My Last Entry About The European & American Situation – for now.

Standard

“The struggle to erase Swedish history, break down Swedish culture and force the Swedes to assimilate into the multicultural phenomenon is going according to plan.

Following the revelations of one of its angry archaeologists, it emerges that the curators of Stockholms Länsmuseum have been ordering the systematic destruction of newly found artifacts from the Iron Age and the Viking period under the guise that it would be too burdensome to process.

Coins, arrow heads, ritual amulets, weapons, jewellery and weights that were kept in the past are now directly dumped into metal recycling bins upon discovery instead of being treasured and displayed.” – Excerpt from the article below.

(Read The Full Article Here).

9 out 10 rapists in the Norwegian city of Stavanger are foreigners, mostly Africans.

This will be my last entry featuring online articles for a little while as I’m currently reading the Holy Bible! I have also decided to take a break writing about the current situation in Europe as I have in many ways said all that there is to say about our cultural turbulence. There are those who are aware and understand what is at stake, but there are equally many if not even more who are in complete and total denial. These type of people will take offence if anyone rightly suggests that “when in Rome do as the Roman’s do” as this statement will be seen as “bigoted,” “xenophobic,” you name it.  Of course you have to be a racist and probably a Nazi if you state that countries of the west should protect and enforce their own culture, if Churchill was around today he would have been branded a brown-shirt, in fact anyone willing to protect their European nation back in WW2 would have been branded a “white-supremacist” today, mark my words. Having revealed and shared as much information as I have there should be more than enough material for people to go through for a while, sadly though I do have the impression that people prefer their own little echo-chambers, so those who are alert and aware of our crisis will keep and eye on things while those who are in denial will screech and throw a hissy fit if they have to see a picture of America’s President and/or engage in dramatic virtue-signalling if exposed to the new European reality when reading a blog.

It is particularly telling that my most popular blog-entry this year has so far been an entry about Skin Care. Yes you read that right. I have commented on it before and will repeat again that people truly enjoy gossip, entries about clothes, make-up, exercising – these type of things – rather than book reviews, social commentaries, etc; Even though I have people visiting my blog every single day, it is interesting to note that there is more actual interaction on posts that are in many ways mundane. Don’t get me wrong, skin care is important to most women, but it is lame that people aren’t more interested in what they are voting for, for example, or even more importantly: why.

I will admit that I was mistaken in thinking that people would be interested in discussing ideas, it is obvious that this doesn’t have a broad appeal; people will either tell you to run for office if they agree with you, or get upset without ever revealing why they disagree with you, or you will have to deal with something even more disappointing: people who just don’t comprehend what you are writing. Yes – of all things.

So it is obvious that it is hard to find the kind of environment online that I’m a part of in the real world. Over here we discuss quantitative, empirical, scientific findings, theories, societal structures, ideas, in addition to reading aloud. We play strategy board games and go for long walks discussing the one intriguing topic after the other. I guess it was silly of me to think that this would interest the general public (take this as evidence that I’m not particularly arrogant, as I have been genuinely surprised and disappointed).

Bear in mind that what I am specifically referring to is the current European crisis, and that I will not abandon my style completely, as that would obviously be quite fake. I’m not the least interested in watching TV or what Hollywood starlets are wearing. In fact there are many things that I find to be boring. Open up your eyes and start observing rather than just seeing, open up your ears and start listening and you will probably see what I’ve seen, especially if you travel around if not, you can read this, as I’ve done the observing and travelling for you: Europe & America’s Transformation Due To Migration – My Observations as A European Globetrotter.

https://www.facebook.com/plugins/video.php?href=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2F1686934311564090%2Fvideos%2F1918477548409764%2F&show_text=0&width=560

If I was to describe my personal impression of how things are now, I would sum it up like this: If you have a deep bleeding wound you would ideally go to the emergency room. Modern politics basically means placing a sparkly, pretty, looking band-aid on said wound as this is politically correct and less offensive. What will inevitably happen as a result is that said wound will become full of pus, it will become increasingly infected – but hey don’t worry- we’ll just put on some bandage without ever really sorting out the wound. Obviously you will go septic as things turn sour, but don’t you worry! You’ll be in the receiving end of morphine! Which is what is given to dying hospital patients to ease their suffering! This way you’ll be “healed” in a politically correct fashion and given drugs so that you can pass away without too much pain! Sounds good right? This is a perfect description of European politics in my opinion.

The time has come for people to embrace the fact that the peace in Europe has been broken. This didn’t have to happen, but it has. We now have an arsenal of “imported issues” in addition to widely promoted self-hate from the “enemy within.”

Today we are out buying local produce as our supermarket foods could potentially be poisoned by our “misunderstood,” “not-really” enemies, as our colourful “friends” have declared that killing us with cyanide is something that they would fancy. Maybe, just maybe, there are politically correct people out there who have realised that “traitor” and “enemy” are two words that don’t really exist anymore in the western world, as it would of course be racist to suggest that there could be people from the outside, pushing inwards who are our enemies, or foreigners within our nations being our enemies – only conservatives are foes since they stand up against progress and are bigoted – l-m-a-o. We are buying local probably because of unjustified paranoia … or *drumroll* racism …

It is also interesting to observe that Transgender Athletes will apparently be allowed to compete in the next Olympics. It is obvious that we have sunk so deep into political correct Soviet ideology, that only falling flat on our faces, can potentially wake us up from the lunacy. Female athletes will have to have their ass kicked left, right and centre for the egalitarianism-police, to maybe, just maybe, go: ooooops, perhaps this was a bad idea? And that is a big maybe. Trans Athletes in the 2018 Winter Olympics!

“The response follows controversy that sparked after 800-meter South African runner Caster Semenya won gold at the 2016 Summer Olympics in Brazil. Semenya’s intersex condition causes her to produce more testosterone (hyperandrogenism) than most women, prompting questions about whether she had an unfair biological advantage.” – Excerpt from the article above.

The Real Danger of The KKK in the U.S.A.

“Meanwhile, the victims of the notorious KKK seem rather fewer in number. The Wikipedia entry for the KKK is over twice as long as that for Communism, and hardly seeks to airbrush the misdeeds of that violent organization, but only manages to provide some 15 murder victims, all listed by name, drawn from the combined decades of the 1950s and 1960s, which represented the height of the Klan’s modern power. This apparent gap between 15 deaths and perhaps 70,000,000 or so seems rather wide.” – Excerpt from the article above.

The American situation.

“Continually, the networks portray what happened Saturday as simply the manifestation of extremism and bigotry from the Right. And practically the only voice that got even remotely close to a rational perspective came from, quite ironically, a black professor, Carol Swain at Vanderbilt University, who distinguished between the very legitimate desires, aspirations and fears of America’s under-attack white majority and the misapprehension that somehow those desires equal inevitably “white racism” or “white supremacy.” As Swain indicated, what has happened during the past few decades is a palpable marginalization of millions of hard working Americans, mostly white and mostly Christian, who have been sidelined and left behind by the advancing progressivist revolution (these last words are mine). They are not naturally “racists” or even “white supremacists,” but rather they seek to guarantee their own survival, and the survival of their families, their communities, and their culture. They have seen the standards, beliefs, traditions, morality and customs that they inherited and have cherished—they have seen them attacked, ridiculed, and, in many cases, banned, even criminalized.”  – Excerpt from the article above.

What The Alt-Right Is.

“In the interest of developing a core Alternative Right philosophy upon which others can build.

