Having A Raison D’être & An End Game – The Impression One Can Get.

When reading about the Iraq war last year I was stunned to see the willingness to sacrifice the integrity of Europe on the altar of momentary territorial access needed in order to get into Iraq.

“Plan Of Attack” by Bob Woodward.

“Decision Points” by George W. Bush.

I was further mystified by the fact that 4-star Army General (ret.) Colin Powell came across as the one lone voice of reason, since he tried to raise awareness of tribalism and ethnic diversity in the targeted area.

The reading certainly gave me the impression that humans are simply being seen as replaceable cogs in the machinery by the establishment.

Culture and ethnicity simply doesn’t matter, it is all about momentary victory, without any overarching solid narrative selling a clearly defined End Game, that will be reached by many separate actions all serving the same underlying objective.

This is a startling realisation.

When reading “The Art Of War” I was surprised about what sort of advice it contained. Prolonged warfare with no end in sight is depicted as one of the worst projects that a Nation can ever engage in. A group that engages in warfare also have to ensure that they have access to an efficient supply line, taking advantage of whatever resources the group can get their hands on as they expand into a territory. A war effort should be swift and precise, without too much meddling from sovereigns located far away. The people who are on the ground need to be able to do what is necessary to reach their goal in a completely mobilised way, to the extent that this is possible.

All of this certainly made me question the sort of warfare that people my age have grown accustomed to. All of our Nations’ war efforts seem concentrated in “alien territories,” fighting and training “aliens” that might turn on the West later, and all of our Nations’ major war efforts seemingly drag out for ever…

No proper end game that logically makes sense is ever presented to the public and when getting an insight into the world of those who run these things, it doesn’t really seem like these characters know what the deal is either (unless a battle ground is simply needed in order to train soldiers and test new equipment).

Warriors & Citizens – American Views of Our Military edited by Kori Schake & Jim Mattis.

A parallel can be drawn to hacker activists, who don’t seem too concerned with allies. They’ll attack an enemy of the West one day only to target Western political and military structures the next, potentially jeopardising the integrity and safety of a Nation State or its military operations.

When reading about community organisers you see this pattern of behaviour once again.  A lot of left-wing activism simply cancels itself out, since the only common denominator seems to be emotionalism. Due to this you’ll get contradicting agitation and advocacy that will leave someone like myself slightly confused, as there is no End Game in sight anywhere.

If you look at Islamic agitation in Europe it is very easy to understand what their End Game and overarching goal is. They engage in demographic expansionism into Europe, which gradually gives them a political advantage. Wealthy Muslim power-players buy themselves into Western Corporations which gives them cultural influence and leverage. Street-level Muslims carve out their own territories and then defend these. Mosques are erected further cementing a claim to a specific territory boosting confidence, while a romanticized fantasy of Islamic Imperialism, appealing to people’s sense of identity and innate penchant for ancestry-worship, is promoted. Of course, as always, not all. But you don’t need every member of a specific group to behave in this particular fashion for it to have its desired effect. My impression of European Islamification is that there is a long-term vision, coupled with a willingness to commit to certain behaviours, in order to eventually reach a clearly defined outcome: Nation States that become compatible in their policies and in their cultures with the Muslim faith, preferably paving the way for a new “Golden-Age.” Of course it is of importance to point out the ethnic and racial diversity within Islam, and that there are numerous conflicting denominations within the faith as well. As an example: we can now clearly observe, imported tribal disagreements and feuds, in Europe, in addition to all of our own inter-ethnic issues that we had from before….

Inter-ethnic dissonance is very prevalent in Africa; which is generally referred to as the most diverse continent on the surface of the earth.

So what can be said of the West? What is our End Game? What can be observed and what conclusions can be drawn? 

What would make sense, instinctively,  would be to have common ancestry as the glue holding Europe together. Race has become way more inclusive than what it used to be, since we now largely see Race as something observable, while ethnic groups give us what has become our European Nation States, with its specific cultures and characteristics.  Back in the day these used to be chopped up into various tribes that probably displayed a lot of similar traits to one another, hence our generalisation regarding population groups contained within the boundaries of the modern Nation State: an extended family sharing common ancestry and a similar distribution of genetic traits on average.

It would make sense if our Nation States in Europe concerned themselves with the protection of our shared and individual cultural heritage, doing everything to ensure the survival and majority status of white children (and mixed whites) in the only territory that actually belongs a 100% to whites, protecting our continent’s borders and integrity.

A strong unified Europe and more broadly speaking, a strong unified West with the more multi-racial configurations found within territories conquered by whites, would in theory make sense.

Is this an End Game for what is collectively known as The West though? No.

This would be a racist objective. It would insinuate that Ethnic-Europeans have a natural claim to a specific territory and that conquest is a legitimate way to establish a Nation, which is what a white presence in all other territories other than Europe is a result of. (To my knowledge … It certainly looks that way when observing strange geographic settlements by Whites and the presence of dark-skinned indigenous groups).

The prevalent mythos championed in the West is this:

  1. that all other groups are minorities, even if Europe looks very small when compared to other continents, and we are outnumbered globally speaking.
  2. That the magic soil theory is truth, meaning that you’ll automatically become  Swedish by simply breathing the air in Sweden.
  3. That all human beings are born equal due to a blank slate, and that genetics simply don’t exist.
  4. That talking about genetics and genuine diversity is dangerous because that will instantly turn you into Hitler and result in a new Holocaust.
  5. That it makes sense to celebrate white ethnic groups becoming minorities, after years of civil-rights battles in the U.S.A. to ensure equal opportunity regardless of skin colour, and after years of Whites trying to do good towards previously marginalised and abused non-white minority groups within their domains. Not to forget: the constant focus on the challenges faced by so-called (and genuine) minorities within traditionally White-majority constructs. None of this paints minority-status in an appealing light … yet we should do everything in our power to lay the groundwork for our own marginalisation…. which is particularly interesting when reading about the merciless brutality in other parts of the world perpetrated by non-white majorities…
  6. That previous white expansionism will just be forgotten, since Whites have decided to “play nice,” which means that we no longer have any enemies and don’t really need any borders….
  7. That only white ethnic groups can be guilty of racism and imperialistic activity.
  8. That white ethnic groups are not under any circumstance “indigenous” and that there will at no point be any need to give any white demographic the status of “protected group.”
  9. That race and/or ethnicity is only real and only counts if/when dealing with “indigenous people,” who can under no circumstance be white. These “indigenous” groups are also the only ones entitled to certain territories that have to be protected in order to ensure their survival.
  10. That charity is only needed in the 3rd world as it is probably your own fault if you are poor and hungry in the superior, egalitarian, socialist inspired constructs that make up the Western World.
  11. That you have to import workers from Africa and The Middle East, rather than employing individuals from territories closer to your own, or within your own continent.
  12. That mixing on a massive scale is always peaceful and not the result of violent demographic change or militant conquest.
  13. That re-writing history and engaging in gas-lighting on a National and/or Continental level is perfectly alright in order to salvage vanity projects initiated by international organisations, that might look good on paper and in theory; until inserting the human factor into the equation actually implementing the idea.

Ok. So this doesn’t look too promising. Then what about Christianity? This is multi-racial, multiethnic and global. It is way more inclusive and has been used as a unifying factor in Europe before…

The West has continuously acted as an enemy to Christian groups in the Middle East, facilitating genocidal persecution of genuine Christian minority tribes. Western governments not only promote the build-down of Christianity within Europe and all other territories under White influence, they actively side with Nations and regimes known for violent Christian persecution.

What about human-rights, enlightenment ideas, world peace and the “human race”?

Western governments have repeatedly sided with regimes guilty of outrageous human rights abuses, making themselves guilty of gross hypocrisy since human rights and the protection of humanity as a whole has become the main narrative and general raison d’être of Western groups.

Portraying oneself as a defender of the human race also becomes tricky as you cannot possible go out there and claim that population group A needs more protection and privileges than population group B as this would be racist and undermine universal rights. And how on earth can you even say population group A and B when race/ethnicity isn’t even real? You cannot say that religious group A is more guilty of persecution than religious group B, because why would religious group B be more righteous or in need of more protection than the other? Are you a bigot or what?

Who are you to say that Terrorists don’t have rights or don’t have a point, when you claim to be a defender of all of humanity? And how on earth do you even define a “War on Terror” or “Terrorists”? Any person or group could fall into this category when nothing is specified.

