When People Can Not Process What They Are Reading.


Years ago I remember taking offence to a Serj Tankian song called “The Unthinking Majority” I thought of the title as extremely arrogant and felt it was disappointing that a political artist, or at least an artist with politically motivated work, would express himself in such a way.

I took offence to how The Chimp Paradox. was presented as well as I don’t think of it as a good idea to address the masses like they are mongrels.

I don’t talk to people like they are s-t-u-p-i-d, I have no interest in saying “those people over there.” I’m part of this world just like everyone else, I’m not above the law, I will fail, I will be wrong and just because I’m right about certain things doesn’t mean that I will be right about others. (Depending on how you define what is right or wrong). We are all hiding behind statistics funny enough and drag out surveys like a final piece of evidence. Yet statistics can be misleading, which is why every side has “evidence” to back up whatever claim they might have. Yet once you de-bunk the collection of data, it might not seem as straightforward after all…  someone disagreeing with you politically doesn’t give you the right to dismiss them as unintelligible, unless it has  been clearly debunked time and time again that what they support is inefficient and false. Meaning: that “truth” has been consistently buried and banned on their part so that their “ideology” can prevail well-guarded from justified scrutiny.

” If I disagree with you, you have to be retarded…” is not a particularly well thought out argument. The same goes for name-calling. If you want to pull the “you are an idiot card” you truly need to have a substantial amount of hard evidence, just as if you are going to pull the “you are insane argument.”

Yesterday my brother and I had a very long and interesting conversation as he is currently reading a lot about genes & IQ. This is of course a very controversial topic as the current orthodoxy is that there is only equality. We spoke and agreed about the grandeur of a meritocracy, discussing how evidence shows that the general IQ at universities have increased since “future leaders” are recruited from all aspects of our societies. The general “intelligence” has therefore gone up since education isn’t only reserved for the children of the wealthy. Yet….the dark side of the moon are quotas enforced when politicians decide that they want to lift the “entire population” or 50% of the population up. As amiable as this may sound like it is simply not do-able.

The result will be a collection of educated people, with official papers for jobs that they cannot really do. This might seem un-fair, but it is actually true. (feel free to read up on all of this, there’s lots of information.).

(It has now been brought to my attention that this increase apparently can be seen among higher university education and that the average is actually decreasing dramatically when it comes to the “regular” student body. So a bit different than what I describe here. Note added on Friday 28th of July 2017).

As horrid as it might be, 50% of the population will not be geniuses. If you drown people with knowledge this will not change as their brains just cannot process the information. This is of course very depressing if you fundamentally believe in “giving everyone a fair chance” by raising the population up, stretching towards national greatness. I take it that this is why those who “headhunt” for the best have to look internationally, to poach “the best people” for their projects.

Yet among the best you also have some cases of those who over think to such an extent that they almost think themselves into idiocy. That’s when  degenerate social constructs are presented to the world, as it might make sense logically if you disregard the human factor or if your brilliance is restricted to one field. There are also those who use elaborate sentences, spending an enormous amount of time on research only to be biased or completely off the hook in terms of their conclusions. The mind is a tricky beast.

Different groups of people have different trait frequencies. There is a plethora of information regarding this. I’m currently reading articles that would certainly come across as “controversial” to all of those who subscribe to the notion that ” we are all created equal.” That said, just because we are “all created differently” doesn’t mean that civil liberties should only be reserved for a small group. I suspect that the furore against “admitting that genuine diversity exists” reminiscent of mass hysteria happens, because people don’t want the idea of “this group being better than that group” gaining ground once again. My point is that “supremacy” or feelings of superiority will emerge regardless, as people will always “find something” to make them “stand out,” even if it is not “legitimate.”

Whether it is a financial situation making someone feel superior to those who are destitute or whether destitution raises ones victim status to such heights as to make someone morally superior. Grievances can be perceived as legitimate and worthy of punishment by the state directed towards those guilty of wealth. The rich person might feel superior but the poor will too, as their struggle makes them superior morally speaking. Rich = mean, poor = good. In terms of appearance it is “all about personality” since slim and/or pretty = mean while fat and/or ugly = nice. A person who looks good and uses this as an asset might feel that this is the “ace up their sleeve,” but just as this can create a sense of “I’m better than you” the traditionally unattractive can relish in their misery by again being seen as the “victim” or “challenging traditional standards of beauty.” Someone who is good at school/academics and/or good in any other field such as sports, music, business you name it, will feel that this is their “ace” whereas those who aren’t good at anything at all can take pride in being morally virtuous since they are unambitious. They are nice because they will not make anyone else “feel bad” by beating them in a competitive sense.