  1. The Alt Right is of the political right in both the American and the European sense of the term. Socialists are not Alt Right. Progressives are not Alt Right. Liberals are not Alt Right. Communists, Marxists, Marxians, cultural Marxists, and neocons are not Alt Right. National Socialists are not Alt Right.
  2. The Alt Right is an ALTERNATIVE to the mainstream conservative movement in the USA that is nominally encapsulated by Russel Kirk’s 10 Conservative Principles, but in reality has devolved towards progressivism. It is also an alternative to libertarianism.
  3. The Alt Right is not a defensive attitude and rejects the concept of noble and principled defeat. It is a forward-thinking philosophy of offense, in every sense of that term. The Alt Right believes in victory through persistence and remaining in harmony with science, reality, cultural tradition, and the lessons of history.
  4. The Alt Right believes Western civilization is the pinnacle of human achievement and supports its three foundational pillars: Christianity, the European nations, and the Graeco-Roman legacy.
  5. The Alt Right is openly and avowedly nationalist. It supports all nationalisms and the right of all nations to exist, homogeneous and unadulterated by foreign invasion and immigration.
  6. The Alt Right is anti-globalist. It opposes all groups who work for globalist ideals or globalist objectives.
  7. The Alt Right is anti-equalitarian. It rejects the idea of equality for the same reason it rejects the ideas of unicorns and leprechauns, noting that human equality does not exist in any observable scientific, legal, material, intellectual, sexual, or spiritual form.
  8. The Alt Right is scientodific. It presumptively accepts the current conclusions of the scientific method (scientody), while understanding a) these conclusions are liable to future revision, b) that scientistry is susceptible to corruption, and c) that the so-called scientific consensus is not based on scientody, but democracy, and is therefore intrinsically unscientific.
  9. The Alt Right believes identity > culture > politics.
  10. The Alt Right is opposed to the rule or domination of any native ethnic group by another, particularly in the sovereign homelands of the dominated peoples. The Alt Right is opposed to any non-native ethnic group obtaining excessive influence in any society through nepotism, tribalism, or any other means.
  11. The Alt Right understands that diversity + proximity = war.
  12. The Alt Right doesn’t care what you think of it.
  13. The Alt Right rejects international free trade and the free movement of peoples that free trade requires. The benefits of intranational free trade is not evidence for the benefits of international free trade.
  14. The Alt Right believes we must secure the existence of white people and a future for white children.
  15. The Alt Right does not believe in the general supremacy of any race, nation, people, or sub-species. Every race, nation, people, and human sub-species has its own unique strengths and weaknesses, and possesses the sovereign right to dwell unmolested in the native culture it prefers.
  16. The Alt Right is a philosophy that values peace among the various nations of the world and opposes wars to impose the values of one nation upon another as well as efforts to exterminate individual nations through war, genocide, immigration, or genetic assimilation.

TL;DR: The Alt Right is a Western ideology that believes in science, history, reality, and the right of a genetic nation to exist and govern itself in its own interests.

The patron saint of conservatives, Russell Kirk, wrote: “The great line of demarcation in modern politics, Eric Voegelin used to point out, is not a division between liberals on one side and totalitarians on the other. No, on one side of that line are all those men and women who fancy that the temporal order is the only order, and that material needs are their only needs, and that they may do as they like with the human patrimony. On the other side of that line are all those people who recognize an enduring moral order in the universe, a constant human nature, and high duties toward the order spiritual and the order temporal.”

This is no longer true, assuming it ever was. The great line of demarcation in modern politics is now a division between men and women who believe that they are ultimately defined by their momentary opinions and those who believe they are ultimately defined by their genetic heritage. The Alt Right understands that the former will always lose to the latter in the end, because the former is subject to change.” – Excerpt from the article above.

Race realism vs. Race denialism.

“The intellectual climate in the West today is one of guerilla race realism.

The commanding heights of Western societies—media, schools, politics—are held by race denialists.

Race denialism is a social dogma. All respectable people are required to affirm it.

Meanwhile, in the maquis:

The biological and human sciences (especially genetics, psychometry, paleoanthropology) uncover ever more race-realist facts—“hatefacts.”

Ever more educated, thoughtful citizens observe persistent patterns in group social outcomes that contradict official dogma. (The thoughtcrime of Noticing.) They conclude that the race-denialist Emperor has no clothes.”

“The ordinary modes of human thinking are magical, religious, social, and personal. We want our wishes to come true; we want the universe to care about us; we want the approval of those around us; we want to get even with that s.o.b who insulted us at the last tribal council. For most people, wanting to know the cold truth about the world is way, way down the list. (We Are Doomed, Chapter 7.)” –  Excerpt from the article above.

Here is a blog entry from a Norwegian blogger describing how a Muslim man refused to listen to a female train conductor as: ” Don’t talk to me you who are a woman.

Here is another article, this one featuring a Muslim man who refused to shake hands with our very own immigration minister: Muslim leader refuses to shake Listhaug’s hand. In our country.

“A middle school in North Carolina was caught with their hand in the politically correct cookie jar in a big way, and the outrage they received is much deserved. Via The College Fix: Allegations that a middle school teacher forced several students to stand and apologize for their “white privilege” have rocked a North Carolina school district. First reported by American Lens, during a meeting of the Rockingham County School Board last month, a woman named Farren Wilkinson made the troubling accusations against a teacher from Western Rockingham Middle School.

“[The teacher] caused some of her students to stand up and apologize to other students based on their inequal [sic] opportunities of education,” Wilkinson said. “So I would like to know how our schools can allow an educator to humiliate, bully and degrade students. This is not a matter of race but a matter of a teacher using fear and the embarrassment of children to satisfy her own personal anger or beliefs.” Feel free to correct me if you disagree,” – Excerpt from the article below.

Students forced to apologise for being white.

I will conclude this entry with a link to something I had never heard of before: The Mouse Utopia Experiment.

Living in the Utopia…….

Standard

Today I want to start my entry with some outtakes that I hope people will actually read as this is important.

IMG_3361

(Taken from an article over at Newropeans Magazine, please click on the link to watch the video).

Peter Sutherland, UN Special Representative for International Migration, who authored a piece on immigration14)with the already mentioned Commissioner Malmstrom (then responsible for Home Affairs, including immigration), adds another economic reason for open borders: the European Union should do its best to undermine the national homogeneity of Europe,15)to promote economic growth. The whole argument is anti-historical as European countries reached their technological, political and economic peak, first leaving behind the rest of the world and then conquering it, in the era of nation states, whilst it’s in a steady decline ever since open borders policies have been implemented. A final argument often brought to the table, even by prospective French President Emmanuel Macron is that mass migration can’t be stopped.16)However, the simple law enforcement by the Donald Trump administration in the United States, including the deportation of illegal immigrants, has resulted in a 40% drop in illegal crossings in the first few months of 2017.17)It seems, therefore, that immigration flows are dependent on the will of the Western governments. Where governments, like the Italian one, opt for open borders and mass migration, shipment channels proliferate and people enter legally or illegally. Where governments opt for law enforcement like in the US, the influx is drastically reduced.

In the meanwhile, a war among the poor is brewing in Italy: after hearing that the Italian government had assigned 10 houses to the cooperatives managing the migrant business in Taranto, Southern Italy, citizens revolted, occupied the building and brought in Italian families in need of housing.18)Elsewhere, in Caserta, a television reporter trying to film a documentary about a huge illegal market of counterfeited goods run by immigrants was chased down and beaten up by them.19)

Meanwhile in America:

“Mr. Johnson said the image of UAC as little children is misleading. Out of nearly 200,000 UAC apprehended between from 2012 to 2016, 68 percent were ages 15, 16 or 17 — meaning older teens. The majority were also male, making them targets for gang recruiting,” The Washington Times noted.

Although security analysts at the time indicated that the children were prime targets for gang recruitment, U.S. officials in the Obama Administration decided to treat them as refugees.

(Taken from an interview with Lee Kuan Yew)

“SPIEGEL: During your career, you have kept your distance from Western style democracy. Are you still convinced that an authoritarian system is the future for Asia?

Mr. Lee: Why should I be against democracy? The British came here, never gave me democracy, except when they were about to leave. But I cannot run my system based on their rules. I have to amend it to fit my people’s position. In multiracial societies, you don’t vote in accordance with your economic interests and social interests, you vote in accordance with race and religion. Supposing I’d run their system here, Malays would vote for Muslims, Indians would vote for Indians, Chinese would vote for Chinese. I would have a constant clash in my Parliament which cannot be resolved because the Chinese majority would always overrule them. So I found a formula that changes that…

SPIEGEL: … and that turned Singapore de facto into a one party state. Critics say that Singapore resembles a Lee Family Enterprise. Your son is the Prime Minister, your daughter-in-law heads the powerful Development Agency…

Mr. Lee: … and my other son is CEO of Singapore Telecoms, my daughter is head of the National Institute for Neurology. This is a very small community of 4 million people. We run a meritocracy. If the Lee Family set an example of nepotism, that system would collapse. If I were not the prime minister, my son could have become Prime Minister several years earlier. It is against my interest to allow any family member who’s incompetent to hold an important job because that would be a disaster for Singapore and my legacy. That cannot be allowed.”

Why do I write? Or more specifically, why do I write about the current crisis in Europe? Why bother to write about something so controversial rather than brushing it under the carpet? Why not look another way? Why bother to warn people?

If Europeans are repeatedly being singled out and attacked due to their ethnicity and this is the norm, well then it is obviously important to sound the alarm and warn others! Yet people don’t understand. If you post a post condemning racism they will automatically think of  it as “pro-mass-migration” as “non-whites” cannot possibly engage in discrimination or racial targeting or violence directed towards “whites;” if something like that happens, they probably deserved it, saw it coming or it was an unfortunate case of “a robbery gone wrong.” If you name the enemy and perpetrator, specifically mentioning Muslim terrorists, you are a bigot, a racist, an evil person, even if you say NOT ALL. It is therefore impossible to write anything that is intelligible, unless you “write in code” and only those who follow alternative media “gets it.”