These kind of points can be spinned indefinitely putting The West in a situation where none of its actions can be seen as righteous and/or legitimate.

It opens up the door for a potential legal, moral and PR nightmare where The West and its natural inhabitants never win.

It also puts Western Nation states in a situation where an enemy cannot be clearly defined, at least not in public, due to important exotic alliances and potential diplomatic disasters. By relying on exotic alliances for abstract military operations, the West paints  itself into a corner, where they cannot kick out subversive elements within their own nations if these stem from their good “friends and allies.”

The West is forced into a position where it cannot really look after the interests of its own inhabitants, nor enforce the heritage and integrity of itself.

Not to forget that The West is put into an incredibly awkward situation when Western leaders cannot clearly formulate anything, if interested in maintaining good international relationships.

This results in cringe worthy narratives that leaves all of those who don’t just parrot our “modern shared values” confused and puzzled. What are we all about really? Does anyone know?

What about Capitalism then? A support for this must surely be a constant factor from The Americans at least? 

No. Think again. The U.S.A. is willing to tolerate oppressive communist regimes that in the long run pose a threat to the American experiment and their global influence, as long as the U.S.A. can gain from such an alliance in the short run.

So what is The End Game of The West? 

Strangely and worryingly enough there doesn’t seem to be one……(but I might be very wrong, after all, who knows what goes on behind the scenes…).

At best it can be argued that there are forces within The West championing stability trough whatever means by expanding the police state and surveillance of their own citizens. This though is worked against by leaders who don’t want to acknowledge the effects of demographic change. In addition it facilitates the very form of governance that Western Nations are outspokenly against, not to forget that the identity destruction currently happening in The Western world work against any conservation efforts intended to protect our cultural and ethnic inheritance, while simultaneously compromising stability and security; in short, all of it compromises the survival of those people who occupy the territories that we collectively refer to as The West.


Oh How You’ve Failed Us With Your “Fine” Ideas.

To read what inspired me to write this entry read here.

Or here. Or here.

I’ve been thinking for a while that we’ll probably miss these post-WW2 years, where all that could be sensed by those my age at least were the signs of a diseased society and the visible fractures in our constructs mercilessly reminding us of our former glorious splendour.

Observing the political landscape here in England these last days has served as a reminder, and a confirmation, as to how our institutions have fallen, and when reading this article that I just came across, it is obvious that the symptoms of continental societal illness are visible and clear to some.

I think we’ll miss those years from 1989 when the wall fell, and up until one specific event in the near future which will be of such magnitude that it will symbolically be the last nail in the coffin for the current European Utopia.

What our leadership leaves behind to people my age and younger are disputed territories, identity confusion, seemingly weak military constructs, outsourced labour, poor infrastructure, crumbling healthcare and lots of debt … in other words – nothing short of chaos. God only knows what will be raised in its stead, because the political visions will surely be many and radically diverse.

Some lessons can be learnt from Europe:

1-Do not mass import people from alien cultures.
2-Do not allow people in from countries you’ve bombed or occupied.
3-Never take loyalty for granted from the son if the immigrant father loves your country. Loyalty to identity and ancestry cannot be bought indefinitely.
4-Do not expect people to sell out their values for government benefits, after all, are you really so cheap that you would sell your beliefs for a BMW?
5-Do not allow people into power who prioritize other citizens over their own.
6-Never allow benefits to become the greatest financial burden of the state.
7-Be clear when it comes to the identity and configuration of your country and nation.
8-Do not forget the founders of your nation and those who died to protect it and build it.
9-Do not allow parallel societies to be established as it will only lead to trouble.
10-If you are to create a Union then create it between strong, independent, sovereign, nations, so that the stronger ones won’t be weakened by the poorer ones, or the weaker ones walked all over by the stronger ones. As both scenarios will sow resentment.
11-The number one duty of a government is to ensure military protection for its citizens.
12-Never de-militarize your society as it will render your country weak from the inside out alienating those willing to serve from the rest of the population.
13-Never create a national culture of guilt.
14-There are no such things as progressive policies, only good and bad ones, and sometimes the good ones are old and tried recipes which have stood the test of time.
15-Do not allow your nation to become a vassal state.
16-Do not allow your nation to be mismanaged for decades as it will probably take even longer to sort it all out.
17-Disrespect will grow if you espouse illegitimate or fake authority.
18-Everyone has to be equal under the law and the law has to be sensible.
19-If you allow one ethnic group to get away with things, do not expect that those who are “easy to police” will remain so for much longer.
20-Make an example out of those who stand for poor leadership – and remember that leadership has nothing to do with being “nice to all” or saying what is “politically correct.”
21-Do not let the roles in your society slip to such an extent that normal citizens have to take on the role as journalists and writers.
22-If the media are acting as tools for propaganda, let it at least be known and legally challenged with opposing propaganda.

Some articles of interest:

  1. This is actually a very important read, not necessarily because I’m against the idea of having “stay-behind-troops” (this is a good thing to have in place) nor that I’m against “anti-communist-measures” but it is the idea that is of interest here. Who stand to benefit from the weakening and downfall of your nation? And at the end of the day: who is really responsible? Is an attack only just that? Is it disguised targeting masked as random acts of terror? And why would you believe those who take official credit? Where does the funding come from if it can be traced?
  2. Word of mouth has it that Norway already has “Swedish Conditions” in certain areas. I also wrote a little while ago that our government had to agree to over 2.000 new quota-refugees in 2018. Still this interview with our immigration & integration minister is interesting.
  3. Dire news regarding England’s Police. Unbelievable both the downsizing and how the funds are being spent. Some months ago I read in an “analogue newspaper” that an ex-police chief was lamenting the current priorities of our police force, such as political correctness training and “bring all of you to work day” (to paraphrase). A transgender friendly initiative/day.
  4. Officially it  is said that this film is from the UK, it certainly looks like it. I’ve seen similar footage across social media from Birmingham and other areas in this country. I’ve also driven through neighbourhoods like this around London and other places in Europe. The New-Europe.  Not to forget what I’ve seen myself.
  5. People smugglers have an easy time in the UK as Border Patrol is suffering from budget cuts leaving the coastline open and vulnerable … incredible. There were people in 2016 who were calling for the resurrection of the “Home Guard,” what I find interesting is this quote that I found in a Wikipedia article about General Sir Anthony Heritage Farrar-Hockley recently: He declared to The Guardian that a secret arms network was established in Britain after the war, but refused to say if it still existed. He aroused controversy in 1983 when he became involved trying to organise a campaign for a new home guard against possible Soviet invasion and in 1990, following Italian Prime minister Giulio Andreotti’s October 1990 revelations concerning Operation Gladio, a NATO stay-behind network, he revealed that the armed anti-communist secret resistance network across western European had involved Britain.[1][5]. I have no idea why any of this would be controversial, especially the revival of the Home Guard? Why would this be looked upon as weird? Why??????????
  6.  A sanction only works if there are no back doors right? That’s what I’m thinking anyway. The Turkish leadership is problematic and their desire for EU membership certainly is as well. The size of their force is not good either. They represent a danger to Europe; not that this is something new. The amount of Turks within European nations as well pose a risk, demonstrated by Erdogan’s recent political agitation, which I wrote about somewhere on this blog 😛 It’s easy to find articles about this anyway…..
  7. Norway has to rent military equipment, sarcastic politicians wonder if we’ll have to rent soldiers as well since the Norwegian military has seen better days.
  8. The author of this article refers to it as provocative behaviour when right-wing activists march through English territory inhabited by Muslims and/or other alien immigrants, as we apparently should consider these zones to be theirs. I assume that we should consider these places lost and keep out of them? What do we do when they inevitably expand? Should Ethnic Britons and other European ethnic groups simply abandon the island, so as to not offend the aliens? The author also has the audacity to claim that you are part of a european ethnic group as long as you’re born here to immigrant parents. A direct assault on ethnic Europeans and our distinct populations, once again. This is a blatant lie. There are races, then there are ethnicities, then you got differences within your ethnic group partly or maybe entirely (?) as a result of your distribution through your own territory, and finally you have individual differences. And there might even be more variances. The fact that the claims in this article are supposed to be accepted as canon is bogus. Feel free to read my “How To Be Evil In 2017.,”entry or my Identity. entry or my Diversity – Why It Is A Complex Issue. entry or this Acid Attacks & Diversity In The UK.

