Alt Right is opposed to the rule or domination of any native ethnic group by another, particularly in the sovereign homelands of the dominated peoples. The Alt Right is opposed to any non-native ethnic group obtaining excessive influence in any society through nepotism, tribalism, or any other means.
  11. The Alt Right understands that diversity + proximity = war.
  12. The Alt Right doesn’t care what you think of it.
  13. The Alt Right rejects international free trade and the free movement of peoples that free trade requires. The benefits of intranational free trade is not evidence for the benefits of international free trade.
  14. The Alt Right believes we must secure the existence of white people and a future for white children.
  15. The Alt Right does not believe in the general supremacy of any race, nation, people, or sub-species. Every race, nation, people, and human sub-species has its own unique strengths and weaknesses, and possesses the sovereign right to dwell unmolested in the native culture it prefers.
  16. The Alt Right is a philosophy that values peace among the various nations of the world and opposes wars to impose the values of one nation upon another as well as efforts to exterminate individual nations through war, genocide, immigration, or genetic assimilation.

TL;DR: The Alt Right is a Western ideology that believes in science, history, reality, and the right of a genetic nation to exist and govern itself in its own interests.

The patron saint of conservatives, Russell Kirk, wrote: “The great line of demarcation in modern politics, Eric Voegelin used to point out, is not a division between liberals on one side and totalitarians on the other. No, on one side of that line are all those men and women who fancy that the temporal order is the only order, and that material needs are their only needs, and that they may do as they like with the human patrimony. On the other side of that line are all those people who recognize an enduring moral order in the universe, a constant human nature, and high duties toward the order spiritual and the order temporal.”

This is no longer true, assuming it ever was. The great line of demarcation in modern politics is now a division between men and women who believe that they are ultimately defined by their momentary opinions and those who believe they are ultimately defined by their genetic heritage. The Alt Right understands that the former will always lose to the latter in the end, because the former is subject to change.” – Excerpt from the article above.

Race realism vs. Race denialism.

“The intellectual climate in the West today is one of guerilla race realism.

The commanding heights of Western societies—media, schools, politics—are held by race denialists.

Race denialism is a social dogma. All respectable people are required to affirm it.

Meanwhile, in the maquis:

The biological and human sciences (especially genetics, psychometry, paleoanthropology) uncover ever more race-realist facts—“hatefacts.”

Ever more educated, thoughtful citizens observe persistent patterns in group social outcomes that contradict official dogma. (The thoughtcrime of Noticing.) They conclude that the race-denialist Emperor has no clothes.”

“The ordinary modes of human thinking are magical, religious, social, and personal. We want our wishes to come true; we want the universe to care about us; we want the approval of those around us; we want to get even with that s.o.b who insulted us at the last tribal council. For most people, wanting to know the cold truth about the world is way, way down the list. (We Are Doomed, Chapter 7.)” –  Excerpt from the article above.

Here is a blog entry from a Norwegian blogger describing how a Muslim man refused to listen to a female train conductor as: ” Don’t talk to me you who are a woman.

Here is another article, this one featuring a Muslim man who refused to shake hands with our very own immigration minister: Muslim leader refuses to shake Listhaug’s hand. In our country.

“A middle school in North Carolina was caught with their hand in the politically correct cookie jar in a big way, and the outrage they received is much deserved. Via The College Fix: Allegations that a middle school teacher forced several students to stand and apologize for their “white privilege” have rocked a North Carolina school district. First reported by American Lens, during a meeting of the Rockingham County School Board last month, a woman named Farren Wilkinson made the troubling accusations against a teacher from Western Rockingham Middle School.

“[The teacher] caused some of her students to stand up and apologize to other students based on their inequal [sic] opportunities of education,” Wilkinson said. “So I would like to know how our schools can allow an educator to humiliate, bully and degrade students. This is not a matter of race but a matter of a teacher using fear and the embarrassment of children to satisfy her own personal anger or beliefs.” Feel free to correct me if you disagree,” – Excerpt from the article below.

Students forced to apologise for being white.

I will conclude this entry with a link to something I had never heard of before: The Mouse Utopia Experiment.

How To Be Evil In 2017.

