Read the original here to see how US decision makers suggested creating a fertility crisis on purpose, against their own citizens in 1969.
Read the original here to see how US decision makers suggested creating a fertility crisis on purpose, against their own citizens in 1969.
There is a proposal on the table that apparently will be voted on and discussed later this month, concerning making it illegal to be a critic of mass-migration, and I guess its effects, which are notable (historically speaking). This is to be done in order to initialize and/or continue with mass migration into Europe without any criticism. I wonder if this makes it illegal to review and talk about History books and/or whether or not it will also make it illegal to write that Norway was converted by the sword, which was the case, only that it was the sword of Christianity. History gives us the key to who we are and what sort of challenges we might face as nations/individuals and how to tackle these … Here is the video:
Ok … now over to what I was actually going to write about:
I was quite surprised when I read an article a while back about anti-immigration riots in South Africa. It was of interest since it depicted Africans demonstrating against other Africans entering into their territory. I linked to the article here on my site and here I’ve found a video about anti-immigration sentiments in Israel.
Once again it illustrates how we all tackle a lot of the same issues regardless of where we live. With our current technology it makes it increasingly easier to compare cultures and how different population groups react to the same challenges.
What is of particular interest in the video is how the two Israeli women start shouting at one another since they disagree about whether or not they should take in the migrants.
Attitudes and behaviours that Westerners seem to regard as outdated are well and alive in other parts of the world, which you quickly realise when reading about the persecution of Christians.
Enforcing certain values and a clear identity will not happened quietly as anything that falls on the outside of the spectrum has to be removed or silenced. This paints a brutal picture that feels foreign in today’s “liberated” Western world of “Thou What Thou Wilt.” It makes sense to say that “when you go to Rome you do as the Romans” and unless you do have an unhealthy fixation on, let’s say, Islam; it makes sense to say that if you live in a Muslim majority country, then once again “you do as the Romans.”
You are a guest; which is why you’ll have to pay your respects or re-locate.
When observing how “respecting other’s sovereignty” plays out in practise though it actually means that you quietly stand by as genuine minorities (such as LGBTQ characters in Russia) are treated poorly, while political dissenters are sent into camps (China), while it also means silently supporting terrifying human-rights violations (Saudi Arabia) all in the name of respecting “sovereignty” and a claim to practise ones “identity.”
Even in Western societies that are officially trying to be “bring-your-own-beer-countries”; they do want to enforce something, which is a normless society. This means that if you actually do stand for what has traditionally been the identity of your territory, well then you must be a bad-guy. Having “no-identity” becomes the identity, in this strange, awkward case. There is no culture, there is no heritage, there is no history, there is no nothing. Only a territory that you define upon your arrival.
Even though I’ve been writing about how important it is to respect a Nations sovereignty and identity, I have to admit that in this I’ve failed on a small-scale by sending words of comfort out to persecuted Christians who in some cases are breaking the rules of the territory that they find themselves in by possessing a Bible and/or being open about their beliefs.
I’m also failing at “bringing my own beer” into identity-less Western territories as I’ve always integrated. This though becomes an issue if you live in a territory where “a deconstruction” is taking place. It means that you are aligned with the old (what the territory used to be) rather than the new (what the territory is becoming).
This might then oddly enough transform you into a dissenter by you successfully integrating into an established identity that is being killed on purpose by whatever establishment…..
Another example of sovereignty violation is this: if environmental pollutants are to be fought against effectively it also means being “rude,” since boots on the ground will be necessary in Africa and Asia to crack down on the worst “climate-offenders;” so there goes your peace and respect for sovereignty!
I wonder sometimes if outspoken celebrities and spokespeople truly understand the natural conclusion of what they are stating and supporting….If you are an actual eco-warrior, well then you can’t respect anyone’s Sovereignty!
Pollution is really and truly a global problem, and we in the West are not the worst offenders.
I’m mentioning this to showcase how difficult it can be to have certain stated principles, only to realise that things might not be as easy as previously thought…
It might also be worth mentioning that global corporations can in some ways operate like “one world governments” for the simple reason that they are their own thing completely and are everywhere, regardless of Nation or Continent.
Their influence is greater than anything else I’m sure.