Being honest about “diversity” is not the same as treating people horribly. It means being honest and aware of the challenges a nation faces, both internally and internationally. How can one create the best school system for example if people are in denial? Maybe it is a good idea to focus more on practical training than merely theory designed for the brainy? Maybe a division at an earlier age would be an idea, so that those who hate reading could thrive by learning “how to be handy?” Maybe segregating the genders, so that boys can be approached like boys without being reprimanded for not being like the girls could benefit boys who are falling behind in the effeminate education system?  What will result from such a religious devotion to modern orthodoxies as we have today is the firing of any academics who dare to uphold “the truth,” which brings to mind the popular representation of “the dark ages.”

It seems like our enlightenment has gradually brought us closer to darkness since any truths violating the  “feelings” of a group, regardless of how marginal the group is, are discarded or left in obscurity. Writing about democracy, in fact mentioning and addressing in-depth any of the issues mentioned above could result in volumes upon volumes of material, which is what we supposedly have academics for. They are not there to be fired if their findings collide with the “values” of our modern “dictatorship of goodness,” it is their job to find the truth or to seek to find the truth through empirical evidence.

To demonstrate how frustrating it is with people who cannot process information that isn’t even particularly complex, I’ve included a series of screen shots below. This is how democracy looks like in practice, this is why it is easy for critical thinkers, obsessed with “truth” to fall into the unforgiving, melancholic, grip of misanthropy.

On Friday, the 24th of March 2017, these three individuals were trending on FB…

Trending on FB

Katie Hopkins was making waves online due to her commentary about the terrorist attack in Westminster. People were raging because she had the audacity to suggest that England has a cultural problem and that the UK is weak in spirit. Her commentary pretty much addressed what I had been addressing in one of my own blog entries, so I was of course puzzled by the negative reactions she experienced as what she had written seemed spot on. (Unless one chooses to be in denial). While I was scrolling around the timeline connected with the “Hopkins topic” I came across a guy in the USA. I agreed with his entry and shared it on my personal FB.

Online Democracy 1

What followed was a public online argument where the guy who had authored what you see above had to defend himself from people who clearly didn’t understand his original post at all. It is not hard to comprehend what he is saying. An interesting thing to note is that he didn’t know that his post was set to “public….”

Online Democracy 2

Obviously I’m trying to protect the identity of these people, as one does…You can see that one individual agrees, then one is clearly disgruntled about Hopkins, someone else agrees, but then enters a very typical argument: “rather __________, than racist.” This is a slogan that has been advocated by Swedish Feminists in particular.

Racist Clear.

What you see next is a very typical argument…”the guy was British.” Well…to be fair no he was not…This was a muslim man of foreign descent, who happened to have a British passport and citizenship…in this day and age that is not really the same as being from that particular nation. A woman of absolute muslim descent, walking around in full traditional, muslim dress, is not Norwegian just because she happens to have a Norwegian passport. She is a citizen yes, and is lucky to live in a western country, where you can enjoy the full benefit of citizenship regardless of where you originally come from. The lady (note how these individuals are women) clearly does not understand the argument from the American man. Her conclusion is that he is “racist clear” whatever that may mean…..

Enters a proper Racist.

Then enters a proper Racist. This clearly illustrates what I’ve been addressing on my blog in so many of my entries. The guy who initially started this discussion has up to this point engaged in arguments protecting himself from the false accusation that he is racist, then enters a real racist, who generalizes and is completely unapologetic in his views. An argument then ensues between the “accused-non-racist” and the “I’m-proud-to-be-racist-racist.” The leftists have succeeded in destroying the meaning of the word “racist” just as they’ve dismantled the word “hate” as used in “hate speech.” False accusations of people being “brown shirts” have taken away the severity of “you are a Nazi” since everyone who at this point questions the left in any way is labeled “literally Hitler.” The unavoidable result is that people will just get nauseated whenever the WW2 argument is brought up, and not for the “right” reasons…..people might even start saying “yeah…what did we really fight for? Maybe the Nazis should have won?” these type of sentiments will probably become more widespread as a result of the left’s way of arguing, rather than an explosion of pro-Nazi sentiments. In other words, if you poke someone long enough they’ll get sick and tired of your bullshit.

