Blame It On The Russians…


Right. Β So today I came across an articleΒ that seemed interesting and legit at first referring to an interview with the English Secretary of Defence. It certainly echoed other articles I’ve come across with Americans complaining about their military readiness and UK generals doing the same; complaints are publicly filed for the whole world to see from several western Nations.

Female participation is criticised since it makes the forces less combat effective, the attitude of (some I hope) students at military institutions are criticised on both sides of the Atlantic, there seems to be no end to the backlash or complaints made public, which I’m guessing is the result of people rejecting the politically correct culture enforced upon them by politicians and/or a cry for help when it comes to better equipment, more funding or maybe a better way to allocate funds.

A great deal of these things I’ve chosen not to share on my blog, such as a political correctness manual, where “subconscious bias” was fought against. Simply put: if a tiger jumps out of the bushes, you should first spend some time contemplating if the tiger is dangerous and a genuine threat before attacking it, because it could potentially be politically incorrect to do so. This of course refers to social issues within the military and a desire to make military culture more like civilian society, and more appealing to women and members of the LGBTQ community… However it does seem as if though normal human instincts should be fought against and further broken down, which leaves me wondering how a culture like this will affect people in combat?

This political correctness manual was so embarrassing to read, in fact so worrying to see as a civilian, that I decided not to publish it, as I thought of it as a disrespectful act to share something of this nature with anyone. Not to forget something that could potentially work against the recruitment of patriotic individuals and depict the military in an unflattering light. Can it potentially help our armed forces to share articles and pass these around? Can the public help or will it just damage reputation and morale? I certainly think that it can have the effect of pushing more young men into the private sector. This political correctness crusade can become a major issue in the future I think.

Yet, after coming across more and more and more complaints, I decided to do so anyway, Β  Β as part of an entry. This PC Manual is official and available for anyone to read and download….. I don’t know how smart that is, but I guess that it is from a post-modern perspective….

Yet the article I read today was, how should I put it, interesting (in lack of a better word) due to the headline pictured above, chosen by the journalist, I’m guessing. Or hoping.

The reason as to why I’m reluctant to share “the-Russians-are-coming-to-get-us-narratives” on my blog should not be surprising, as once again we are moving into “the-boy-who-cried-wolf-territory,” a dangerous narrative to peddle when you are a leader….or more correctly put: this seems to be the case when observing things from a citizen’s perspective, whether correct or not.

What I’m witnessing when travelling/moving around in Europe, what I have seen and heard, what other people are talking about, is apparently Russian propaganda. How can the civilian population take the Russia threat seriously, when the current, imported, internal, threat is not properly addressed by our leadership? It can easily seem (whether genuine or not) that Russia gets picked as a scapegoat, rather than addressing the very real issues and problems that the European population have to deal with everyday. Is Putin to blame for how the so-called migration crisis is handled by the European leadership? Are the Russians to blame for the cultural tensions that we are currently facing as a result of street level diversity and anti-western measures? Sure, who really knows who is behind a bomb going off here and there, but what do you do, when bombs, as I’ve said before, are just the tip of the iceberg? The problems that we Europeans have to deal with are real and genuine and not the result of Russian interference, unless they secretly run the entire world and we are all Russian puppets, which sounds nothing short of insane.

According to Hillary Clinton, Putin was the Godfather of the Alt-Right. As if though Nationalistic sentiments cannot emerge without Russian interference. Trump’s victory was also the result of Russian interference, and so is the general disgruntled air among the European populace, tired of losing their culture and countries to foreigners and politicians with their own strange agenda. I’m guessing that fragmentation within the U.S.A. as a result of criminal gangs and self-segregation, also can be pinned on the Russians. Social cohesion/trust actually breaks down the more ethnic/racial diversity you get within your borders……I’ve linked to articles and studies about this here on my blog, studies and articles by experts from various backgrounds.

Anyway… check this out: currently I’ve borrowed a whole bunch of books about roughly the same topic; in one of these I found a paragraph describing how fearful the English were of a 5th column during WW2. The intelligence community were not interested in German infiltration. Do I have to explain how absurd it this to read about this in the current year? Infiltration is welcomed into our societies, you’ll be called a bigot if you don’t want 5th columns. So if this is the impression civilians get, then how on earth can the Russia narrative be expected to be successful? Where are these Russians destroying us from within? I don’t see them, do you? I do however see expansionist militant Islam, and how new-Europeans carve out territories for themselves (while defending these from us) and as I’ve said before, how long does it take before these expand any further?