National Sovereignty is consistently disrespected by world leaders who initiate sanctions and/or declare war against the leadership of other Nations, who they deem unfit to rule. Hence, no respect for sovereignty, nor the enforcement of National Identity.
The reason for this is probably due to how painful it actually is to witness Nation-State enforcement of territorial identity and also (in most cases I’m guessing) how unprofitable it is if Nation States break away from unions where so-and-so is/are the decision maker/s and/or big player/s.
Back to the migration issue; people are protective of their environment because they don’t want to lose out on their resources, which is one of the reasons as to why people have trough the ages “fortified their positions.” Something that is illegal in today’s Western Europe, unless you are a member of the establishment…..
Previous enforcement of ones right to be in a territory is also why we have distinct population groups, because group such and such was not erased by being absorbed into someone else’s “thing.” Hence in order to have a Nation and secure the continuation of said Nation you actually have to exclude, which a lot of people instinctively do; but this is never going to look pretty, especially not on a large-scale, which is what I’m talking about in this entry.
This of course makes an “open world” scary since it is a dangerous illusion; nobody is really interested in being squeezed out, not even those who are initially “open and inclusive,” when all of a sudden they wake up to find out that they have become a minority and that their claim to whatever territory and influence is null and void.
Their definition of their territory that they once upon a time wanted to generously share with others, have slipped and doesn’t include them any more. They simply lost it.
(It might be an idea to note that citizenship also becomes bizarre in “an open world” since citizenship is merely a piece of paper in this case. You territory belongs to everyone, and anyone can be of your territory. The same can be said of legislation tackling digital abuse and scams online. What you get is digital-global-anarchy since a criminal operation from one Nation abusing the member of another cannot really be prosecuted. Which governing body is supposed to police human interactions over the global internet?)
There are those who clearly do not see the arrivals of large hordes of other population groups as problematic. This is precisely why the arguing becomes so ugly, because those who end up being exposed to these transformations have a tendency of being very loud and extremely upset when their home-areas change suddenly. Especially if trust breaks down and inter-racial and/or inter-ethnic violence (the targeting of those who are not part of your in-group) becomes a thing.
The same can be noted now with anti-immigration sentiments here on the continent, that would appear to be reserved for Africans and Arabs primarily, but are also extended to other European Nationalities as well, in addition to heated arguments between individuals who look just the same (due to being members of the same Nation), because of disagreements over whether or not EurAbia or EurAfrica ought to be forcefully created, regardless of the human cost in the process.
I think it can be argued with certainty that trying to unite Europeans was a challenge great enough, just like trying to unite Africa is a monumental challenge due to inter-Racial diversity.
Now it can be witnessed that it is all falling apart here in “Europe,” since it was simply “too much, too quickly, too soon.” Rather than admitting that this has all been a spectacular political failure (unless you want chaos) the political establishment in Brussels appear hellbent on forcing their vision on everyone else, regardless of whether or not people actually want this in great numbers…
Things are already getting ugly since the survival of one “ideological vision” in this case, means the destruction of the other.
The good news is: that this is how humans behave, regardless of where they might be….
Here is one case of internal dissent in Germany and a proposed solution by a French academic:
This is an open letter written to the French President. It is very good and delivers some stellar points. I would highly recommend reading it.
As a side-note it is worth mentioning that the centralisation seen in Norway, just to pick an example, function as a way to erase Norwegian identity. I’ve spoken about it with my brother before, and my mother actually just brought it up as well. If you want to know a territory and a people it is worth going out into the country since major cities won’t tell you much.
When you then wage “war” against the districts, turning villages and hamlets into desolate “ghost towns,” you’ll force everyone to cluster in the major cities and towns, which means that charming architecture, dialects, quirky habits and traditions all go down the toilet.
As I’ve mentioned before on this blog of mine; my dad complained to me last year that “everything looks the same now in Europe.” He lamented how London used to have so much character and how Europe’s capitals now all look increasingly “streamlined.” It would appear that this call for “diversity” doesn’t include those of us who are native to these territories and as I’ve also mentioned before it doesn’t really include anyone else’s true identity either, since shock ensues whenever the mainstream media (or anyone else) reports that mass importing people from Africa and the Middle East doesn’t just include getting fancy-dress and spicy food…..