Exit Nazi & Permission to share posts

A certain somebody asks for permission to use this discussion in a blog entry….the racist from the previous frame, admits that he is proud to be what he is.

Enters random guy.

Another character enters claiming the “he was British argument” before the classical “IRA argument” is brought up. In fact this whole thread illustrates all the common narratives in the current political climate. Note how the “new arrival” in this thread uses the “fake news” narrative. The American who accidentally ended up in a public discussion, that ended up highlighting all of his points due to the contribution by those who are hating on him, is becoming tired….as can be understood by his posting below…

the IRA argument

Argument continues

The American who started the thread tries to conclude the discussion, at this point he also adds one of his comments in the thread into his original post, in order for people to see where he is coming from. The lady with the “IRA argument” clearly can not let it go, so another discussion then ensues with an evidently tired American, baffled by the inability to process basic information displayed by those attacking him….

Arguing Online.jpg

The thread, as it looked like at that point, ends with this:


This discussion alone prove the points I addressed above. It would have been one thing if these screenshots were my only evidence…..but no…hold on… I got more……

The argument below is more sophisticated in nature due to how the participants express themselves. Regardless of this the topic is the same; I’m calling this sequence ” The Oxford Argument.”


The post attracted one individual who decided to express his dissent….this was counter-attacked by a guy who was clearly interested in commencing a discussion.





” I read that paragraph but I just hear racism.” Again that same old card is used in an incorrect manner. Also note how these individuals perceive Muslims as the victims and any precautions on the part of “the west” as unjustified racism. The argument is made from “the dissenter” that concerns about Muslim supremacists are justified, especially when seen from a historical perspective. This of course clashes with the current orthodoxy or the false enlightenment claim, that all men are created equal. By admitting that there is an enemy you are merely engaging in discrimination. Even when “the dissenter” specified “NOT ALL muslims” it was still concluded that he was a racist and “good riddance.”

My last example before I conclude my entry stems from my very own Twitter. Yes you’ve read that right. I launched this blog a couple of years ago at the request of my fans, not really knowing what my blog would be about.  I’m not a “pink blogger” I like to read, and enjoy to think, discuss and write about what I’ve read. I’m a virtuoso musician and would classify myself as pretty geeky. My blog entries where I’ve written about personal matters have proven very popular and overall I’ve certainly seen that people adore entertainment while abhorring intellectual discussions. I’ve shared my blog entries on my Twitter and in my entries I usually provide people with links to the articles and/or YouTube videos that inspired me to write that specific blog entry, so that people can see my “sources.”

This year I received a request to do an interview about my entries for the very first time. I was asked about the content on my blog regarding Islamism mainly, since it seemed like the interviewer was obsessed with ‘the terror threat.” I replied to the best of my ability and said among other things this:

“It’s obvious that there are some who are just born with a “complaining gene.” We are spoilt in our part of the world. I don’t think there’s ever been a point in history where people had it better. There is healthcare for everyone, there is so much food that the poor are obese, everyone has access to some sort of education, pollution levels are much better than they were under the industrial revolution for example, you will not be imprisoned or chemically castrated just because of your sexual orientation, women can get an education, work their way up into the system. You can come from a minority background and become the leader of a nation or go into important government positions in a country that you weren’t even born in. We’ve come as close as we can get to Utopia and should just be happy, but no. Then you get people complaining about trans-gender bath room issues, micro-aggressions, sexist snow-removal and pronouns. There is no end to the stupidity. I believe in equality when it comes to the starting point and opportunity, but it has now been brought to my attention that those who talk about egalitarianism usually advocate equality when it comes to outcome. Which doesn’t make any sense to me.”