IMG_3302

Before the terror attack in Manchester I was mentally working on a draft for a new entry called : “Europe – the lonely;” inspired by a number of issues …..It is obvious that we – Europeans, are very much alone in everything … if you are the kind who stand against the EU orchestrated deconstruction of the old that is….

…….if you cherish our modern state-worship, non-existing values and self-destruction then you’re probably very happy.  I, however, am not.

  1. If you are a patriot, which means proud of your country, and you use “European” as a way to indicate your solidarity, rather than denying your original (Norwegian/English/German/Italian/French/etc;) ancestry or roots, you probably feel like you stand alone.
  2. If you believe in protecting the borders of all of Europe’s Great Nations within the continent by bringing back border control, you probably feel like you stand alone.
  3. If you believe in what I mentioned above as you’ve realised Europe’s vulnerable position and you are aware of previous expansionism fought off by our ancestors trying to protect these lands, then you will not be amused by anything at all and you’ll certainly feel very much alone. 
  4. If you are aware of the fact that we have castles and fortresses within our nations for a reason, then you’ll probably sleep bad at night, facepalm 24/7, roll your eyes in disbelief, and yes – feel very much alone in your worries.
  5. If you think that a person should pledge absolute loyalty to their new country of residency, leaving their old-tribalism behind, you will feel alone.
  6. If you believe that civic nationalism is nothing but a mirage, you will feel like you stand alone for sure. IMG_3276
  7. If you believe that multiculturalism divides rather than unites, based on personal experience and observations, you will feel like you stand alone. 
  8. If you’ve realised how much white people are unjustly hated, not only in America but also here, and you observe and understand what is happening, in terms of a paradigm shift in our popular media and culture; such as removals of statues of historical men, altering of our historical facts so as to constantly paint our ancestors in a negative light  or discreditation of white people’s accomplishments; all of it disguised as being “anti-offensive-measures,”  not only will you feel alone but you’ll also feel sad, probably angry.
  9. If you realise that the values of current secularist forces aren’t making our military stronger, but rather weaker, as we used to be strong once upon a time, well then you’ll feel like you are standing very much alone, as all should be done in order to promote “our shared modern values.” 
  10. If you’ve realised that we really don’t have any values in our modern secular society, you’ll feel like you stand alone.
  11. If you realise that the slogans you’ve been parroting don’t really mean anything or meant something else all along, you’ll feel like you stand alone. 
  12. If you’ve realised that many atheists are no less governed by faith than those they ridicule, you’ll feel alone in your realisation.
  13. When you realise that many of those who profess: ” I fucking love Science” and proclaim that they subscribe to scientific reasoning are in denial over biological gender and basic science while hating and sneering at those who believe in holy teachings condemning them as “irrational;” then you’ll realise the hypocrisy and you’ll feel like you stand very much alone. 
  14. When you realise that your ancestors had a point and you decide to align with their values instead, rather than rejecting your parents, grandparents and great-grand-parents as is custom in our current modern tradition of socially and scholarly encouraged rebellion, you will feel like you stand alone.
  15. If you have observed and understood that human beings are naturally tribal and will create new identities the moment that the old ones are taken away from them, you’ll feel like you are alone in your realisation.
  16. When you realise that the media promotes an increased police-state rather than the deportation of incompatible, violent alien populations back to their countries of origin, you’ll feel like you stand alone in criticising loss of privacy and civil rights. 
  17. If you are mortified at the fact that your nation’s prisons are largely inhabited by inmates who cannot even speak the Native language, you’ll feel like you stand alone.
  18. When you realise that those who practise the current mantra of “Do What Thou Wilt” aren’t happy and that YOLO is a ridiculous hashtag resulting in dumb choices and ruined lives, you’ll stand alone as you reject these ways. 
  19. If you feel like protecting what you’ve inherited from those who came before you and you feel like revering them, you’ll feel like you stand alone.
  20. If you acknowledge and realise that our culture and heritage is under attack on two fronts from both Islamists and “deconstructionists,” you will feel alone.
  21. When you understand that “high culture” is a thing of the past left to decay and rot along with the knowledge that generated it, you’ll feel like you stand alone. 
  22. If you reject our modern society as you’ve realised how utterly dysfunctional it is, you stand alone. 
  23. If you realise that those who know keep quiet while those who know nothing are outspoken, you’ll feel alone.
  24. If you are more concerned about family values rather than the screeching of militant feminist, you will feel like you stand alone.
  25. When you realise that the enemy is here already and has been let in by those who should have kept them out, you’ll feel angry and like you stand very much alone. 
  26. When you realise that at the end of the day, if we ever decide to rise up against those who have done us harm, we might be worked against and defeated by Americans, backing their Saudi allies rather than helping those nations that gave birth to the American idea, you’ll feel disillusioned. 
  27. When you realise that those who criticise the current mess in Europe and report honestly run the risk of becoming an enemy of the state by defending the people, you will grow resentful. 
  28. When you don’t know who the good guys are anymore as your very own government act against its own people, you’ll become hateful.
  29. When western leadership claim that the other side is bad “since they are killing babies” when our own societies engage in the same, only calling it abortion, you’ll feel alone in your opposition to the latter. 
  30. When everybody claim that they pray, whenever it is convenient in a highly secularised anti-religious world, you’ll roll your eyes.
  31. When everyone is obsessed with morals in a completely degenerate society and you see it for what it is, you’ll feel like you are standing alone.
  32. When a doctor is trying to “protect your modesty” in a completely vulgarized culture and you have to be examined with a female nurse present, while women are sleeping drunk on the streets dressed like prostitutes during the weekend, you’ll roll your eyes at the double standard.
  33. When you start questioning who really cares about Europe and the integrity, safety and traditions of our great nations and you realise that our leaders surely can not, since they allow subversion from foreign entities to happen and harbour and protect our enemies, while prioritising new alien populations rather than those that they’ve been elected to protect … When you criticise this, you’ll feel alone. 
  34. If you pay attention to your surroundings and you realise that you and your people are the past, you’ll be filled with hate.
  35. If you realise that “the dark side” have many soldiers and that these can only be fought off through violent means, you’ll feel like you stand alone. 
  36. If you realise how fickle public opinion is, you’ll start doubting everything.
  37. If you recognise and see our current narratives for what they are and feel tired of parroting them, you might start feeling a bit depressed.
  38. If you then try to address your concerns in efforts to  warn your fellow country men and women and they either attack you verbally or misunderstand you completely, you’ll probably lose hope.
  39. When you realise how divided we are internally, even when we as a group are targeted, well then there isn’t much optimism  left … because it is becoming increasingly obvious to me at least that a great number of Europeans would probably side and defend those who abuse them, all in the name of “not being a racist” even if it means covering up and engaging in racism…….

Yes … it is all very confusing and makes little sense, no wonder then that these type of sentiments give way to melancholy as no sane person can probably find much cheerfulness in witnessing his/her own civilisation drawing its last breath. You have to be deeply lost in the brainwashing to aid those who wish to do you harm, to side with those who hate you, to defend those who want you dead, yet that is what we are told to do all in the name of social order, and that is what people are doing. We are meant to embrace racism and hate direct towards ethnic Europeans as normal, get used to it, carry on…..As everyone knows: you first have to admit that you have a problem in order to solve the problem … no point helping someone with a self-destructive habbit if they are in denial……

carry on_96198769_victims_14

What happened to those who were sabotaging the Nazis as they didn’t want Germans to rule their country? What happened to those who fought for independence? What happened to the memory of those who lost their lives so that they could hand over a nation to us, built by our ancestors, for us? Now our leaders give our territories away, and we – the people – are guilty and racist if we don’t agree with it. Now you are an extremist if you believe in protection your country, a threat as you engage in discrimination when you dare to say that we have enemies. Europe is so weak and so removed from its ancestry and heritage it is seriously frightening. And while everyone who follows citizen journalists or alternative media are having nightmares and premature seizures about the future of Europe, our fellow countrymen and women keep on parroting our “shared values” over and over and over and over and over and over and over again. If they were under attack – they would parrot them; if their county was to burn – they would parrot them; if their kids and/or relatives were executed one by one right in front of their eyes – they would probably parrot them … or they might just freeze … as they never, ever, ever, saw it coming. Yet there are those of us who are not amused by this apathy, who are not happy, who want people to wake up, and who waste time trying to cause this awakening since people have grown so accustomed to sleepwalking that not even a suicide bomber can potentially wake them up……

IMG_3258

IMG_3344

 

When People Can Not Process What They Are Reading.

Standard

Years ago I remember taking offence to a Serj Tankian song called “The Unthinking Majority” I thought of the title as extremely arrogant and felt it was disappointing that a political artist, or at least an artist with politically motivated work, would express himself in such a way.

I took offence to how The Chimp Paradox. was presented as well as I don’t think of it as a good idea to address the masses like they are mongrels.