When reading about the Iraq war last year I was stunned to see the willingness to sacrifice the integrity of Europe on the altar of momentary territorial access needed in order to get into Iraq.
I was further mystified by the fact that 4-star Army General (ret.) Colin Powell came across as the one lone voice of reason, since he tried to raise awareness of tribalism and ethnic diversity in the targeted area.
The reading certainly gave me the impression that humans are simply being seen as replaceable cogs in the machinery by the establishment.
Culture and ethnicity simply doesn’t matter, it is all about momentary victory, without any overarching solid narrative selling a clearly defined End Game, that will be reached by many separate actions all serving the same underlying objective.
This is a startling realisation.
When reading “The Art Of War” I was surprised about what sort of advice it contained. Prolonged warfare with no end in sight is depicted as one of the worst projects that a Nation can ever engage in. A group that engages in warfare also have to ensure that they have access to an efficient supply line, taking advantage of whatever resources the group can get their hands on as they expand into a territory. A war effort should be swift and precise, without too much meddling from sovereigns located far away. The people who are on the ground need to be able to do what is necessary to reach their goal in a completely mobilised way, to the extent that this is possible.
All of this certainly made me question the sort of warfare that people my age have grown accustomed to. All of our Nations’ war efforts seem concentrated in “alien territories,” fighting and training “aliens” that might turn on the West later, and all of our Nations’ major war efforts seemingly drag out for ever…
No proper end game that logically makes sense is ever presented to the public and when getting an insight into the world of those who run these things, it doesn’t really seem like these characters know what the deal is either (unless a battle ground is simply needed in order to train soldiers and test new equipment).
A parallel can be drawn to hacker activists, who don’t seem too concerned with allies. They’ll attack an enemy of the West one day only to target Western political and military structures the next, potentially jeopardising the integrity and safety of a Nation State or its military operations.
When reading about community organisers you see this pattern of behaviour once again. A lot of left-wing activism simply cancels itself out, since the only common denominator seems to be emotionalism. Due to this you’ll get contradicting agitation and advocacy that will leave someone like myself slightly confused, as there is no End Game in sight anywhere.
If you look at Islamic agitation in Europe it is very easy to understand what their End Game and overarching goal is. They engage in demographic expansionism into Europe, which gradually gives them a political advantage. Wealthy Muslim power-players buy themselves into Western Corporations which gives them cultural influence and leverage. Street-level Muslims carve out their own territories and then defend these. Mosques are erected further cementing a claim to a specific territory boosting confidence, while a romanticized fantasy of Islamic Imperialism, appealing to people’s sense of identity and innate penchant for ancestry-worship, is promoted. Of course, as always, not all. But you don’t need every member of a specific group to behave in this particular fashion for it to have its desired effect. My impression of European Islamification is that there is a long-term vision, coupled with a willingness to commit to certain behaviours, in order to eventually reach a clearly defined outcome: Nation States that become compatible in their policies and in their cultures with the Muslim faith, preferably paving the way for a new “Golden-Age.” Of course it is of importance to point out the ethnic and racial diversity within Islam, and that there are numerous conflicting denominations within the faith as well. As an example: we can now clearly observe, imported tribal disagreements and feuds, in Europe, in addition to all of our own inter-ethnic issues that we had from before….
Inter-ethnic dissonance is very prevalent in Africa; which is generally referred to as the most diverse continent on the surface of the earth.
So what can be said of the West? What is our End Game? What can be observed and what conclusions can be drawn?
What would make sense, instinctively, would be to have common ancestry as the glue holding Europe together. Race has become way more inclusive than what it used to be, since we now largely see Race as something observable, while ethnic groups give us what has become our European Nation States, with its specific cultures and characteristics. Back in the day these used to be chopped up into various tribes that probably displayed a lot of similar traits to one another, hence our generalisation regarding population groups contained within the boundaries of the modern Nation State: an extended family sharing common ancestry and a similar distribution of genetic traits on average.