I also said this:

“Yes, there are plenty of disturbing videos of this, I’ve posted some of them on my blog. You got angry young Muslim men shouting and then you got angry young white men shouting. Looks like a mess, especially if tensions escalate.”

Then you got this:

“I assume that the majority are afraid, because people like to conform and don’t want to be ostracised. They see what happens to those conservatives and classical liberals who speak out and decide to stay quiet, whereas those who shout the loudest are those who hate immigration because they actually are real racists and real nazis.”

…and this:

“What it is that we want immigrants to “integrate into” for example is a question nobody is asking. We keep on mentioning vague values, that apparently are “our shared values,” but it can easily seem that we don’t really have a cultural identity anymore. It is not strange that foreigners should be horrified at the fractured families of the West or the unintelligible mainstream entertainment we have that produce nothing but icons of degeneracy and vulgarity. High culture of beauty and excellence is something we have sacrificed on the altar of modernity. Spirituality and faith has been crushed and is routinely mocked. Masculinity is actively worked against in the school system. It is understandable that people would be reluctant to “integrate” into this. Let’s not forget that. After all, why should anyone respect a culture that doesn’t even respect itself?”

If you read through these segments you will understand that this is not a racist talking, but someone who is concerned, especially if you read the whole interview. What I say is critical of militant Islam and the effects of “the change” that has been imposed on Europe. When asked about: “What about Islamism in Scandinavia? Have you been back to Norway recently? What do you see happening there?” I replied in an honest way; describing a country where immigration has become stricter but where certain specific changes were observed by me during some visits back home:

“1-Norway has changed to such an extent that my father and I were the only white people at a supermarket up in the mountains, deep into the fjord land.
2-I’ve had elevator rides where I was the only white person and the only woman not wearing a burqa.
3-I’m not even Norwegian anymore, I’m an ethnic-Norwegian apparently.
4- I visited my grandmother some years back and there was a terror warning on the news “today the terror alert has been raised to severe.” That, in particular is ridiculous. Why are we supposed to accept this as a new reality?”

First of all it is important to specify that Norway is not America. If you live in the USA and you get surprised by encountering an Afro-American or a Native-American, well then you got issues. America has always been a diverse “nation,” there was diversity among the caucasian population, there was diversity due to slavery and the “original population.” Norway is not America. We got Norwegians and then we got Samis, who are nomads living up in the North, moving around between Northern countries with their reindeer, etc; It is just and right to question the changes that have been imposed on Scandinavia, as these are neither natural nor justifiable IF they result in demographic displacement or gradual demographic replacement. It is racist, to support this type of activity and the fact that these type of measures are supported and initiated by ethnic Europeans is nothing but extraordinary. (Obviously I have to specify that there is a major difference between some immigrants here and there, and demographic displacement/replacement. I hope that people can comprehend that….) It cannot be justified in any way, that English people should all of a sudden find themselves becoming minorities in certain parts of their country, nor can it be justified that there are “no-go-zones” in Sweden, but an interesting thing to note, and this is important, is that I highlight that the worst of these changes is the terror threat, that we are supposed to treat as “normal.” 

So far so good, one should hope, but no. Even though it should be ridiculously easy to follow what I’m writing above, I received this tweet after the release of the interview:

evil CIC 2

Curious I decided to check out this individual and saw this:

CIC evil1

First of all I said in the interview that I don’t live in Norway anymore. I also said that “my father and I were the only white people at a supermarket up in the mountains, deep into the fjord land.” This describes a supermarket. I also describe being in an elevator as the only woman not wearing a burqa. I’m clearly describing a country undergoing radical fundamental changes. But I’m not describing an entire town, and seen from a European perspective it all makes sense, if you’ve followed what I wrote above. In the interview I can be quoted as saying ” I’m not even Norwegian anymore, I’m an ethnic-Norwegian apparently.” Again this goes to demonstrate a “core change” within a Nation. I’m not even Norwegian anymore.” So you see a change of word-use in terms of how an ethnic group is being addressed and labeled. This is not minor. Obviously this is not hillbilly talk, as a hillbilly would probably behave like this:

Enters a proper Racist.