I don’t talk to people like they are s-t-u-p-i-d, I have no interest in saying “those people over there.” I’m part of this world just like everyone else, I’m not above the law, I will fail, I will be wrong and just because I’m right about certain things doesn’t mean that I will be right about others. (Depending on how you define what is right or wrong). We are all hiding behind statistics funny enough and drag out surveys like a final piece of evidence. Yet statistics can be misleading, which is why every side has “evidence” to back up whatever claim they might have. Yet once you de-bunk the collection of data, it might not seem as straightforward after all…  someone disagreeing with you politically doesn’t give you the right to dismiss them as unintelligible, unless it has  been clearly debunked time and time again that what they support is inefficient and false. Meaning: that “truth” has been consistently buried and banned on their part so that their “ideology” can prevail well-guarded from justified scrutiny.

” If I disagree with you, you have to be retarded…” is not a particularly well thought out argument. The same goes for name-calling. If you want to pull the “you are an idiot card” you truly need to have a substantial amount of hard evidence, just as if you are going to pull the “you are insane argument.”

Yesterday my brother and I had a very long and interesting conversation as he is currently reading a lot about genes & IQ. This is of course a very controversial topic as the current orthodoxy is that there is only equality. We spoke and agreed about the grandeur of a meritocracy, discussing how evidence shows that the general IQ at universities have increased since “future leaders” are recruited from all aspects of our societies. The general “intelligence” has therefore gone up since education isn’t only reserved for the children of the wealthy. Yet….the dark side of the moon are quotas enforced when politicians decide that they want to lift the “entire population” or 50% of the population up. As amiable as this may sound like it is simply not do-able.

The result will be a collection of educated people, with official papers for jobs that they cannot really do. This might seem un-fair, but it is actually true. (feel free to read up on all of this, there’s lots of information.).

(It has now been brought to my attention that this increase apparently can be seen among higher university education and that the average is actually decreasing dramatically when it comes to the “regular” student body. So a bit different than what I describe here. Note added on Friday 28th of July 2017).

As horrid as it might be, 50% of the population will not be geniuses. If you drown people with knowledge this will not change as their brains just cannot process the information. This is of course very depressing if you fundamentally believe in “giving everyone a fair chance” by raising the population up, stretching towards national greatness. I take it that this is why those who “headhunt” for the best have to look internationally, to poach “the best people” for their projects.

Yet among the best you also have some cases of those who over think to such an extent that they almost think themselves into idiocy. That’s when  degenerate social constructs are presented to the world, as it might make sense logically if you disregard the human factor or if your brilliance is restricted to one field. There are also those who use elaborate sentences, spending an enormous amount of time on research only to be biased or completely off the hook in terms of their conclusions. The mind is a tricky beast.

Different groups of people have different trait frequencies. There is a plethora of information regarding this. I’m currently reading articles that would certainly come across as “controversial” to all of those who subscribe to the notion that ” we are all created equal.” That said, just because we are “all created differently” doesn’t mean that civil liberties should only be reserved for a small group. I suspect that the furore against “admitting that genuine diversity exists” reminiscent of mass hysteria happens, because people don’t want the idea of “this group being better than that group” gaining ground once again. My point is that “supremacy” or feelings of superiority will emerge regardless, as people will always “find something” to make them “stand out,” even if it is not “legitimate.”

Whether it is a financial situation making someone feel superior to those who are destitute or whether destitution raises ones victim status to such heights as to make someone morally superior. Grievances can be perceived as legitimate and worthy of punishment by the state directed towards those guilty of wealth. The rich person might feel superior but the poor will too, as their struggle makes them superior morally speaking. Rich = mean, poor = good. In terms of appearance it is “all about personality” since slim and/or pretty = mean while fat and/or ugly = nice. A person who looks good and uses this as an asset might feel that this is the “ace up their sleeve,” but just as this can create a sense of “I’m better than you” the traditionally unattractive can relish in their misery by again being seen as the “victim” or “challenging traditional standards of beauty.” Someone who is good at school/academics and/or good in any other field such as sports, music, business you name it, will feel that this is their “ace” whereas those who aren’t good at anything at all can take pride in being morally virtuous since they are unambitious. They are nice because they will not make anyone else “feel bad” by beating them in a competitive sense.

Being honest about “diversity” is not the same as treating people horribly. It means being honest and aware of the challenges a nation faces, both internally and internationally. How can one create the best school system for example if people are in denial? Maybe it is a good idea to focus more on practical training than merely theory designed for the brainy? Maybe a division at an earlier age would be an idea, so that those who hate reading could thrive by learning “how to be handy?” Maybe segregating the genders, so that boys can be approached like boys without being reprimanded for not being like the girls could benefit boys who are falling behind in the effeminate education system?  What will result from such a religious devotion to modern orthodoxies as we have today is the firing of any academics who dare to uphold “the truth,” which brings to mind the popular representation of “the dark ages.”

It seems like our enlightenment has gradually brought us closer to darkness since any truths violating the  “feelings” of a group, regardless of how marginal the group is, are discarded or left in obscurity. Writing about democracy, in fact mentioning and addressing in-depth any of the issues mentioned above could result in volumes upon volumes of material, which is what we supposedly have academics for. They are not there to be fired if their findings collide with the “values” of our modern “dictatorship of goodness,” it is their job to find the truth or to seek to find the truth through empirical evidence.

To demonstrate how frustrating it is with people who cannot process information that isn’t even particularly complex, I’ve included a series of screen shots below. This is how democracy looks like in practice, this is why it is easy for critical thinkers, obsessed with “truth” to fall into the unforgiving, melancholic, grip of misanthropy.

On Friday, the 24th of March 2017, these three individuals were trending on FB…

Trending on FB

Katie Hopkins was making waves online due to her commentary about the terrorist attack in Westminster. People were raging because she had the audacity to suggest that England has a cultural problem and that the UK is weak in spirit. Her commentary pretty much addressed what I had been addressing in one of my own blog entries, so I was of course puzzled by the negative reactions she experienced as what she had written seemed spot on. (Unless one chooses to be in denial). While I was scrolling around the timeline connected with the “Hopkins topic” I came across a guy in the USA. I agreed with his entry and shared it on my personal FB.

Online Democracy 1

What followed was a public online argument where the guy who had authored what you see above had to defend himself from people who clearly didn’t understand his original post at all. It is not hard to comprehend what he is saying. An interesting thing to note is that he didn’t know that his post was set to “public….”

Online Democracy 2

Obviously I’m trying to protect the identity of these people, as one does…You can see that one individual agrees, then one is clearly disgruntled about Hopkins, someone else agrees, but then enters a very typical argument: “rather __________, than racist.” This is a slogan that has been advocated by Swedish Feminists in particular.

Racist Clear.

What you see next is a very typical argument…”the guy was British.” Well…to be fair no he was not…This was a muslim man of foreign descent, who happened to have a British passport and citizenship…in this day and age that is not really the same as being from that particular nation. A woman of absolute muslim descent, walking around in full traditional, muslim dress, is not Norwegian just because she happens to have a Norwegian passport. She is a citizen yes, and is lucky to live in a western country, where you can enjoy the full benefit of citizenship regardless of where you originally come from. The lady (note how these individuals are women) clearly does not understand the argument from the American man. Her conclusion is that he is “racist clear” whatever that may mean…..

Enters a proper Racist.

Then enters a proper Racist. This clearly illustrates what I’ve been addressing on my blog in so many of my entries. The guy who initially started this discussion has up to this point engaged in arguments protecting himself from the false accusation that he is racist, then enters a real racist, who generalizes and is completely unapologetic in his views. An argument then ensues between the “accused-non-racist” and the “I’m-proud-to-be-racist-racist.” The leftists have succeeded in destroying the meaning of the word “racist” just as they’ve dismantled the word “hate” as used in “hate speech.” False accusations of people being “brown shirts” have taken away the severity of “you are a Nazi” since everyone who at this point questions the left in any way is labeled “literally Hitler.” The unavoidable result is that people will just get nauseated whenever the WW2 argument is brought up, and not for the “right” reasons…..people might even start saying “yeah…what did we really fight for? Maybe the Nazis should have won?” these type of sentiments will probably become more widespread as a result of the left’s way of arguing, rather than an explosion of pro-Nazi sentiments. In other words, if you poke someone long enough they’ll get sick and tired of your bullshit.

Exit Nazi & Permission to share posts

A certain somebody asks for permission to use this discussion in a blog entry….the racist from the previous frame, admits that he is proud to be what he is.

Enters random guy.