It would make sense if our Nation States in Europe concerned themselves with the protection of our shared and individual cultural heritage, doing everything to ensure the survival and majority status of white children (and mixed whites) in the only territory that actually belongs a 100% to whites, protecting our continent’s borders and integrity.
A strong unified Europe and more broadly speaking, a strong unified West with the more multi-racial configurations found within territories conquered by whites, would in theory make sense.
Is this an End Game for what is collectively known as The West though? No.
This would be a racist objective. It would insinuate that Ethnic-Europeans have a natural claim to a specific territory and that conquest is a legitimate way to establish a Nation, which is what a white presence in all other territories other than Europe is a result of. (To my knowledge … It certainly looks that way when observing strange geographic settlements by Whites and the presence of dark-skinned indigenous groups).
The prevalent mythos championed in the West is this:
Ok. So this doesn’t look too promising. Then what about Christianity? This is multi-racial, multiethnic and global. It is way more inclusive and has been used as a unifying factor in Europe before…
The West has continuously acted as an enemy to Christian groups in the Middle East, facilitating genocidal persecution of genuine Christian minority tribes. Western governments not only promote the build-down of Christianity within Europe and all other territories under White influence, they actively side with Nations and regimes known for violent Christian persecution.
What about human-rights, enlightenment ideas, world peace and the “human race”?
Western governments have repeatedly sided with regimes guilty of outrageous human rights abuses, making themselves guilty of gross hypocrisy since human rights and the protection of humanity as a whole has become the main narrative and general raison d’être of Western groups.
Portraying oneself as a defender of the human race also becomes tricky as you cannot possible go out there and claim that population group A needs more protection and privileges than population group B as this would be racist and undermine universal rights. And how on earth can you even say population group A and B when race/ethnicity isn’t even real? You cannot say that religious group A is more guilty of persecution than religious group B, because why would religious group B be more righteous or in need of more protection than the other? Are you a bigot or what?
Who are you to say that Terrorists don’t have rights or don’t have a point, when you claim to be a defender of all of humanity? And how on earth do you even define a “War on Terror” or “Terrorists”? Any person or group could fall into this category when nothing is specified.
These kind of points can be spinned indefinitely putting The West in a situation where none of its actions can be seen as righteous and/or legitimate.
It opens up the door for a potential legal, moral and PR nightmare where The West and its natural inhabitants never win.
It also puts Western Nation states in a situation where an enemy cannot be clearly defined, at least not in public, due to important exotic alliances and potential diplomatic disasters. By relying on exotic alliances for abstract military operations, the West paints itself into a corner, where they cannot kick out subversive elements within their own nations if these stem from their good “friends and allies.”
The West is forced into a position where it cannot really look after the interests of its own inhabitants, nor enforce the heritage and integrity of itself.
Not to forget that The West is put into an incredibly awkward situation when Western leaders cannot clearly formulate anything, if interested in maintaining good international relationships.
This results in cringe worthy narratives that leaves all of those who don’t just parrot our “modern shared values” confused and puzzled. What are we all about really? Does anyone know?
What about Capitalism then? A support for this must surely be a constant factor from The Americans at least?
No. Think again. The U.S.A. is willing to tolerate oppressive communist regimes that in the long run pose a threat to the American experiment and their global influence, as long as the U.S.A. can gain from such an alliance in the short run.
So what is The End Game of The West?
Strangely and worryingly enough there doesn’t seem to be one……(but I might be very wrong, after all, who knows what goes on behind the scenes…).
At best it can be argued that there are forces within The West championing stability trough whatever means by expanding the police state and surveillance of their own citizens. This though is worked against by leaders who don’t want to acknowledge the effects of demographic change. In addition it facilitates the very form of governance that Western Nations are outspokenly against, not to forget that the identity destruction currently happening in The Western world work against any conservation efforts intended to protect our cultural and ethnic inheritance, while simultaneously compromising stability and security; in short, all of it compromises the survival of those people who occupy the territories that we collectively refer to as The West.
Everyone wants your vote and/or signature. Whether it is an activist group, a charity or politicians. It can be difficult to know what to support or who to vote for. I think most support what they do in good faith, only to get the shock of their life if they realize that they’ve voiced their support for something that turns out to be a proper “slippery slope.” Totally flagging out and opting for inactivity isn’t really the answer either; especially when coming across blatant declarations of war written by those who truly cannot stand their fellow country men (or fellow residents) if they stand in the way opinion or value wise. To say that I find these articles frightening, would be a gross understatement.