Some months later I received another Tweet from a different individual as a response to a blog entry I had published on January the 30th, 2017.

twitter argument.jpg

These are some quotes from the blog entry that he was referring to:

“We need to make sure that we advance into the future “with baby steps” so that we can successfully integrate the new-Europeans into the fabric of our societies, without losing ourselves.”

We are reaching a tipping point & the only sensible course of action would be to do everything in our power to prevent escalated chaos within our continent.”

“….then why not keep those who like it here & have integrated well, while sending out those who do not?”

“If “refugees” thrive at the expense of the original European population, it will create anger and resentment within the ethnic populace and rather than directing this anger towards government figures, we run the risk of this sentiment being directed towards innocent muslims.”

These things are clearly not written by someone who hates ALL Muslims. This is obviously written by someone who is concerned about EVERYONE. And someone who is critical towards Militant Islam. No wonder that people give up, when those who are “moderates” or tempered in their assessment, are accused of being “racist.” I did the dumbest thing and decided to engage with this man in a short Twitter argument as I obviously assume that my fellow human beings “can understand what I write.” I’ve made the mistake of expecting people to be reasonable. Which brings us back to the very beginning of my very long entry…. Here are the Tweets:













Again, I’m obviously not racist, but then comes the kicker:


At this point I realised that what I was engaging in was pointless….When I then saw the thread further up in this entry later that month I realised that I had to write a blog entry. It is a serious issue that so many cannot comprehend the information that they are presented with. Sure, it is tough to read science papers, especially if written in an academic language, it is difficult to read ancient literature, of course this is hard, but none of what I shared on here today is. None of it. None.

This is why politicians talk “down to people” this is why there are PR agencies that are commissioned to create and manufacture easy slogans and “perfect” official personas. People who never say anything that contradicts or challenges the orthodoxy, even when they are aware of how bad things are, such as Podesta. This is how corporations get away with blood on their hands, because they are good at marketing and making their products “human.” How healthy is this for a society and how healthy is it for the west? Not particularly, which I’ll address in my next entry, where I’ll discuss an article I read some days ago about “Politics vs. Emotionalism.”

Real Racism.


I have written in the past about racism directed towards Afro-Americans in heavy metal and criticised utterly racist entertainment from the past. I then directed my focus towards current racism or current racist propaganda directed towards the “evil-white-man,” criticising the  narrative that only white people can be guilty of racism and genocide. There is quite a lot that can be written about the topic actually. Today I’ve decided to focus on a different kind of racism that might not be that obvious at first, with the exception of Benjamin Hermansen and his friends. I’ve included  two mixed Norwegian individuals who experienced racism in our part of the world, I’ve also decided to include the hijab wearing young girl who was turned into an online meme after the terrorist attack in London, which was certainly corny. I’ve also included the infamous Rachel Dolezal at the end, even though she isn’t biologically mixed and Norwegian hijab poster-girl (who no longer wears her hijab) Malika Faviano. There are also a couple of honorary mentions……such as:                  

1- Harambe. Yes, I couldn’t help myself  😀 Why? Because the world is messed up. Harambe the Gorilla became an online sensation after he was shot, sparking a flood of memes “honouring” the deceased animal… one would think that liberals would have been happy… but no…they started screeching as THEY saw the black Gorilla as symbolising “black” people…… :/ yeah… :/

“Liberal social justice warriors are upset again. This time, it’s over Harambe memes — because they’re racist and show how Americans are using an African name to mock black people by talking about a gorilla. Apparently.”

If you want to lose all faith in humanity then check out the “very offensive” memes….SMH…Libtards.

2- Benjamin Hermansen haunted countless Norwegian newspapers for all the wrong reasons at the tender age of 15. He was not there because he was doing well for himself, nor was he there as a result of a scandal. Hermansen had become famous as he had been slain due to his skin colour. The people behind it: three very real Neo-Nazis.

This is a story of an actual innocent young man, half Norwegian, half Ghanaian. A boy with no criminal record, no gang membership, no gun, going out to exchange cell-phone covers with a friend (or heading out with the trash according to popular myth) only to meet his maker.

Hermansen did not know that he and his friend were being eyed by strangers, until three older individuals emerged from a nearby car heading for them. Both young men then ran for their lives, Benjamin jumped over a fence, but then fell on his stomach. This particular spot became the 15-year old’s final resting place in this life as the neo-nazis stabbed  him, killing him viciously, without any mercy, because of his complexion.

