The Heated Topic Of Immigration Wordlwide & What Sovereignty Actually Means.

There is a proposal on the table that apparently will be voted on and discussed later this month, concerning making it illegal to be a critic of mass-migration, and I guess its effects, which are notable (historically speaking). This is to be done in order to initialize and/or continue with mass migration into Europe without any criticism. I wonder if this makes it illegal to review and talk about History books and/or whether or not it will also make it illegal to write that Norway was converted by the sword, which was the case, only that it was the sword of Christianity. History gives us the key to who we are and what sort of challenges we might face as nations/individuals and how to tackle these …  Here is the video:

http://www.investmentwatchblog.com/criticism-of-immigration-will-be-banned-in-europe/

Ok … now over to what I was actually going to write about:

I was quite surprised when I read an article a while back about anti-immigration riots in South Africa. It was of interest since it depicted Africans demonstrating against other Africans entering into their territory. I linked to the article here on my site and here I’ve found a video about anti-immigration sentiments in Israel.

Once again it illustrates how we all tackle a lot of the same issues regardless of where we live. With our current technology it makes it increasingly easier to compare cultures and how different population groups react to the same challenges.

What is of particular interest in the video is how the two Israeli women start shouting at one another since they disagree about whether or not they should take in the migrants.

Attitudes and behaviours that Westerners seem to regard as outdated are well and alive in other parts of the world, which you quickly realise when reading about the persecution of Christians.

Enforcing certain values and a clear identity will not happened quietly as anything that falls on the outside of the spectrum has to be removed or silenced. This paints a brutal picture that feels foreign in today’s “liberated” Western world of “Thou What Thou Wilt.” It makes sense to say that “when you go to Rome you do as the Romans” and unless you do have an unhealthy fixation on, let’s say, Islam; it makes sense to say that if you live in a Muslim majority country, then once again “you do as the Romans.”

You are a guest; which is why you’ll have to pay your respects or re-locate.

When observing how “respecting other’s sovereignty” plays out in practise though it actually means that you quietly stand by as genuine minorities (such as LGBTQ characters in Russia) are treated poorly, while political dissenters are sent into camps  (China), while it also means silently supporting terrifying human-rights violations (Saudi Arabia) all in the name of respecting “sovereignty” and a claim to practise ones “identity.”

Even in Western societies that are officially trying to be “bring-your-own-beer-countries”; they do want to enforce something, which is a normless society. This means that if you actually do stand for what has traditionally been the identity of your territory, well then you must be a bad-guy. Having “no-identity” becomes the identity, in this strange, awkward case. There is no culture, there is no heritage, there is no history, there is no nothing. Only a territory that you define upon your arrival. 

Even though I’ve been writing about how important it is to respect a Nations sovereignty and identity, I have to admit that in this I’ve failed on a small-scale by sending words of comfort out to persecuted Christians who in some cases are breaking the rules of the territory that they find themselves in by possessing a Bible and/or being open about their beliefs.

I’m also failing at “bringing my own beer” into identity-less Western territories as I’ve always integrated. This though becomes an issue if you live in a territory where “a deconstruction” is taking place. It means that you are aligned with the old (what the territory used to be) rather than the new (what the territory is becoming).

This might then oddly enough transform you into a dissenter by you successfully integrating into an established identity that is being killed on purpose by whatever establishment…..

Another example of sovereignty violation is this: if environmental pollutants are to be fought against effectively it also means being “rude,” since boots on the ground will be necessary in Africa and Asia to crack down on the worst “climate-offenders;” so there goes your peace and respect for sovereignty!

I wonder sometimes if  outspoken celebrities and spokespeople truly understand the natural conclusion of what they are stating and supporting….If you are an actual eco-warrior, well then you can’t respect anyone’s Sovereignty!

Pollution is really and truly a global problem, and we in the West are not the worst offenders.

I’m mentioning this to showcase how difficult  it can be to have certain stated principles, only to realise that things might not be as easy as previously thought…

It might also be worth mentioning that global corporations can in some ways operate like “one world governments” for the simple reason that they are their own thing completely and are everywhere, regardless of Nation or Continent.

Their influence is greater than anything else I’m sure.

National Sovereignty is consistently disrespected by world leaders who initiate sanctions and/or declare war against the leadership of other Nations, who they deem unfit to rule. Hence, no respect for sovereignty, nor the enforcement of National Identity.

The reason for this is probably due to how painful it actually is to witness Nation-State enforcement of territorial identity and also (in most cases I’m guessing) how unprofitable it is if Nation States break away from unions where so-and-so is/are the decision maker/s and/or big player/s.

Back to the migration issue; people are protective of their environment because they don’t want to lose out on their resources, which is one of the reasons as to why people have trough the ages “fortified their positions.” Something that is illegal in today’s Western Europe, unless you are a member of the establishment…..

Previous enforcement of ones right to be in a territory is also why we have distinct population groups, because group such and such was not erased by being absorbed into someone else’s “thing.” Hence in order to have a Nation and secure the continuation of said Nation you actually have to exclude, which a lot of people instinctively do; but this is never going to look pretty, especially not on a large-scale, which is what I’m talking about in this entry.