The world would be such a better place if there wasn’t so much sneaky behaviour, deception and hate.
I think the time has come for the citizens of The West to say Thank You and contemplate how lucky we are for living where we do, but alas, the complaints just keep on coming. I’m happy that I can pursue my passion, believe what I want, read what I want, and hopefully say what I want and create what I want. The last thing I would be interested in is to have these privileges retrieved. I don’t know why women aren’t more thankful about the fact that we are “allowed” to be as active as we are, this is not a given. Minorities (whether genuine or not) are even granted full citizenship with access to whatever institutions. Strange and peculiar identity movements are accepted, celebrated even. This isn’t really the norm; our societies are abnormal and unusual. Why do we take it for granted, and why do we assume that our societies will stay this way for ever?
At what point does the pushing and poking stop? Why on earth do people assume that the light at the end of the tunnel is Utopia? It is most likely an enemy ready to crush us or a proper reactionary movement tired of the non-stop poking and “degeneracy;” I think we ought to be grateful and know when to stop. How many cultures are as free as ours?
If you are going to watch something today then take the time to watch this passionate speech from the extraordinary Jordan B. Peterson. You do not see something like this everyday. Wow.
This is an optimistic article predicting the political climate and its development in 2015-2016; it argues the slow death of the totalitarian political correctness police, and the re-establishment of the “centre.” An intriguing read.
This is a long article about Mark Zuckerberg that should interest people considering his influence in addition to his USA travels this year … These are some extracts from the text that stood out to me:
“Planetary technical systems like Facebook, David Banks, a SUNY Albany professor who studies large technical systems, told me, “don’t want to be in an environment” — natural, legal, political, social — “they want to be the environment.” Facebook, this announcement seemed to imply, was an environment in which democracy takes place; a “natural” force not unlike democracy itself.”
The article concludes with this statement:
“It tends to get forgotten, but Facebook briefly ran itself in part as a democracy: Between 2009 and 2012, users were given the opportunity to vote on changes to the site’s policy. But voter participation was minuscule, and Facebook felt the scheme “incentivized the quantity of comments over their quality.” In December 2012, that mechanism was abandoned “in favor of a system that leads to more meaningful feedback and engagement.” Facebook had grown too big, and its users too complacent, for democracy.”
I also thought it was interesting that it wasn’t specifically mentioned in which political direction the Facebook “task force” was skewed:
“It wasn’t just a panicking media Establishment that wasn’t buying Facebook’s neutral stance but increasingly Facebook employees themselves. In late November, BuzzFeed reported on the existence of a secret Facebook “task force” that had assembled, without managerial oversight, to deal with the problem of misinformation. That BuzzFeed was able to learn about the task force was as noteworthy as its existence: Dissent is rare at Facebook, and openly critical leaks like that are almost unheard of. It had become clear that the company could no longer fall back on the pieties of neutral platformism.”
Vladimir Putin warns of the unavoidable. I don’t know if this is a future I would want to be part of, in rejecting the natural development of our world, you’ll make yourself completely irrelevant and obsolete. Me Tarzan you Jane…. Super-Humans….
The soul goes back into the Universe after a human dies according to this article.
Some spirituality … A list of things allegedly forgotten by man…
C.S.Lewis’ take on the greatest sin to Christians: Pride.
“… our world stands shivering in the midst of the light because we cannot receive the love it provides. – JC“
This is a very interesting read: The Sun Always Shine on TV.
There is no end to what comes out of the Hollywood floodgates opened by the Weinstein allegations. More harassment in the movie industry…
More “flattering” material about Harvey Weinstein.