A vile, contemptuous act. A murder that shook an entire nation united in bottomless grief and embarrassment. Norway’s first racist murder, in the year of 2001.

I remember the story, I remember the newspapers. It was a sad day for Norway and the Norwegian people.

Hermansen’s parents experienced the worst nightmare any parent can ever experience.

In my opinion his death day should have been turned into an official day of remembrance. So that we never forget this horrible tragedy.

The female nazi who was the girl friend of one of the perpetrators refused to be interviewed when approach by Dagbladet in 2011. One of the killers though actually had some comments and officially said that he had gradually gotten involved with right-wing extremists as he was paranoid and afraid after being beaten up by immigrant youths. He claimed that the police weren’t there for him but that the neo-nazis were.

This is sadly the potential nightmare of an ethnically divided society with increased tribalism and racially motivated infighting. You run the risk of innocent people being caught in the melee, which I’ve expressed concern about several times. In fact I feel like a broken record by now.

The nazi-guy apparently laughed a lot during the interview with Dagbladet. According to their journalist he did not display any type of regret. The other guy guilty of the murder and the most infamous one, due to his picture being constantly used in the media was active on neo-nazi forums online at the time of publishing, even though he was still behind bars.

One can only guess that they haven’t really improved.

Benjamin Hermansen

Real Nazis

3- Victor Lopez. This guy was a friend of Benjamin and went out in the public eye criticising nazis and racists in Norway. He was found dead only some months after his friend but the police concluded it was suicide even though no one who knew him thought that was the case.

He was found hanged by the leash of his dog with grass marks on his knees according to what I just read. Everyone in the area felt it was a racist crime as skin heads apparently kept on re-visiting Holmlia, which is considered an “immigrant territory” in many ways.

Victor Lopez’s death was labeled a suicide by the authorities and is not really mentioned anywhere. A female friend of the two also  died a few years later after being killed by an immigrant.

What a tragic fate for these friends 😦 Sad. Very, very sad.

Victor Lopez

More on Lopez.

Lise Joanni Johansson

4- When the left fails miserably.….After first claiming that the killing of Harambe was synonymous with oppression directed towards Afro-Americans, the left decided that King Kong was racist…..A funny thing to note is that the very liberal left are the ones who come up with these type of things…….. maybe this says more about them than anything……King Kong apparently represents “the black man….”

5-Some weeks ago I saw a post somewhere, somehow about how one of Norway’s biggest pop-stars had experienced racism. At first when I saw it I didn’t give it much thought as I probably assumed that it was “fake news” or “fake racism.”

Yet tonight after having an interesting conversation with a “mixed”relative of mine, I remembered the story and decided to read up on it.

Maria Mena, one of our biggest selling artists, is half Norwegian while her father is afro-American, so the exact same combo as my relative.

She has been famous in Norway since she was 16 and never gave racism much of a thought, until she sat in an Oslo Taxi and the driver didn’t recognise her, constantly calling her “negro.” In Norway that particular word has never really been seen as a racist or derogatory word. Yet now due to an influx of “new Norwegians” the word is considered non-grata. Fair enough, after many years in the USA I personally feel that it is outdated.

When one of Norway’s biggest stars then tried to ask the taxi driver (whose ethnicity is uncertain, the majority of cab drivers in Oslo are Muslims) if he had ever heard of her music, he replied with “I don’t listen to Negro-Music” following up with questions about why her Norwegian was so good. “Where did she come from originally?” He asked.

Whether this taxi driver was an old Norwegian man unaccustomed to the “new ways” or whether or not he was from the middle east, was not mentioned, at least not in the article I read.

To be completely honest I never thought about Mena not being Norwegian, even when she was a teen with braids I never really wondered about her ethnicity at all. I always thought of her as Norwegian and find it really strange that anyone would call her Negro.

Maria Mena apparently apologised online to her father, publicly, for never taking his “racism” claims seriously.

6- A distressed looking, hijab wearing woman became an online meme after the London terrorist attack. The whole ordeal was despicable as the alt-right & new conservatives threw themselves on the trend, holding up the photo as the ultimate piece of evidence. “Muslims don’t care about non-muslims being killed in a terrorist attack.”