This of course makes an “open world” scary since it is a dangerous illusion; nobody is really interested in being squeezed out, not even those who are initially “open and inclusive,” when all of a sudden they wake up to find out that they have become a minority and that their claim to whatever territory and influence is null and void.

Their definition of their territory that they once upon a time wanted to generously share with others, have slipped and doesn’t include them any more. They simply lost it.

(It might be an idea to note that citizenship also becomes bizarre in “an open world” since citizenship is merely a piece of paper in this case. You territory belongs to everyone, and anyone can be of your territory. The same can be said of legislation tackling digital abuse and scams online. What you get is digital-global-anarchy since a criminal operation from one Nation abusing the member of another cannot really be prosecuted. Which governing body is supposed to police human interactions over the global internet?)

There are those who clearly do not see the arrivals of large hordes of other population groups as problematic. This is precisely why the arguing becomes so ugly, because those who end up being exposed to these transformations have a tendency of being very loud and extremely upset when their home-areas change suddenly. Especially if trust breaks down and inter-racial and/or inter-ethnic violence (the targeting of those who are not part of your in-group) becomes a thing.

The same can be noted now with anti-immigration sentiments here on the continent, that would appear to be reserved for Africans and Arabs primarily, but are also extended to other European Nationalities as well, in addition to heated arguments between individuals who look just the same (due to being members of the same Nation), because of disagreements over whether or not EurAbia or EurAfrica ought to be forcefully created, regardless of the human cost in the process.

I think it can be argued with certainty that trying to unite Europeans was a challenge great enough, just like trying to unite Africa is a monumental challenge due to inter-Racial diversity.

Now it can be witnessed that it is all falling apart here in “Europe,” since it was simply “too much, too quickly, too soon.” Rather than admitting that this has all been a spectacular political failure (unless you want chaos) the political establishment in Brussels appear hellbent on forcing their vision on everyone else, regardless of whether or not people actually want this in great numbers…

Things are already getting ugly since the survival of one “ideological vision” in this case, means the destruction of the other.

The good news is: that this is how humans behave, regardless of where they might be….

Here is one case of internal dissent in Germany and a proposed solution by a French academic:

https://sputniknews.com/europe/201811101069694506-german-military-plot-spoiled/

https://foreignpolicy.com/2017/05/01/the-german-military-has-a-neo-nazi-problem-extremism-right-wing-terrorism/

http://freewestmedia.com/2017/11/18/french-academic-proposes-muslim-apartheid-state-in-france/

A Brilliant Article Worth Reading.

This is an open letter written to the French President. It is very good and delivers some stellar points. I would highly recommend reading it.

“It would appear that American nationalists have historically cared more about your country than you do.”

As a side-note it is worth mentioning that the centralisation seen in Norway, just to pick an example, function as a way to erase Norwegian identity. I’ve spoken about it with my brother before, and my mother actually just brought it up as well. If you want to know a territory and a people it is worth going out into the country since major cities won’t tell you much.

When you then wage “war” against the districts, turning villages and hamlets into desolate “ghost towns,” you’ll force everyone to cluster in the major cities and towns, which means that charming architecture, dialects, quirky habits and traditions all go down the toilet.

As I’ve mentioned before on this blog of mine; my dad complained to me last year that “everything looks the same now in Europe.” He lamented how London used to have so much character and how Europe’s capitals now all look increasingly “streamlined.” It would appear that this call for “diversity” doesn’t include those of us who are native to these territories and as I’ve also mentioned before it doesn’t really include anyone else’s true identity either, since shock ensues whenever the mainstream media (or anyone else) reports that mass importing people from Africa and the Middle East doesn’t just include getting fancy-dress and spicy food…..

 

 

Having A Raison D’être & An End Game – The Impression One Can Get.

When reading about the Iraq war last year I was stunned to see the willingness to sacrifice the integrity of Europe on the altar of momentary territorial access needed in order to get into Iraq.

“Plan Of Attack” by Bob Woodward.

“Decision Points” by George W. Bush.

I was further mystified by the fact that 4-star Army General (ret.) Colin Powell came across as the one lone voice of reason, since he tried to raise awareness of tribalism and ethnic diversity in the targeted area.

The reading certainly gave me the impression that humans are simply being seen as replaceable cogs in the machinery by the establishment.

Culture and ethnicity simply doesn’t matter, it is all about momentary victory, without any overarching solid narrative selling a clearly defined End Game, that will be reached by many separate actions all serving the same underlying objective.

This is a startling realisation.

When reading “The Art Of War” I was surprised about what sort of advice it contained. Prolonged warfare with no end in sight is depicted as one of the worst projects that a Nation can ever engage in. A group that engages in warfare also have to ensure that they have access to an efficient supply line, taking advantage of whatever resources the group can get their hands on as they expand into a territory. A war effort should be swift and precise, without too much meddling from sovereigns located far away. The people who are on the ground need to be able to do what is necessary to reach their goal in a completely mobilised way, to the extent that this is possible.