I will share more articles and translate more horrible news articles from Scandinavia. There is one shocking story in particular from Sweden, that illustrates how rape is being used as a weapon against Ethnic European women.

Whatever that is left of the European spirit cannot be allowed to die. If everyone loses faith in Europe we are officially done; and by Europe I mean all of our individual nation states and their distinct European ethnic groups. Our shared and individual heritage is ours and we can not let it go. If we don’t care about our cultures anymore, then why should anyone else? Love your country, love your people, know your history, or you’ll perish.

The Myth of Independence.

Move out, get a job and become independent – is a commonly heard chant –  but how does this work when renting is too expensive, jobs are few and far between and/or independence is unobtainable?

Whereas people in England and America have understood that the times have changed, it seems like Norwegians are still stuck in a fantasy. Norwegian households are some of the most indebted in the world. ( Read this if interested in detailsAn Insight Into The State of A European Nation – Election in Norway/Valg i Norge 2017.) Benefit payments is also the greatest financial burden for the Norwegian state. It is said that the nation is currently experiencing a mental-health epidemic as well and that this is set to increase; too bad for Norway Inc; as this will mean more young people officially labeled as “unfit to work,” which means even less circulation of cash within the welfare project.

Years ago I remember looking into how expensive it would be for me to move out. What were my options? How would my life change? What I found out was that it would only change for the worse.

First of all it would mean sharing living space with other people; strangers. Like having a room in another family’s house, or living in a collective with strangers, or even worse sharing room with a stranger which is now perfectly common in a big city such as London. Even living small would have cost a fortune and certainly not offered any sort of independence or freedom in terms of what I could have done with my time.

Not to forget that it is potentially unsafe, as “independence” in a European country either means:

  1. co-living with others in a “cheap” area inhabited by immigrants. Which is dangerous in the current Europe, unless you convert and/or date a New-European for protection. Not to forget that you’ll have no free time to do anything that you want to do, as you’ll literally be a wage slave; unless you can think of a clever way out. You’ll also be soaked in debt and probably possess a fancy sounding degree that you cannot use for anything.
  2. live off the government, which will give you a substantial income, but drain the resources of your nation. There are many who live like this. It is perfectly accepted and not looked down upon. Many a times I wondered in the past how my female friends could buy themselves new clothes and fine things – well they got the cash from the Norwegian state.

This is basically what baby-boomers in particular mean when they talk about independence, because when they were young, they had their own places, had time to do fun stuff and seemingly had cash raining down on them from somewhere magical. They therefore champion “finding oneself” (which you will not have the money or the time to do if living on your own) and getting a degree (which will give you lots of debt and no guarantees for future employment).

It is not uncommon to run into people in their late twenties and early thirties who still live at home with their parents even though they have a job and/or are building their own business, in fact it would probably surprise you how many there are. In fact it is the norm to hear of people who bravely moved out only to move back home shortly afterwards, because they just couldn’t afford it.

People don’t really know what they talk about when they chant about independence, it is “false advertising” from individuals who don’t seem to comprehend that you’ll be furthered tied to the state (which is not beneficial for the nation) or stuck in the gutter (which will not make you happy or keep you safe).

The best option in most cases is therefore to live with family while studying, working and/or building a business. This is not uncommon to see in southern Europe, in fact there it is perfectly normal to do so until marriage. In the North however it is generally frowned upon if you live with your parents, even if you are not a burden on the much worshipped welfare state.

An Insight Into The State of A European Nation – Election in Norway/Valg i Norge 2017.

This read will probably be of great interest to Americans – it certainly offers a substantial amount of information about the state of affairs on the other side of the Atlantic – as a great number of Norway’s current issues can be seen all over the European continent. It is of crucial importance to understand how global organisations such as The UN view the current “Western & Asian situation.”  They have been discussing openly since 2000 that the welfare issues posed by “the ageing population” in our part of the world can be sorted out by “replacement migration.” It doesn’t require much imagination nor intelligence to understand what sort of severe implications this will have for our cultures, ethnic groups and cultural heritage. The UN’s Plan For Europe, Russia & Japan.Here is another article: Africans are becoming greater in numbers…Women in the West freeze their eggs as they struggle to find a partnerThe plight of educated women.

the end of europe1

This year we are facing National elections in my country of origin – Norway. Which is what this entry is about.  I’ve actually taken the time to read the entire “plan of action” of two of our political parties in addition to our constitution.

Our constitution was written in 1814 and is the oldest one in Europe and the second oldest constitution in the world still in use today. 

Reading the constitution poses several critical questions in a post-modern time. Especially in an environment where “tolerance” & “openness” are touted as our “modern values.” The issue with these “politically correct” battle cries is that they are neither defining nor unifying principles for a nation or an ethnicity. At best they offer confusion and enable subversion from other competing cultures in a globalised reality. Modern values don’t really offer anything definite in terms of a framework and therein lays the catalyst of a mass existential crisis and the genuine risk of your history, heritage and identity being erased and/or replaced by something new. (This is an interesting project.)

marginalising fathers by law

The father role was marginalised by law in 2008: ” a child cannot have a father and a lesbian father figure.” In short this law has been put into effect to accommodate “modern family structures” where there has to be a clear right for a woman to inhabit the role of the “father” without any interference from “the biological father.” As being a “father” has nothing to do with biological gender … nor genetic contribution.

As an actual example of what I mentioned above regarding the fragility of our modern-values you can read about Norway’s “flag debate.” There are those who would like to wave the UN-flag or foreign flags on our National Day – the 17th of May. This is precisely the sort of dilemma you will face if your National values are “openness” and “tolerance.” At worst it can create a constitutional crisis at best an awkward and ridiculous debate. Integration will look like a failure if foreigners are allowed to wave the flag from their country of origin, it can be seen as an act of disrespect, dishonour, confident defiance, and/or royal offence or it can highlight the pitfalls of multiculturalism due to the inherent importance of identity, ethnicity and roots. The Norwegian Flag Debate.

A parallel can also be drawn to the USA where there are those who support the idea of America officially being bilingual, funny enough this request does not come from Native or Afro-Americans but rather from Hispanics. Again I ask the question: How can this request be rejected in a post-modern society where “openness” and “tolerance” are celebrated and enforced values?

Another parallel can also be drawn towards an increasingly politically correct Christian church; where accusations of “heresy” are not far-fetched as the religion has to be “sterilised” in order for it to be compatible with “our shared values.” The Capsizing of The Church. An extremely interesting read!!!

This is also relevant; read about how people on the left treat science when it contradicts their ideology: Feminist Science.The LGBTQP community attack scientific findings from a liberal institution.

It is particularly eye-opening to see how many times our Norwegian constitution has been amended … it has been amended over 300 times! Our founding document can only be amended by “The Ting,” and nothing can be changed without a 2/3 majority. In 2014 an entire new chapter was added about “human rights,” courtesy of “The Ting.” Civil rights according to our founding fathers were: 

  1. Protection under the law, right to a just sentence and a total ban on torture.
  2. Laws will not be applied retroactively.
  3. Freedom of speech and access to public information.
  4. Protection of private property.

What I’ve pasted in below illustrates a radical modification to one of our constitutional paragraphs. In the first variation it is written that it is the responsibility of the government to create favourable circumstances so that people who are capable can work and earn a living. In other words; it is not the responsibility of the government to outsource jobs or to engage in irresponsible management that would create massive unemployment. BUT an amendment has taken place giving the people of Norway  A RIGHT to receive benefits from the state if they cannot sustain themselves financially. This is fatal IF a nation is heading for bankruptcy or if Norway Inc; can’t afford government schemes such as benefit payments. This addition to the constitution makes it now – unconstitutional to cut benefit schemes if it is proven that they are needed – something that does not look good as the welfare state is NOT sustainable. This looks more like FDR’s New Deal (that I haven’t read in full) rather than a responsible method of governance. Your nation has to have a sound economy to sustain this amendment, and there is no way that you can salvage a rotten economy with this new addition as you would be breaching civil-rights if cutting benefit payments. Norway has to re-prioritise in order to rebuild our military for example, we simply have to cut benefit payouts – how on earth can you do that now, with this type of constitutional “legislation?” Another addition to this paragraph – an older one I might add –  is that your amount of influence in your workplace as a worker has to be determined by law. But not constitutional law. 