A little while ago I came across a “scandal” that was creating quite a buzz over in Norway. The online frenzy had been caused by  a commercial, launched by a Norwegian weapon manufacturer. The company in question had teamed up with the national ski jumping  team creating a poster depicting the athletes with a Norwegian flag waving in the wind.

This created a social media “backlash” since the “national romantic” picture could resemble “Nazi” propaganda according to critics. A representative for the company even bothered to officially apologise claiming that they only saw “proud ski jumpers & the Norwegian flag” but that they would never use such an ad again….(here is the story)

Yes…you read that right…I’m guessing that one of the reasons for the backlash was the fact that all of the athletes were white. You see an all-ethnic-Norwegian line-up, looking towards the sky, with the “evil” flag in the background. This of course looks nationalistic and has to be suppressed. I’m willing to bet that the ad would have been welcomed with open arms if the girl in the front was wearing a hijab. But alas, only Norwegians are in this picture featuring representatives of Norwegian sportsmanship  so of course this is offensive………..

Everyone knows that a national team is only good if the majority are immigrants so that they don’t really represent how an ethnicity/nation would actually perform internationally…. A good team, just like the military has to reflect what is politically correct, so I have to say that I’m amazed at the fact that a quota hasn’t been forced upon the ski jumping team as the absence of such measures must surely be racist….

I’ve previously mentioned “national romanticism” in my “Identity” entry, as this movement was very important to Norwegian culture as we had just gained our independence from Sweden. This movement emphasised and celebrated everything Norwegian, as we took our power back.

Now though, regardless of its contribution, the mainstream do everything in their power to destroy it, in a desperate attempt to create the “new Norway” where being Norwegian is not an ethnicity anymore and where the Norwegian flag only counts if an imam is waving it…if a blond Norwegian waves it I bet it would be very “nazi-ish.”

There was a debate raging some years ago about whether or not it was wrong that Norwegians were waiving Norwegian flags on Norway’s Constitution/National Day as this was offensive to outspoken Muslims.

Yes I repeat…it was offensive to wave only Norwegian flags on Norway’s National Day.

Norway is only Norway if anything or anyone can be Norwegian….including the flag.

So a Chinese dish is as everyone knows very Norwegian, a mosque is totally viking, a turban wearing Sikh is the epitome of Norwegianness, in fact everyone knows that it is very “Nazi-ish” to be white and live in Norway or any other Scandinavian country…

Openness is the new shared European value, which means that there really is no culture anywhere at all, as anything goes. The only cultural identity is no identity at all or actual cultural appropriation.

In this spirit Sweden has apparently spent or is going to spend   1,5 million Swedish Kroners of taxpayers money to build a camel centre…..as everyone knows camels are very Scandinavian, so of course it makes sense that you would go to Sweden to pet them. Muslims are for some strange reason feeling insulted as the initiative is meant for them! I have truly no idea as to why they would feel that a camel zoo in Sweden is ridiculous…(when I first heard of this I thought it was a joke…a part of me still want to believe that…)

This ties in with some other articles  I came across where a certain Eastern-European leader is described as disgusting. Why is he disgusting? Because he is an actual nationalist…and everyone knows that the number one way to make enemies in the current year is to be European, proud of your country and waving your flag while singing your national anthem…..

Identity.

While spending way too many days in bed due to illness I completed all the seasons of the popular tv-show “Vikings.” I must say that I find it very awkward that a show depicting “self-preservation” and “protectionism” of ones territory and culture actually has been aired. I find it equally astonishing that it has proven to be such a commercial success in the current cultural climate. The Frankish princess who proclaims her love for Paris must surely be a racist, right? Why aren’t the English or the Franks keen on a tribe of barbarians looting their fortunes, raping their women and stealing their land? These people must surely be fascist for protecting “their” territory. Yet tv-shows that depict protectionism, patriotism and honour prove successful which can only mean that we are suffering from a collective mass nostalgia.

Why on earth is the Stark family so popular in a cultural environment where Stark’s obsession with “the” North, “their” North, “their tribe”, would land them in the category of racists, bigoted, low quality rednecks? Yet a real culture of “little fingers” and “Lokis” place Lord Stark on a pedestal in an absence of “real” Lord Starks. The character portrayed by Sean Bean symbolises the sort of role-models people actually want. The audience cheers for a comeback of the Stark children in Winterfell; taking back “their” territory and re-asserting the influence and authority of “their tribe.” People yearn for blood dripping revenge on behalf of wronged characters. And all this unfolds in a social climate where you would expect “politically correct” entertainment to thrive.