All of this certainly made me question the sort of warfare that people my age have grown accustomed to. All of our Nations’ war efforts seem concentrated in “alien territories,” fighting and training “aliens” that might turn on the West later, and all of our Nations’ major war efforts seemingly drag out for ever…

No proper end game that logically makes sense is ever presented to the public and when getting an insight into the world of those who run these things, it doesn’t really seem like these characters know what the deal is either (unless a battle ground is simply needed in order to train soldiers and test new equipment).

Warriors & Citizens – American Views of Our Military edited by Kori Schake & Jim Mattis.

A parallel can be drawn to hacker activists, who don’t seem too concerned with allies. They’ll attack an enemy of the West one day only to target Western political and military structures the next, potentially jeopardising the integrity and safety of a Nation State or its military operations.

When reading about community organisers you see this pattern of behaviour once again.  A lot of left-wing activism simply cancels itself out, since the only common denominator seems to be emotionalism. Due to this you’ll get contradicting agitation and advocacy that will leave someone like myself slightly confused, as there is no End Game in sight anywhere.

If you look at Islamic agitation in Europe it is very easy to understand what their End Game and overarching goal is. They engage in demographic expansionism into Europe, which gradually gives them a political advantage. Wealthy Muslim power-players buy themselves into Western Corporations which gives them cultural influence and leverage. Street-level Muslims carve out their own territories and then defend these. Mosques are erected further cementing a claim to a specific territory boosting confidence, while a romanticized fantasy of Islamic Imperialism, appealing to people’s sense of identity and innate penchant for ancestry-worship, is promoted. Of course, as always, not all. But you don’t need every member of a specific group to behave in this particular fashion for it to have its desired effect. My impression of European Islamification is that there is a long-term vision, coupled with a willingness to commit to certain behaviours, in order to eventually reach a clearly defined outcome: Nation States that become compatible in their policies and in their cultures with the Muslim faith, preferably paving the way for a new “Golden-Age.” Of course it is of importance to point out the ethnic and racial diversity within Islam, and that there are numerous conflicting denominations within the faith as well. As an example: we can now clearly observe, imported tribal disagreements and feuds, in Europe, in addition to all of our own inter-ethnic issues that we had from before….

Inter-ethnic dissonance is very prevalent in Africa; which is generally referred to as the most diverse continent on the surface of the earth.

So what can be said of the West? What is our End Game? What can be observed and what conclusions can be drawn? 

What would make sense, instinctively,  would be to have common ancestry as the glue holding Europe together. Race has become way more inclusive than what it used to be, since we now largely see Race as something observable, while ethnic groups give us what has become our European Nation States, with its specific cultures and characteristics.  Back in the day these used to be chopped up into various tribes that probably displayed a lot of similar traits to one another, hence our generalisation regarding population groups contained within the boundaries of the modern Nation State: an extended family sharing common ancestry and a similar distribution of genetic traits on average.

It would make sense if our Nation States in Europe concerned themselves with the protection of our shared and individual cultural heritage, doing everything to ensure the survival and majority status of white children (and mixed whites) in the only territory that actually belongs a 100% to whites, protecting our continent’s borders and integrity.

A strong unified Europe and more broadly speaking, a strong unified West with the more multi-racial configurations found within territories conquered by whites, would in theory make sense.

Is this an End Game for what is collectively known as The West though? No.

This would be a racist objective. It would insinuate that Ethnic-Europeans have a natural claim to a specific territory and that conquest is a legitimate way to establish a Nation, which is what a white presence in all other territories other than Europe is a result of. (To my knowledge … It certainly looks that way when observing strange geographic settlements by Whites and the presence of dark-skinned indigenous groups).

The prevalent mythos championed in the West is this:

  1. that all other groups are minorities, even if Europe looks very small when compared to other continents, and we are outnumbered globally speaking.
  2. That the magic soil theory is truth, meaning that you’ll automatically become  Swedish by simply breathing the air in Sweden.
  3. That all human beings are born equal due to a blank slate, and that genetics simply don’t exist.
  4. That talking about genetics and genuine diversity is dangerous because that will instantly turn you into Hitler and result in a new Holocaust.
  5. That it makes sense to celebrate white ethnic groups becoming minorities, after years of civil-rights battles in the U.S.A. to ensure equal opportunity regardless of skin colour, and after years of Whites trying to do good towards previously marginalised and abused non-white minority groups within their domains. Not to forget: the constant focus on the challenges faced by so-called (and genuine) minorities within traditionally White-majority constructs. None of this paints minority-status in an appealing light … yet we should do everything in our power to lay the groundwork for our own marginalisation…. which is particularly interesting when reading about the merciless brutality in other parts of the world perpetrated by non-white majorities…
  6. That previous white expansionism will just be forgotten, since Whites have decided to “play nice,” which means that we no longer have any enemies and don’t really need any borders….
  7. That only white ethnic groups can be guilty of racism and imperialistic activity.
  8. That white ethnic groups are not under any circumstance “indigenous” and that there will at no point be any need to give any white demographic the status of “protected group.”
  9. That race and/or ethnicity is only real and only counts if/when dealing with “indigenous people,” who can under no circumstance be white. These “indigenous” groups are also the only ones entitled to certain territories that have to be protected in order to ensure their survival.
  10. That charity is only needed in the 3rd world as it is probably your own fault if you are poor and hungry in the superior, egalitarian, socialist inspired constructs that make up the Western World.
  11. That you have to import workers from Africa and The Middle East, rather than employing individuals from territories closer to your own, or within your own continent.
  12. That mixing on a massive scale is always peaceful and not the result of violent demographic change or militant conquest.
  13. That re-writing history and engaging in gas-lighting on a National and/or Continental level is perfectly alright in order to salvage vanity projects initiated by international organisations, that might look good on paper and in theory; until inserting the human factor into the equation actually implementing the idea.