In our constitution it is also canon that all men should serve in the military to protect the fatherland – regardless of their socioeconomic background. It could therefore be argued that “downsizing” the military is unconstitutional – if you think about it – as it is specifically said that all should be able/prepared to protect the nation. When you are done with your mandatory service to the realm – you simply join the reserves. But you will always be at the ready if someone attacks the fatherland – the ancestral land as specified in the old “Soldier’s Handbook.”

It is also of interest that our founding document begins with The Holy King (who has to be a Protestant ) and his executive powers. According to an article I found you are supposed to read this in an abstract way as the King in large just serves as decoration. (More info here.) But it says right here in what I’ve pasted in below that when The King delivers his oath upon taking The Throne the oath goes as follows: “I promise and swear that I will rule the kingdom of Norway in accordance with its constitution and laws, so help me God the almighty and all-knowing.”

  1. I will rule the kingdom
  2. so help me God the almighty and all-knowing


Who manages/employ the administration today is determined by the election results in The Ting. When people vote they either vote for local representatives into the local government or they vote to influence the distribution of ministers in The Ting. The various political parties then have to form a coalition and decide who will occupy various roles within the administration (these individuals can also be civilians, they don’t have to be party members, but the prime minister certainly will) – The Monarch (regardless of gender) will then formally “appoint” the administration, even though there is no interference from The Monarch at all.

HOWEVER Norway was not 100% parliamentary from the start, it functioned like a hereditary monarchy with restricted powers; with the government being divided into three branches.  Reading the constitution in a straightforward manner will therefore tell you this:

The King – who cannot be a ruler if born out-of-wedlock – is supposed to staff/employ ministers (the administration) and is the executive branch of the government. He is the commander-in-chief of the military and can be “out in the field” in which case the prime minister takes his place as manager of “the realm.” The King is in other words the CEO of Norway Inc; it is his job to staff the various positions within “his company” to run his nation. If any of his ministers fail to warn him or oppose him in the case of a “royal mistake” the minister who failed to warn the King of his transgression will face legal consequences – as silence from the ministers is translated as a yes … The  King can pardon a person; Norway used to have the death penalty. You also have “The Ting” as its own entity which consists of members voted forth by “the people.” The Ting has the power to write laws, laws that can be vetoed by The King and they are also responsible for the state-budget. A minister in “the administration” cannot occupy a “double role” by being active in “The Ting;”  in addition there is also a Supreme Court, separate from the other branches of government that has the final say on any legal matters where its judgment is required. These judges cannot be fired if they pass judgement that is unpopular with the administration or The Ting. Everyone is equal before the law. But The King will pass judgement on other Royals of importance and has to approve the marriage of his children! The King is holy and has immunity from earth-bound judges. More about the division of power can be found here. The article is in Norwegian.


The constitution is remarkably small and can be found in various Norwegian forms online; whether in new-Norwegian, official book-Norwegian or the old-fashioned Danish-Norwegian.

Needless to say our country has changed dramatically and The King (and in modern times Queen) holds no real executive power anymore. Rather than having a hereditary CEO of Norway Inc; with the power to “employ” capable ministers to run all of the various institutions within the corporate entity; we now have elections. The party who holds the power through positive election results become the executive branch by providing a prime minister who employ ministers for the administration. The Supreme Court maintains their role as before. The monarch is left behind marginalised and only really holds the power of “veto.” Something The King used against the Nazis when he rejected them. But this power to say “no” hasn’t been put into effect since.

An interesting thing to note is also the ever-expanding size of “Norway’s Laws.”


(Here I had a picture comparing the size of the Holy Bible, the quran and Norway’s laws. Funny enough I just received a warning from this guy to remove the photo containing the quran. Hilarious. The description of the photo that was here previously said that “here we have three of Norway’s most prominent works, photo suitable for topics regarding laws and religion” – which is false – the Muslim faith has nothing to do with Norway. But alas. Here I’ve taken a screenshot so you can see for yourself) L-O-L. 16/09/2017


Norway is marred in bureaucracy from A-Z which I will address further down in this entry. I find it interesting after having read the constitution how far we have departed from our founding principles but also how legal “barbed wire” is being erected continuously – something that you will become aware of when reading various “party programs” and/or if your parents inform you that “the law-book” has expanded dramatically. I haven’t read “Norway’s Laws” as of yet – but both my mom and my aunt had to know it by heart. Any well-stocked personal-Norwegian library will include “Norway’s Laws” in addition to “Skikk og Bruk” a huge book about Etiquette and how one ought to behave …

It is obvious that progressivism and deconstructionism and the politics that these ideas inspire move us into a direction where our founding documents are becoming increasingly irrelevant.

In fact; it can be suggested that we are so far removed from our starting point that we can might as well create a new constitution by starting from scratch. An idea that would probably appeal enormously to those on the left and suit our contemporary times better. Or we can remove amendments so as to go back to “the purity” of the founding of our nation, which would throw us back in time to start afresh – but from a traditional starting point – rather than a neo-contemporary one. This would starkly contradict “openness,” “tolerance,” “inclusion,” or “diversity” as there would be very strict guidelines – even the death penalty.

Much like bureaucracy clouds and muffles the principles of the US Constitution – ours suffers the same fate. In fact lessening the powers of the monarch in this case can be viewed as unconstitutional – the same can be said of taxes and regulations intruding upon a person’s property rights; but what does constitutional or unconstitutional mean when you can amend said document repeatedly which the last paragraph of our Constitution grants The Ting the authority to do?

Regardless of my realisation of Norway’s “unconstitutional” nature; or at least “radical departure from founding principles,” there is still an election coming up … and on that occasion I’ve picked two political parties that I’ll present to you below.

The reason as to why I’ve picked these two political parties is because they are the only ones that are strict on immigration and openly believe in enforcing Norwegian culture rather than working against our national identity and heritage. It is a shame that the options are so few if one chooses to let immigration from historically incompatible cultures, political subversion and crime levels be decisive factors in the casting of ones vote. To give you a sneak peek at our problems before I continue my entry below I’ve pasted in some interesting information … a translation is offered underneath each screenshot – they have a light grey background if you struggle to distinguish them. I would also like to add that a lot of the screenshots pasted throughout this entry offer a shocking insight into a Nation that has been grossly mismanaged over decades. Just if you look at the current lack of respect for the teaching profession this symbolises a massive culture change that can best be described as pre-1968 and post-1968.

Welcome to a post-1968 Europe … it is not a pleasant sight:

Prison sentences in Norway.

“Fremskrittspartiet ønsker strengere straffer for alle typer kriminalitet. Vi mener at maksimumsstraffen skal opp fra 21 år til 30 år. Strafferabatten som innebærer at folk som begår ti lovbrudd blir kun dømt for to lovbrudd skal vekk. De som begår kriminalitet skal straffes for den, og ikke få kvantumsrabatt for å begå enda mer kriminalitet.”


The Progress Party wants stricter prison sentences for any type of crime. It is our opinion that the maximum prison sentence should be increased from 21 years to 30. The Prison Sentence Rebate which entails that persons who break the law ten times will only be sentenced for two should be removed. Those who commit criminal actions should be punished for it, not get a discount for committing even more crime.”

mat lager

Norway doesn’t have much of a food-storage for national crisis situations – This is from The Democrats in Norway.


Norwegians vulnerable because of debt

Norwegian households are extremely vulnerable because of debt.


univereties some of the worst in Europe

Norway’s Universities – some of the worst in Europe and in the World.


no more farmers in Norway

“Only 10% of farmers are under 40 years of age, the average age being 54 years.” Many have closed down production at their farms because of government fees and red tape.


cheap prices on food on Norway

“… the increased pressure of cheaper food has resulted in reduced quality and cheating with the content.”


50% of crew should be norwegian

The Democrats in Norway demands that at least 50% of the crew on fishing boats have to be Norwegian Citizens. They are afraid that our oldest industry will die out unless measures are taken.


The Norwegian Police-Force.

“Gjennom tiår har en snillistisk kriminalpolitikk ført til at den kriminelle har blitt satt i fokus, og at man skal skåne den kriminelle – fremfor å fokusere på offeret. I møte med virkeligheten har dette vært feilslått. Organisert kriminalitet blir stadig tøffere, og politiet møter en helt ny hverdag.
Parallelt med dette har det blitt ført en asyl- og innvandringspolitikk som ikke har tatt tryggheten til folk flest på alvor. Asylsøkere man ikke har oversikt over, som kan være drapsmenn, voldtektsmenn, krigsforbrytere og terrorister har fått gå fritt rundt i landet. Fremskrittspartiet har lenge satt ned foten og sagt at disse må på lukkede mottak inntil deres identitet er avdekket. Vi kan ikke føre en innvandringspolitikk som går på bekostning av en trygg hverdag for folk flest.