View this post on Instagram
Out of all the stories of harassment, abuse and victimization of women that have emerged since the Harvey Weinstein scandal broke last month, this one is possibly the most bizarre, and – if accurate – repugnant. To wit, the New York Post reported Friday that a former portfolio manager at #SorosFundManagement, the firm founded by Billionaire investor #GeorgeSoros, sadistically abused and victimized women in a #Manhattan penthouse sex dungeon – even beating one woman so brutally that one of her breast implants flipped. #HowieRubin, 62, a former #BearStearns trader who was featured in the best-selling Michael Lewis novels “Liar’s Poker” and “The Big Short,” was accused in a $27 million lawsuit filed in Brooklyn federal court of luring women to his sex dungeon, abusing them, then trying to silence them with settlements and NDAs. Rubin reportedly rented a lavish Metropolitan Tower pad in Midtown to indulge in brutal sex with women whom he paid between $2000 and $5000 per session, according to the suit filed Thursday. The three unidentified plaintiffs in the case – including two #Playboy Playmates – claim the married father raped and beat them to the point that they needed extensive medical attention, court papers say. After luring the women to the $8 million penthouse, they were shown to a side room with chains, and sex toys along with other BDSM equipment. There, they were gagged, tied up and viciously beaten by Rubin. One woman complained that he punched her in the head. “I’m going to rape you like I rape my daughter,” Rubin allegedly barked during one of the purported beatings. In one session, he beat one of the women’s “breasts so badly that her right implant flipped,” the papers state. The former Bear Stearns trader paid her $20,000 to repair the damage. One plaintiff was tied up, gagged and shocked with a cattle prod in her groin before Rubin allegedly raped her, according to the filing. Two unnamed female fixers and a lawyer abetted Rubin’s abusive sexual romps by coaxing women into signing NDAs.
Red flags to look out for if you fear that a cult might be trying to recruit you…
When I first saw Joy Villa’s Grammy Dress there were lots of photos circulating online of her previous attention grabbing attempts. Looking at that I was suspecting that she was a bit of an opportunist. Then again it is hard to find musicians and artists who are not, and after all, who on earth would brand themselves as a Trump supporter and/or a conservative artist if they are not? There are actually lots of people out there who are on the right politically, the issue is that this is not equally represented in the mainstream media or the entertainment industry. Or the left are flashier and better marketers. In addition I’ve also noticed that you can know someone for a long time without knowing that they are a traditionalist, whether with liberals – you’ll know their political orientation after just a couple of seconds.
It doesn’t matter if you’ve paid for a service and you are dealing with someone who isn’t even a family member or a friend, those on the left spectrum seem to think that their viewpoints are so morally superior, that they’ll sneak in politics on any occasion and basically initiate potentially controversial and drawn out discussions – especially when it is completely uncalled for.
Because of the general silence on the right, with the exception of the far-right, an impression is therefore created of a left-leaning majority. This is actually false and can easily create a sense of political isolation.
Because outspoken artists are usually, if not almost always on the far-left spectrum, you also get a radical left-wing impression of the music industry. It is also a funny fact that different professions apparently have a tendency to vote in a specific way on average, which reveals more about various groups and their different temperaments/character traits.
Anyway, back to Joy Villa. I thought her dress was bold and cool and featured her on my blog. I also got a friend who knows her and he seems to be her number one fan. So I threw myself somewhat on the Villa-train, even though I’m usually sceptical of the integrity of artists – especially after having bumped into one of Villa’s Hollywood friends at an award show in L.A….. This female “artist” I ran into just started talking to me at random as if though she knew me and like a pro held up her camera and took a selfie with me, without even asking if it was ok. She seemed completely out-of-place at the event, I have no clue how she got in there, but she was obviously scouting to see if she could find some important contacts and threw herself over me just in case. She was a total shark and was clearly not genuinely interested in me as a person, only in how I could be potentially useful for her. Once she got my photo, had found my Instagram and given me her business card, she went scouting for more industry people to take selfies with and hijack, I on the other hand went to hang out with industry people who wouldn’t ambush me. Joy Villa’s artist-friend didn’t bother to add me by the way, I guess my Instagram following wasn’t impressive enough for her *shaking my head* I did however check out her videos as she wasn’t hard to forget….her music was though….
Still, people aren’t perfect, especially not artists, so I’ve been liking Villa’s posts and featured her a couple of times on here. It is of interest though that she has been exposed as a former Trump-hater … even retweeting someone who referred to Trump supporters as “stupid.” Now that is quite wow, all things considered. Well … people change, or people can suddenly change. Yet Villa does come across as the chieftain of opportunists when reading this: Joy Villa.