Another character enters claiming the “he was British argument” before the classical “IRA argument” is brought up. In fact this whole thread illustrates all the common narratives in the current political climate. Note how the “new arrival” in this thread uses the “fake news” narrative. The American who accidentally ended up in a public discussion, that ended up highlighting all of his points due to the contribution by those who are hating on him, is becoming tired….as can be understood by his posting below…

the IRA argument

Argument continues

The American who started the thread tries to conclude the discussion, at this point he also adds one of his comments in the thread into his original post, in order for people to see where he is coming from. The lady with the “IRA argument” clearly can not let it go, so another discussion then ensues with an evidently tired American, baffled by the inability to process basic information displayed by those attacking him….

Arguing Online.jpg

The thread, as it looked like at that point, ends with this:

Conclusion

This discussion alone prove the points I addressed above. It would have been one thing if these screenshots were my only evidence…..but no…hold on… I got more……

The argument below is more sophisticated in nature due to how the participants express themselves. Regardless of this the topic is the same; I’m calling this sequence ” The Oxford Argument.”

OA1

The post attracted one individual who decided to express his dissent….this was counter-attacked by a guy who was clearly interested in commencing a discussion.

OA2

OA3

OA4

OA5

” I read that paragraph but I just hear racism.” Again that same old card is used in an incorrect manner. Also note how these individuals perceive Muslims as the victims and any precautions on the part of “the west” as unjustified racism. The argument is made from “the dissenter” that concerns about Muslim supremacists are justified, especially when seen from a historical perspective. This of course clashes with the current orthodoxy or the false enlightenment claim, that all men are created equal. By admitting that there is an enemy you are merely engaging in discrimination. Even when “the dissenter” specified “NOT ALL muslims” it was still concluded that he was a racist and “good riddance.”

My last example before I conclude my entry stems from my very own Twitter. Yes you’ve read that right. I launched this blog a couple of years ago at the request of my fans, not really knowing what my blog would be about.  I’m not a “pink blogger” I like to read, and enjoy to think, discuss and write about what I’ve read. I’m a virtuoso musician and would classify myself as pretty geeky. My blog entries where I’ve written about personal matters have proven very popular and overall I’ve certainly seen that people adore entertainment while abhorring intellectual discussions. I’ve shared my blog entries on my Twitter and in my entries I usually provide people with links to the articles and/or YouTube videos that inspired me to write that specific blog entry, so that people can see my “sources.”

This year I received a request to do an interview about my entries for the very first time. I was asked about the content on my blog regarding Islamism mainly, since it seemed like the interviewer was obsessed with ‘the terror threat.” I replied to the best of my ability and said among other things this:

“It’s obvious that there are some who are just born with a “complaining gene.” We are spoilt in our part of the world. I don’t think there’s ever been a point in history where people had it better. There is healthcare for everyone, there is so much food that the poor are obese, everyone has access to some sort of education, pollution levels are much better than they were under the industrial revolution for example, you will not be imprisoned or chemically castrated just because of your sexual orientation, women can get an education, work their way up into the system. You can come from a minority background and become the leader of a nation or go into important government positions in a country that you weren’t even born in. We’ve come as close as we can get to Utopia and should just be happy, but no. Then you get people complaining about trans-gender bath room issues, micro-aggressions, sexist snow-removal and pronouns. There is no end to the stupidity. I believe in equality when it comes to the starting point and opportunity, but it has now been brought to my attention that those who talk about egalitarianism usually advocate equality when it comes to outcome. Which doesn’t make any sense to me.”

I also said this:

“Yes, there are plenty of disturbing videos of this, I’ve posted some of them on my blog. You got angry young Muslim men shouting and then you got angry young white men shouting. Looks like a mess, especially if tensions escalate.”

Then you got this:

“I assume that the majority are afraid, because people like to conform and don’t want to be ostracised. They see what happens to those conservatives and classical liberals who speak out and decide to stay quiet, whereas those who shout the loudest are those who hate immigration because they actually are real racists and real nazis.”

…and this:

“What it is that we want immigrants to “integrate into” for example is a question nobody is asking. We keep on mentioning vague values, that apparently are “our shared values,” but it can easily seem that we don’t really have a cultural identity anymore. It is not strange that foreigners should be horrified at the fractured families of the West or the unintelligible mainstream entertainment we have that produce nothing but icons of degeneracy and vulgarity. High culture of beauty and excellence is something we have sacrificed on the altar of modernity. Spirituality and faith has been crushed and is routinely mocked. Masculinity is actively worked against in the school system. It is understandable that people would be reluctant to “integrate” into this. Let’s not forget that. After all, why should anyone respect a culture that doesn’t even respect itself?”

If you read through these segments you will understand that this is not a racist talking, but someone who is concerned, especially if you read the whole interview. What I say is critical of militant Islam and the effects of “the change” that has been imposed on Europe. When asked about: “What about Islamism in Scandinavia? Have you been back to Norway recently? What do you see happening there?” I replied in an honest way; describing a country where immigration has become stricter but where certain specific changes were observed by me during some visits back home:

“1-Norway has changed to such an extent that my father and I were the only white people at a supermarket up in the mountains, deep into the fjord land.
2-I’ve had elevator rides where I was the only white person and the only woman not wearing a burqa.
3-I’m not even Norwegian anymore, I’m an ethnic-Norwegian apparently.
4- I visited my grandmother some years back and there was a terror warning on the news “today the terror alert has been raised to severe.” That, in particular is ridiculous. Why are we supposed to accept this as a new reality?”

First of all it is important to specify that Norway is not America. If you live in the USA and you get surprised by encountering an Afro-American or a Native-American, well then you got issues. America has always been a diverse “nation,” there was diversity among the caucasian population, there was diversity due to slavery and the “original population.” Norway is not America. We got Norwegians and then we got Samis, who are nomads living up in the North, moving around between Northern countries with their reindeer, etc; It is just and right to question the changes that have been imposed on Scandinavia, as these are neither natural nor justifiable IF they result in demographic displacement or gradual demographic replacement. It is racist, to support this type of activity and the fact that these type of measures are supported and initiated by ethnic Europeans is nothing but extraordinary. (Obviously I have to specify that there is a major difference between some immigrants here and there, and demographic displacement/replacement. I hope that people can comprehend that….) It cannot be justified in any way, that English people should all of a sudden find themselves becoming minorities in certain parts of their country, nor can it be justified that there are “no-go-zones” in Sweden, but an interesting thing to note, and this is important, is that I highlight that the worst of these changes is the terror threat, that we are supposed to treat as “normal.” 

So far so good, one should hope, but no. Even though it should be ridiculously easy to follow what I’m writing above, I received this tweet after the release of the interview:

evil CIC 2

Curious I decided to check out this individual and saw this:

CIC evil1

First of all I said in the interview that I don’t live in Norway anymore. I also said that “my father and I were the only white people at a supermarket up in the mountains, deep into the fjord land.” This describes a supermarket. I also describe being in an elevator as the only woman not wearing a burqa. I’m clearly describing a country undergoing radical fundamental changes. But I’m not describing an entire town, and seen from a European perspective it all makes sense, if you’ve followed what I wrote above. In the interview I can be quoted as saying ” I’m not even Norwegian anymore, I’m an ethnic-Norwegian apparently.” Again this goes to demonstrate a “core change” within a Nation. I’m not even Norwegian anymore.” So you see a change of word-use in terms of how an ethnic group is being addressed and labeled. This is not minor. Obviously this is not hillbilly talk, as a hillbilly would probably behave like this:

Enters a proper Racist.

Some months later I received another Tweet from a different individual as a response to a blog entry I had published on January the 30th, 2017.

twitter argument.jpg

These are some quotes from the blog entry that he was referring to:

“We need to make sure that we advance into the future “with baby steps” so that we can successfully integrate the new-Europeans into the fabric of our societies, without losing ourselves.”

We are reaching a tipping point & the only sensible course of action would be to do everything in our power to prevent escalated chaos within our continent.”

“….then why not keep those who like it here & have integrated well, while sending out those who do not?”

“If “refugees” thrive at the expense of the original European population, it will create anger and resentment within the ethnic populace and rather than directing this anger towards government figures, we run the risk of this sentiment being directed towards innocent muslims.”

These things are clearly not written by someone who hates ALL Muslims. This is obviously written by someone who is concerned about EVERYONE. And someone who is critical towards Militant Islam. No wonder that people give up, when those who are “moderates” or tempered in their assessment, are accused of being “racist.” I did the dumbest thing and decided to engage with this man in a short Twitter argument as I obviously assume that my fellow human beings “can understand what I write.” I’ve made the mistake of expecting people to be reasonable. Which brings us back to the very beginning of my very long entry…. Here are the Tweets:

T1

t14

T2

T3

t10

t11

t12

T4

T5

T6

T7

T8

Again, I’m obviously not racist, but then comes the kicker:

t9

At this point I realised that what I was engaging in was pointless….When I then saw the thread further up in this entry later that month I realised that I had to write a blog entry. It is a serious issue that so many cannot comprehend the information that they are presented with. Sure, it is tough to read science papers, especially if written in an academic language, it is difficult to read ancient literature, of course this is hard, but none of what I shared on here today is. None of it. None.