“Through decades we’ve let kindness dictate our crime-politics which has prioritized the wellbeing of criminals – rather than focusing on the victims. This has been a failure when faced with reality. Organised crime is becoming increasingly tougher, and our police force encounters a completely new everyday-reality. Parallel to this we’ve engaged in an asylum and immigration policy where the safety of the common man wasn’t taken seriously. Asylum seekers that nobody could account for, who could be murderers, rapists, war criminals and terrorists have been moving around freely in our country. The Progress Party have long fought for that these asylum seekers should be kept in closed environments until the authorities are aware of their true identity. We cannot engage in an immigration policy that endangers the local population.”




The Norwegian Democrats oppose that our national interests should be compromised on the altar of the EU – and oppose anti-democratic globalist trade deals such as TISA, TTIP & CETA.




“It has proven difficult to discuss, critique, or challenge the content or practises of Islam without being met with anger and threats. In a free and democratic society there has to be space to express both skepticism and critique of other’s faith without being frightened into silence.” The Democrats in Norway want to fight against Islamism and ban Islam in Norway as they see it as an extremist-religion that is threatening Norway, our heritage and our way of life.


increase in people living alone

More and more people are living all alone – this isn’t reflected in the Tax levels.


some of the worst roads in Europe

Norway has some of the worst roads in Europe.

The Progress Party are openly and vocally against Islamification and have been so for years. They are currently in Government and much more established than the other political party I’ve mentioned. I like our current immigration and integration Minister, she is absolutely fantastic and a keeper.

She is trying to do her job and protect Norway and Norwegian interests and has acquired a vast fan base across the nation because of her commitment to her people. Those on the left hate her as they seem to be more concerned with protecting the rights of Jihadis and sub-Saharan Africans rather than Norwegians… Kidding you not. So she is perceived as being “controversial” by the traditionally-left-dominated Norwegian-political-scene and the left-dominated-mainstream media.

She is calling a spade a spade in other words.

genital mutilation

The Progress Party want to ban all genital mutilation in Norway.

The Progress Party – as they are hilariously called – is not as the name of the party might suggest a “politically progressive” party. Quite on the contrary they are a globalist extreme-capitalist party that believes in smashing Norwegian socialist-bureaucracy by making the government smaller and more efficient. It is shocking to read their program as it makes you realise how overly taxed the Norwegian population is. There isn’t exactly a lot of freedom in Norway as the amount of taxes and the general tax level, not to forget how costly products and services are, can in many ways be compared to a hostage situation, blackmailing or a financial prison.

  • Norwegian left-wing-politicians are so dictatorial that they want to decide not only where and how you build your house, but also what you do on your boat.
  • The elderly at care homes  can be placed into shared rooms without their consent and have no influence over their everyday activity, you are not allowed to own a house in Norway unless you pay your taxes there and live there, you are obliged to live in your house for so and so many days a year, your tax return is published for everyone to see and you are taxed on your property regardless of what your income level is which can potentially put you in a rather sticky situation. It is also the duty of politicians to design the school curriculum rather than the teachers … I’ve pasted in more screenshots of these matters further down in my entry.
elderly couples separated in care homes

Elderly couples are separated in care homes. This is from The Democrats in Norway.


political death panels at hospitals

Politicians run the healthcare system rather than doctors. This is from The Democrats in Norway.


council tax based on size of house

The Democrats in Norway want to amend the council tax so that people are taxed on actual usage rather than estimates based on the size of their house.


child services abusing their power 2

It is way too easy for the child services to remove a child from their biological parents. The unjustified break up of families in Norway has become a tragic problem of government interference.

The Progress Party are currently in a coalition with other parties as is custom in Norway; the last election was the first time they managed to get into national government and become an active part of an administration. Because they are in a coalition and this is the norm in Norwegian politics, I don’t think we have to worry about the more extreme aspects of their economic platform. If they were less Globalists and more protectionists I would join them as a member for sure, I might still vote for them even though I disagree with their anti-protectionism because of this: If more people feel inclined to vote for The Democrats in Norway in the National election it will be bad for The Progress Party as those who would have voted for them might go for an even more Nationalistic Party. We need a party on the right with influence, that’s the thing … I’m swinging between the two, undecided as of now…. A good plan of attack  would be for Norwegians to vote for The Progress Party in the National Election, while increasing the influence of The Democrats in Norway during the local elections whenever they may be.

On the other side of the scale you got:

The Democrats in  Norway. They are a Nationalistic Democratic Party that are anti-EU, anti-Globalist and pro-public-national health-care to battle a myriad of alarming health issues. They also believe in empowering our military and offer some excellent suggestions in that direction. They are economically centrists promoting a mixed economy. Their founder used to be a politician in The Progress Party but fell out with the other ministers. The founder of The Democrats in Norway was physically attacked by a Norwegian artist ( who was one of the first people to ever endorse my music funny enough) and has received death threats according to Wikipedia due to his critique of Islamism. A stance later adapted in a more moderate packaging, by The Progress Party  and funny enough one of the main reasons for their appeal and popularity … The two political parties share several viewpoints and certain segments in their Party Programs are completely identical – yet there are some differences of course. Not to forget that The Democrats in Norway are very precise and offer lots of great information on a number of topics in their Party Program – which makes them seem more high-brow or more concise than their competitor. (There are some typos in certain sections of their Party Program though).

norway leading cancer epidemic

We are one of the top countries in Europe when it comes to the prevalence of cancer. Why our country has been so badly affected I don’t know. Is it our genes? Is it pollutants  from industry or is it the food? Testicle cancer and Gut cancer is very prevalent :/ There has also been a spike in mental disorders among the young. Whether this “mental health” epidemic has to deal with the fact that “natural selection” has come to an end in the west or whether it is a symptom of the health of our overall culture is an unanswered question. It doesn’t look good that’s for sure.


fighting radical Islam

“Today there is a total lack of understanding of the theology and ideology of Islam within those authorities who are responsible for tackling radicalization.” The Democrats in Norway understand the issue with Islamism better than anyone else in Norway – at least from what they’ve written in their Party Program; but when one looks at all the measures they want to implement it would be much wiser financially to just ban immigrants from muslim countries until the turbulence within our nation has been stabilised.



The Democrats in Norway describing our current vulnerabilities due to a weak defence \m/

The Democrats in Norway glorify the ancient Democracy in Athens and believe that there should be more referendums that are binding. They are in my opinion extreme-Democrats who inhabit an idealistic belief in the over-all cognitive abilities of their fellow human beings. Not to forget that referendums would go against the three-power-structure of our government as laid out by our constitution. They also believe in cutting through the jungle of Socialist red-tape in Norway like their competitors but The Democrats in Norway seem to be more in-tune with the dark aspects of Globalisation and the need for Norwegians to be prepared and equipped to face unfavourable situations. I really like them due to their anti-EU stance, the only criticism I have is their absolute worship of utopian enlightenment principles, just like their competitor, which is why they champion the idea of empowering other nations through the glory of the free-market and democracy. They also believe in standing together with other democratic nations regardless of where they might be in a strange form of democracy-solidarity-ism. They want to work with the UN to perfect it – so that they can keep on fighting the good fight – which in a neocon fashion means spreading democratic ideas and free-market capitalism. Those nations that aren’t particularly interested in this, because they break human rights, should be rewarded with sanctions … I do not agree with this.

Women will be the driving force of cultural change in The Middle East according to this type of thinking – in other words women should be used as a feminist tool to fundamentally change Middle Eastern societies. I fail to see how “imposing” neo-contemporary values will yield much diversity. In fact it will not. All cultures will have to remove themselves from their founding principles to accomplish these measures, which will put other nations in our shoes. Your religion, your constitution and your values will be watered-down to such an extent that they will no longer bear any meaning or authority. 