Ok. So this doesn’t look too promising. Then what about Christianity? This is multi-racial, multiethnic and global. It is way more inclusive and has been used as a unifying factor in Europe before…

The West has continuously acted as an enemy to Christian groups in the Middle East, facilitating genocidal persecution of genuine Christian minority tribes. Western governments not only promote the build-down of Christianity within Europe and all other territories under White influence, they actively side with Nations and regimes known for violent Christian persecution.

What about human-rights, enlightenment ideas, world peace and the “human race”?

Western governments have repeatedly sided with regimes guilty of outrageous human rights abuses, making themselves guilty of gross hypocrisy since human rights and the protection of humanity as a whole has become the main narrative and general raison d’être of Western groups.

Portraying oneself as a defender of the human race also becomes tricky as you cannot possible go out there and claim that population group A needs more protection and privileges than population group B as this would be racist and undermine universal rights. And how on earth can you even say population group A and B when race/ethnicity isn’t even real? You cannot say that religious group A is more guilty of persecution than religious group B, because why would religious group B be more righteous or in need of more protection than the other? Are you a bigot or what?

Who are you to say that Terrorists don’t have rights or don’t have a point, when you claim to be a defender of all of humanity? And how on earth do you even define a “War on Terror” or “Terrorists”? Any person or group could fall into this category when nothing is specified.

These kind of points can be spinned indefinitely putting The West in a situation where none of its actions can be seen as righteous and/or legitimate.

It opens up the door for a potential legal, moral and PR nightmare where The West and its natural inhabitants never win.

It also puts Western Nation states in a situation where an enemy cannot be clearly defined, at least not in public, due to important exotic alliances and potential diplomatic disasters. By relying on exotic alliances for abstract military operations, the West paints  itself into a corner, where they cannot kick out subversive elements within their own nations if these stem from their good “friends and allies.”

The West is forced into a position where it cannot really look after the interests of its own inhabitants, nor enforce the heritage and integrity of itself.

Not to forget that The West is put into an incredibly awkward situation when Western leaders cannot clearly formulate anything, if interested in maintaining good international relationships.

This results in cringe worthy narratives that leaves all of those who don’t just parrot our “modern shared values” confused and puzzled. What are we all about really? Does anyone know?

What about Capitalism then? A support for this must surely be a constant factor from The Americans at least? 

No. Think again. The U.S.A. is willing to tolerate oppressive communist regimes that in the long run pose a threat to the American experiment and their global influence, as long as the U.S.A. can gain from such an alliance in the short run.

So what is The End Game of The West? 

Strangely and worryingly enough there doesn’t seem to be one……(but I might be very wrong, after all, who knows what goes on behind the scenes…).

At best it can be argued that there are forces within The West championing stability trough whatever means by expanding the police state and surveillance of their own citizens. This though is worked against by leaders who don’t want to acknowledge the effects of demographic change. In addition it facilitates the very form of governance that Western Nations are outspokenly against, not to forget that the identity destruction currently happening in The Western world work against any conservation efforts intended to protect our cultural and ethnic inheritance, while simultaneously compromising stability and security; in short, all of it compromises the survival of those people who occupy the territories that we collectively refer to as The West.

 

US Defence Secretary Mattis, President Trump, Feminism, Intolerance & Reading Lists.

This happened today! I hope the same will happen over here in Europe. One can hope:

In June this year a high school student over in the USA managed to get hold of the phone number of Defence Secretary Mattis, he then decided to send the man a message asking for an interview and funny enough he received a reply. This is an interesting read: http://mihsislander.org/2017/06/full-transcript-james-mattis-interview/

I’m also including a couple of reading lists. Ever since I read “The Art Of War” earlier this year I’ve realised that it is a massive drawback that the militant aspects of history is downplayed in terms of general education and popular culture. I’m probably one of few millennials to have experienced a school system promoting a classical-western-education platform – even though I obviously need to brush up on my philosophy and history after years of neglect. I also had the great privilege of growing up in a family possessing a very beautiful and well-stocked library, but I was little back then. Hopefully I’ll get my hands on some of these at one point: http://www2.latech.edu/~bmagee/201/great_books_etexts.html

I’m including this list as well since Mattis has mentioned it in several interviews. I had never heard of this before: https://www.usmcofficer.com/marine-corps-knowledge/commandants-reading-list/