This is why politicians talk “down to people” this is why there are PR agencies that are commissioned to create and manufacture easy slogans and “perfect” official personas. People who never say anything that contradicts or challenges the orthodoxy, even when they are aware of how bad things are, such as Podesta. This is how corporations get away with blood on their hands, because they are good at marketing and making their products “human.” How healthy is this for a society and how healthy is it for the west? Not particularly, which I’ll address in my next entry, where I’ll discuss an article I read some days ago about “Politics vs. Emotionalism.”

A Neo-Contemporary Understanding Of The Highway Code.

Standard

Social issue addressed and identified by B.Hagen.

Conclusion reached and formulated by L.W.Hagen.

  1. The Problematic Issue At Hand: A systematic approach initiated to combat perceived, enforced legal discrimination against Sikhs can simultaneously be interpreted as systemic racism toward said group, as their road safety is uniquely undermined and compromised when they are exempted from wearing a helmet.
  2. Conclusion: This exemption in the Highway Code, although initially framed through the lens of acknowledging, and respecting the agency of Sikhs can in fact be understood as an example of white supremacist, neo-colonial oppression subconsciously masquerading as progressive anti-racist paternalism which itself is, due to its paternalistic, socially constructed nature; covert enforcement of hetero-normative, white cis-gendered PATRIARCHY. 

B. Hagen is a blogger of undermined ethno-gendered orientation.

L.W. Hagen is a 1/2 Attack-Helicopter kin memetic construct of Ethnic Kekistani origin.

Norway’s Worst Nazis by Bernt Rougthvedt.

Standard

During one of my visits to Norway I saw a book about “Norway’s Worst Nazis” while passing through the airport. I thought that this was interesting since the only narrative we love to share is the one of “resistance” and “contempt” for “the occupation.” So this time around I made it my mission to track down the work! I was really happy that I was able to find it since I had forgotten what the title was which meant that I had to go through lots of WW2 books over in Bergen, as I was only able to recognised it due to the “wording” or the author’s writing style on the back of the book.

This work features 60 Nazis who had influence in Norway during the “occupation years.” Some of them were ideologues others were guilty of torture, some were actual Germans, the most hated ones were Norwegians aiding the occupants, some received a sentence that they deserved when the war was over, others escaped very cheaply from their crimes…(Gestapo man Georg Wolf became a journalist for Der Spiegel for example….. some other German nazis apprehended in Norway were deported back to their homeland where they got themselves normal jobs………)

The book makes for a sad read that’s for sure, especially because some of the most heinous crimes depicted in this book came from Norwegians mistreating, torturing and killing their fellow country men over ideology…

Written about Thorvald Thronsen: ” 30. November he led a group of 15 “hird-men” in an outright attack on students and teachers at the Oslo “Handelsgymnasium.” They wanted to set an example after a “hird-boy” at the school had been in conflict with other students. During the attack they forced themselves into the school building and classrooms mistreating both headmaster, teachers and students.” (direct translation by me from the Norwegian text).

Written about Ole Wehus and his torture of Tor Njaa: “Njaa developed gangrene in his wounds, and over time he was incapable of standing upright. Big meat-chunks the size of the palm of a hand came off his body. The stench in his cell was intolerable. Sipo-SD however never managed to get any information out of him … He died under a transportation to Dachau in september 1944. This was however not the only time that Ole Wehus was active during the interrogation of a prisoner. He had tortured and mistreated more than 90 people before the war was over.” (direct translation by me from the Norwegian text).

“Germans deported 644 students to Germany, after Jews, military officers and police officers had suffered the same fate.” (direct translation by me from the Norwegian text).

There is special focus on the ship SS Donau in the book, probably because this was the first “shipment” of un-wanted people (jews). There were more individuals who were deported though not mentioned in the book. Out of the 532 prisoners on SS Donau only 9 survived the war, more deportations (and escapes) followed suit. 767 Jews from Norway were deported during the occupation, the majority ended up in Auschwitz, only 26 survived. Internment camps were also erected in Norway.

“Nasjonal Samling” Norway’s only legal political party during “the occupation” were literally “puppets” for the Germans, they were butting heads though as Germany’s vision for Norway differed. Quisling was very keen on Norway re-gaining its sovereignty and his main ideologue emphasised “Norwegianness” which clashed with Germany’s view of Norwegians as a sub-race to “Übermensch” Germans. It is believed that Quisling’s main ideologue, along with his wife, was assassinated by the occupants, when his car officially slipped off a ferry drowning him. The couple was apparently asleep in the backseat when it happened, but it wasn’t legal at the time to drive/leave a car with passengers inside the vehicle onto that type of boat. As the men on board were Germans, and things were politically tense, the accident gave birth to conspiracy theories. The Germans were not happy with Norwegian patriotism, but Quisling, funny enough, managed to get a promise from Hitler himself, that Norway was to regain its sovereignty after the war…..

The book reminds me of a real life “Game Of Thrones” in many ways, with all of these different characters, many of them extremely intelligent and successful, competing for control and power. There seems to have been many assassinations carried out by the Norwegian resistance during “the occupation.”  The most popular targets were Norwegians aiding the Nazis, Quisling even asked for 10 000 personal pistols to “his people” so that they could protect themselves from the rebels.

An interesting character that stood out to me was Halldis Neegaard Østbye who through a letter written to Quisling tried to delay or postpone the Jewish deportation, advocating for imprisonment in Norway instead, as the country was facing so much instability internally that she felt that a “moderate” direction would benefit NS more.  She also proclaimed that it was “un-aryan” to kill people slowly prolonging the suffering of ones enemies. Yet she also knew what the deportation entailed for the unfortunate victims as she wrote that: “it is granted that “the final solution” should be brought to completion without sentimentality when it comes to securing our own people and Europe from a new Jewish foray.” (my own direct translation based on the Norwegian text). “She meant that ” the jews are no race,” but viewed Judaism as a religious sect where followers had been guilty of inbreeding, isolating themselves from the outer world for centuries.” (my own translation based on the Norwegian text). 

It is interesting to note that the Jewish community was criticised since they did not integrate but rather created parallel societies within European countries…….

Even in Norway properties and belongings were confiscated, something that disgusted certain individuals within the Nazi/NS regime as it was seen as tasteless and corrupt theft of other’s property.

There was a lot of internal division. Some nazis were full on supporters of the Germans only, others of only Quisling, the majority of the population probably hated the whole scenario, while some of the resistance fighters appears to have been full on communists. Written about Per Imerslund: These groups formed a left-ish oppostion to NS, who they accused of being a capitalist party managed by freemasons. The Ragnarok-group … was just as anti-capitalist as it was anti-communist.” (translation by you-know-who).

It is also interesting to note that those who were reluctant to partake in the horror-regime were sometimes threatened with deportation themselves from their superiors: ” his subordinates feared him, because he threatened to send them to concentration camps or kill them with his own hands if they disobeyed  his orders.” ( Written about Ernst Weiner p.173, translated by guess-who).

It was also part of the plot of course to infiltrate the church, the education system and entertainment industry, in order to win the culture war and sway public opinion – and we all know who won that war in the end……*cough*The ghost of Marx*cough*cough*

The book is an interesting read for sure. I think it would have been good if a “map” of all the different Nazis mentioned had been included though, depicting how NS and the various German institutions overlapped, along with the personnel included. Since the perpetrators are presented to the reader in alphabetical order, you’ll find yourself going back and forth within the book to connect the various dots.

I would certainly recommend this book. I liked it.

 

 

Police separate Pro-Muslim Extremists Group & Anti-Muslim Extremists Groups … & More Racism News.

Standard

Before I start today’s entry I would like to add that the parents at my sibling’s school are apparently freaking out since their children are about to embark on a London trip. Worried parents are telling their kids to carry objects that they can defend themselves with and to be vigilant. Quite funny, considering how outspokenly non-conservative a lot of these people are. Doesn’t this “completely unjustified fear” make them “bigoted” and “xenophobic?” Over in the USA some parents experienced a change of hearts as well, once one of “their own” was raped by two illegal immigrants at a local high school. Interesting how people normally become worried once something happens close to them or to someone they know…isn’t enough to hear about other people’s suffering? Maryland School Rape Caseanother take on the same case.

Here is an interesting article that explains how “hate crimes” are categorised/defined in the UK. Here is an excerpt: “The police’s ‘Hate Crime Operational Guidance’ now stresses that the victim’s perception is the deciding factor in whether something is measured as a hate crime. No evidence is required. ‘Evidence of… hostility is not required for an incident or crime to be recorded as a hate crime or hate incident,’ the guidance says. ‘[The] perception of the victim, or any other person, is the defining factor… the victim does not have to justify or provide evidence of their belief, and police officers or staff should not directly challenge this perception.’ So you don’t need actual evidence to prove hate crime, just a feeling.” Read full article HERE.