Strategically it is probably good to promote such things, but I would compare it to cultural abuse and identity-castration. What you will inevitably get is a violent reactionary movement that will spot the discrepancies and call out the heretics for their heresy and the traitors for their treachery. If you then try to argue against this you won’t have much cerebral ammunition as “the traditionalist” is on solid ground while you are in “fairytale-land.” You would have to cull a great amount of the world’s population to accomplish a utopia based on the deletion of differing values – and even if you were to initiate such atrocities bear in mind that diversity in culture and values is just a symptom of genetic diversity within the various “human tribes” on this planet.

It is therefore a good idea to let other Nations govern themselves after whichever principles they find the most rewarding and rather contain our differences so that those who want Sharia can live in a Sharia nation while those who want western democracy can live within a democratic construct. You should not be allowed to live within Swedish territory if you burn the flag and promote The Caliphate in other words.

Is this inclusive? Both yes and no. Yes – because you should not enforce your way of life upon other Nations. No – because you will demand that those who live within your borders adhere to a specific set of rules. Hence there is “openness” and “tolerance” globally but not continentally in the case of Europe or Nationally within the kingdom of Norway or Saudi Arabia for that matter.

I do believe that what I laid out is more just rather than the liberal approach – where all should be liberated and revolutionaries aided all in the name of – enforced liberation. Take a look at what I wrote above – we are meant to be a monarchy for Christ sake and where are we now? One of the parties I’m openly promoting is pro-Athenian-democracy and the other a free-market-globalist-party – but these two are the only parties worth promoting as the other ones believe in over taxation and more migration. You cannot vote for those who don’t even want to uphold and protect your cultural heritage.


the oil foundation in dollars

“It is very risky that such a great amount of The Oil Foundation is in dollars, as the dollar is becoming increasingly weaker due to America’s increasing debt.”


EU Army

The Democrats in Norway are concerned about the EU army, the potential of German soldiers patrolling Norwegian territories and how this can violate Norway’s sovereignty. They do not support EU’s imperialistic un-democratic ambition.


Back to Norway and the current election. I believe in an even more Nationalistic approach where the UN quotas are completely ignored and neglected and where foreign aid is scrapped completely as we need to sort out our own issues first. I think that Norway should focus more on independence rather than reliance on NATO for everything. We don’t have the man power to defend our natural resources or borders as of now. The Democrats in Norway also highlights their concerns regarding Norway’s inability to protect itself. We are extremely weak at this point, especially when keeping in mind that Sweden is becoming a security threat in the midst of Scandinavia due to their lack of control over Islamists and migrants. Culturally speaking we should also reach out to our Scandinavian neighbours for the simple reason that it is idealistic to believe that foreigners should care much about Scandinavia and Scandinavian culture. Not even the left cares about Norwegians, Swedes or Danes as ethnic groups anymore. Our current left-infused culture believes in demographic warfare and the annihilation of the Norwegian identity and the Norwegian people as it is of course – offensive to be white or proud of ones ethnic group and origin if white. This sentiment and tactic can be witnessed in Germany where government officials believe in replacing their own population with Muslims and sub-Saharan Africans; it can also be seen in the French government. Ethnic suicide is the current continental orthodoxy. If you think that is some sort of conspiracy, then start reading. Not that it will make you any happier.

I agree with The Democrats in Norway that  we should bolster our Nordic Union, but an important matter to keep in mind is that such a union would not be particularly interesting unless we hold the greater influence due to military power. We’ve been subjugated before both by Sweden and Denmark and if one looks at Feminist-Politics in Sweden this isn’t much to celebrate. Sweden as I just mentioned pose a National Security risk both to us and Denmark. But whenever their situation is sorted, and as long as we don’t draw the shortest straw – then it is probably in our cultural interest to stand more together … at least it would look like that from a theoretical and logical perspective. 


The Democrats in Norway are rightfully concerned about Erdogan in Turkey and how he can potentially create problems for NATO.


I believe that you should lose your passport and be deported back to your country of origin if you are guilty of crime or if you’re supportive of terrorism. It doesn’t resemble anything that English has to be spoken in Norwegian prisons. Nor does it make much sense that the Norwegian government should purchase prison cells abroad for foreign criminals who’ve committed crime in Norway. I also think that western-born Jihadis should be executed. We cannot unleash them upon The Middle East, we cannot let them stroll around on our streets, nor can we give them recruitment ground in our prisons. Some organised crime groups literally run their operations from prisons.

I have nothing against Islam or Muslim Nations that use Sharia law. We should respect other cultures and different methods of governance as races and ethnicities are different and will established civic-minded or tribal societies depending on their “nature.” Going against this will only result in destabilised countries, unhappiness and chaos. People are different and will gravitate towards different social-constructs. That said … Europe is not the Middle East. Last time I checked Norway borders to Sweden not Iraq so it is completely unnatural that we should be building Mosques left right and centre, in fact they don’t belong anywhere in Europe, freedom of religion should be restricted to the old Gods (Paganism) and the new Gods (various denominations of Christianity). If you want to worship something else on our continent you can do that within the walls of your house. 

Without firm guidelines we will lose. We are already losing. This has to be reversed. If the quote misattributed to Voltaire rings true: “To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticise” – then conservative Islam currently rules Europe. (I honestly thought it was a Voltaire quote, apparently it’s not ;/ It is still a good quote though).


The Democrats in Norway are pointing out that The Church of Norway has been corrupted and taken over by “the political correctness police.”


My main concern with The Democrats in Norway is the fact that I’ve never heard of them before and that I don’t know if they are established and branded enough. I do have more of a thing for their party program even though it looks as if though two completely different people, one realist and one delusional idealist have put together their “vision.” But then again it is virtually impossible to find a political party that you’ll agree with a 100% – which is why people start their own party, don’t vote or learn to compromise. At this point I’m just glad if the left lose. They’ve done enough damage already.

To briefly mention someone from the opposition; The Green Party in Norway are at war with one of Norway’s most crucial industries: The Petroleum Industry. They are also on a crusade to stop all traffic into Oslo – hilariously enough they want to focus more on Oslo’s restaurants and vibrant night-life; which instantly made me wonder how on earth musicians would get their amps and gear to venues and how on earth produce would be delivered to restaurants – when all transport ought to be shut down? They’ve now amended their crusade so that it only affects car-drivers; but this still raises obvious concerns for merchants as it is obviously much easier to shop when you can place your groceries or purchases in a car … The Green Party’s crusade against parking spaces in Oslo also raises concerns … for some strange reason there are many who see them as totally nuts. I wonder why … Playing gigs in Oslo will be hopeless in the future unless dealing with major organisers who can hire major transportation companies to deliver gear/backlines etc; No cars in Oslo. Read here about:The Commerce Bureau Furious.

Likewise The Green Party in Gloucestershire, UK, sent out a pamphlet printed on eco-friendly paper laying out their well-meaning plan of how to help everyone through one government program after the other – how all of this was to be financed … they didn’t say.

The reds obviously believe in more taxation and an increase in migrants. 

You can marvel at the result of their politics in what I’ve pasted in below (a translation can be found underneath each box), a critical opinion piece about The Progress Party’s economic vision follows ↓

both parents have to work

“Norwegian society is built up around two-income families.” Changing the prevalence of this would be an idea to fight against miserable, dysfunctional families and low-fertility. It is telling that mental health is becoming such a National Health issues not to forget our low birth-rates as mentioned in the intro to my entry. The Democrats in Norway demands that foreigners should integrate into our fractured-family structures … something to bear in mind if family values are important to you and you want to move to Norway…..Everyone on the left believes in this as well. Mom and Dad should both be in work so that the kids can walk home to school all by themselves with a key around their neck. Not to forget that state-funded education becomes the biggest influencer in the life of your child as they look after your offspring from the age of 1 and upwards.

Foreign criminals in Norway.

“Hele straffesakskjeden, og spesielt politiet, har blitt nedprioritert i altfor lang tid. Soningskøene har økt, og politiet har hatt sterk mangel på ressurser. Dette har ført til at politiet ikke har ressurser nok til å oppklare hverdagskriminalitet, og folk flest mister tilliten til systemet. Vi må bygge flere fengsler, og etablere løsninger for å få utenlandske kriminelle til å sone i utlandet slik at vi får ned soningskøene. Samtidig må politiet få de ressursene de trenger. Andelen utenlandske domfelte nærmer seg nå 40 prosent, og den høye standarden i norske fengsler virker lite avskrekkende på disse kriminelle. Vi må etablere egne fengsler for utenlandske kriminelle, og kjøpe fengselsplasser i deres hjemland.”