I will still support her albeit in a lukewarm fashion, as she is currently functioning as a conservative-symbol, lending her face as a right-wing commentator. She has certainly put her head on the chopping block by wearing her politics on her sleeve (whether genuine or not) and she has spoken up against the political correctness police and YouTube censorship. Showbiz is also extremely small and I already know one independent artist who self-promotes herself just like Villa (I’m not referring to myself obviously, but to another female guitarist who posses half-naked, etc;) and she gets away with it just fine, because hey, if you don’t have a label, you have to stick your face out there by yourself. I also know, as I previously wrote, somebody who knows her and even ran into one of her girlfriends. Yet would I trust her? Hmmm….probably not, but then again …. who is dumb enough to trust artists? Trump supporters she would probably tell you – at least when looking at her old tweets…
An ex-ANTIFA member speaks out against the left-wing-cult.
This is a site filled with conspiracy theories: Weird stuff…
Not a flight I would want to be on … The Flight From Hell.
One of Norway’s conservative newspapers wanted Islam-critic Hege Storhaug to lose government support for her website and work. In the article I just pasted in the editor of Nettavisen defends her and oppose the idea of opinions being silenced just because you disagree with what is being said. In this spirit he also defends governmental financial support being given to a Muslim institution in Norway, funny enough. I couldn’t disagree more with that since Islam’s interests aren’t Norwegian, anyway … I took the survey in the article and the majority of the readership were against Storhaug losing her funding, the latest I heard regarding this issues, is that she has been allowed to keep it…Ha!
A change in Norway’s laws now require 5 years of membership in folketrygden (social security) for both parents, before benefits can be redeemed in relation to staying at home with a newborn child. The Norwegian government is doing this to get more migrants into the workplace and their children into kindergarten. Those who are EU-citizens can document their membership in other EU or Schengen welfare-states to account for the period. It is obvious which demographic this measure is intended for.
The Norwegian conservative government are red-pilling everyone by officially announcing that Norway’s golden age is over. Trends have shifted for Norway’s oil based economy, this negative development has happened while an ageing population makes the welfare state increasingly unsustainable. Financial growth will have to happen on land rather than in our waters it is said. A sustainable welfare-state was the headline picked by the government, who had crafted the speech read by our King during the official opening of the Norwegian Parliament.
Here is a short opinion piece I found in the Stavanger Aftenblad; I liked it so much that I’ll translate it into English so that others can enjoy it.
Initially published in Norwegian on the 7th of October, 2017, written by Kjell Skartveit.
Is normlessness a sign of an inclusive and open society?
DEBATE: Should the rainbow flag wave from municipality flagpoles?
That is a question people disagree about in Eigersund. Bjørn Karlsen, group leader for the conservatives in Egersund, says to Aftenbladet that it is about principles: In principle the municipality can flag the rainbow flag every day as far as we are concerned. As an open and inclusive society we certainly have to say yes to such a symbol-cause. Due to this we are stating clearly and visibly that we have zero problems with seeing the rainbow flag in the municipal flag pole.
Not problematic in Stavanger.
The rainbow flag could also been seen in Stavanger during the pride days this august, there as well it was not seen as problematic by the political leadership.
It is however thought provoking that Norwegian politicians wish to use flags from organisations on public offices, without explaining what they truly flag for. Is it really so that the rainbow flag symbolises an inclusive society? Many of us will find it problematic to accept that claim. As it is simply not so that the rainbow flag only represents a group of people, it represents a certain view of humanity, a political ideology.
The message from the organisation FRI, which the rainbow flag is connected to, is that there exists dozens of orientations and genders, sexual identities and co-habitation variants. Out from their vision it is all depicted as just as natural, healthy and positive – whether it is homosexuality, bisexuality, polyamorous-arrangements, sadomasochistic activity, orgies, sex-change on children, or planned fatherlessness, etc;
A normless society.
Traditional forms of sexuality, gender and co-existence should not only be abolished, but be portrayed in a negative light to such an extent that it can be viewed as the reason as to why children and adults don’t get to redeem their human rights. It is the idolisation of the normless society that the rainbow flag represents.