Today’s News.

“Anti-fascists,” (which could read: “fascists who don’t really realise that they are the actual fascists”) lost the plot when two right-wing groups decided to protest Islamic Extremism in London. The event was highly guarded by police as the authorities feared violent confrontations. It seemed like the police were doing a great job from the footage I’ve seen. Must be strange though to be a cop of immigrant background having to protect “Britain First” and/or “English Defence League” or maybe they agree with their concerns regarding Muslim Extremism…..one can hope….

The “Anti-Fascists” were fronted by a hijab wearing woman ( at least in one video clip I’ve seen) and they were all shouting about how the right-wingers were nazis and islamophobes as one does the second anyone is against muslim supremacists and islamic terror and/or borders and/or strict immigration. “Off-our-streets-Nazi-Scum” they yelled.

The mainstream media tried to spin a story about how the two groups “Britain First” and ” English Defence League” had teamed up together for the protest, this was denounced by the groups themselves on FB…….

Protest in London

Both right wing groups apparently expected lots of people to join them but according to the mainstream media their attendance was rather poor. People used footage of the masked “anti-fascists” as evidence of the right-wingers violent nature if one is to believe social media commentators…. A great number of people online pointed out that these masked people were in fact the “anti-fascists” who are called “Unite Against Fascism” btw. As you can see people were just as divided online as they were in the protest in London.

protests in London 2protest london 3london protest 4

The masked “anti-fascists” decided to attack the “nazis” (for all I know some of them might be :/ )…according to the alternative narrative…..this is the typical scenario though on both sides of the pond…. Anyone who disagrees with “refugees welcome” or “no borders-no nation-fuck deportation” is a nazi and literally Hitler, even when protesting peacefully. Tommy Robinson had to be escorted by the police to avoid attacks by the “peace-loving” “anti-fascists” in the footage I’ve seen. I also took the time to read about Robinson some days ago and even though his criminal record is dodgy I have to say that his concerns about radical Islam seems to be spot on, from what I could see/tell. He also abandoned the group he had started as he felt that it was being infiltrated by actual, real, nazis, apparently. Who knows if this is true or not, or what has happened, but he certainly was out protesting today….

I’m not a supporter of racism, but you cannot give up your country either, I have no idea where this assumption comes from that any person should be allowed to go wherever they may like. Any welfare system/tax system will collapse as a result. We all have our systems and have to operate within these matrixes. You can destroy one, but this will only lead to the uprising of another. I have no idea why you are evil if you want to defend and protect what is yours either, but apparently you are….Maybe these “anti-fascists” who actually are fascists should go and protest over in the middle east or something and see how much tolerance they get over there….One can only assume that these individuals can’t get enough terrorism and senseless violence in Europe. There is so much information about Muslim Supremacists behaving badly all over our continent it is quite frankly alarming…..in a weak moment when I thought to myself that “maybe it is right that it is Russian propaganda…..maybe it is all a hoax” I came across a Podesta email I’ve linked to further down in this entry….and well yeah…let me just say that no….none of these stories of Europe going to shits are exaggerated or false.

Calling this “islamophobia” or “targeting of muslims” is ridiculous, they keep on highlighting their own group through incompatible, unacceptable behaviour in any western territory where they have a significant presence….. Of course not all are, but you get the point. (In fact I’m getting tired of writing about this. Maybe I should stop. There is just too much information out there and whenever you think you’re done, there’s always something new popping up).

In one of these articles there is a picture of a man holding a “fuck you ISIS” flag…this was apparently very offensive….as if though the very existence of ISIS is not offensive…I’m starting to wonder if people’s shock at Trump’s inauguration speech had to deal with the fact that he said that ISIS should be eradicated/annihilated. I fail to see why this would be a loss…..

Protest in London as reported by The Independent.

Protest in London as reported by Metro.

Protest in London as reported by RT.

Protest in London as reported by Daily Star Sunday.

In another example of racial/cultural/political tension… A young man was almost killed in Croydon on Saturday. He was standing on a bus stop with a couple of friends when a group of people in their 20s approached him asking him where he came from. He revealed that he was an asylum seeker from the middle east and this resulted in him being “viciously attacked,” the ethnicity of his attackers have so far not been revealed. I’ve kept an eye on the story all day and not much have been revealed besides the age of the perpetrators…

Croydon Hate crime as reported by The Independent.

Croydon Hate Crime as reported by The Telegraph.

Funny enough…people are trying to highlight what a diverse and safe neighbourhood Croydon is….I didn’t live far from that place when the riots broke out……I’m just saying….it doesn’t seem like a very diverse area to me after having lived right by it….nor is it a place where I would walk around alone after dark to put it that way…

Whether the attackers were muslims, hating on another muslim, which happens all the time in the middle east and now also in Europe, or whether they were white, hating on a foreigner doesn’t change the fact that these are the type of situations you get with diversity. Especially if one group is tired of being attacked and bullied by the other or if one group is becoming worried as they start to see their territory as “lost” or “changed.”

Of course there are those who try to place the blame on right-wing politicians and xenophobia. I suspect that this will be the narrative that people will keep on promoting and spinning rather than revealing the fact that our continent has been slipping gradually and that a lot of hate has been fuelled by how immigrants have actually behaved,  not to mention the political elite and the mainstream media who have created this situation in many ways…by bringing in incompatible cultures, then justifying it, hating on any criticism, throwing whistle blowers under the bus ( Bombshell. A must read for anyone who cares about Europe.) constantly preferring and prioritising other people than their own….and so on and so on…..this obscene article for example that dares to claim that there is “institutionalised islamophobia” in Europe, as if though muslims are our continent’s “afro-Americans” a group that was transported in chains to America, is an insult to all of those who have felt abandoned by their representatives while their neighbourhoods have gradually been destroyed and an insult to any minority that actually have been victims of institutionalised racism. The politically correct narrative has been ethno-masochism for so long, you are basically considered a racist unless you willingly wear a hijab “in solidarity” at this point (a bit exaggerated, but I guess you see the picture). Obscene bullshit article from Huffington Post.

Of course I’m not justifying an attack on an innocent person, I’m just trying to get my point across that innocent people end up getting hurt, when “the system” creates a foundation upon which internal conflicts can/will emerge. This creates a situation where “the people” end up fighting each other in the streets, while those behind the mess are left alone….. Or it creates support for a “big brother” government as everyone is feeling unsafe…. or it creates so much instability the whole structure of your nation just falls apart….eventually….also making you vulnerable to foreign meddling and interests…

On a different note; the authorities warned embassies in the UK that they feared an increase in “hate crimes” after the “triggering” of article 50. The police have spoken about an increase in racism towards “other Europeans” as well.  All in all though it does seem as if though this “increase in racism” is greatly exaggerated if one is to read the article I linked to above concerning “hate-crimes.” Who knows. I hope that Europe will be Europe and not Europe-stan in the future. If I wanted to live in Algerie or Saudia Arabia I wouldn’t be here…. I also hope that we can move forward without our continent falling apart. If it does then don’t forget who is responsible. Don’t forget who created this mess in the first place.

 

 

Real Racism.

Standard

I have written in the past about racism directed towards Afro-Americans in heavy metal and criticised utterly racist entertainment from the past. I then directed my focus towards current racism or current racist propaganda directed towards the “evil-white-man,” criticising the  narrative that only white people can be guilty of racism and genocide. There is quite a lot that can be written about the topic actually. Today I’ve decided to focus on a different kind of racism that might not be that obvious at first, with the exception of Benjamin Hermansen and his friends. I’ve included  two mixed Norwegian individuals who experienced racism in our part of the world, I’ve also decided to include the hijab wearing young girl who was turned into an online meme after the terrorist attack in London, which was certainly corny. I’ve also included the infamous Rachel Dolezal at the end, even though she isn’t biologically mixed and Norwegian hijab poster-girl (who no longer wears her hijab) Malika Faviano. There are also a couple of honorary mentions……such as:                  

1- Harambe. Yes, I couldn’t help myself  😀 Why? Because the world is messed up. Harambe the Gorilla became an online sensation after he was shot, sparking a flood of memes “honouring” the deceased animal… one would think that liberals would have been happy… but no…they started screeching as THEY saw the black Gorilla as symbolising “black” people…… :/ yeah… :/

“Liberal social justice warriors are upset again. This time, it’s over Harambe memes — because they’re racist and show how Americans are using an African name to mock black people by talking about a gorilla. Apparently.”

If you want to lose all faith in humanity then check out the “very offensive” memes….SMH…Libtards.

2- Benjamin Hermansen haunted countless Norwegian newspapers for all the wrong reasons at the tender age of 15. He was not there because he was doing well for himself, nor was he there as a result of a scandal. Hermansen had become famous as he had been slain due to his skin colour. The people behind it: three very real Neo-Nazis.