“The entire chain of criminal justice, especially the police has been deprioritised for way too long. The queues for criminal processing  have increased, and the police suffer greatly due to lack of resources. This has resulted in the decreased ability of the police to solve everyday-crime, and most people have in turn lost their faith in the system. We have to build more prisons, and establish solutions to deport foreign criminals so that we can reduce the queue of criminals waiting to serve their prison sentence. At the same time we have to grant the police-force the resources that they sorely need. The amount of sentenced foreign criminals are now approaching 40%, and the high standard of living within Norwegian prisons is not a deterrent to foreigners. We have to established separate prisons for foreign criminals, and buy prison spaces for them in their countries of origin.”

Screenshots revealing the massive challenges we face in Norway if we want to unravel the nanny-state – a small translation can be found underneath each picture explaining the issue:

billions in fees for companies

Norwegian companies have to use billions in fees related to rules and documents according to The Democrats in Norway.


pensum utvikling

The Progress Party want teachers rather than politicians to develop the curriculum in Norwegian schools.


welfare state vulnerable

The Progress Party address that immigration takes a heavy toll on our welfare state.


eldreomsorgen - ingen rettigheter

The Progress Party believes in respecting the elderly and treating them with dignity.


Eindom Norge

The Progress Party oppose excessive taxation on property.


allow local governments to veto migrant housing

The Democrats in Norway want to grant local governments the right to VETO the establishment of migrant centres. The fact that they don’t have this freedom is obscene if you take into consideration the impact a large influx of “alien populations” have on “district-Norway.”


part time jobs

Part-time jobs is not good at all for workers who want to buy a house for example; People fought against this in the 1900’s as a full-time job is what most want.


problems with EU migration

Labour migration from EU countries have contributed to less employment of young Norwegians. This is a problem that rings true in all Northern countries it seems. We as nations have not really benefited.


the consequence of EU migrants

“Employment Bureaus” that are privately owned; offer an employment opportunity where workers are being paied for odd jobs whenever they may appear but will then be forced to claim benefits in-between work – from what I’ve understood. This service is usually used by EU migrants but is unfortunate as it put these bureaus in an advantageous position in comparison to normal employers in addition to the fact that they just add new claimants to the benefit schemes.

The political system in Norway is such that nobody ever really seems to get a clear majority and absolute stronghold, meaning that you always get coalitions. With this in mind it matters little what I’ve written below as an opinion piece on The Progress Party’s extreme-capitalism. The likelihood that they would get a free-pass to re-structure Norway completely, is from a contemporary perspective slim,  we need those on the right to battle Islamification and foreign violent crime regardless of what their party program offers in full. The Democrats in Norway and The Progress Party are the two parties we got.

The Progress Party are, in my humble opinion, too capitalistic. As I said they are globalist with a major G. To their credit they obviously realise what sort of negative implications this can have culturally on a population, which might explain why they are so obsessed with protecting Norwegian cultural heritage and openly fight against Islamification. The Democrats in Norway have expressed an even greater commitment to fight Islamification in addition to formulating ways in which “the culture war” can be won.

The Progress Party believe in removing protectionism as free-market capitalism is the remedy to all of the world’s problems including Norway’s issues. I’m pretty sure that unrestrained free-market capitalism can be perceived as “unconstitutional.” Remember it is the responsibility of the government to make sure that Norwegians have a favourable job-market so that they can find employment. Then again I guess that it can be argued that Norway’s international situation will improve if free-trade opens up Norway to anyone who wants to set up camp … I think it is a good idea to protect our national treasures and likewise protect our Norwegian workers.

The Democrats in Norway and The Progress Party believe in fighting world-poverty with the free-market and allow impoverished nations access into the Norwegian market so as to lift them out of their financial misery. Which indirectly means that they want to empower other nations through capitalism something that I’m not supportive of. I think the west has empowered the east & the south way too much. Nothing is really made in England, the USA or Norway anymore. Now how did that happen? Globalism has made the west financially vulnerable if one looks at the situation over in the USA during the end of Bush’s presidency when he wanted the gamblers on Wall Street to fail but felt compelled to let the government interfere due to the fatal consequences if these giga-companies in the USA went under. Bankruptcies of major corporations in the USA have implications far and wide not only for innocent American families but for the “global economy” as well……

I personally believe in Nationalist Capitalism as the only way forward, with heavy protectionism so that foreign companies or multinational corporations cannot get a stronghold within your nation. I believe that the more self-sufficient and self-reliant a nation is the more empowered it will be. The more your nation can produce and fix on its own, the better it is for the nation especially in a crisis situation. The more “knowledge” you invest in and harvest and keep within your borders the better it is for your people. The stronger your military is and the more prepared the general population is to handle crisis situations such as climate change or war, the better. Overly depending on the “globalist network” is something that I would strongly advise against. Sure you will always need trade and trade partners, but I think the aim of any nation should be to be able to stand on its own two feet if a natural catastrophe all of a sudden would sever the lines of international trade. If you export all of your skilled labour and all of your factories you put an entire nation in the role of dependers and easy victims.

A new general attitude also has to be introduced into the subconsciousness of the populace – that having access to anything you want at any given time is unnatural and unsustainable. People now lose the plot if they cannot get hold of their favourite snack without realising that this is due to bad crops in some far away distant place.

As The Democrats in Norway points out in their Party Program – Norway imports the majority of the food it consumes as a Nation. In addition to this we don’t really have a food-storage for crisis situations. None of this bodes well.

Governments in the west have a moral obligation to prepare younger generations for survival outside our societies of convenience. The general population should be told to start prepping and brace themselves for shortages when it comes to certain foods.

Back to a civilised, convenient, high-functioning, construct:

The Progress Party believes that demand should drive the entertainment industry and that modern art/music/entertainment should cater to the consumer. With the current popularity of “The Kardashians” and all sorts of “McDonalds-entertainment” there is little doubt in my mind that simply catering to the consumer will only yield trashy, accessible art and literally function like a sledgehammer on anything resembling high-culture.

If artists are to be forced to create “accessible” music as well it will work against progress and artistic creativity as many if not most of the greatest artists throughout our times had patrons, whether the church or the court, facilitating their artistic growth. Some influential artists didn’t really sell anything until after their death as well. So to let average consumers dictate the course of art seems like a dubious idea.

The Progress Party present great points in terms of Norwegian education. Norway is a pretty “brainy country” in terms of international genetic studies, so there is really no need “to make the population stupid” through our education programs. There is scientific reason to believe that ethnic-Norwegians could lead internationally in terms of their cognitive abilities. The potential is huge, in terms of brain-power. To dull this is a crime against Norwegians and goes against our national interest.

Yet I think that extreme-capitalists such as The Progress Party put too much faith into the power of the average consumer in terms of  “what the masses want.” They do not believe in social-engineering but rather in unrestrained liberty due to an unwavering belief that people, regardless of where they are or who they are, can govern themselves a 100%. This of course sounds very nice and emphatic but in the current climate of “transgender children” not to forget the “obesity crisis” and also the fact that worldwide access to the biggest library ever available have not given way to a “knowledge boom” speaks volumes. There are those who “drive society forward” but then you have an awful lot who don’t have much to say for themselves. In the spirit of liberty we might end up with completely dysgenic societies, something that can currently be noticed all over the “free and developed” western world. Something to bear in mind as neither obesity nor the normalisation of abstract identity movements are in the national interest of any nation.

Lots of physically and psychologically healthy children, presented with an education designed to exploit their individual genetic inheritance to the fullest, raised with a deep knowledge and appreciation of their national heritage and prepared for survival in the case of an absolute breakdown of their nation, is what we need. We need to raise warriors  intellectually and physically that can improve the chances of our people’s survival. Rewarding obesity, victim mentality, making people stupid through education and ignorant of their history, while indulging dysgenic behaviour is a bad idea. Yet it is precisely bad ideas that the left has a tendency to promote in order to be “nice.” Too much liberty also has the potential to work against the best interest of the nation, as a common goal, a common social unifying objective is probably more in line with national interest than social and ideological fragmentation which is the inevitable risk of unregulated freedom as preached by many conservatives.

The west cannot afford to be as vulnerable as we are. We do not have the luxury of numbers.

More screenshots from BOTH political parties can be found below – A small translation can be read underneath each picture. As always I recommend my readership to read the text in full but in the name of sharing important information I’m sharing all of this with you now. Please take the time to do your own research and make up your own mind.