In addition I see an overall increase in articles questioning cultural masochism and the bizarreness of cultural self loathing in my social media news feeds. I honestly cannot believe that this topic is now becoming mainstream in my country of origin: Norway. Even individuals of immigrant backgrounds are now officially asking themselves what on earth is up with “western self hate” and I don’t blame them. I’m wondering about this too.

When I was a kid I grew up with parents and visited grandparents that were, and still are, very proud of their country. My grandmother would take me for walks up to the old fortress in Halden and speak about Norway’s triumph over Sweden, how we got our independence and how wonderful this was for “our people.” My grandfather would talk about the monstrous Nazis, whom parents and grandparents alike hated as they had the nerve to “come here and tell us how to live our lives.” Tales of the horrors of war, treachery and stories of bravery. Those brave “countrymen” that spat in the face of the idea of some outsiders dictating how Norwegians ought to live. There were no doubts in my parents or grandparents when it came to “what it meant to be Norwegian.” It was quite obvious for many generations, that being Norwegian meant that you were part of an ethnic group, that you were born in a cold and harsh land, that you were born with “skis on your legs”, that there was “no such thing such as bad weather only bad clothes” and that you would grow up listening to gory “folk” tales about trolls. There were no doubts that certain dishes were Norwegian or “typical” Norwegian, that certain songs were Norwegian, that Norwegians for generations celebrated Christmas and that the arrival of Christianity in Scandinavia wasn’t such a bad thing after all. In fact Viking history was preserved by a Christian viking and the Norwegian “Stav” churches is almost all that remain from an ancient culture whose buildings have largely vanished.

Today our cultural heritage is being kept alive by foreign pop-culture. Viking references are rife in everything from Disney productions, to Netflix’s “How To Train Your Dragon” series, to any high budget fantasy epic for grown ups. You see it in the gaming world, you even see Norwegian knitting patterns in the fashion world. Odin lives on. The Vikings are more pop than ever. Yet the only people who don’t really keep the “folklore” alive are “mainstream” modern-day Norsemen and women, who hide in eternal shame from a “non-culture” that apparently never really was or never really deserved to be. For spiritual enlightenment people don’t look to the “old Gods” or “the new”, rather they look to other distant cultures that have nothing to do with our heritage. Young people wish that they were Americans, that they had the “urban gangsta rap” culture, so they adopt this and present their own version of it walking around ignorant of what they truly align themselves with. People who feel a divine connection turn to Islam, as Islam actually has credibility in an increasingly “liberated” Christian church,that quite frankly shoot themselves in the foot with their liberalism. The more pandering they do and the more desperate they get, the more they suffer.

A recent competition in a Norwegian mainstream newspaper, targeted towards young people, asked: “what does it mean to be Norwegian in 2016?” The top entry was from a Vietnamese person who referred to actual Norwegians as “indigenous”, the other entry a glorification of the destruction of the “traditional Norwegian” ideal. An attack on Norwegian “national romanticism”, a movement that flourished after Norway gained independence from Sweden, a movement meant to cherish Norwegian independence, identity, culture and heritage.

This overall attitude fits well with an interview I recently came across. A new Norwegian composer spoke warmly of traditional Norwegian folk-tones becoming increasingly popular but stressed how the inspiration was not attributed to nationalism, but rather the beauty of the melodies. It was of course very important to reassure people of the death of Norwegian patriotism. 

The defeat of Nazism eventually gave birth to a strange culture of “historical” “self-hate” and “self-loathing” put into system, even within countries that were actual victims of Nazism. It is a very awkward and strange transformation that has happened in a relatively short amount of time. A reason for cultural “degeneracy” according to the Romans as quoted by a roman historian I recently saw on YouTube, is that older generations fail to install certain morals within the younger generation.