An article entitled “Harvard Law Professor: ‘White Liberal College Graduates’ Are ‘the Least Tolerant” is very interesting. I’ve seen how I’ve lost some followers when I’ve been liking conservative posts and I’ve actually been accused of bigotry myself due to what I retweeted after the most recent terrorist attack in London. There is very little tolerance from those on the left and this is greatly disturbing since these people don’t even bother to ask questions. All you get is either an accusation (read name-calling) or you’ll see that you’ve lost some followers or that someone has simply unfriended you. After expressing joy over Trump’s victory over in the USA I received a message from a well-meaning friend encouraging me to stay quiet as many people had been so hurt by Trump’s victory. I wonder how those on the  left would react if  those on the right behaved in the exact same way? I don’t think I have anyone on my friends list who likes the Trump administration, at least not openly. Yet it is said that Generation Z is more conservative in their views. I certainly hope so as ethnomasochism, anti-Americanism, anti-Europeanism or anti-western attitudes are terrible for our various nations. As a millennial I feel like a minority at this point.

On May the 14th this year I posted this text along with a picture on my Instagram: “If you have the resources or know someone who has the power to make things happen, then please help English churches that are falling apart due to lack of funds, etc; This is a country with a rich history, please help by either spreading the word or contributing, so that we can protect the heritage & integrity of this great nation. I’ve also included a map depicting where persecution of Christians is most common, let’s stand in solidarity with those who are killed, imprisoned & silenced in the name of Islam & Communism.” 

An older male who’s been a fan of me for years wrote in the comment section that my views were disturbing. Sadly I deleted this, I should have let it stand or taken a screen shot of it. I honestly fail to see why it is disturbing to protect ones cultural heritage or country or why it is wrong to post the picture of a map depicting hot spots for Christian persecution in the world?

Why on earth is this wrong? Why is it wrong to protect oneself? Why is it wrong to warn others?

To read the article I referred to further up, click on this: http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/07/22/harvard-law-prof-white-liberal-college-graduates-least-tolerant/

Behold Christine Teigen acting like a fool. If you are going to criticise someone then please explain why you are doing so. I’ve tweeted that Merkel is treacherous, why? Well due to her inviting a whole bunch of potential terrorists into the EU, not to forget that it is too expensive for our nations anyway. Europe does not look good from a street level. Our continent is being fundamentally transformed. A leader should run around and be proud of their country, I’ve seen footage of Merkel refusing to wave the German flag. What is that all about? If she wants to change Germany then fine, but don’t come here and throw the rest of us into the abyss. Replacement migration is not ok. When you are a leader you have to put your country and your people first and then keep the peace with your neighbours. Why do those on the left attack European cultures and ethnic Europeans????? I think I have a good reason for tweeting about my dislike for Merkel. Here you got Teigen trolling the president of the USA:

You can read the whole story here: http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2017/07/25/trump-blocks-model-chrissy-teigen-on-twitter-after-near-decade-of-hate/

I honestly think that Merkel is dubious. We are having serious issues over here. The internationally broadcasted terrorist attacks are just the tip of the iceberg. It might look silly to tweet something like this; but European populations are facing brand new problems we’ve never dealt with before. And it is not just one country or one isolated area, it is everywhere.

While reading an entertaining article written by a mother advising her son not to marry a feminist, an article about “fierceness” as promoted by feminists activists caught my attention. This is particularly interesting to me since I’ve been thinking about this an awful lot myself. The article I’ve pasted in below link to an article written by David French over at the National Review called “Feminism Has A Ferocity Problem.” Read this: https://pjmedia.com/trending/2017/04/21/why-is-feminism-so-insistent-that-women-be-fierce/ & http://www.nationalreview.com/article/446881/feminist-intolerance-traditional-roles-are-shunned-and-devalued

To end this rather short entry of mine; this one is called “Always on the Move: How Residential Mobility Impacts Our Well-Being” published by a site I certainly like the name of: “The Inquisitive Mind.” Since there’s been so much talk about the negative implications of moving I decided to read some articles about the topic. It was not very flattering what I found in terms of the long-term effects on kids :/ but it was nonetheless interesting. Read this: http://www.in-mind.org/article/always-on-the-move-how-residential-mobility-impacts-our-well-being

Internet – The Gift That Keeps On Giving.

Before I start my entry then please watch this as it is extremely important to understand the forces that work against Europe and those who want to defend it. This is relevant for Americans as well. Anyone who is patriotic is a potential problem for these people as they are anti-Western radicals.