Well, you can claim this if you have the numbers and proper evidence, but a photo like that is not even funny as a joke.

This vicious act of prejudiced racism caught fire without anyone bothering to ask the hijab wearing muslim woman  how she felt, or what her thoughts had been at the time.

 I just went in here to edit my article (18thSept.2017) as I’ve certainly started to feel uncomfortable travelling to London since I just see Niqabs and Hijabs everywhere. Now it is actually quite alarming, as you’ll feel uncomfortable walking around without being covered up. Yet, after going back to my entry, I still think it is silly to just pick a random picture and hold it up as some sort of evidence. I guess it was meant to be funny. (Still not laughing).

Anyway – you can read what she had to say right here: READ THIS!

7- Ok………………I was going to write something sympathetic towards Rachel Dolezal, not because of the false claims that race is a social construct ( I will follow-up on that) but because I do believe that we all should have the freedom to re-invent ourselves.

If Dolezal wants to be afro-American then why not. HOWEVER I then actually took the time to read this horrible article: yeah….

The article includes fantastic claims from Dolezal, she is either in desperate need of advanced medical help or became “black” to cope with the abuse she endured as a child. Whatever her intent is I cannot help but to actually find her racist due to what she actually says.

If she took advantage of the historical suffering and abuse of Afro-Americans, literally using cultural appropriation to raise her salary….well….then I have no words, here are some of her words though:

“I’d stir the water from the hose into the earth … and make thin, soupy mud, which I would then rub on my hands, arms, feet, and legs,” Dolezal writes.

“When she was 17, she had the opportunity to travel to Washington, DC, during summer break and work for a family friend’s fine-art greeting card company.

She complained the job consisted mostly of being a nanny and a cook.

Thankfully, she writes, the autobiography of Miss Jane Pittman, a famous slave who lived through emancipation, provided her with “much needed solace.”

“I could still relate to aspects of her struggle. I certainly wasn’t enslaved … but it wouldn’t have been too much of a stretch to call me an indentured servant,” Dolezal claims.

“Miss Pittman’s plight and her perseverance resonated with me. I knew what it was like to be a child and have to work as hard as an adult, and how it felt to be used and abused.

“I also understood the pain that comes from being treated like less than a full human being … and the fortitude required to fight this sort of injustice.”

8- Here we have a Norwegian-(Italian?) opportunist who decided to take a Norwegian female hairdresser to court, when she refused to serve a woman in hijab…

I guess we can assume that this chick is Norway’s Dolezal as she was born Charlotte Antonsen, but then converted to Islam and changed her name to Malika Bayan.

She was partying hard using drugs according to herself, but then found Allah.

According to herself she wore the hijab for 4 years before venturing into the hairdresser’s salon, who was apparently well-known as “islam-critical” according to others.

A new witness was called in during the appeal who revealed that the whole scenario had been staged. Look here.

Bayan also called to the Norwegian anti-racist centre after she was turned away from the salon, which some people have looked upon as suspicious.

Malika Bayan went ahead and reported the hairdresser taking her all the way to court becoming a national hijab-icon. She also won the case.

As of late though Malika had a change of hearts and decided to throw the hijab releasing a number of sexy photos on her Instagram, looking more like an attention seeking-wanna-be-celebrity….like someone who becomes famous for nothing at all…but still manages to cling on to fame for some strange reason….

She stated that she struggled a bit with “practising the religion” but that she was still muslim. Norway’s number one hijab-icon, who sued a woman for discrimination because she was refused service, now promotes herself like some hot babe. Note that she has included an email address in case people want to collaborate with her…. I guess the court case was her way of getting ahead in this world? Cultural appropriation much? Here She Is.

9-There are plenty of articles about “robberies gone wrong” where white people in America end up getting killed by Afro-Americans. It is obvious that these type of cases are racially motivated when you look at the bestiality of the murders and the humiliation involved….  “Robbery gone wrong” is simply used to smooth things over by the authorities as White Americans would probably freak out big time, if they really knew how dangerous it is to live in the USA…..I will link to this article in a new entry…which is why it is featured here merely as a mention.