The ideal that presides in our modern era is the idea of children “raising themselves”, walking home from school alone with a key around their neck, with both mom and dad out of the house. Who are the people who influence the majority of a Norwegian child’s average day? Entertainment without parent control and employees from state funded institutions who follow government approved ways of teaching and thinking. The education system is entirely lost to the “cultural marxists” who handle your children from their infancy all the way into early adulthood. These are the people who technically raise your children and mould their brains along with mainstream entertainment. The result? In Norway there are teachers that are afraid of their students. Students have no respect for their elders, attacking and bullying those that are meant to be their mentors. In the UK there has been an alarming increase in violence towards parents from their children. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3071428/Huge-rise-violence-against-parents-children-Cases-60-offspring-young-seven-investigated.html So not only are children ignorant of who they are and where they come from, they become increasingly violent towards those that are supposed to teach them morals and respect for rules. Legitimate authority is now constantly confused with oppression.

Another result of our “new-think”; is that historically incompatible cultures have been invited into  Norwegian/Scandinavian/European territories with the deliberate intent of gradually changing the culture. People in our part of the world were told that the planet suffered  from “over-population” and that it somehow was the duty of Scandinavians and/or Europeans to put an end to this. In addition a culture was promoted where a woman in the home was no woman at all. A happy woman would be a financially independent woman focusing on her career. A woman would be happy to not have too many children and to leave her baby in the care of state funded institutions.  Yet now the very same people who promoted these ideals are telling us that due to “low-birthrates” we are “forced” to import people from theoretically incompatible cultures in order to keep “the system” working, so over-population was clearly never “our” issue. The people who arrive into our territories are not told that they should assimilate. This is not encouraged as it would come across as racist and bigoted. In Norway for example it is expected that people should integrate, but we ought to ask ourselves what we want them to integrate into? There only seems to be support for the muslim woman in the liberal camp if conservatives criticize religious garments, God forbid that the muslim woman desires to be a home maker. The muslim woman is acceptable to the Norwegian mainstream culture if she gets out in the work place and rids herself of her offspring into state funded day care. What you ought to be integrating into is Marxism apparently. Is that really a recipe for happiness? As critical as I am of the potential instability of multiculturalism I’m not a supporter of undermining family values. Maybe we can learn from past mistakes and take a tip or two from our immigrants.

There is strength in diversity we are told, or broadly speaking any diversity except our own. Yet I start to wonder whether this diversity is heartfelt or whether it is limited to exotic food and traditional dress when I see the common Norwegian anger from socialist women who strongly oppose government funding intended to improve lives of new-baked mothers. Mothers of B-A-B-I-E-S. For some strange reason it is assumed that this government initiative, even though it is not earmarked for muslims, will results in muslim mothers staying at home with their babies longer. Muslim women have to be forced into the workplace apparently, as they are only “liberated” once they leave the home. Their children have to be forced into the “system” at one years old, just like all other good Norwegians, who are raised by the State. The angry comments about this specific type of government spending go like this: women who don’t wanna do anything and are free loaders shouldn’t get money from the government. I’m just quoting a GUY who responded negatively to my comment underneath the news article announcing the news… Yet nobody seems particularly baffled when it comes to spending money on refugees centers, vanity projects abroad etc; The Norwegian Christian Party are literally trying to promote some family values and I fail to see what the controversy is???  There was an online poll as well on the website which I took part in, I was part of the 20% supporting the benefit scheme, 50% said no. In my opinion this displays the overall lack of respect towards motherhood regardless of ethnicity. A culture where the general population consider parenting babies as “no work” and “loitering” is not a culture where starting a nuclear family will be easy. You will most likely find yourself in an unserious relationship with a low-quality, “mother-hating” truly misogynist, responsibility-averse guy, who will lose interest once you become pregnant, or hate you if you stay at home with the baby for too long and probably leave you if you wish to be a full-time mom with several children. It is my belief that a call-girl would probably gain more respect in the current cultural climate, as a stripper or a prostitute at least bring in some revenue. With the type of culture that is unfolding in Scandinavia, coupled with low birthrates, there is no doubt in my mind that the Christian party’s attempt at promoting “motherhood” as viable, is a good thing.

Anyway…back to this issue of identity… what inevitably happens when a minority gradually expands within a territory that is new to them, is that new nations create themselves within already settled territories. This solidifies a foundation upon which countless conflicts can emerge, as various ethnic groups starts competing over political influence and access to resources.