Back to my actual intro: The fun never stops in internet-land … the latest from the Podesta-circus or “Pizzagate” … is that Chester Bennington was apparently Podesta’s bastard child 😀 Podesta allegedly killed Bennington since he was about to reveal the truth about Pedo-gate. It doesn’t help much that Bennington was abused as a kid by an older male or that Bennington’s parents divorced as Chester was the result of infidelity; all of this has made the online world explode with memes – especially due to Chester Bennington’s resemblance to Podesta :0 Yes there you go. The conspiracy theories just keep on getting better and better. The dark side to the comedy though is that Podesta might end up getting killed because of the internet. Last time I checked responsibility rests on the accuser, but in these wild-west days of the online world I guess people have forgotten about that one. Not that it isn’t entertaining as hell to read what people come up with – it has sadly resulted in violence though if you think about the Fake-News-Media inspiring that Bernie Sanders supporter who shot some Republican politicians, so the fun stops there obviously. People ought to be careful – look for proof! There are people out there who want to kill the President of the USA because they are convinced that he is guilty of treason. I mean what treason? Where? Aggressiveness coupled with blind belief or ignorance is seriously scary. Shame on you CNN.

No evidence can be found anywhere when it comes to Bennington-gate! Linkin Park were involved with raising money for Haiti, but so were countless other performers. Rumour has it that Chester Bennington received a grant from The Clinton Foundation; but I’ve not managed to find any information about this anywhere online; besides from the conspiracy theorists themselves 😛 You can imagine my face when I saw these pictures on Instagram, I haven’t laughed that much in ages! I’m actually starting to feel sorry for Podesta, what if he’s just gay or a weirdo and his “hot dog stand in Hawaii” or “handkerchief” has nothing to do with pedophilia? There are enough people out there who see him as a dangerous predator so it wouldn’t surprise me if someone actually tries to kill him … I’ve pasted in a video below from YouTube that people claim is from Podesta….the evidence is lacking though, to put it mildly.

View this post on Instagram

Rp from @streetwearaddicts714 The internet is an interesting place. JOHN PODESTA IS NOW SUSPECTED IN THE MURDER OF HIS BASTARD SON: LINKIN PARK'S CHESTER BENNINGTON It is safe to say that Podesta is also the chief suspect of being the 'family friend' who molested and raped Chester as a child. Linkin Park coincidentally had a 'broken Pedophile symbol' for their bands logo. Obviously this was no fkn coincidence. Bennington was beginning to become vocal about the horror he endured during his childhood, the logical and plausible conclusion is that Podesta had him silenced. The murder of Bennington, brings new focus upon the blatantly staged suicide of singer Chris Cornell who was also becoming a voice speaking out about organized Pedophile Syndicates in the entertainment business, government and society at large. Cornell and Bennington were close friends. Bennington even being the Godfather to one of Cornell's daughters. These murders and you have to be a damn fool to not understand these men were both fkn murdered, will not go unanswered. It is time for the arrest of the murdering psychopath predator pedophile John Podesta. RIP Chester. RIP Chris. It is rumored that Chester Bennington from Linkin Park was John Podesta's bastard child. Chester Bennington struggled his whole life with mental health issues as a result of being molested as a child. Chester Pennington's parents divorced when Chester was 9 years old after his father found out his mother was messing around. Chester Bennington's mother Elaine had an affair with John Podesta. Chester Bennington received a grant from the Clinton Foundation as a result of John Podesta's influence. John Podesta personally knew he was Chester's biological father, something that was not revealed to Chester until much later in years possibly just recently. It could be that after Chester Bennington found out who his real father was he was stricken with sorrow and anger. He possibly then looked into John Podesta to find out that Podesta was involved with child sex pedophile Rings linked with Hillary Clinton Foundation and was responsible of human trafficking and prostitution of minors in Haiti and other places of

A post shared by Spike Keystone (@spike_keystone_11) on

That said! I did come across something truly frightening while reading about Podesta killing Bennington. A truly horrifying article on Wikipedia about human experimentation done over in the US of A, without the consent from the “subjects” (unknowing pregnant women, innocent hospital patients, US soldiers, prisoners, inmates at mental hospitals;etc) sanctioned by the US government. So no wonder that Americans are prone to believe anything. I was absolutely disgusted by reading this article. It nauseates me to know that there are people out there who put their creativity and curiosity to such insidious use. I would prefer to not know about these type of things. So to make my readership happy – enjoy! The horror of reality surpasses my wildest imagination once again: Unethical human experimentation in the United States.

The Chinese are becoming scary. Not only are the Asians smarter than us on average, they are also free to do whatever they may please scientifically. Something to keep in mind if you don’t live in China … Scary news from China & The latest from China’s genetically altered “Super Dogs.”

PayPal and Patreon have been cracking down on “Alt-liters” & “Alt-righters.” That is interesting.  The ADL released an article about the threat from the right. This organisation is criticised by liberals, jews and conservatives. The ADL supports and promotes supremacy from all other ethnic groups than white groups – so they are a bunch of racist hypocrites from what I’ve understood. That said there are some freaky people on ADL’s list for sure. Some pretty antiquated views about women and flat-out racism. I don’t like racists, my thing is that I write about all sorts of racism – I don’t follow a one-sided narrative but the well-being of Europe and the Western World is closest to my heart for obvious reasons since I’m a European myself. Duh. You can’t be an ethnomasochist and you cannot under any circumstance support replacement migration.  It is interesting though that I just rolled my eyes when I read the ADL article at first, since the narrative of “xenophobia, misogyny, bigotry;etc” was thrown out there as usual – they should have started their article with quotes from those furthest on the right. Instead they didn’t and chose to play the same old broken record of name-calling before actually exposing some individuals who did seem dubious. Yet the ADL has no credibility since they just seem to hate on white people from what I’ve heard and seen so far:

The Coalition For Jewish Values released their own list of dangerous activists on the far-left to counter-attack the ADL list:

 

The Anti-Defamation League’s (ADL) new “hate list” of top alt-right figures “gives a free pass to antisemitism coming from left-wing activists,” a rabbinical group is asserting.