It might be that we will be taken by surprise, that Washington’s never-ending Russia paranoia finally will be proven to be right, but as a member of the civilian population, it is very awkward, strange and absurd to buy into this narrative, especially if it is promoted by people in official denial over the issues and problems that Ethnic-Europeans now face. While the people in power officially address China and Russia as our number one enemies, I think civilians will have a hard time to relate, while trying to live normal lives in an ever-changing Europe. Simply put, people are losing their sense of safety, not because of a Russian presence (at this time of writing) but because of the new arrivals into Europe and how scandalously this has been handled. Everything is changing and many are extremely disgruntled with our western leadership as a result, but I guess we should blame that on the Russians……..




Me: I’m going to take a break from writing about the state of affairs in Europe, it’s not like everybody cares about what’s happening over here, those who know keep an eye on things anyway, and after all, I’ve said enough.

Just some days later: Shit a homemade “bomb” went off! Watch out!

Me: I’ve written enough about this. It’s probably only going to get me into trouble. I’m done.

Some days later: Oh my God look at this!

Me: Totally done now. I’m making my blog private.

Some hours later: Nah…can’t really do that. Maybe I’ll Β save someone’s life if I don’t.

Me: It’s boring to sound like a broken record, there are more things in this world to write about, like srsly.

Sun 19. Nov. 2017 – Oh whatever, here we go again….

So … I was in Norway last week and guess what I just found out? More violence and fragmentation in Europe, and this time it happened right in the area where I was. How glorious….as I’ve already described there were visible changes to the environment which I observed and wrote about, but I had no idea that the area had upgraded to racial/ethnic violence. This hits just as close to home as the attack down in Nice. If things escalate like this I guess it will be highly likely that at least one of your relatives will be affected in the coming years, if your family and acquaintances are spread around the continent and/or live in culturally enriched areas. Keep in mind that these territories are expanding, and that “safe zones” aren’t safe, unless gated and/or guarded. *Don’t forget*

So as the geeky person I am. Why not translate this articleΒ into English? Yes, here we go:

Around 30 immigrant boys attacked handball boys.

Around 30 youths of immigrant background attacked boys from the handball team from Kolbotn without any motive. The police have received several complaints.Β 

It was on a Saturday a week ago, 11. November, that a youth gang numbering around 30 provoked to create trouble on Kolbotn Market. There they allegedly hit and kicked several other boys without any motive.

The media kept their silence.Β Until now, probably because the police have received several complaints after the incident. But even though (ØB) reported on the case on the 17th of November – behind a subscription wall, just so you know – the newspaper seem unwilling to share concrete information and none of those involved, or their parents, have been interviewed.

“Brawl between youths in Kolbotn and Ski”

ØB quotesΒ John-Erik Veseth, the leader of the pre-emptive unit East Police department Follo, as saying “From what we’ve unravelled from the investigation so far, we’re getting closer to these people.”

The timeline of events is described as follows: A gang of around 30 youngsters have allegedly been behind several attacks on other youths around the centre of Kolbotn. The first complaint about trouble came from a private residence, where some youths were gathered for a party, right outside the town centre right before seven o’clock on Saturday evening. There were also two adults in the home, and they reported on the uninvited guests who interrupted the gathering, but said that they had control over the situation.

After this the youth-gang allegedly moved towards the centre of Kolbotn. “Here they just started physically attacking other youngsters who happened to be in town, among them the members of a young sports team who were out to celebrate with their fellow handball players.”

It is further said that ” the Follo-Police have received 5 reports about violence after the gang ran amok in the town centre. All of the reports concern boys under 18 of age. One of the reports concern a 16 year old from Ski who was punched.” It is also said that the police were first told that “the gang took the train from Kolbotn to Ski after the raucous in Kolbotn centre, but this has proven to be false.”

But several things seem to suggest that the situation is way worse than what ØB are reporting.