It doesn’t even have to be radical ethnic or religious differences when you look at Norwegians in Spain. Now Norwegians are obviously not gonna be suicide bombers and will undoubtedly never wage a holy war against the Spaniards, but nevertheless they behave in an embarrassing and unacceptable fashion. What is the point of going to Spain if you only want to eat Norwegian food, watch Norwegian tv-shows, send your kids to Norwegian schools and rent out your property to “Norwegians Only? ”

As an international Norwegian who have lived the majority of my life as an immigrant I condemn such behaviour, as we always integrated well when we moved around. We would attend local schools for a start which is a major cornerstone when it comes to integrating into new cultures. Yes – if you are part of an expat community you can theoretically live in different places while never learning the local language. By sending off your children to international schools and living in expat communities you can potentially experience the different corners of the world without ever really learning anything. As an immigrant who always was an ethnic minority I tell you this. You are either an immigrant or you are not. If you do not intend to respect your country of residency, move back home or someplace else.

I am under the impression though, that the idea of a group taking over another is alright ideologically, even welcomed, as long as the “perpetrators” are being perceived as victims. In one scenario you have an aggressor that invades your country over night and subjugates you. On the other hand you have an ethnic or religious group invited into your country, who gradually rises to power and “outdo you.”  New Europeans, who will use, and are already trying to use our democracy to promote a way of life that they deem “superior” is ok to the cultural marxists. The consequences though are the same. Out with the old, in with the new. Resistance is accepted and seen as right in the first example, resistance and criticism towards the last scenario will be met with staunch criticism.

Identity and the importance of identity, is something that the globalists have completely taken out of the equation. This is one reason as to why “cultural marxists” and “idealists” are so very dangerous. They refuse to accept natural laws as long as it disagrees with their political orthodoxy. This is because they have certain principles that guides them. Cornerstones to their agenda.

My grandmother would always tell me before I left Norway as a child: “husk at du er Norsk” which means: “remember that you are Norwegian.” My mother would order Norwegian school books and regular books so that we could read Norwegian at home, we always spoke Norwegian within the house and grew up with an awareness regarding Norwegian cultural heritage that got lost on a lot of our peers who actually grew up in Norway. We celebrated 17th of May within our four walls or in our private garden and mixed Norwegian traditions with local traditions which we picked up as we moved around.

Years later I realised the importance of these efforts when we moved to the USA.

I thought that I moved to the United States Of America…. I knew about America’s history of slavery and segregation of course, all Europeans know about the civil rights movement. I felt sorry for the oppressed Afro-Americans that according to Al Sharpton are eternally wronged. I thought that there was only one people living in the modern-day version of the US regardless of race or ethnicity, namely: Americans. Yet I was very surprised at what I found when I moved to Chicago.

The majority of Americans that I encountered during my high school years in the States, did not refer to themselves as Americans. They proclaimed that they were from Sweden, from Italy, from Germany,  from God knows where. Being Norwegian and a European I would of course speak Italian to the Italians, Norwegian to the Swedish, broken French to the French, only to be encountered with:

” no, I don’t speak the language”

which would make me go: “oh, but you are Italian right?”

” yes, yes, yes, I’m Italian my great, great, great, great, great, whatever, grandparents came from there”…

I would go…” ehhh….ok…” while thinking to myself….this is an American who doesn’t realise that he/she/it is an American…..

The saga continued of confused young Americans that apparently weren’t really Americans, with the exception of a few. They came from Asia, Africa, Latin America, from all sorts of exotic places, yet they had never been to any of these locations that they claimed to come from, had not been born there and couldn’t speak a word of their assumed mother-language.

These people looked at me like I was some sort of an alien when they realised that I was born in Norway, could speak Norwegian and most shocking of all ” was not something else in addition.” The fact that I was Norwegian-Norwegian was apparently “wow.”

I just imagined the voice of Sir. Attenborough: ” …and here we have a member of the elusive Scandinavian species, a Norwegian. In its natural habitat, this pale white nordic ape….”

Then…. I noticed to my amazement how the Americans (that weren’t really Americans according to themselves) would voluntarily segregate into neighbourhoods mimicking where their ancestors originally came from or gravitate towards neighbourhoods with a racial demographic correlating to their own ethnicity….