This is a story of an actual innocent young man, half Norwegian, half Ghanaian. A boy with no criminal record, no gang membership, no gun, going out to exchange cell-phone covers with a friend (or heading out with the trash according to popular myth) only to meet his maker.

Hermansen did not know that he and his friend were being eyed by strangers, until three older individuals emerged from a nearby car heading for them. Both young men then ran for their lives, Benjamin jumped over a fence, but then fell on his stomach. This particular spot became the 15-year old’s final resting place in this life as the neo-nazis stabbed  him, killing him viciously, without any mercy, because of his complexion.

A vile, contemptuous act. A murder that shook an entire nation united in bottomless grief and embarrassment. Norway’s first racist murder, in the year of 2001.

I remember the story, I remember the newspapers. It was a sad day for Norway and the Norwegian people.

Hermansen’s parents experienced the worst nightmare any parent can ever experience.

In my opinion his death day should have been turned into an official day of remembrance. So that we never forget this horrible tragedy.

The female nazi who was the girl friend of one of the perpetrators refused to be interviewed when approach by Dagbladet in 2011. One of the killers though actually had some comments and officially said that he had gradually gotten involved with right-wing extremists as he was paranoid and afraid after being beaten up by immigrant youths. He claimed that the police weren’t there for him but that the neo-nazis were.

This is sadly the potential nightmare of an ethnically divided society with increased tribalism and racially motivated infighting. You run the risk of innocent people being caught in the melee, which I’ve expressed concern about several times. In fact I feel like a broken record by now.

The nazi-guy apparently laughed a lot during the interview with Dagbladet. According to their journalist he did not display any type of regret. The other guy guilty of the murder and the most infamous one, due to his picture being constantly used in the media was active on neo-nazi forums online at the time of publishing, even though he was still behind bars.

One can only guess that they haven’t really improved.

Benjamin Hermansen

Real Nazis

3- Victor Lopez. This guy was a friend of Benjamin and went out in the public eye criticising nazis and racists in Norway. He was found dead only some months after his friend but the police concluded it was suicide even though no one who knew him thought that was the case.

He was found hanged by the leash of his dog with grass marks on his knees according to what I just read. Everyone in the area felt it was a racist crime as skin heads apparently kept on re-visiting Holmlia, which is considered an “immigrant territory” in many ways.

Victor Lopez’s death was labeled a suicide by the authorities and is not really mentioned anywhere. A female friend of the two also  died a few years later after being killed by an immigrant.

What a tragic fate for these friends 😦 Sad. Very, very sad.

Victor Lopez

More on Lopez.

Lise Joanni Johansson

4- When the left fails miserably.….After first claiming that the killing of Harambe was synonymous with oppression directed towards Afro-Americans, the left decided that King Kong was racist…..A funny thing to note is that the very liberal left are the ones who come up with these type of things…….. maybe this says more about them than anything……King Kong apparently represents “the black man….”

5-Some weeks ago I saw a post somewhere, somehow about how one of Norway’s biggest pop-stars had experienced racism. At first when I saw it I didn’t give it much thought as I probably assumed that it was “fake news” or “fake racism.”

Yet tonight after having an interesting conversation with a “mixed”relative of mine, I remembered the story and decided to read up on it.

Maria Mena, one of our biggest selling artists, is half Norwegian while her father is afro-American, so the exact same combo as my relative.

She has been famous in Norway since she was 16 and never gave racism much of a thought, until she sat in an Oslo Taxi and the driver didn’t recognise her, constantly calling her “negro.” In Norway that particular word has never really been seen as a racist or derogatory word. Yet now due to an influx of “new Norwegians” the word is considered non-grata. Fair enough, after many years in the USA I personally feel that it is outdated.

When one of Norway’s biggest stars then tried to ask the taxi driver (whose ethnicity is uncertain, the majority of cab drivers in Oslo are Muslims) if he had ever heard of her music, he replied with “I don’t listen to Negro-Music” following up with questions about why her Norwegian was so good. “Where did she come from originally?” He asked.

Whether this taxi driver was an old Norwegian man unaccustomed to the “new ways” or whether or not he was from the middle east, was not mentioned, at least not in the article I read.

To be completely honest I never thought about Mena not being Norwegian, even when she was a teen with braids I never really wondered about her ethnicity at all. I always thought of her as Norwegian and find it really strange that anyone would call her Negro.

Maria Mena apparently apologised online to her father, publicly, for never taking his “racism” claims seriously.

6- A distressed looking, hijab wearing woman became an online meme after the London terrorist attack. The whole ordeal was despicable as the alt-right & new conservatives threw themselves on the trend, holding up the photo as the ultimate piece of evidence. “Muslims don’t care about non-muslims being killed in a terrorist attack.”

Well, you can claim this if you have the numbers and proper evidence, but a photo like that is not even funny as a joke.

This vicious act of prejudiced racism caught fire without anyone bothering to ask the hijab wearing muslim woman  how she felt, or what her thoughts had been at the time.

 I just went in here to edit my article (18thSept.2017) as I’ve certainly started to feel uncomfortable travelling to London since I just see Niqabs and Hijabs everywhere. Now it is actually quite alarming, as you’ll feel uncomfortable walking around without being covered up. Yet, after going back to my entry, I still think it is silly to just pick a random picture and hold it up as some sort of evidence. I guess it was meant to be funny. (Still not laughing).

Anyway – you can read what she had to say right here: READ THIS!

7- Ok………………I was going to write something sympathetic towards Rachel Dolezal, not because of the false claims that race is a social construct ( I will follow-up on that) but because I do believe that we all should have the freedom to re-invent ourselves.

If Dolezal wants to be afro-American then why not. HOWEVER I then actually took the time to read this horrible article: yeah….

The article includes fantastic claims from Dolezal, she is either in desperate need of advanced medical help or became “black” to cope with the abuse she endured as a child. Whatever her intent is I cannot help but to actually find her racist due to what she actually says.

If she took advantage of the historical suffering and abuse of Afro-Americans, literally using cultural appropriation to raise her salary….well….then I have no words, here are some of her words though:

“I’d stir the water from the hose into the earth … and make thin, soupy mud, which I would then rub on my hands, arms, feet, and legs,” Dolezal writes.

“When she was 17, she had the opportunity to travel to Washington, DC, during summer break and work for a family friend’s fine-art greeting card company.

She complained the job consisted mostly of being a nanny and a cook.

Thankfully, she writes, the autobiography of Miss Jane Pittman, a famous slave who lived through emancipation, provided her with “much needed solace.”

“I could still relate to aspects of her struggle. I certainly wasn’t enslaved … but it wouldn’t have been too much of a stretch to call me an indentured servant,” Dolezal claims.

“Miss Pittman’s plight and her perseverance resonated with me. I knew what it was like to be a child and have to work as hard as an adult, and how it felt to be used and abused.

“I also understood the pain that comes from being treated like less than a full human being … and the fortitude required to fight this sort of injustice.”

8- Here we have a Norwegian-(Italian?) opportunist who decided to take a Norwegian female hairdresser to court, when she refused to serve a woman in hijab…

I guess we can assume that this chick is Norway’s Dolezal as she was born Charlotte Antonsen, but then converted to Islam and changed her name to Malika Bayan.

She was partying hard using drugs according to herself, but then found Allah.

According to herself she wore the hijab for 4 years before venturing into the hairdresser’s salon, who was apparently well-known as “islam-critical” according to others.

A new witness was called in during the appeal who revealed that the whole scenario had been staged. Look here.

Bayan also called to the Norwegian anti-racist centre after she was turned away from the salon, which some people have looked upon as suspicious.

Malika Bayan went ahead and reported the hairdresser taking her all the way to court becoming a national hijab-icon. She also won the case.

As of late though Malika had a change of hearts and decided to throw the hijab releasing a number of sexy photos on her Instagram, looking more like an attention seeking-wanna-be-celebrity….like someone who becomes famous for nothing at all…but still manages to cling on to fame for some strange reason….

She stated that she struggled a bit with “practising the religion” but that she was still muslim. Norway’s number one hijab-icon, who sued a woman for discrimination because she was refused service, now promotes herself like some hot babe. Note that she has included an email address in case people want to collaborate with her…. I guess the court case was her way of getting ahead in this world? Cultural appropriation much? Here She Is.

9-There are plenty of articles about “robberies gone wrong” where white people in America end up getting killed by Afro-Americans. It is obvious that these type of cases are racially motivated when you look at the bestiality of the murders and the humiliation involved….  “Robbery gone wrong” is simply used to smooth things over by the authorities as White Americans would probably freak out big time, if they really knew how dangerous it is to live in the USA…..I will link to this article in a new entry…which is why it is featured here merely as a mention.