High immigrant youths who kicked, punched and threatened.Β 

After the handball-boys in the age group 14-16 had eaten pizza and been to the cinema over in Kolbotn, which finished around 8 o’clock, they were greeted by a boy-gang of around 30 individuals, also in the age group 14-16, who were looking for trouble.

It is told that the boys were dark-skinned, were wearing hoodies and had covered their faces. The boys were perceived as being intoxicated. Some of the handball boys were trying to get away, but some were caught by the attackers.Β 

The boys who were kept behind were in the receiving end of direct violence such as kicks and punches. In addition there were several others who were threatened and ran after.Β 

Those of the handball boys who managed to escape called their parents, who in their turn contacted the police.

The police are looking for more information, according to ØB. That is interesting, considering that the media first reported on the incident a week after it happened. And then as if tough we are just talking about a simple “brawl” between teens.

Hmmm….sounds like Chicago or L.A. to me. I seem to recall young boys who I knew back then were plotting to start a “UN gang” to protect themselves against unprovoked attacks from a certain demographic. Hmm … how peculiar. Why on earth would people want to protect themselves against racist assaults? I have no clue….these handball boys were probably fascists. It’s all a conspiracy I bet…..


Acid Attacks & Diversity In The UK.


“Savagery knows no cultural boundaries” states The Guardian’s Ian Black. This can hardly be denied but don’t forget or dismiss racism in an effort to disguise racial tensions and/or cultural incompatibility. Β If savagery is only to be perceived as a universal human trait without specific catalysts, then we dismiss the reasons as to why some groups feel superior to others – even justifying and engaging in murder/genocide as well as supporting and/or excusing “random” and/or institutionalised racism. We cannot abandon the fact that ethnicities/cultures are different from one another to such an extent that nations with their borders can be perceived as “self-segregation on a global scale.” Remove your fences and walls and all you get is “self-segregation on a national scale.” If you remember “the times” before enforced multiculturalism in Europe, then you might recall internal, national, diversity, where people from the north were seen as culturally different to those from the south, etc; all within the same nation and the same ethnicity…..Same language, different dialects, some of them impossible to understand when coming from a different part of the very same country…In the 1840s a philologist even travelled far and wide on a mission to compress all of Norway’s dialects into a new language called “Ny-Norsk.”

Sure violence happens within ” the group” as well, it would be lunacy to deny this, but isn’t it so that some cultures are more barbarous than others? Especially if you compare how the west treats its women, how we were ahead in condemning slavery, how we treat those who are different/disadvantaged, how we treat animals, not to mention our global altruism, our “openness” and how we treat our criminals, etc; ? Isn’t so that all burden of evidence rest upon the accuser? And Β that no one is to be seen as guilty until proven so?

Some countries even fare better under foreign administration, for some weird reason, proving that the “nobel savage” myth may just be that, a myth. We all like to believe in civic nationalism, but how realistic and successful is this, if the result of multiculturalism is sectarianism, “white flight,” and unsuccessful integration in a lot of cases? Not to mention the taboo of “performance levels” proven and mentioned by real and well-respected scientists (more on that later) who normally are hushed down or put in the dog house as a result of their findings….. Among the rest of the populace the topic is only really highlighted by actual neo-nazis and uncompromising hateful (quite frankly scary) racist individuals. Which means that the general population is fairly ignorant, but still very outspoken when it comes to this issue, funny enough. Obviously I don’t believe in discrimination but I do believe in honesty, if we are not, then how can we possibly help those who need extra assistance within our nations?

I’m convinced that diversity would be our undeniable strength if, and only if, no group or only one group was allowed to be the major player. An issue arise when new arrivals don’t have to integrate in order to “survive” but are given the option of clustering together with their own within their new country.

If you were to have a street for example where every single household represented a different ethnicity and a different mother tongue, where survival depended on inter-marriages and a common “broken english” then diversity would be the equivalence of strength as nobody would be able to function without their neighbours.

If there was a foreign and/or alien threat to all, where every single man and woman was needed somehow, then unity, regardless of differences would be paramount but notΒ “universal” as there will always be those who aid the enemy.Β Native Americans in The USA.

If you were to headhunt the very best scientists from all over the world to partake in an ambitious project collecting them all within the walls of one room, then once again diversity would be the equivalence of strength. The project would fall apart if the participants refused to work together, not to mention, that the “identity” that would unite the participants would be their gifted nature….as they would represent the “very best” of their countries/ethnicities.