In addition to all this I also realised to my great shock that Latinos and Whites were being mugged and attacked en masse in the school area by Afro-American groups. I witnessed myself how an Afro-American group  vandalised a fancy boutique sign in the school area as a “fuck you privileged whities” measure. I over heard high school boys wondering if the time had come for them to start a gang of their own to protect themselves from Afro-American attacks and commence a retaliation. I was stunned. This was not the America I thought that I would encounter. This was not the America portrayed in Europe. The Afro-American community really surprised me in many ways,  there was rampant, mostly unjustified, unprovoked paranoia when it came to the “whities.” Black-mailing was an offensive, racist word as “mailing” became bad due to the addition of “black.” White people tanned because they were envious of black people and secretly wanted their complexion. “Cultural appropriation” happened because that was what whities did, hijacking and stealing African ideas. The Afro-American population were apparently descendants of the Egyptians, enslaved by the white man, envious of their superiority. Disagree with any of this and you are per definition a racist fuck. I was stunned at the attitudes I encountered when confronted with ghetto kids from Cabrini Green. Of course these attitudes are not representatives of all Afro-Americans, but there are enough that actually believe these myths. When my brother attended a school on South-Side Chicago as the only caucasian in his class, he even had to learn “The Black American National Anthem.” A suggestion from our family that there ought to be only one National Anthem in America, uniting ALL Americans, was met with accusations of racism.

Driving through the proper rough South-Side was shocking and depressing. You literally have enclaves in the US just as in Europe that could best be described as “third world”, pretty much every evening you could hear gun shots from the surrounding areas of where we lived in Hyde Park. Official statics were genuinely fixed to hide the staggering numbers of deaths in the Afro-American part of town, but these deaths were for the most part gang-related….You see…Afro-American and Latino gangs run the urban streets of America. Afro-Americans shooting other Afro-Americans in a city with uber strict gun-control, mind you, was what I heard of and what I was afraid of getting in the middle of as I was walking around the South-Side of Chicago. Did I ever really see any white people?….hmm…I saw some white cops patrolling, one of the worst high schools in the city….but the crimes I heard of were black on black crimes or Afro-American youths attacking “whities” in affluent “white areas” as “projects” and up-scale town houses, stood and probably still stand, side by side.

I was a friendly Scandinavian, but often I would be met with total indifference from a race that was not even interested in making my acquaintance as ” I was one of them, one of those people.”

So much for being a politically correct, socially liberal Scandinavian.

I realised rather quickly that there was no such thing as The United States Of America but that there existed something called The Divided Tribes of America. I also came under the impression that a lot of young Americans suffered from a severe identity crisis and that the same fate had to be avoided at all costs in Europe. I thought to myself: “If  Europeans don’t know where they come from either, what sort of a western world will we have?”

I was never as aware of my ethnicity as when I lived in the multi-cultural urban inner-city reality of America. This taught me the importance of belonging and identity.

When afro-Americans on south side Chicago walk around in African outfits and turbans while third generation muslims in Europe wear the most conservative of muslim religious garments; it proves how important cultural identity and pride in ancestry truly is.

When young westernised muslims made the decision to fight for ISIS, I don’t think they were in need of any psychiatric help. They were paying tribute to a glorified, fantasy of Islam’s past and former “glory.” Maybe they were in the middle of an identity crisis…. Something that in my opinion becomes un-avoidable unless first generation immigrants completely assimilate. Then again who would be willing to do truly that? Will you forsake your country of origin a 100%, forget your ancestors and their pride and their history? Do you even know what you are integrating into? And where would your loyalty be in a moment of potential conflict involving your country of residency and your country of origin?

The failure to recognise the genuine importance of identity is the greatest flaw of globalist idealists and cultural marxists and therein lays the failure of their utopian project. Self hate and cultural loathing can gradually break down your national and ethnic identity, but this will only open your culture up for replacement and attack by others with a stronger cultural identity. These people who are “culturally stronger” become superior due to a strength that has its basis in their commitment and conviction of their strength. They will take over your land and culturally convert you in the process or eliminate you, establishing their identity as the new order. The past of your nation and your genuine heritage will be either destroyed or swallowed up into the new.

We need our identity.