More from The Progress Party:


The Progress Party openly oppose Islamification and demand that foreigners should integrate into our society rather than foreigners imposing their way of life upon us.




The Progress Party believes in a meritocracy – not quotas.




The Progress Party want to cut taxes and ban the publication of “tax lists.” In Norway your income level and your tax level is published for all to see regardless of who you are.



eldreomsorgen 1

The Progress Party want to improve the life quality of the elderly.




The Progress Party also address the issue of pollution contrary to what critics might believe.




The Progress Party address the issue with micro plastics, a crucial issue to solve for aquatic life.




The Progress Party are strict on immigration.



norwegian heritage

The Progress Party on our cultural inheritance and culture. They want to protect it.



norwegian education

The Progress Party believe in the liberation of our school system from the cultural-marxists. They want to give the power back to the teachers.



school environemnt

The Progress Party believes in cracking down on bullying.




The Progress Party wants to restore respect and credibility to the teaching profession.



human rights

The Progress Party subscribe to enlightenment principles in terms of their views of the rest of the world.


norge og verden

The Progress Party is a free-market globalist party.




The Progress Party believe in making the justice system more efficient and just.



The Progress Party believe in justice-reform to facilitate the complex situations of police officers stuck in an antiquated system not designed to handle organised crime and Islamists.


More from the Democrats in Norway – a small translation can be found underneath each picture:


the norwegian democrats

The Democrats in Norway want the government to protect Norway’s natural resources on behalf of the Norwegian population.


petrolium demokratene

The Democrats in Norway reveal that it is becoming increasingly challenging to extract oil in Norwegian territories.



The Democrats in Norway are not supportive of Nukes but at least they are realistic and believe  in building a “rocket-shield” together with their allies to defend Norway from Islamists with Nukes.



The Democrats in Norway are anti-globalists. That’s great. I hope they get bigger as a party.



The Democrats in Norway wants to maintain Norway as a country you escape to – not a country you escape from. They want Christian education back in the schools and a ban on Mosques being built in Norway.


norwegian culture

The Democrats in Norway want to bring back education of our heritage and bring Norwegian culture back from the shadows. Music to my ears.



The Democrats in Norway understand the importance of NRK. I think that is good to hear as I like NRK very much.


the church

The Democrats in Norway are not interested in subversion. The fact that they actually put this into their party program is astonishing; no wonder their founder was assaulted 😛


the church 2

The  Democrats in Norway are clever enough to understand that “humanism” and “human rights” cannot compete with other religions. They write black on white that Norwegians have a duty to promote Norwegian and Norwegian culture. Fantastic.


ban on marriage between cousins etc

More cultural enrichment: The Democrats in Norway want to create a general law forbidding marriages between cousins…I wonder why?


cancer in Norway

Norway has one of the world’s highest prevalences of testicle cancer! 😮


citizenship DNA of spouses

Immigration is so messed up that The Democrats in Norway want to enforce DNA tests on foreign spouses to ensure that they are not related to their spouse with a Norwegian passport and also to determine the person’s age. They also want children to be examined for genital mutilation …

fake drugs online

62% of the medication you buy online is fake!

loss of citizenship

They want those who’ve been granted citizenship to lose it if they commit a serious offence. The Democrats in Norway also want to ban Quran schools in Norway.

mental health epidemic

The Democrats in Norway state that Mental Health is the greatest challenge today when it comes to National Health. It costs Norway more than 185 billion Kroner a year.


more mental issues among the young

“6 out of 10 “disabled” young people had in 2009 a psychiatric diagnose.”


new health challenges for the nation

Physical inactivity, obesity and mental issues are new health challenges in Norway.



The Democrats in Norway want to stop the special treatment that Muslims receive in Norway. They do not want them to get education in their mother-language, they do not want to fulfil their demands for halal-meat, private bath and wardrobe rooms, prayer rooms, day off on Muslim holidays or a right to wear traditional religious garments.


benefits so that you don't become homeless

If you face financial problems your local government can apparently confiscate your house and property if you fail to pay local fees to your local government – from the other material I’ve read it is said that bureaucracy fees remain the same regardless of your financial situation which obviously makes it harder when you are poor. See socialism has a tendency to not really benefit those that it is intended for. It happens all the time.


national ID system to crack down on illegal migration

The Democrats in Norway want a national ID system at our borders to guard against foreign criminals and illegal immigration.


norway is doing alright with rehab of criminals

Norwegian prisons are better than the other Nordic countries when it comes to “repeat offenders.” It seems like our much mocked rehabilitation programs might be working – which is good news!


Norway looking for a future Australia

According to The UN; a refugee is a politician, journalist, editor; pretty much a member of the intellectual elite who is being persecuted for their political activity. As The Democrats in Norway point out though we can’t allow our nations to be used as platforms for further political agitation and/or subversion. A very important point that few ever bring up. They want to use a “third country” for processing migrants; sounds like they are looking for a new Australia 😀 Maybe we should just say no to migrants! It’s too much of a hassle if we have to process  and handle matters correctly.


organized crime

Norway is being plagued by organised crime. Drugs, weapons and human trafficking are problems we now face.


rape, drugs and genital mutilation

The upper paragraph describes how rape was “defeated” in Stavanger as everyone got involved with making the city safer. The second paragraph has to deal with Norway’s problems with drugs and the final one addresses the modern issue of genital mutilation. A new problem that we now all of a sudden have to deal with as Muslims stay more loyal to their religious practises than Norwegian law.


crack down on muslim migration

The Democrats in Norway want to limit immigration from muslim countries, not because they hate Muslims but because those who truly and fully believe in the Quran and want to emulate the life of Muhammad are not compatible with a democratic, western social construct.


we cannot compete with wages

“Norway will not be able to compete with wages we therefore have to be ahead when it comes to technological advancements.”


theswedes kicking our ass

The Swedes spent 5 years working on a road  – Norwegian’s spent 8 years doing the exact same thing.


the eu being eco-friendly

The EU Parliament alternates between Brussel and Strasbourg, spending every other month in each – 4000 people and lots of equipment has to be transported as a result. The Democrats in Norway just find it funny to point this out due to the current climate debate.


the cost of socialised healthcare

Care-home pensioners run the risk of ending up on benefits due to the cost of their new home, despite working hard their entire lives and contributing to the welfare state.


suicide among children in foster care

The Democrats in Norway want to work towards the reduction of children taken by The Child Services committing suicide.


sugar tax and plane seat tax

We apparently have the sugar-tax  as well and an airplane-seat-tax – I will have to investigate.


Stoltenberg should pay his taxes

“Those who should be taxed are those who take leading jobs abroad in the public sector whether it is the position as General Secretary of NATO or a top job at The UN.”


pensioneers getting a worse deal than migrants

“The Democrats find it immoral that people without any ties to the country should get better economic situations than those who’ve contributed to the welfare state through a long life.”


too much debt in Norway

“Today’s tax-system stimulates lending rather than saving.”


Norwegian crew on boats

The Democrats in Norway express their concern that Norway can cease to be a Naval Nation due to a lack of Norwegian crew….incredible I had no idea we were in such a bad situation…


norwegian child services abusing their power

More about The Child Services abusing their power by separating parents from their children when the parents haven’t done anything wrong.


no to inheritance tax and Norway finacial collapse

The Democrats in Norway are happy that the inheritance-tax is gone as it makes it possible for family businesses to stay in the family. In the paragraph underneath it is mentioned how Norway’s households are some of the most indebted in the world. This doesn’t look well…


grain storage

Politicians in Norway claim that a “grain storage” isn’t needed – we are therefore ill-equipped to deal with a food shortage….


fulltime students

It’s so expensive to study in Norway that the years drag out … this means that students cash in    benefits, while working part-time which means that they are putting less into the state than ideal.


fees and intersts from the state

“Regular taxes are determined by income level, fees and prices are static without any regard for whether or not you can pay.”


eco friendly my ass

The Democrats in Norway want to use our forest for commercial purposes to produce eco-friendly material … I just think it is funny … how the hell does this defend our planet?



eat local

“If a Britt eats a traditional dinner with only imported produce the meal will generate 650 times more transport related carbon emissions than if he had eaten the same meal made with local produce.”


Another example of the state bypassing professional expertise

The Norwegian benefit office has more authority than healt-care professionals.