Yet in all other settings I’m convinced that multiculturalism is a recipe for disaster based on my readings and more importantly, my observations/ experiences.

According to BBC’s Mark Easton white flight in London is “a story of aspiration. It is a story of success.” He claims that this is the case since affordable housing provided working class whites with a ladder out of their “misery,” which eventually gave them the opportunity to buy “that little cottage in the countryside or by the sea.”

There is therefore no reason to be alarmed or to worry about “demographic replacement” according to Easton….as white people are becoming a minority Β in London not because of white flight but because of upward, financial, mobility….which means that no body really wants to live in the capital if one if to follow this type of logic…

I guess that “white flight” in other countries and other cities is a result of….upward mobility too…………

Regardless of what Ian Black is trying to promote, I’ve come across an article where acid attacks by London boroughs are listed…..London Acid Attacks…

As you can see Newham tops the list. A quick google will yield this result: “Demography. Newham has the youngest overall population and one of the lowest White British populations in the country according to the 2011 Census. The borough has the second highest percentage of Muslims in Britain, after the London Borough of Tower Hamlets, at 32%”

The second borough on the list is Barking & Dagenham: “Summary of the 2011 Census results for Barking and Dagenham: The borough’s population has increased by 22,000 since 2001. There has been an almost 50% growth in 0 to 4 year olds. The White British population has decreased from 80.86% in 2001 to 49.46% in 2011.”

Mark Easton mentions the borough in this article:Β London’s White Flight.Β Here is an excerpt: “The years between the last two censuses have witnessed significant cultural change in London, particularly in the outer boroughs. Some white British may have moved because their neighbourhood has been culturally transformed, the tea rooms and restaurants replaced by takeaway chicken shops and halal supermarkets serving the new arrivals.
But there is also a story here of white working class families that escaped from the slums and bombed-out East End in the middle of the last century, found new opportunities in London’s outer boroughs and then, in the past decade – often having prospered from the housing boom and the capital’s economic growth – cashed in their assets and bought themselves that little cottage in the countryside or by the sea.
It is a story of aspiration. It is a story of success.”Β Note how any article about a grim topic, always ends on a positive note, so as to leave the reader with the impression that things aren’t really that bad….

In this article (acid attacks in the uk,) which was the first one I came across, it is revealed that the majority of those who are attacked are white males. Nowhere does anyone ask if this is the result of increased racial attacks towards whites…Notice how a global comparison is instantly brought up as if to muffle the severity of this national issue: “Six in 10 of all victims were male, while 71% described their ethnic origin as white British, the figures show (white British, according to the 2011 census, accounts for 80% of the British population in England and Wales). Globally, an estimated 80% of victims are women.”Β 

Notice how the article reveals that the attacks are usually unprovoked and initiated by strangers, but then quote this:Β β€œYoung men need to be educated on how to sort out disputes with other young men without resorting to violence. We need to work out why these young people are so unhappy.”

Also bear in mind that the narrative we are presented with from the media/political establishment is this: if one white person is guilty of terrorism/racist violence, then all other whites should be ashamed and engage in an “honest conversation,” but if a member of a (so-called) minority group is guilty of the same then it is constantly branded as a “lone wolf” attack. According to influential media-outlets….we’ll never know why a muslim extremist committed a terrorist attack outside Parliament as his motives will forever remain unknown………. We should also feel sorry for other migrants since they are the true victims. It’s more important to feel sorry for them than the actual victims and their families. We should also fear a large-scale right-wing-supremascist backlash…..since white people are so inherently racist….All focus is therefore shifted towards how the terrorist attack probably was “well deserved” or how fearing another attack by the same group of people makes you “an evil, xenophobic, bigoted, whatever.” Β  What do you think the reaction would have been if people felt more sorry for “moderate nazis” (#notall) rather than the countless different groups of people who were targeted by the nazis and those “who only followed orders?”Β Typical…

Here is a list of articles concerning acid attacks in the UK:

Acid Attacks as reported by RT.

Another article about acid attacks from The Guardian.

Acid attacks as reported by The Mirror.

Acid attacks as reported by the Sunday Express.

An acid attack as reported by The Daily Mail.

Acid attacks as reported by the BBC.