The Coalition for Jewish Values, which represents 200 Orthodox rabbis in the US and Canada, also charged that “political motives” were behind the ADL’s inclusion of Corey Stewart, a prominent Virginia conservative who is seeking the Republican nomination to oppose Senator Tim Kaine.

The Coalition countered the ADL’s list by releasing a top 10 list of left-wing activists who, it says, are “far more guilty of anti-Jewish defamatory speech” than those named by the ADL. The Coalition’s list includes Linda Sarsour, the feminist activist and BDS promoter; Hatem Bazian, founder of Students for Justice in Palestine, arguably the most active anti-Israel group on college campuses; Rachel Gilmer, co-author of the Black Lives Matter platform, which accused Israel of genocide; and Rebecca Vilkomerson, executive director the anti-Zionist organization Jewish Voice for Peace.

You can read the article here: https://www.algemeiner.com/2017/07/21/rabbis-dispute-adls-alt-right-list-issue-own-list-of-the-far-left/

You can read the ADL article right here: https://www.adl.org/education/resources/backgrounders/from-alt-right-to-alt-lite-naming-the-hate?utm_source=PANTHEON_STRIPPED&utm_campaign=PANTHEON_STRIPPED&utm_medium=PANTHEON_STRIPPED&utm_term=PANTHEON_STRIPPED

I posted a link about this missing boy on my FB some days ago, sadly he was found dead: http://www.theindychannel.com/news/local-news/missing-8-year-old-autistic-non-verbal-child-missing-in-brownsburg

Here is a video about Soros’ Groups plotting to desecrate the graves of fallen American heroes. A disturbing video for sure, but an interesting watch:

This is of relevance to Americans more than to Europeans as our grandparents grew up during Nazi-occupation and obviously believed in saving rather than lending and over-spending. Things have changed dramatically when one looks at the “rebellious” parent generation, but not all “parents” were hippies. Some parents obviously decided to go in the other direction protecting what our grandparents had built after the war. Yet this article is of interest in today’s political environment: http://voxday.blogspot.co.uk/2017/06/mailvox-bitter-generation.html

This is a hilarious article about a mother advising her son to not marry an angry, man-hating feminist: http://www.patheos.com/blogs/markmeckler/2017/05/advice-young-men-dont-marry-feminists/?utm_content=bufferdd2b2&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook&utm_campaign=David+Clarke

Gad Saad released this video after the infamous virtue signalling from Pierce Morgan, it is a bit old but it is still important to share this kind of information:

Here is an article explaining the meme-culture: (http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/memes)and I also found a picture of a very awesome cake! Maybe I can get one of these for my next birthday 😛

Rex Perpetuus – Trump, Mattis, Putin, Bill Gates & Revolutionaries.

The other day I watched Donald Trump’s important speech over in Poland. It was refreshing and shocking to hear a western leader talk about how our heritage has to be protected! People in the east love and respect President Trump while west-hating individuals in western Europe and America seem to head for a public social-media breakdown every time Trump or anyone from his administration say anything at all. The speech was not as energetic as his inauguration speech but it reached a climax towards the very end. It is a great shame that a powerful western country such as America can shift so violently in terms of their political platform since straight-up self-loathing is allowed to fester even influencing policy making and America’s dealings with the rest of the world… These awkward flag-burning, genuinely anti-American sentiments seem to be protected under “freedom of speech” and liberty – so what if the revolutionary “libtards” with all their ethnomasochistic hatred are voted back into office next election? Long may Trump and his associates reign – the west needs leaders who are strong and proud. Never forget that there is an ongoing culture-war where those on the hard-left are at war with “western civilisation” that according to them is a fiction or something oppressive worth deconstructing and destroying. It is sad. Discussing our various ideas and reaching a compromise while being united in love for our mother-country is what we are supposed to do. Not divide ourselves between “let us protect our land” or “to hell with it, let it all burn.” You can’t be friends with those who want you dead – obviously……………

My two favourite leaders meeting for the first time! I don’t know what they are saying in this video but you can see the first handshake between the two presidents. Putin looks like he has a “Trump-crush” 😛

Speaking of Putin:

I love this! ❤ ❤ ❤ ❤

Speaking of which, I had no idea that secular censorship had been pushed through in terms of “BC & AD.” I spotted this in one of my siblings books some days ago and then noticed it again in a book about warfare published by the same publishing company. It is quite disturbing this dictatorial change of how we are supposed to speak – I’m pretty sure I’ve posted a link in the past to an article concerning ‘the racism of proper English grammar.” Read this article to be mortified of the “rewriting/adjustments” of western history as this is just one of many adjustments being carried out:  http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/australiaandthepacific/australia/8737038/To-BC-or-BCE.html