My questions are therefore very easy. Is sexual normlessness an ideal for those parties that mean that the rainbow flag should wave from the municipalities flagpoles, and is normlessness a sign of an inclusive and open society?
Those are a couple of good questions indeed. I guess society naturally fragments, it certainly seems that way, maybe social cohesion is a myth that can only be implemented through brute force and fear, or maybe social fragmentation is the result of militant deconstructionism and isn’t that natural after all? People love rituals and need their flock to survive….
My sister funny enough told me today that her fellow students are openly and vocally now complaining about the over-representation of transgenderism and unusual sexual orientations, as they are tired of being bombarded with it. That is an interesting development considering how liberal most of her friends are….. It seems like the “conditioning” is backfiring already.
Here is an old picture of me showing solidarity with Obama’s gay-work.
I did not know what the rainbow flag represented until I read the article above. Nor could I ever have imagined in a million years how the LGBTQ movement has been used as a slippery slope to excuse pedophilia and normalise transgenderism and alternative sexualities to little kids in the public school-system, etc; A very good example of how one can support something without knowing everything else that comes in the same package. Nothing can be innocent I guess…. I also seem to remember that I posted something sympathetic about Caitlyn Jenner’s transformation back when that happened. What a grown-up person decides to do with his/her own body is his/her decision. What two consenting adults do is their own business. What parents decide to teach their kids about LGBTQ is their choice as parents. Fundamentally changing society to accept the abnormal as normal and the normal as abnormal is sick and degenerate. Sadly it seems like we are not only calling for different people to be respected and left alone with their private affairs, rather we are unknowingly calling for a revolution and a dysgenic one indeed.
Brings to mind Lena Dunham’s feminist character in the latest season of American Horror Story. She does a splendid job portraying a militant feminist on a quest to kill all men … simply put: Make the world a better place – extinguish humanity!
The long overdue, mandatory, “degeneracy entry.”
I started this post some months ago to ponder Russias’s claim that we are “degenerate,” a sentiment that is echoed all over the internet by those in the west who are embarrassed and worried over where “the west” is heading. This piece of Russian travel “literature” made waves and probably caused quite some giggles around the Kingdom, but if you’ve read stories like these: “Getting Wasted On Cum” how can you not agree with the general criticism?
It does seem like the west is heading towards self annihilation with everything from:
Well….all in all it doesn’t look very promising. Not to forget the increase in surveillance (The New STASI app, sorry FB., HERESY!!!!!!!!!!!!) and the support of the police state from a terrified population (and media) willing to give up their civil liberties at the altar of multiculturalism. Maybe it is understandable then that people look to Putin to rescue us from this madness as many in the west, myself included, have put Russia up on a pedestal. I think a great deal of this has to deal with the lack of western leadership and heroes; but maybe that has come to an end?
Yet … those of us who have looked to Kremlin for salvation (as America is far away, without ancient European culture + inhabited by bat-shit crazy far-left SJW wackos) will be disappointed to watch these videos that I’ve found about Russia:
Yeah I know….seems like the only place of hope is Poland at this point, whose leadership love Trump and hate Merkel. Immigrants worse than EU Sanctions. It is interesting to note however that this fascination with Russia from conservatives is nothing new: The Return Of Conservative Russophilia.…..yet don’t forget that Russia and Europe are both “delinquents” in terms of “degeneracy.” So … hurray hurray we are all aboard the sinking Titanic together, with the exception of Eastern Europe it seems. Maybe we can seek refuge in Comrade Trudeau’s Canadian Utopia in a future current year if the EU and/or Russia kill the east…..good grief.
At Brockhampton in The Cotswolds
Omnes vulnerant, ultima necat
Putting the 'current' back in current events
Documenting the Islamization of America
Rock 'n' roll, heavy metal, Halloween, Christmas, junk food, superheroes & old stuff
A light look at literature-everything from the classics to Young Adult and Picturebooks. Please give me your view!
"We're All Mad Here...."
(not suitable for those suffering from hippopotomonstrosesquipedaliophobia)
The Art and Craft of Blogging
The latest news on WordPress.com and the WordPress community.