Some weeks ago I came across this disturbing article about abortion: http://birthofanewearth.blogspot.co.uk/2013/04/one-third-of-new-york-babies-aborted.html This is also an interesting take on the issue – http://www.politifact.com/texas/statements/2016/jan/19/wendy-davis/flawed-wendy-davis-claim-1-3-women-has-had-abortio/

Here are some cool vids with (Ret.) Marine General, now US Defence Secretary Mattis: http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/05/29/james-mattis-a-warrior-in-washington

An interesting video from one Hollywood’s most respected actors:

https://twitter.com/lindsaylohan/status/882097820404264961?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=http%3A%2F%2Fvariety.com%2F2017%2Fdigital%2Fnews%2Fdonald-trump-lindsay-lohan-twitter-1202487482%2F

Lindsay Lohan standing by her president on her official twitter, as can be seen above…

A Guardian article about American politicians rocking out. Quite funny actually: https://www.theguardian.com/music/musicblog/2017/jun/21/us-politicians-bands-rock-music

Black Lives Matter are being sued for their “revolutionary” actions against the American police: http://edition.cnn.com/2017/07/09/us/lawsuit-black-lives-matter-baton-rouge/index.html

More “revolutionary” behaviour in America……http://edition.cnn.com/2017/06/14/homepage2/james-hodgkinson-profile/index.html

Horrible “revolutionaries” disturbing the peace in Germany. A disgrace. #StandByThePolice http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/07/06/german-police-fire-water-cannon-g20-demonstration/ 

 

An interesting article about Madonna and her relationship with Tupac, actually. Worthy a read: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/music/artists/tupac-split-madonna-white-prison-letter-reveals/

And now over to the most politically incorrect part of this entry … Bill Gates has shocked the world by expressing logical concerns about the flood of migrants heading for Europe. His opinion is that we should seek to help African populations where they are rather than killing our own countries by letting them in – as we cannot handle the burden. Those who have seen or heard of the future “migrant” predictions might go even further in their views on the “African issue” as we will not have enough men nor conventional weapons to defend ourselves if future predictions of movement towards our beloved Europe rings true. Which they are according to this EU official: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4676640/Europe-underestimating-scale-migrant-crisis.html We are facing quite a potential-situation if “lost territories” within our European nations expand in addition to increased pressure at our “gates” from without…I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again…our leaders should nip things in the bud now. If all of Europe’s nations could come together to enforce our borders in the south this would be a good thing. Will it happen? I do not know, but I suspect that it won’t as it would be seen as “xenophobic,” “racist,” and or “bigoted” to keep these people out as “freedom of movement” ought to be a human right…Further down as a last video in this entry I’ve included a cartoon that in my opinion illustrates European charity perfectly. It isn’t considered “nice” of course to speak of these matters/issues … but sooner or later we will be forced to, whether we like it or not. :/  😦

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4665198/Bill-Gates-warns-open-door-migration-overwhelm-Europe.html

Here is a bonus article for those who are curious; Mike Pence created waves in the liberal-leaning media after admitting that he never eats or have drinks alone with other women than his wife. This statement resulted in him being accused of holding extremely old-fashioned views, but funny enough it turns out that Americans agree with him. It is an interesting topic for discussion in our post-modern times because it is becoming increasingly difficult to know how to operate socially within our progressive construct. As a woman active in a predominantly male profession I would be very lonely if I never spoke to any of my male colleagues…. It is also difficult to know if you are “hanging-out” or “going on a date” with one of your “metro-sexual” peers for example. Is he gay or is he straight? Is he interested or not? If the bill is split equally I would classify it as a “non-date.” You are hanging out in a “sibling/cousin-fashion.” I’ve chatted with “male friends” and “colleagues” several times in real-life and online which from a traditional perspective can probably be perceived as dubious – why would a woman talk to a man unless she is interested? Mike Pence’s statement makes sense from a traditional perspective but it is confusing in a post-modern society of socially enforced equality between the genders – when you aren’t really aware of what is what or what is going on. I certainly remember saying and probably writing to male colleagues that “we should have a drink next time I’m in the country” or “what about dinner” without this meaning that I’m interested. I guess that our progressive society will just spin even further into confusion. I remember when I was introduced to American high-school culture years ago and I heard of “friends with benefits” I had no clue what on earth this meant – much to the amusement of my American peers. http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/07/06/nyt-poll-americans-agree-with-mike-pences-rules-about-dining-with-women/

 

The Odyssey – for children.

Years ago I learned about Greek legends in school – it’s been a while so I was curious to check out my younger brother’s child copy of “The Odyssey.” It was very cool but it was surprising to read something so “politically incorrect” in this day and age 😀 I certainly enjoyed it and see why boys and men alike will never tire of these tales. Much could be gained from sharing these stories with school children in the North as well; conditioning our future to solely depend on a modern, convenient, high-tech, pacifistic social construct can best be described as reckless. What happens the moment that climate change or destabilisation as a result of conflict shatters our current comfort?